Study design
The study was conducted within Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, a 3,325-bed general tertiary care and university-affiliated teaching hospital in Nanjing, Jiangsu province, China.
The study design was shown in Figure 1. Briefly, the samples of patients hospitalized into in a 27-bed intensive care unit (ICU) in our hospital were continuously taken to monitor MDR-AB from 2013 to 2014. The bedrail, bedside table, injection pump button, monitor button, treatment vehicle and treatment table were chosen and referred to as HTCS, basing on hand contact frequency and easy-to-contact area of patients. The HTCS were marked by fluorescence labeling and continuously monitored for clearance level of fluorescence labeling and for contamination rate of MDR-AB, which was resistant against at least one agent in three or more of tested antimicrobial categories (18).
Labeling of fluorescence marks and determination of the clearance level
The fluorescence marks were drawn by a fluorescent pen (RUHOF), which uses a special nontoxic target solution. When exposed to black light, the marks emit fluorescence brightly. Noteworthily, the fluorescence marks are inconspicuous, dry rapidly on surfaces, remain environmentally stable for several weeks, resist dry abrasion, but could be easily removed by minimal abrasion with moistened cloth (17, 19). Fluorescence labeling was performed before cleaning (twice a day at 10 a.m. and 5 p.m.), one mark every square centimeter (Figure S1). The targets were evaluated following terminal cleaning after patients had occupied the room. Clearance level of fluorescence labeling was calculated by comparing the number of fluorescence marks before and after cleaning. Environment cleanliness was divided into cleaning (labeling clearance rate >80%) and contamination (labeling clearance rate < 80%).
Monitoring contamination of MDR-AB on the HTCS
To monitor contamination of MDR-AB on the HTCS of the ICUs, samples were accordingly taken for bacterial culture from each site of fluorescence labeling by a cotton swab moistened with saline, according to the Technical Specification for Disinfection of Hospital Disinfection Hygiene Standard issued by the Ministry of Health of China (http://www.biaozhun8.cn/biaozhun108760). Once A. baumannii was detected, antimicrobial susceptibility was further implemented to detect MDR-AB.
The colonization and infection rates of MDR-AB among inpatient in the ICU
Clinical samples including sputum, urine, blood, etc., from patients within the ICU during 2013-2014 were routinely taken and sent to the clinical microbiology laboratory for bacterial culture and susceptibility testing. The diagnostic criteria for colonization and infection referred to the criteria issued by the US CDC in 2008 (20). According to the international epidemiological quantitative statistical methods, the newly isolated multidrug-resistant bacteria per thousand hospitalization days was adopted as the quantitative statistical standard, that is, the detection or infection density of multidrug-resistant bacteria in a specific time range (Number of newly isolated multidrug-resistant bacteria infected or colonized new patients in a period/number of hospital days in a period).
Bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Strains isolated were identified by ATB32E or Vitek-2 technology (Bio-Meriere, France). The susceptibility was determined by Kirby-Bauer method according to the guidelines of CLSI 2015. The tested antimicrobial agents were as follows: amikacin, ceftazidime, cefoperazone/sulbactam, imipenem, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefepime, ticarcillin/clavulanate, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, sulfamethoxazole, minocycline and tigecycline. Escherichia coli ATCC25922 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC27853 were used as the quality controls in parallel.
Pulsed field gel electrophoresis
When three or more MDR-AB were detected simultaneously in a short period of time, the genetic relatedness among those MDR-AB strains collected from the patients and the HTCS during the same period were further analyzed through pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) according to the protocol (21). Briefly. Fresh and pure bacterial cultures were embedded in agarose plugs and digested with proteinase K (20 mg/mL), followed by paI restriction endonuclease (TaKaRa, Dalian, Beijing, China). The standard strain Salmonella enterica serotype Braenderup H9812 digested with XbaI was used as a marker. The electrophoresis was performed in 0.5 × TBE buffer in a pulsed-field electrophoresis system (Chef Mapper; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA), and the conditions were as follows: 14°C, 6 V/cm, switch angle 120°, switch ramp 5–20 s for 19 h. BioNumerics software version 7.6 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium) was used to analyze the PFGE banding patterns. A cut off of 80% was used to judge the relatedness of strains analyzed based on the tree constructed by the unweighted pair group method of averages and a position tolerance of 1.5% (20).
Statistical analysis
The correlation between the removal level of fluorescence labeling and colonization rates of MDR-AB, and the relationship between the colonization rates and infection rates of MDR-AB were analyzed by the Spearman correlation analysis through IBM SPSS Statistics 20. p< 0.05 was taken as statistically significant.