Reduced frequency of primary cilia in OLK and OSCC
To identify the role of primary cilia in the development of oral cancer, we first detect the frequency of primary cilia in OLK and OSCC patients. Tissues were made into continuous frozen sections. The HE slide was used as a reference to find the tissue types of interest on the adjacent serial section, thereby further guiding the IF co-staining of cilia using acetylated-α-tubulin (labeling the axoneme of primary cilia) and γ-tubulin (labeling the associated centrosomes) antibodies (Fig.1A). Then the percentage of primary cilia in epithelial was quantified and a total of 47,220 nuclei were counted with a range of 262-1264 nuclei per tissue. Significantly decreased frequency of primary cilia was observed in OLK tissues compared with normal epithelium (Fig.1A-B). While primary cilia were hardly detected in OSCC tissues (the median percentage was 1.11%) compared with normal or adjacent tissues. Additionally, there was no statistical difference in cilia length between normal, OLK, peri-tumor, and OSCC tissues (Fig.1B). These data suggested that primary cilia were gradually lost in the epithelium during the progression of oral mucosa carcinogenesis.
To further explore the differential expression of primary cilia, we assessed their expression on normal human oral keratinocyte cell line (HOK) and five OSCC cell lines (HSC-3, Cal27, SCC47, UM1, and SCC25). Although the specific mechanisms are not fully understood, serum starvation is widely by researchers to induce ciliary formation in cultured cells[11]. About 6.25% of cells were displayed primary cilia in HOK, while only 0.55% and 1.77% of cells in SCC47 and UM1 cells had cilia under conventional culture conditions (Fig.2A-B). After 24 hours of serum starvation induction, the percentage of primary cilia was both increased in SCC47 and UM1 cells. However, no primary cilia were detected in HSC-3, Cal27, and SCC25 cell lines neither in routine culture or serum starvation induction (Fig.2B). Because of the different culture systems, we did not compare the cilia ratio between HOK and OSCC cells directly. However, the results of cell culture still suggested that the formation of primary cilia was inhibited in OSCC cells, especially in HSC-3, Cal27, and SCC25 cells, which completely lost the ability to form primary cilia.
Multiple ciliary genes were abnormally expressed in OSCC
To explore the expression of ciliary genes in OSCC, bioinformatics analysis was conducted on the gene expression data of 32 pairs of OSCC and their corresponding adjacent normal tissues from TCGA database. A total of 1149 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained, among which 382 genes were upregulated and 767 genes were downregulated in OSCC tissues (Fig.3A). Then, Venn diagrams were used to calculate the intersection of the DEGs and the ciliary genes set, and 12 ciliary genes, including AURKA and Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) were screened in this study (Fig.3B-C). Aurora A is a critical conserved kinase inducing cilia disassembly, in which overactivity has been proved to result in cilia loss in multiple tumors (17). Therefore, the regulatory effect of Aurora A on primary cilia in oral cancer was verified preferentially in this study.
EGFR-Aurora A signaling suppresses primary ciliogenesis in OSCC
As EGFR kinase was recently shown to suppress ciliogenesis by stabilizing Aurora A(10), we tested the expression levels of EGFR-Aurora A signaling by IHC analysis in normal, OLK, peri-tumor, and OSCC tissues. The results showed that both EGFR and phosphorylated EGFR were notably overexpressed in OLK tissues, especially in OSCC tissues compared to normal (Fig.4A-B). Correlation analysis further revealed a significant negative correlation between EGFR activity and cilia ratio (Fig.4C). Moreover, Aurora A was overexpressed in none of the normal or tumor-adjacent cases, 32% of OLK, and 78.9% of OSCC, as shown in Fig.4D and Table 1. The cilia ratio of Aurora A positive tissues was notably lower than negative tissues (Fig.4D).
Table 1. Positive rate of Aurora A in normal, peri-tumor, OLK, and OSCC groups.
|
Total
|
Aurora A (IHC positive)
|
Normal
|
12
|
0
|
Peri-tumor
|
15
|
0
|
OLK
|
25
|
32%
|
OSCC
|
21
|
78.90%
|
To further determine whether the loss of primary cilia in oral cancer caused by high EGFR-Aurora A activity, we selected two OSCC cell lines under treating with hEGF or gefitinib (EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor) to activate or inhibit the EGFR kinase in vitro respectively. Immunoblot showed that hEGF successfully stimulated the phosphorylation of EGFR and Aurora A and gefitinib inversely blocked the activity of them (Fig.5A). The IF analysis showed that EGF stimulation induced the disassembly and disappearance of cilia under serum starvation, meanwhile, gefitinib significantly blocked the absorption of cilia caused by serum restimulation (Fig.5B-C). Next, EGFR and Aurora A were knocked down in OSCC cells. As expected, the cilia ratio increased after EGFR or Aurora A silencing in these two OSCC cell lines (Fig.5D-F and Appendix Fig.1). Thus EGFR-Aurora A signaling pathway was essential for the regulation of primary ciliogenesis in OSCC.
AURKA silencing induces ciliogenesis and reduces tumor growth
To determine whether AURKA silencing contributes to restoring cilia formation in vivo, AURKA silenced/unsilenced SCC47 cells were grafted to the flanks of nude mice by subcutaneous injection. Data from IF analysis showed that the cilia ratio increased significantly in two AURKA silenced groups compared to the NC controls (Fig.6A-B). Remarkably, the tumors derived from the silenced AURKA cells were smaller than the control cells and grew more slowly compared to the controls (Fig.6C). Together, these results suggested that Aurora A played an important role in the primary ciliogenesis of OSCC.
HDAC6 is not involved in the regulation of primary ciliogenesis in OSCC
Histone deacetylases 6 (HDAC6), a tubulin deacetylase, has been reported to be a key target of Aurora A and induce cilia disassembly by deacetylation of microtubules of the ciliary axoneme (18). So, we investigated whether HDAC6 is involved in the regulation of ciliogenesis in oral mucosa carcinogenesis. The IHC results showed that HDAC6 expression did not increase, but decreased gradually from normal to OLK to OSCC tissues (Appendix Fig.2A-B). Then tubacin, an HDAC6 specific inhibitor, was used to treat OSCC cells in vitro. Accompany with the dose of tubacin increased, the expression of HDAC6 was gradually inhibited and meanwhile, acetylated α-tubulin, the main substrate of HDAC6-mediated cilia disassembly, was correspondingly increased, indicating that tubacin treatment substantially suppressed HDAC6 activity (Appendix Fig.2C). However, IF staining showed that the incidence of primary cilia in SCC47 or UM1 cells was not increased under the tubacin treatment (Appendix Fig.2D). Taken all together, these findings suggested that HDAC6 was not involved in the loss of primary cilia in oral mucosa carcinogenesis.