1 Faderl S, Talpaz M, Estrov Z, O'Brien S, Kurzrock R, Kantarjian HM. The biology of chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:164-72.
2 Sant M, Allemani C, Tereanu C, De Angelis R, Capocaccia R, Visser O, et al. Incidence of hematologic malignancies in Europe by morphologic subtype: results of the HAEMACARE project. Blood. 2010;116(19):3724-34.
3 Hoffmann VS, Baccarani M, Hasford J, Lindoerfer D, Burgstaller S, Sertic D, et al. The EUTOS population-based registry: incidence and clinical characteristics of 2904 CML patients in 20 European Countries. Leukemia. 2015;29(6):1336-43.
4 Druker BJ, Talpaz M, Resta DJ, Peng B, Buchdunger E, Ford JM, et al. Efficacy and safety of a specific inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase in chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(14):1031-7.
5 https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2017/20170508137859/anx_137859_it.pdf (accessed 01 October 2020).
6 Radich JP, Kopecky KJ, Appelbaum FR, Kamel-Reid S, Stock W, Malnassy G, et al. A randomized trial of dasatinib 100 mg versus imatinib 400 mg in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2012;120(19):3898-905.
7 Kantarjian HM, Shah NP, Hochhaus A, Cortes J, Shah S, Ayala M, et al. Dasatinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(24):2260-70.
8 Hjorth-Hansen H, Stenke L, Söderlund S, Dreimane A, Ehrencrona H, Gedde-Dahl T, et al. Dasatinib induces fast and deep responses in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukaemia patients in chronic phase: clinical results from a randomised phase-2 study (NordCML006). Eur J Haematol. 2015;94(3):243-50.
9 Saglio G, Kim DW, Issaragrisil S, le Coutre P, Etienne G, Lobo C, et al. Nilotinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(24):2251-9.
10 http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/it_IT/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/000709/WC500056998.pdf (accessed 01 October 2020).
11 https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2017/20170524137917/anx_137917_it.pdf (accessed 01 October 2020).
12 https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2013/20130327125474/anx_125474_it.pdf (accessed 01 October 2020).
13 Cortes JE, Kim DW, Kantarjian HM, Brümmendorf TH, Dyagil I, Griskevicius L, et al. Bosutinib versus imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: results from the BELA trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(28):3486-92.
14 Cortes JE, Gambacorti-Passerini C, Deininger MW, Mauro MJ, Chuah C, Kim DW, et al. Bosutinib Versus Imatinib for Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Results From the Randomized BFORE Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(3):231-7.
15 https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2016/20160825135744/anx_135744_it.pdf (accessed 01 October 2020).
16 Lipton JH, Chuah C, Guerci-Bresler A, Rosti G, Simpson D, Assouline S, et al. Ponatinib versus imatinib for newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukaemia: an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(5):612-21.
17 Hochhaus A, Larson RA, Guilhot F, Radich JP, Branford S, Hughes TP, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Imatinib Treatment for Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(10):917-27.
18 Osca-Gelis G, Puig-Vives M, Saez M, Gallardo D, Lloveras N, Guàrdia R, et al. Is survival in myeloid malignancies really improving? A retrospective 15 year population-based study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56(4):896-902.
19 Sant M, Minicozzi P, Mounier M, Anderson LA, Brenner H, Holleczek B, et al. Survival for haematological malignancies in Europe between 1997 and 2008 by region and age: results of EUROCARE-5, a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(9):931-42.
20 Wiggins CL, Harlan LC, Nelson HE, Stevens JL, Willman CL, Libby EN, et al. Age disparity in the dissemination of imatinib for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Am J Med. 2010;123(8):764.e1-9.
21 Hochhaus A, Saussele S, Rosti G, Mahon FX, Janssen JJWM, Hjorth-Hansen H, et al; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Chronic myeloid leukaemia: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2017;28 (Supplement 4): iv41-iv51.
22 Radich JP, Deininger M, Abboud CN, Altman JK, Berman E, Bhatia R, et al. Chronic Myeloid Leukemia, Version 1.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16(9):1108-35.
23 Vener C, Banzi R, Ambrogi F, Ferrero A, Saglio G, Pravettoni G, et al. First-line imatinib vs second- and third-generation TKIs for chronic phase CML: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood Advances. 2020;4(12):2723-35. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019001329.
24 http://methods.cochrane.org/bias/assessing-risk-bias-included-studies (accessed 01 October 2020).
25 http://gradepro.org/ (accessed 01 October 2020).
26 Cipriani A, Higgins JP, Geddes JR, Salanti G. Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:130-37.
27 http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (accessed 01 October 2020).
28 https://cinema.ispm.unibe.ch/ (accessed 01 October 2020).
29 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003; 327:557-60.
30 Veroniki AA, Vasiliadis HS, Higgins JP, Salanti G. Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:332-45.
31 Higgins JP, Jackson D, Barrett JK, Lu G, Ades AE, White IR. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3:98-110.
32 Salanti G, Ades AE, Ioannidis JP. Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(2):163-71.
33 Nikolakopoulou A, Mavridis D, Furukawa TA, Cipriani A, Tricco AC, Straus SE, et al. Living network meta-analysis compared with pairwise meta-analysis in comparative effectiveness research: empirical study. BMJ. 2018;360:k585.