1) Holm-Knudsen RJ, Rasmussen LS. Paediatric airway management: basic aspects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53:1-9.
2) Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestiha T, Koudouna E, Xanthos T.Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54:1050-61.
3) Kovatsis PG: Continuous ventilation during flexible fiberscopic-assisted intubation via supraglottic airways. Paediatr Anaesth. 2016;26:457–8.
4) Riveros R, Sung W, Sessler DI, Sanchez IP, Mendoza ML, Mascha EJ, et al. Comparison of the Truview PCDTM and the GlideScope (H) video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in pediatric patients: a randomized trial. Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:450-7.
5) Cooper RM. Use of a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in the management of a difficult airway. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:611–3.
6) Lim TJ, Lim Y, Liu EH. Evaluation of ease of intubation with the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope by anaesthetists in simulated easy and difficult laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:180–3.
7) Cooper RM, Pacey JA, Bishop MJ, McCluskey SA. Early clinical experience with a new videolaryngoscope (GlideScope) in 728 patients. Can J Anaesth. 2005;52:191–8.
8) Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, Choi PT. Glidescope® videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: asystematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:41–52.
9) Lee JH, Park YH, Byon HJ, Han WK, Kim HS, Kim CS, et al. A comparative trial of The GlideScope(R) video laryngoscope to direct laryngoscope in children with difficult direct laryngoscopy and an evaluation of the effect of blade size. AnesthAnalg. 2013;117:176-81.
10) Armstrong J, John J, Karsli C. A comparison between the GlideScope Video Laryngoscope and direct laryngoscope in paediatric patients with difficult airways a pilot study. Anaesthesia. 2010;65:353–7.
11) Fiadjoe JE, Gurnaney H, Dalesio N, Sussman E, Zhao H, Zhang X, et al. A prospective randomized equivalence trial of the GlideScopeCobalt® video laryngoscope to traditional direct laryngoscopy in neonates and infants. Anesthesiology. 2012;116:622–8.
12) Kim JT, Na HS, Bae JY, Kim DW, Kim HS, Kim CS, et al. GlideScope video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008;101:531–4.
13) Donoghue A, Hsieh TC, Nishisaki A, Myers. Tracheal intubation during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A videography-based assessment in an emergency department resuscitation room. Resuscitation. 2016;99:38-43.
14) Hippard HK, Kalyani G, Olutoye OA, Mann DG, Watcha MF. A comparison of the Truview PCD and the GlideScope Cobalt AVL video-laryngoscopes to the Miller blade for successfully intubating manikins simulating normal and difficult pediatric airways. PaediatrAnaesth. 2016;26:613-20.
15) Fiadjoe JE, Hirschfeld M, Wu S, Markley J, Gurnaney H, Jawad AF, et al. A randomized multi-institutional crossover comparison of theGlideScope® Cobalt Video laryngoscope to the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope in a Pierre Robin manikin. PaediatrAnaesth. 2015;25:801-6.
16) Wald S, Keyes M, Brown A. Pediatric video laryngoscoperescue for a difficult neonatal intubation. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008;18:790-2.
17) Liu KP, Li CH, Xue FS. Comparison between the Truview PCD™ or the GlideScope® video laryngoscope and direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in pediatric patients.Can J Anaesth. 2013;60:735-6.
18) Sun Y, Lu Y, Huang Y, JiangH. Pediatric video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PaediatrAnaesth. 2014;24:1056-65.
19) Lees M, Seal RF, Spady D, Csanyi-Fritz Y, Robinson JL. Randomized trial of success of pediatric anesthesiologists learning to use two video laryngoscopes. PaediatrAnaesth. 2013;23: 435-9.
20) Das B, Samanta A, Mitra S, Jamil SN. Comparative evaluation of Airtraq™ optical Laryngoscope and Miller's blade in paediatric patients undergoing elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation: A randomized, controlled trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61:326-31.
21) Madziala M, Smereka J, Dabrowski M, Leung S, Ruetzler K, Szarpak L. Eur A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study. J Pediatr. 2017;176:779-86.
22) Hurford DM, White MC. A comparison of the Glidescope and Karl Storz DCI videolaryngoscopes in a paediatric manikin..Anaesthesia. 2010;65:781-4.
23) Kovac AL. Controlling the hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. J ClinAnesth. 1996;8:63-79.
24) Maassen RL, Pieters BM, Maathuis B, Serroyen J, Marcus MA, Wouters P, et al. Endotracheal intubation using videolaryngoscopy causes less cardiovascular response compared to classic direct laryngoscopy, in cardiac patients according a standard hospital protocol. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2012;63:181-6.
25) Li XY, Xue FS, Sun L, Xu YC, Liu Y, Zhang GH, et al. Comparison of hemodynamic responses to nasotracheal intubations with GlideScope video-laryngoscope, Macintosh direct laryngoscope, and fiberoptic bronchoscope. ZhongguoYiXue Ke Xue YuanXueBao. 2007;29:117-23.
26) Abdelgawad AF, Shi QF, Halawa MA, Wu ZL, Wu ZY, Chen XD, et al. Comparison of cardiac output and hemodynamic responses of intubation among different videolaryngoscopies in normotensive and hypertensive patients. J HuazhongUnivSciTechnologMedSci. 2015;35:432-8.