Randomized controlled trial evaluating a virtual parenting intervention for young children at risk of obesity: Study protocol for Parenting Addressing Early Years Intervention with Coaching Visits in Toronto (PARENT) trial

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1097157/v1

Download PDF

Research Article

Randomized controlled trial evaluating a virtual parenting intervention for young children at risk of obesity: Study protocol for Parenting Addressing Early Years Intervention with Coaching Visits in Toronto (PARENT) trial

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1097157/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 04 Jan, 2023

Read the published version in Trials →

You are reading this latest preprint version

Background: The prevalence of overweight (15%) and obesity (6%) in children under five years of age in Canada are high, and young children with overweight and obesity are at increased risk of the development of chronic disease(s) in adulthood. Prior research has demonstrated very few published trials on effective obesity prevention interventions in young children at risk of obesity, within primary health care settings. The aim of this study is to determine if 18 - 48-month-old children at risk for obesity, who are randomized to receive the Parents Together program (i.e., intervention group) have reduced body mass index z-score (zBMI), compared to those not receiving the intervention, at 12-month follow up. Secondary clinical outcomes between the intervention and control groups will be compared at 12 months.

Methods: A pragmatic, parallel group, 1:1, superiority, randomized control trial (RCT) through the TARGetKids! Practice Based Research Network will be conducted. Young children (ages 18 – 48 months) who are at increased risk for childhood obesity will be invited to participate. Parents who are enrolled in the intervention group will participate in eight weekly group sessions and 4 – 5 coaching visits , facilitated by a trained public health nurse. Children and parents who are enrolled in the control group will receive usual health care. The primary outcome will be compared between intervention arms using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed by parent focus group and interviews, and fidelity to the intervention will be measured using nurse completed checklists. A cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) will be conducted.

Discussion: This study will aim to reﬂect the social, cultural, and geographic diversity of children in primary care in Toronto, Ontario represented by an innovative collaboration among applied child health researchers, community health researchers, and primary care providers (i.e., paediatricians and family physicians in three diﬀerent models of primary care). Clinical and implementation outcomes will be used to inform future research to test this intervention in a larger number, and diverse practices across diverse geographic settings in Ontario.

Trial registration: Date of registration: June 27^th, 2017; Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Registration number: NCT03219697

Randomized control trial

intervention

childhood

obesity

cohort

evaluation

The prevalence of overweight (15%) and obesity (6%)(1,2) in Canadian children are high, and one third of Canadian youth are affected. Preschool children with overweight or obesity are at risk of obesity in later childhood and adulthood, mental health problems, cardiometabolic disease,(3–5) and increased health care utilization.(6)

Most obesity prevention interventions have been delivered in elementary or middle school settings(7). Few interventions have been delivered in other settings such as home, primary care, or community settings. Home visiting, parenting skill-building, and parent support through coaching calls are all promising approaches toward obesity prevention in early childhood.[8–13] Two trials implemented intensive and frequent home visits and parenting support through coaching calls and text messages, showing a small but significant reduction in standardized zBMI at 6 months and 2 years.(10,11) One RCT conducted in primary care used a group-based parenting intervention alone and demonstrated improvement in child’s eating behaviours but not zBMI(9). Another trial where primary care providers delivered biweekly counselling and telephone phone coaching for parents found a reduction in total energy intake at 12 months among those in the intervention, but there was no difference seen in the children’s zBMI.[12]

Many interventions that have demonstrated effectiveness were of high intensity and duration and utilized core components such as home visiting or telephone support in primary care, but few focused on children at risk of obesity. The PARENT trial aims to determine if a multifaceted intervention (including coaching visits and virtual group parenting sessions), delivered by a trained public health nurse, with a focus on parentings skills to support healthy behaviours, will result in reduced zBMI and improved health behaviours and outcomes when compared to usual care at 12-months post-intervention. Evaluation of implementation outcomes will inform clinical outcomes and the potential for future scale up.

Participants and study design

Study design: This will be a pragmatic, parallel group, 1:1, superiority, randomized controlled trial, within The Applied Research Group for Kids (TARGetKids!) Practice Based Research Network. TARGetKids! is a primary care research network for children in Toronto, Montreal, and Kingston, Canada. The protocol for this study has been developed in accordance with the SPIRIT Reporting Guidelines.(13)

Inclusion criteria: Young children (18 - 48 months) identified as being at increased risk for childhood obesity will be eligible and invited to participate. The following risk factors, identified in the literature, will be used: a birth weight greater than 3500g(14), weight gain in first year of life (crossing of at least one percentile line of weight-for-length or zBMI percentile)(15) maternal or paternal overweight and obesity (BMI ≥25)(16), gestational smoking(17), and a low median household self-reported income.(18) Availability of at least one parent (caregiver) to participate in the study will be required.

Exclusion criteria: Young children with Prader-Willi syndrome or severe developmental delays, or with obesity or severe obesity will be excluded, as they may require a different intervention; families who are not able to participate in English will also be excluded, as the intervention is only available in English; children with a sibling already enrolled in the study will be excluded to control for confounding variables; and families who reside beyond the Toronto Public Health catchment areas will be excluded from this study, as the intervention is delivered by Toronto Public Health nurses.

Measurements

Eligible participants will be invited to complete questionnaires, physical measurements, accelerometry, and laboratory testing at baseline prior to randomization and at follow-up at 12 months. To comply with public health precautionary measures during the COVID-19 pandemic, if children and parents are unable to attend the primary care setting at enrollment, parents will perform height and weight measurements using standardized equipment with instructions sent to their home. Questionnaires and physical measurements will also be collected at 6 months. Questionnaires include measures of child’s mental health (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire), child’s development (Ages and Stages Questionnaire), child’s temperament (Child’s Behaviour Questionnaire), child’s dietary intake (NutriSTEP®), physical activity, sedentary behaviour, sleep duration (Nutrition and Health Questionnaire), direct measure of physical activity, family psychosocial health (Depression, Anxiety, and Parenting Stress), parenting skills (Parenting Scale), and healthcare utilization. Physical measurements include anthropometric measurements to calculate zBMI, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Blood samples for cholesterol, insulin, and glucose will be collected at baseline and 12-month follow-up visit. Implementation feasibility and acceptability will be assessed by interviewing parents. Fidelity to the intervention will be assessed using fidelity checklists for all intervention core components, and cost will be collected from study investigators, participants, and administrative datasets.

Clinical Outcome Variables

The primary outcome measure will be the difference in age and sex-standardized BMI z-score at 12-months post-randomization in the intervention and control groups. zBMI will also be measured at 6-months post-randomization. BMI is the key obesity related outcome used in prevention and treatment trials in obesity, and is the Canadian standard for growth monitoring, using the World Health Organization Growth Chart.(19,20) Secondary outcomes will include physical activity, screen time, sleep duration, eating behaviours, family psychosocial health, and cardiometabolic risk (blood pressure, waist circumference, non-HDL, HDL, triglycerides, total cholesterol, glucose, insulin), and mental health outcomes in the children. Sociodemographic measures will be collected via questionnaire. We will examine health care utilization outcomes for children and their mothers through secondary data in partnership with The Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences (https://www.ices.on.ca/). For a more detailed overview of all measures, please see Table 1.

Implementation effectiveness outcomes: The feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity outcomes and their corresponding measures for the study are based on a working taxonomy of implementation outcomes.(21) Implementation fidelity will be assessed to capture adherence to the program core components, delivered as intended. A random sample of parents will be interviewed by phone regarding their experience (of the program and implementation).

Health services outcomes: A CEA will be used to determine the incremental costs of the parenting intervention compared to usual care in improving child’s BMI. Using patient level data, the CEA will take a health system perspective and 12- month time horizon. All costs and outcomes will be assigned to the family as the unit of analysis. Direct health care costs including costs of creating and executing the intervention and health services use during the study period will be collected from study investigators and participants. Individual health service utilization will be linked to administrative datasets for those health care visits which are reimbursed by the publicly funded system. Direct patient costs will include out-of-pocket expenses and childcare cost incurred from participating in the intervention. The parenting intervention will be micro-costed and will include all labour and supplies related to creating the program as well as ongoing delivery of the program. Intervention costs will be collected during the study interval and will be allocated across all participants.

Study Procedures

Eligibility and recruitment: Eligible participants will be recruited through the TARGetKids! practice sites in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario, Canada via research assistants and recruitment flyers and videos. Participants will be asked to complete an informed consent if they choose to participate in the study. They will then complete baseline assessments and will be randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. All parents and children will have follow-up visits at 6-months and 12-months post-intervention by a trained research personnel, and all outcome data will be collected by trained TARGetKids! research staff embedded at each practice site.

Randomization and blinding: Individual children will be randomized based on a stratified randomization technique, ensuring equal recruitment of intervention and control participants for each practice site, executed via computer-generated random allocation sequence, in variable block sizes (i.e., 2, 4, 6). Contamination will be addressed by delivering the parenting group sessions after hours or online, and we will record all participants’ participation in other community-based services. To reduce the risk of bias, research assistants who will not be part of the delivery of the intervention will collect all outcome data, and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation. Parents cannot be blinded to the study allocation; however, they will be blinded that the primary outcome is zBMI.

Intervention: The intervention is composed of eight 2-hour weekly group-based sessions and 4 – 5 coaching visits over a 6-month period. To consolidate learning, 1 – 2 group booster sessions (1 hour each) will be scheduled following completion of the eight parenting group sessions. The intervention curriculum was developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts in child growth and development, health and mental health, parenting, nutrition, and movement behaviours including physical activity, screen time, and sleep. For an overview of the study timeline, please see Figure 1a and 1b.

All intervention components are facilitated by a trained public health nurse. Public health nurses (3) were selected for training and delivery of the intervention by the local public health unit, in consultation with the primary investigator, through an existing collaboration with SickKids Hospital and Toronto Public Health. The nurses were trained in parenting skills, and health behaviours, and had expertise in child obesity prevention and management. For this study, the nurses meet biweekly with the study team to discuss any feedback regarding the intervention. Parenting group session topics will include optimizing healthy behaviours and providing parents with parenting skills training. The parenting skills sessions are based on the Chicago Parent Program, an evidence-based program for parents and children to prevent and treat regulatory problems in young children and promote social, emotional, and academic competence.(22) General parenting topics to be covered will include persistence and emotion coaching; praise and social coaching; routines and rules; limit setting and follow through; and calm-down strategies. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, all sessions will be delivered virtually over secure video conferencing (i.e., Zoom or Webex).

The coaching visits will be approximately 30 – 40 minutes long and delivered by a public health nurse. The coaching visits will integrate health messages and parenting skills addressed in other intervention components and encourage families to incorporate healthy nutrition and health behaviours individualized for their unique home and family environments through effective parenting practices learned in the program. The public health nurse will also link participants to local community resources where appropriate to support individual child and parental health and mental health identified during the coaching visits; referral will be facilitated by tools such as the Toronto Early Childhood and Family Resource System.(23) Finally, the coaching visits will be used to discuss participant progress, set and monitor personalized goals, and answer any questions. The criteria for a participant to discontinue the intervention is completed through participant request.

Control: The control group children and parents will receive usual care. In Ontario, usual care for this population consists of individual well-child health clinic visits guided by the Rourke Baby Record. Participants in the control group are being offered to participate in future virtual group sessions after the 12 month follow ups are complete.

Data Collection and Management: Trained research assistants will facilitate the collection of questionnaire data, physical measurements, accelerometry data, and blood tests. These questionnaires will be completed on paper or electronically, according to parent preference. REDCap, a secure web-based application will be used to capture data. Non-fasting blood work will be obtained by trained personnel according to the TARGetKids! protocol.(24,25) To address public health measures during COVID-19 pandemic, if children and parents are unable to attend the primary care setting at enrollment, parents will perform height and weight measurements using standardized equipment with instructions sent to their home. Blood tests are only collected if the child attends the clinic visit. All data will be managed through REDCap, which allows for remote web-based data entry directly from the participating sites. REDCap will be managed by the Applied Health Research Centre at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital (Toronto).

Statistical Analysis of Clinical Data

Appropriate descriptive statistics for baseline characteristics (frequencies and proportions for discrete variables; means and standard deviations for symmetric variables; and medians and inter-quartile ranges for skewed data) will be used to compare groups. The principle of intention-to-treat will be applied to the analysis of outcomes. Outcome variables will be compared between arms using ANCOVA with the corresponding baseline measure as the covariate. For the primary outcome, the following additional covariates will be included: age, and each of the risk indicators, (i) birth weight greater than 3500g, (ii) weight gain in first year of life, (iii) maternal or paternal obesity, and (iv) smoking during pregnancy (v) mean family income less than $80,000. Mean differences and corresponding confidence intervals will be calculated. A two-sided level of 0.05 will be applied for the primary outcome. To determine if the treatment effect on the primary outcome depends on baseline BMI, the interaction term between treatment group and baseline BMI will be added to the covariate model. If this term is significant at the 0.1 level, then sub-groups determined by baseline BMI will be examined.

Sample Size

The sample size calculation is based on an ANCOVA for the primary outcome zBMI at 12 months, using the baseline zBMI as a covariate. The total sample size of 108 (54 per arm) is based on the following criteria: A two-sided, level 0.05 test of the null hypothesis of no difference; Power of 0.80; smallest clinically important difference is 0.5 zBMI units at 12 months; between-subject standard deviation is 1 unit; within-subject correlation is 0.638, derived from TARGetKids! dataset of subjects meeting criteria (n>700). Lost-to-follow-up is estimated at 10%.(26,27) Obesity intervention trials in young children with 15-50 children per group have demonstrated significant treatment effect sizes of 0.3-0.5 units of zBMI.(10)

Feasibility and Acceptability: Semi structured interviews will be conducted with parent participants in the intervention and control groups to assess their experiences with the intervention, perceived quality of the intervention, and barriers and facilitators to their participation. Interviews will be recorded, transcribed, and thematic analysis will be conducted.

Fidelity to the core components of the intervention will be measured by the public health nurses following each group session and coaching visit using fidelity checklists and reported using descriptive statistics.

Economic Evaluation Analysis: Cost-effectiveness will be expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) calculated by dividing the incremental costs between the intervention and usual care arms by the incremental change in child’s zBMI between baseline and the end of the follow-up period. A probabilistic analysis using Monte Carlo simulation will be used to establish a point estimate and 95% confidence interval of the ICER. Extensive sensitivity analysis will be used to examine the robustness of the results and evaluate uncertainty in each of the parameters in the analysis. Ranges for the sensitivity analysis will be obtained from 95% confidence intervals generated from study data for each of the parameters. This analysis will be conducted in accordance with guidelines set out by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.(28)

Parent Oriented Research Approach

Parents participating in the TARGetKids! network have reviewed and provided feedback on the proposed study protocol and recruitment methods via a Parents’ Panel. (29) The Parents’ Panel was developed to engage parents involved in TARGetKids! research and gather their perspectives on proposed on-going research. The Parent Panel will be engaged throughout the trial to support interpretation of results and knowledge translation.

Knowledge Translation

TARGetKids! is a collaboration between child health researchers, primary care practitioners (paediatricians and family physicians), parents and their children. This study incorporates an integrated knowledge translation approach through continuous engagement with practising primary care clinics and public health nurses in the TARGetKids! network and with parents. At end-of-grant, study findings will be communicated to key knowledge users including parents, health professionals and organizations (primary care physicians and public health practitioners), decision- and policy makers, and other researchers. The research team will actively engage with policy makers early in the execution of the trial to ensure the program is scalable and feasible from a health policy perspective. Reporting of outcomes in peer-reviewed manuscripts will be guided by STaRI standards(30).

There are a few practical and operational issues that have been taken into consideration throughout the conduction of this trial. There have been challenges with coordinating the group sessions, to find a time that is appropriate for all parents attending these sessions. Due to COVID-19, the group sessions transitioned to online delivery which may have allowed an increase in program attendance. Recruitment into the trial was delayed due to COVID-19, as the primary method for recruitment is conducted in clinical practice. Participant uptake of coaching calls has also posed a challenge, as some participants are not always interested in attending these calls. To mitigate this, we have not made the coaching calls mandatory but encouraged by the Public Health Nurse. One last challenge in terms of recruitment for this trial, is the eligibility criteria. Participants included in this trial are those that have children who are at risk of developing obesity, which may present as a sensitive topic to discuss with a participant (parent) during initial enrolment. To aid in this discussion, we have implemented a script to guide our research assistants when communicating with the parent surrounding the topic of weight bias.

TRIAL STATUS

Protocol Version Number and Date: 05.JAN.2021

Start Date of Recruitment: May 1^st, 2018

Estimated Completion Date of Recruitment: April 15^th, 2023

ANCOVA: Analysis of Covariance

ICER: Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio

RCT: Randomized Control Trial

TARGetKids!: The Applied Research Group for Kids

zBMI: Body Mass Index Z-score

Ethics approval and consent to participate: The current protocol adheres to the Standard Protocol Items for Randomized Trials guidelines,(31) and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03219697). This study has received Research Ethics Board (REB) approval from The Hospital for Sick Children, St. Michael’s Hospital, and Toronto Public Health. Informed and written consent are obtained from parents at the point of recruitment. Families who attend TARGetKids! practice sites and meet the study’s inclusion criteria but decline study participation will still receive usual health care. All protocol amendments will be submitted to The Hospital for Sick Children REB.

Consent for publication: Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials: The final trial dataset will be available to study investigators and the Research Ethic Boards at all participating sites.

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding: This work was supported by Ontario SPOR SUPPORT Unit (OSSU) grant (grant number not applicable), PSI Foundation grant number 19-25 and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada grant number G-19-0026347.

Authors’ contributions: C.S.B and J.M. conceptualized the study and developed the initial foundation for the intervention components. C.S.B and F.O were responsible for the development of the study protocol. C.S.B and A.W. were responsible for the development of the data analysis plan. S.R. and F.O. were responsible for supplemental material required for the intervention. S.R wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors provided feedback on drafts and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements: Parents were involved at several stages of the trial, including the design, intervention, management, conduct, and authorship. We received input from parents with young children participating in the TARGetKids! cohort and have published this work (Kim et al. Engaging parents to research childhood interventions aimed at preventing common health problems. CMAJ (2018), 190 (Suppl) S22-S23; doi: 10.1503/cmaj.180323 and Vanderloo et al. Parent engagement in co-design of clinical trials: the PARENT trial. Trials (2021), 22, 347; https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05305-6). We have also carefully assessed the barriers and facilitators of the trial interventions on participants. We intend to disseminate the main results to trial participants, cohort participants, and will seek parent involvement in the development of an appropriate method of dissemination with our parent and clinician advisory committee.

The authors would like to thank the children participants and their families for their participation in this study as well as to all clinicians who are currently involved in the TARGetKids! practice-based research network.

*TARGetKids! Collaborators – Co-Leads: Catherine S. Birken, Jonathon L. Maguire; Advisory Committee: Ronald Cohn, Eddy Lau, Andreas Laupacis, Patricia C. Parkin, Michael Salter, Peter Szatmari, Shannon Weir; Science Review and Management Committees: Laura N. Anderson, Cornelia M. Borkhoff, Charles Keown-Stoneman, Christine Kowal, Dalah Mason; Site Investigators: Murtala Abdurrahman, Kelly Anderson, Gordon Arbess, Jillian Baker, Tony Barozzino, Sylvie Bergeron, Dimple Bhagat, Gary Bloch, Joey Bonifacio, Ashna Bowry, Caroline Calpin, Douglas Campbell, Sohail Cheema, Elaine Cheng, Brian Chisamore, Evelyn Constantin, Karoon Danayan, Paul Das, Mary Beth Derocher, Anh Do, Kathleen Doukas, Anne Egger, Allison Farber, Amy Freedman, Sloane Freeman, Sharon Gazeley, Charlie Guiang, Dan Ha, Curtis Handford, Laura Hanson, Leah Harrington, Sheila Jacobson, Lukasz Jagiello, Gwen Jansz, Paul Kadar, Florence Kim, Tara Kiran, Holly Knowles, Bruce Kwok, Sheila Lakhoo, Margarita Lam-Antoniades, Eddy Lau, Denis Leduc, Fok-Han Leung, Alan Li, Patricia Li, Jessica Malach, Roy Male, Vashti Mascoll, Aleks Meret, Elise Mok, Rosemary Moodie, Maya Nader, Katherine Nash, Sharon Naymark, James Owen, Michael Peer, Kifi Pena, Marty Perlmutar, Navindra Persaud, Andrew Pinto, Michelle Porepa, Vikky Qi, Nasreen Ramji, Noor Ramji, Danyaal Raza, Alana Rosenthal, Katherine Rouleau, Caroline Ruderman, Janet Saunderson, Vanna Schiralli, Michael Sgro, Hafiz Shuja, Susan Shepherd, Barbara Smiltnieks, Cinntha Srikanthan, Carolyn Taylor, Stephen Treherne, Suzanne Turner, Fatima Uddin, Meta van den Heuvel, Joanne Vaughan, Thea Weisdorf, Sheila Wijayasinghe, Peter Wong, John Yaremko, Ethel Ying, Elizabeth Young, Michael Zajdman; Research Team: Farnaz Bazeghi, Marivic Bustos, Charmaine Camacho, Dharma Dalwadi, Christine Koroshegyi, Tarandeep Malhi, Sharon Thadani, Julia Thompson, Laurie Thompson; Project Team: Mary Aglipay, Imaan Bayoumi, Sarah Carsley, Katherine Cost, Anne Fuller, Laura Kinlin, Jessica Omand, Shelley Vanderhout, Leigh Vanderloo; Applied Health Research Centre: Christopher Allen, Bryan Boodhoo, Olivia Chan, David W.H. Dai, Judith Hall, Peter Juni, Gerald Lebovic, Karen Pope, Kevin Thorpe; Mount Sinai Services Laboratory: Rita Kandel, Michelle Rodrigues.

Canning P, Courage ML, Frizzell LM, Seifert T. Obesity in a provincial population of Canadian preschool children: Differences between 1984 and 1997 birth cohorts. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2007;
Shields M, Tremblay MS. Canadian childhood obesity estimates based on WHO, IOTF and CDC cut-points. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2010;
Whitaker RC, Wright JA, Pepe MS, Seidel KD, Dietz WH. Predicting Obesity in Young Adulthood from Childhood and Parental Obesity. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(13):869–73.
Reilly JJ, Bonataki M, Leary SD, Wells JC, Davey-Smith G, Emmett P, et al. Progression from childhood overweight to adolescent obesity in a large contemporary cohort. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;
Olshansky SJ, Passaro DJ, Hershow RC, Layden J, Carnes BA, Brody J, et al. A potential decline in life expectancy in the United States in the 21st century. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005.
Hering E, Pritsker I, Gonchar L, Pillar G. Obesity in children is associated with increased health care use. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2009;48(8):812–8.
Wang Y, Cai L, Wu Y, Wilson RF, Weston C, Fawole O, et al. What childhood obesity prevention programmes work? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;
Taveras EM, Marshall R, Sharifi M, Avalon E, Fiechtner L, Horan C, et al. Comparative effectiveness of clinical-community childhood obesity interventions a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;
Gerards SMPL, Dagnelie PC, Gubbels JS, Van Buuren S, Hamers FJM, Jansen MWJ, et al. The effectiveness of lifestyle triple P in the Netherlands: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2015;
Haines J, McDonald J, O’Brien A, Sherry B, Bottino CJ, Schmidt ME, et al. Healthy habits, happy homes: Randomized trial to improve household routines for obesity prevention among preschool-aged children. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;
Wen LM, Baur LA, Simpson JM, Rissel C, Wardle K, Flood VM. Effectiveness of home based early intervention on children’s BMI at age 2: Randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2012;
Sherwood NE, Levy RL, Langer SL, Senso MM, Crain AL, Hayes MG, et al. Healthy Homes/Healthy Kids: A randomized trial of a pediatric primary care-based obesity prevention intervention for at-risk 5-10year olds. Contemp Clin Trials. 2013;
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, et al. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013;
Qiao Y, Ma J, Wang Y, Li W, Katzmarzyk PT, Chaput J-P, et al. Birth weight and childhood obesity: a 12-country study. Int J Obes Suppl. 2015;
Weng SF, Redsell SA, Nathan D, Swift JA, Yang M, Glazebrook C. Estimating overweight risk in childhood from predictors during infancy. Pediatrics. 2013;
Whitaker KL, Jarvis MJ, Beeken RJ, Boniface D, Wardle J. Comparing maternal and paternal intergenerational transmission of obesity risk in a large population-based sample. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;
Morandi A, Meyre D, Lobbens S, Kleinman K, Kaakinen M, Rifas-Shiman SL, et al. Estimation of Newborn Risk for Child or Adolescent Obesity: Lessons from Longitudinal Birth Cohorts. PLoS One. 2012;
Statistics Canada. Census Profile, 2016 Census - Toronto [Census metropolitan area], Ontario and Ontario [Province]. Statistics Canada. 2016.
Dietitians of Canada, Canadian Paediatric Society, College of Family Physicians of Canada, Community Health Nurses of Canada, Secker D. Promoting optimal monitoring of child growth in Canada: using the new WHO growth charts. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2010;
de Onis M, Garza C, Victora CG, Onyango AW, Frongillo EA, Martines J. The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study: Planning, study design, and methodology. Food Nutr Bull. 2004;
Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Heal Ment Heal Serv Res. 2011;
Gross D, Garvey C, Julion W, Fogg L, Tucker S, Mokros H. Efficacy of the Chicago parent program with low-income African American and latino parents of young children. Prev Sci. 2009;
Toronto Early Childhood and Family Resource System. Pathway and Resource Listing. Partners. 2016.
Birken C., Maguire J. Registry Protocol: TARGet Kids! Healthy children together. 2020.
Anderson LN, Maguire JL, Lebovic G, Hanley AJ, Hamilton J, Adeli K, et al. Duration of Fasting, Serum Lipids, and Metabolic Profile in Early Childhood. J Pediatr. 2017;
O’Brien R, Muller K. Unified power analysis for t-tests through multivariate hypotheses. Appl Anal Var Behav Sci. 1993;297–344.
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. In: Behavior Research Methods. 2007.
Ross J, Saitz RL, Carr D. Guidelines for the Economic Evaluation of Health Technologies: Canada (4th Edition). CADTH Methods Guidel. 2017;
Vanderloo L., Vanderhout S, Taveras E, Maguire J., Straus S, Birken C. Parent engagement in co-design of clinic trials: The PARENT Trial. BMJ Open. 2020;
Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, Eldridge S, Grandes G, Griffiths CJ, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) Statement. BMJ. 2017;
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2013.
De Onis M, Garza C. WHO | The WHO Child Growth Standards. Acta Pædiatrica International Journal of Pædiatrics. 2003.
Datar A, Sturm R. Childhood overweight and elementary school outcomes. Int J Obes. 2006;
Bisset S, Fournier M, Pagani L, Janosz M. Predicting academic and cognitive outcomes from weight status trajectories during childhood. Int J Obes. 2013;
CFDCA P. Third National Health and Nutrition Examination (NHANES III), in Anthropometric Procedures Video. 2003.
de Onis M, Garza C, Victora CG. The WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study: strategy for developing a new international growth reference. Forum of nutrition. 2003.
Kelly AS, Steinberger J, Jacobs DR, Hong CP, Moran A, Sinaiko AR. Predicting cardiovascular risk in young adulthood from the metabolic syndrome, its component risk factors, and a cluster score in childhood. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;
Tremblay M, Wolfson M, Gorber SC. Canadian Health Measures Survey: rationale, background and overview. Health Rep. 2007;
Birken CS, Maguire J, Mekky M, Manlhiot C, Beck CE, Jacobson S, et al. Parental factors associated with screen time in pre-school children in primary-care practice: A TARGet Kids! study. Public Health Nutr. 2011;
Simpson JAR, Keller HH, Rysdale LA, Beyers JE. Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (NutriSTEP^TM): Validation and test-retest reliability of a parent-administered questionnaire assessing nutrition risk of preschoolers. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;
Larouche R, Garriguet D, Tremblay MS. Outdoor time, physical activity and sedentary time among young children: The 2012–2013 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Can J Public Heal. 2016;
Bornstein DB, Beets MW, Byun W, McIver K. Accelerometer-derived physical activity levels of preschoolers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport. 2011.
Borkhoff CM, Heale LD, Anderson LN, Tremblay MS, Maguire JL, Parkin PC, et al. Objectively measured physical activity of young Canadian children using accelerometry. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2015;
Goodman R. Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;
Stone LL, Otten R, Engels RCME, Vermulst AA, Janssens JMAM. Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4- to 12-Year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review. 2010.
Squires J, Bricker D. Ages & Stages Questionnaires. Third Edition. (ASQ-3): A Parent-Completed Child-Monitoring System. Paul Brookes Publ Co. 2009;
Rothbart MK A, Hershey K, Fisher P. Investigations of temperament at 3-7 years: The Children’s Behaviour Questionnaire. Child Dev. 2001;72:1394–408.
Arnold DS, O’Leary SG, Wolff LS, Acker MM. The Parenting Scale: A Measure of Dysfunctional Parenting in Discipline Situations. Psychol Assess. 1993;
Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales. Psychology Foundation of Australia. 1995.
Abidin R. Parenting Stress Index (PSI) Short Form. J Clin Child Psychol. 1995;
Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JBW. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;

Table 1: Outcome Measures for the PARENT trial

Primary Outcome
Outcome		Outcome Measure
Age and sex-standardized BMI (6- and 12-month follow-up)		zBMI(32)
Secondary Outcomes
Child Outcomes		Outcome Measure
Child Anthropometry and Adiposity (Baseline, 6- and 12- month follow-up)	Height Weight Head circumference Arm circumference Waist circumference	Measurement of child height (or length for children under 2) and weight is performed using standardized anthropometric protocols.(33–35) The WHO Growth Standards will be used to transform BMI to age and sex standardized z-scores.(36).
Child Cardiometabolic Risk (Baseline, 6- and 12-month follow-up)	Systolic and diastolic blood pressure	National High Blood Pressure Education Program (NHBPEP)(37)
	Non-Fasting Blood samples (only baseline and 12-month follow-up)	A trained health professional experienced with paediatric blood collection will collect 9-12 ml of blood. Topical anesthetic cream (e.g., EMLA or Ametop) will be offered to minimize discomfort from venipuncture. The blood samples include complete blood count, alkaline phosphatase, glucose, insulin, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, total cholesterol, non-HDL, ferritin, 25-OH vitamin D, CRP, and ALT.(37)
	Diet intake, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep duration	The NHQ is an age specific TARGet Kids! instrument based on the Canadian Community Health Survey and Canadian Health Measures Suvey. Domains including outdoor free play;(38) sedentary behaviours, child daily screen time(39) sleep quality and duration; sociodemographic factors (i parent self-reported income, maternal education, ethnicity, immigration status, and marital status). Parental health, mental health, exposures during pregnancy (e.g., nutrition, medication and vitamin use) and family medical history.
	Dietary intake	NutriSTEP® questionnaire for toddlers (18-35 months) and preschoolers (3-5 years).(40) The NutriSTEP® is parent-administered, validated 17- item nutrition screening tool that has been developed to assess nutritional risk and includes topics of dietary intake (including fruit and vegetable intake, fast food intake), physical activity and screen time, physical growth and development/weight concerns; and factors affecting food intake (food security, psycho-social feeding environment) validated to identify children with nutritional risk in multicultural Canadian children.(40)
	Direct physical activity levels (only baseline and 12-month follow up)	The Actical accelerometer device worn for 24-hours on three consecutive days will provide direct measures of physical activity. (41–43)
Child Mental Health and Development (Baseline, 6- and 12- month follow-up)	Mental health	The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) consists of 25 items subdivided into four difficulties scales, emotional symptoms, conduct problems, inattention-hyperactivity and peer problems, and a separate fifth strength scale, prosocial behavior.(44) The SDQ Total Difficulties Score (TDS) can be calculated as the sum of the scores for the emotional symptoms; conduct problems, hyperactivity in attention, and peer problems subscales (range 0-40). Scores from the SDQ have been found to be highly correlated with the Child Behavior Checklist which correlates with mental health disorders in adolescence and adulthood.(45) There are two SDQ versions, one for children ages 2-4 and one for children ages 4-17.
	Development	The Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) is a screening questionnaire completed by parents, which identifies toddlers and preschool aged children, at risk of a developmental delay in five developmental domains: Communication, Gross Motor, Fine Motor, Problem Solving and Personal Social Behaviour. Each domain consists of six questions about important age specific developmental milestones.(46) The ASQ was developed and validated in the US and is used worldwide. Psychometric characteristics of the ASQ were found to be excellent, with a sensitivity and specificity of 80% and 84%, respectively.
	Temperament	The CBQ, a care-giver report measure, has been developed with the goal of providing a highly differentiated assessment of temperament in young children.(47) The Very Short Form of the CBQ (36 items) provides comprehensive assessment of reactive and self-regulative temperamental behaviour patterns in young children and is designed to assess 3 domains: Surgency (12 items), Negative Affect (12 items) and Effortful Control (12 items).
Parental Outcomes		Outcome Measure
Parental Anthropometry (Baseline, 6- and 12- month follow-up)	Height , Weight, waist circumference, BMI	Parent height, weight and waist circumference will also be measured using standardized anthropometric protocols.(33–35) Reported weight and height of other parent will be recorded if the second parent is not present.
Parent Health Behaviours (Baseline, 6- and 12- month follow-up)	Physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep duration	Parent reported measures of physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep duration will be collected based on the Canadian Community Health Survey.(38)
Parenting (Baseline, 6- and 12- month follow-up)	Parenting skills	The 30-item parent-completed Parenting Scale is designed to help clinicians identify the discipline practices of parents of young children.(48) The scale measures three main parenting domains: laxness, over reactivity, and verbosity). (48) A higher score indicates the “ineffective” end of the item.
Family Psychosocial Health (Baseline, 6- and 12- month follow-up)	Mental Health	Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale (DASS-21) The DASS-21 is a 21-item parent-completed form designed to measure the negative emotional states of depression, anxiety, and stress. Each of the three DASS scales contains 7 items per scale.(49) Parenting Stress Index (PSI) The 36-item, parent-completed PSI is designed to identify potentially dysfunctional parent-child systems and includes three scales: parental distress, difficult child characteristics and dysfunctional parent-child interaction.(50) Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)(51) is a self-administered multipurpose instrument for monitoring and measuring the severity of depression. The inventory scores each of the nine DSM-V criteria for depression as “0” (not at all) to “3” (nearly every day), and scores of 5, 10, 15 and 20 represents mild, moderate, moderately severe and severe depression.
Health Care Utilization	Total and mental health related ED visits and hospitalizations for children and mothers	The study data will be linked to ICES, to gain access to information such as CIHI databases, specifically the Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) for hospitalizations and the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System (NACRS) for emergency visits for the purpose of identifying early life exposures in this cohort.
Feasibility and Acceptability		Semi-structured interviews with parents to assess their experiences of the overall conduct of the trial, perceived quality of the intervention, and barriers and facilitators to participation..
Fidelity to the Intervention		Fidelity checklists of core components for each group sessions and coaching visits will be completed by the public health nurses.
Economic Evaluation (12- month follow-up)		Cost-effectiveness will be expressed as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which will be calculated by dividing the incremental costs between the treatment and control arms by the incremental change in child’s zBMI between baseline and the end of the follow up period.

PARENTSPIRITChecklistNov19.docx

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 04 Jan, 2023

Read the published version in Trials →

Editorial decision: Major revision
21 Jun, 2022
Reviewers agreed at journal
16 Jun, 2022
Reviewers invited by journal
16 Jun, 2022
Editor assigned by journal
29 Apr, 2022
First submitted to journal
19 Nov, 2021

You are reading this latest preprint version

Randomized controlled trial evaluating a virtual parenting intervention for young children at risk of obesity: Study protocol for Parenting Addressing Early Years Intervention with Coaching Visits in Toronto (PARENT) trial

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods / Design

Discussion

List Of Abbreviations

DECLARATIONS

REFERENCES

table

Supplementary Files

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1