Our data add further to the growing knowledge on the role of HEV as a possible camel associated zoonotic pathogen with epidemic potential. There are several notable findings from our study.
First, our study of DcHEV in domestic and imported DCs from Africa in Saudi Arabia is the largest published to date and provides evidence for the presence of DcHEV in both domestic and imported camels from Africa with evolving genomic changes.
Second, phylogenetic analysis of the RdRp sequences identified infection with HEV genotype 7. When comparing with HEV genotype 7 sequence KJ496144, the two full genome sequences from our study showed 242 nucleotide variations including 24 nonsynonymous mutations leading to the amino acid changes.
Third, sequences from domestic camels formed a separate cluster together with published sequences from Kenya, Somalia, and UAE.
Fourth, the sequences of imported camels clustered with one DcHEV isolate previously reported from UAE indicating a possible common source of animal infection. Both domestic and imported sequences clustered away from isolates reported from Pakistan.
Fifth, full-genome sequences generated from this study were added to the only two full-genome sequences of genotype 7 in GenBank. The analysis showed a 24 amino acid difference between our sequences and the GenBank sequences while the other 218 nucleotide mutations were synonymous mutations and did not result in amino acid changes.
Sixth, we found that domestic DCs from Saudi Arabia had higher prevalence of DcHEV RNA than imported camels from Africa.
HEV is a cause of morbidity in several regions around the world, where it is endemic in some developing countries with poor sanitation/hygiene and frequent water contamination, which are the most common risk factors [25]. While in developed countries like the US, Japan and Europe, the most common risk factor is the consumption of infected meat and animal products [26]. The zoonosis of HEV was established by the identification and characterization of HEV isolated from pigs that have close genetic relationship to human HEV [27]. Several other reports on the transmission of HEV to human through consumption of animal products or frequent contact with animals have led to the acknowledgement of HEV as an important human zoonosis [5]. HEV studies from Saudi Arabia have been scanty. One seroprevalence study in 2002 reported HEV seroprevalence ranging from (7.2% vs. 10.8%) in dialysis patients from Jeddah as compared to 16.9% and 18% HEV seroprevalence in blood donors in Jeddah (West) [15] and sickle cell anemia in children from Jizan (South) [13, 14], respectively.
The importance of investigating HEV infection in camels in Saudi Arabia comes from the social and economic role that dromedaries play in the Arabian Peninsula. Dromedaries constitute a source of income through camel trade, camel races and camel shows and consumption of meat and milk. Camel herds frequently move across the Arabian Peninsula and might cross the borders of many Gulf countries for many reasons such as grazing, participation in camel races and camel shows. Camels’ frequent movement might increase the risk of transmitting the infection to different populations of these countries. However, there is no official national identification procedures nor obligatory vaccination campaigns focused on camels; it is difficult to quantify the extent of these movements. Camels from both UAE and Qatar travel every year during the winter seasons (November – February) for grazing, shows and racing in the Eastern region of Saudi Arabia.
The main source of dromedary camels to the Arabian Peninsula is the importation of life camels from the Horn of Africa (Sudan, Djibouti, Somalia, Ethiopia and Kenya) to the Arabian Peninsula. The importance of performing this study in Jeddah comes from the geographical location of the seaport in Jeddah as the main port of entry of dromedaries from Africa [28]. In 2013, official records in Saudi Arabia reported the import of 131,932 camels representing more than 70% of the animals slaughtered in the country [29]. Detailed spatiotemporal studies of camel movement patterns are lacking and are urgently needed to try and understand the role of camel movement in spreading the infection.
Recent studies from UAE have also identified the presence of DcHEV-specific viral genomes in DCs where calves became infected during the first 6 months of life and cleared the virus with time [19]. In this study, the prevalence of HEV RNA was higher in domestic camels (4.1%) compared to imported camels (0.9%). The difference might be due to the younger age of domestic camels (the majority are 1-3 years old) where they acquire the infection early in life compared to the imported camels (all are 4-5 years old) where they have most probably acquired and cleared the DcHEV infection. Alternatively, this higher prevalence might indicate a possible risk factor for the infection in domestic camels responsible for this higher prevalence. In a recent study on the same subset of samples [21], we showed that the seroprevalence of DcHEV in domestic camels is slightly higher than those of imported camels (25.4% vs. 22.4%, p value = 0.3). Observations from both studies warrant the need for further investigations to identify the possible risk factor that is causing this higher prevalence.
Both domestic and imported sequences clustered away from isolates reported from Pakistan. This indicates the presence of a genetic difference between sequences from this study and those from Pakistan. Further investigation is needed to clarify the significance of these differences. Phylogenetic analysis of the RdRp sequences in this study shows that they belong to HEV genotype 7. Sequences from domestic camels formed a separate cluster with reported sequences from Kenya, Somalia, and UAE (except for three samples) while imported sequences clustered with one isolate from UAE indicating a possible common source of infection. Previous studies have demonstrated the HEV seropositive DCs in Africa and the Middle East [17, 21, 30-33]. A recent study [33] showed a higher seroprevalence in dromedaries in Israel where they found a seroprevalence of 68.6%. Further investigation is needed to identify the clinical role of these amino acid changes in the course of the disease. The duration seropositivity and the protective immune mechanisms also need to be defined.
Our study had several limitations. Whilst our DCs study sample was large, the number of positive DcHEV cases was small. Pooling leads to sample dilution which might have affected prevalence. The prevalence of HEV RNA might be underestimated because lifespan of viraemia in serum is short [19].
Our results provide evidence for the presence of DcHEV in both domestic and imported camels from Africa with evolving genomic changes. Further surveillance studies are required to identify the role of the identified DcHEV amino acid changes in the course of the disease. Our data highlight the potential role of DcHEV in the burden of HEV in the Saudi population specially in populations who have frequent contact with dromedaries like camel handlers and slaughterhouse workers and those who frequently consume camel meat and milk. Any change in transmissibility and virulence of DcHEV in DCs would affect the risks of spread to humans and its potential impact on national and regional public health security. Further clinical, serological, molecular and epidemiology investigations of DcHEV in human populations in the Middle East and Africa are needed to define and monitor the potential threat of DcHEV to Middle eastern and global public health security in light of 10 million pilgrims who visit Saudi Arabia every year from 182 countries.
Study Limitation: The low number of domestic camels compared to imported camels could not allow for statistical significance in the differences between the two groups of camels.