1.McAfee A, Brynjolfsson E. Big data: the management revolution. Harv Bus Rev. 2012;90:60–6, 68, 128.
2.Chesbrough HW. Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press; 2003.
3.Chesbrough HW, van Haverbeke W, West J, editors. New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
4.Gassmann O, Enkel E. Open Innovation: Die Öffnung des Innovationsprozesses erhöht das Innovationspotenzial; 2006.
5.Enkel E, Gassmann O. Creative imitation: exploring the case of cross-industry innovation. R&D Management. 2010;40:256–70. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9310.2010.00591.x.
6.NASA. Cross Industry Innovation Summit. 2016. https://events.jsc.nasa.gov/innovation/.
7.Hamburg Kreativ Gesellschaft (HKG). Cross Industry Conference. 2018. https://cross-innovation-conference.eu/.
8.Furr N, O’Keeffe K, Dyer JH. Managing Multiparty Innovation. Harv Bus Rev. 2016;94:76–83.
9.Xiao Y, Watson M. Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2017;39:93–112. doi:10.1177/0739456X17723971.
10.Webster J, Watson RT. Analyzing the Past to Prepare for the Future:: Writing a Literature Review. MIS Quarterly. 2002;26:xiii–xxiii.
11.Vom Brocke J, Simons A, Niehaves B, Riemer K, Plattfaut R, Cleven A. Recon-structing the giant:: on theimportance of rigourin documenting theliterature search process. Proceedings Administrative Science Quarterly. 2009:2206–17.
12.Mayring P. Qualitative Content Analysis 2000. doi:10.17169/FQS–1.2.1089.
13.Calero Medina CM, Leeuwen TN. Seed journal citation network maps: A method based on network theory. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;63:1226–34. doi:10.1002/asi.22631.
14.Carvalho MM, Fleury A, Lopes AP. An overview of the literature on technology roadmapping (TRM): Contributions and trends. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2013;80:1418–37. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2012.11.008.
15.Leone RP, Robinson LM, Bragge J, Somervuori O. A citation and profiling analysis of pricing research from 1980 to 2010. Journal of Business Research. 2012;65:1010–24. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.04.007.
16.Landström H, Harirchi G, Åström F. Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy. 2012;41:1154–81. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.009.
17.Shafique M. Thinking inside the box?: Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988–2008). Strategic Management Journal. 2013;34:62–93. doi:10.1002/smj.2002.
18.Vogel R. The Visible Colleges of Management and Organization Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis of Academic Journals. Organization Studies. 2012;33:1015–43. doi:10.1177/0170840612448028.
19.Chadegani AA, Salehi H, Yunus MM, Farhadi H, Fooladi M, Farhadi M, Ebrahim NA. A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Social Science 2013. doi:10.5539/ass.v9n5p18.
20.Moehrle MG, Gerken JM. Measuring textual patent similarity on the basis of combined concepts: Design decisions and their consequences. Scientometrics. 2012;91:805–26. doi:10.1007/s11192–012–0682–0.
21.Walter L, Schnittker FC. Patentmanagement: Recherche - Analyse - Strategie. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Oldenbourg; 2016.
22.Gerken JM, Moehrle MG. A new instrument for technology monitoring: Novelty in patents measured by semantic patent analysis. Scientometrics. 2012;91:645–70. doi:10.1007/s11192–012–0635–7.
23.Niemann H, Moehrle MG, Frischkorn J. Use of a new patent text-mining and visualization method for identifying patenting patterns over time: Concept, method and test application. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017;115:210–20. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.004.
24.Moehrle MG. Measures for textual patent similarities: A guided way to select appropriate approaches. Scientometrics. 2010;85:95–109. doi:10.1007/s11192–010–0243–3.
25.Duran BS, Odell PL. Cluster analysis: A survey; 1974.
26.Zwicky F. Entdecken, Erfinden, Forschen im morphologischen Weltbild. Munich: Droemer Knaur; 1966.
27.Gassmann O, Zeschky M, Wolff T, Stahl M. Crossing the Industry-Line: Break-through Innovation through Cross-Industry Alliances with ‘Non-Suppliers’. Long Range Planning. 2010;43:639–54. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2010.06.003.
28.Schmidt T. Absorptive capacity-one size fits all?: A firm-level analysis of absorptive capacity for different kinds of knowledge. Managerial and Decision Economics. 2010;22:n/a-n/a. doi:10.1002/mde.1423.
29.Gassmann O, Zeschky M. Opening up the Solution Space: The Role of Analogical Thinking for Breakthrough Product Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management. 2008;17:97–106. doi:10.1111/j.1467–8691.2008.00475.x.
30.Lai H-Y, Chen Y-Y, Lin S-H, Lo Y-C, Tsang S, Chen S-Y, et al. Automatic spike sorting for extracellular electrophysiological recording using unsupervised single linkage clustering based on grey relational analysis. J Neural Eng. 2011;8:36003. doi:10.1088/1741–2560/8/3/036003.
31.Borg I, Groenen P. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. Journal of Educational Measurement. 2003;40:277–80. doi:10.1111/j.1745–3984.2003.tb01108.x.
32.Kruskal JB. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika. 1964;29:1–27. doi:10.1007/BF02289565.
33.Vom Stein N, Sick N, Leker J. How to measure technological distance in collaborations - The case of electric mobility. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2015;97:154–67. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2014.05.001.
34.Simon H, Sick N. Technological distance measures: new perspectives on nearby and far away. Scientometrics. 2016;107:1299–320. doi:10.1007/s11192–016–1888–3.
35.Caiazza T, Volpe JL, Sta R, Ciliberti S, Carraresi L, Bröring S. Drivers of innovation in Italy: Food versus pharmaceutical industry. British Food Journal. 2016;118:1292–316. doi:10.1108/BFJ–10–2015–0405.
36.Ciliberti S, Carraresi L, Broering S. External Knowledge Sources as Drivers for Cross-Industry Innovation in the Italian Food Sector: Does Company Size Matter? International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 2016;19:77–98.
37.Li Y, Vanhaverbeke W. The effects of inter-industry and country difference in sup-plier relationships on pioneering innovations. Technovation. 2009;29:843–58. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.08.001.
38.Plum O, Hassink R. On the Nature and Geography of Innovation and Interactive Learning: A Case Study of the Biotechnology Industry in the Aachen Technology Region, Germany. European Planning Studies. 2011;19:1141–63. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.573128.
39.Buganza T, Chiaroni D, Colombo G, Frattini F. Organisational Implications of Open Innovation: An Analysis of Inter-Industry Patterns. International journal of innovation management. 2011;15:423–55. doi:10.1142/S1363919611003210.
40.Gandia R. The digital revolution and convergence in the videogame and animation industries: Effects on the strategic organization of the innovation process. International journal of arts management. 2013;15:32–44.
41.Lew YK, Sinkovics RR. Crossing Borders and Industry Sectors: Behavioral Governance in Strategic Alliances and Product Innovation for Competitive Advantage. Long Range Planning. 2013;46:13–38. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.006.
42.Larsson A, Lindström KN. Bridging the Knowledge-gap Between the Old and the New: Regional Marine Experience Production in Orust, Västra Götaland, Sweden. European Planning Studies. 2013;22:1551–68. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.784578.
43.Levén P, Holmström J, Mathiassen L. Managing research and innovation networks: Evidence from a government sponsored cross-industry program. Research Policy. 2014;43:156–68. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.004.
44.Tsujimoto M, Matsumoto Y, Sakakibara K. Finding the ‘boundary mediators’: Net-work analysis of the joint R&D project between Toyota and Panasonic. International Journal of Technology Management. 2014;66:120. doi:10.1504/IJTM.2014.064598.
45.Tatarynowicz A, Sytch M, Gulati R. Environmental Demands and the Emergence of Social Structure. Administrative Science Quarterly. 2016;61:52–86. doi:10.1177/0001839215609083.
46.Bornkessel S, Broering S, Omta SWF. Cross-industry Collaborations in the Convergence Area of Functional Foods. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review. 2016;19:75–98.
47.Amitrano CC, Coppola M, Tregua M, Bifulco F. Knowledge Sharing in Innovation Ecosystems: A Focus on Functional Food Industry. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management. 2017;14:1750030. doi:10.1142/S0219877017500304.
48.Hauge ES, Kyllingstad N, Maehle N, Schulze-Krogh AC. Developing cross-industry innovation capability: regional drivers and indicators within firms. Europe-an Planning Studies. 2017;25:388–405. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1276158.
49.Corradini C, Propris L de. Beyond local search: Bridging platforms and inter-sectoral technological integration. Research Policy. 2017;46:196–206. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.017.
50.Zhang Y, Cantwell J. Exploration and exploitation: The different impacts of two types of Japanese business group network on firm innovation and global learning. Asian Business & Management. 2011;10:151–81. doi:10.1057/abm.2011.7.
51.Mahnken TA, Moehrle MG. Multi-cross-industry innovation patents in the USA - A combination of PATSTAT and Orbis search. World Patent Information. 2018;55:52–60. doi:10.1016/J.WPI.2018.10.003.
52.Filiou D, Massini S. Industry cognitive distance in alliances and firm innovation performance. R&D Management. 2018;48:422–37. doi:10.1111/radm.12283.
53.Bader K. How to benefit from cross-industry innovation?: A best practice case. International journal of innovation management. 2013;17:1–26.
54.Enkel E, Heil S. Preparing for distant collaboration: Antecedents to potential absorptive capacity in cross-industry innovation. Technovation. 2014;34:242–60. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2014.01.010.
55.Heil S, Enkel E. Exercising Opportunities For Cross-Industry Innovation: How to support Absorptive Capacity in Distant Knowledge Processing. International journal of innovation management. 2015;19:1550048. doi:10.1142/S1363919615500486.
56.Dingler A, Enkel E. Socialization and innovation: Insights from collaboration across industry boundaries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2016;109:50–60. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.05.017.
57.Enkel E, Heil S, Hengstler M, Wirth H. Exploratory and exploitative innovation: To what extent do the dimensions of individual level absorptive capacity contribute? Technovation. 2017;60–61:29–38. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2016.08.002.
58.Enkel E, Groemminger A, Heil S. Managing technological distance in internal and external collaborations: Absorptive capacity routines and social integration for innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2018;43:1257–90. doi:10.1007/s10961–017–9557–0.
59.Brunswicker S, Hutschek U. Crossing Horizons: Leveraging Cross-Industry innovation Search in the front-end of the Innovation. International journal of innovation management. 2010;14:683–702. doi:10.1142/S1363919610002829.
60.Gassmann O, Daiber M, Enkel E. The role of intermediaries in cross-industry innovation processes. R&D Management. 2011;41:457–69. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9310.2011.00651.x.
61.Horváth A, Enkel E. When general recommendations fail: How to search in single innovation project settings. R&D Management. 2014;44:409–26. doi:10.1111/radm.12079.
62.Enkel E, Bader K. Why do experts contribute in cross-industry innovation? A structural model of motivational factors, intention and behavior. R&D Management. 2016;46:207–26. doi:10.1111/radm.12132.
63.Lyng HB, Brun EC. Knowledge Transition: A Conceptual Model of Knowledge Transfer for Cross-Industry Innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 2018. doi:10.1142/S0219877018500438.
64.Herstatt C, Kalogerakis K. How to use Analogies for Breakthrough Innovations. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management. 2005;02:331–47. doi:10.1142/S0219877005000538.
65.Sheu DD, Lee H-K. A proposed process for systematic innovation. International Journal of Production Research. 2011;49:847–68. doi:10.1080/00207540903280549.
66.Poetz MK, Prügl R. Crossing Domain-Specific Boundaries in Search of Innovation: Exploring the Potential of Pyramiding*. Journal of Product Innovation Management. 2010;27:897–914. doi:10.1111/j.1540–5885.2010.00759.x.
67.Franke N, Poetz MK, Schreier M. Integrating Problem Solvers from Analogous Markets in New Product Ideation. Management Science. 2014;60:1063–81. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2013.1805.
68.Kim E, Horii H. Analogical Thinking for Generation of Innovative Ideas: An Exploratory Study of Influential Factors. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management. 2016;11:201–14. doi:10.28945/3539.
69.Heil S. Cross-industry innovation: A theoretical and empirical foundation on the concept of absorptive capacity; 2015.