1 Al-Moraissi, E. A., Elmansi, Y. A., Al-Sharaee, Y. A., Alrmali, A. E. & Alkhutari, A. S. Does the piezoelectric surgical technique produce fewer postoperative sequelae after lower third molar surgery than conventional rotary instruments? A systematic review and meta analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 45, 383-391, doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.005 (2016).
2 Anesi, A. et al. Structural and ultrastructural analyses of bone regeneration in rabbit cranial osteotomy: Piezosurgery versus traditional osteotomes. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 46, 107-118, doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2017.10.004 (2018).
3 Pappalardo, S. & Guarnieri, R. Randomized clinical study comparing piezosurgery and conventional rotatory surgery in mandibular cyst enucleation. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 42, e80-85, doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2013.06.013 (2014).
4 Liu, J., Hua, C., Pan, J., Han, B. & Tang, X. Piezosurgery vs conventional rotary instrument in the third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of dental sciences 13, 342-349, doi:10.1016/j.jds.2016.09.006 (2018).
5 Li, X., Lin, X., Guo, J. & Wang, Y. The Stability and Survival Rate of Dental Implants After Preparation of the Site by Piezosurgery vs Conventional Drilling: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 30, e51-e56, doi:10.11607/jomi.5913 (2020).
6 Metzger, M. C., Bormann, K. H., Schoen, R., Gellrich, N. C. & Schmelzeisen, R. Inferior alveolar nerve transposition--an in vitro comparison between piezosurgery and conventional bur use. The Journal of oral implantology 32, 19-25, doi:10.1563/1548-1336(2006)32[19:IANTIV]2.0.CO;2 (2006).
7 Barone, A. et al. Osteotomy and membrane elevation during the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure. A comparative study: piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotative instruments. Clinical oral implants research 19, 511-515, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01498.x (2008).
8 Gonzalez-Garcia, A., Diniz-Freitas, M., Somoza-Martin, M. & Garcia-Garcia, A. Piezoelectric and conventional osteotomy in alveolar distraction osteogenesis in a series of 17 patients. The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants 23, 891-896 (2008).
9 Arakji, H., Shokry, M. & Aboelsaad, N. Comparison of Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiographic Trial. Int J Dent 2016, 8169356, doi:10.1155/2016/8169356 (2016).
10 de Freitas Silva, L. et al. Alveolar repair after the use of piezosurgery in the removal of lower third molars: a prospective clinical, randomised, double-blind, split-mouth study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 57, 1068-1073, doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.09.017 (2019).
11 Kesting, M. R., Wolff, K. D., Nobis, C. P. & Rohleder, N. H. Amniotic membrane in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg 18, 153-164, doi:10.1007/s10006-012-0382-1 (2014).
12 Hao, Y., Ma, D. H., Hwang, D. G., Kim, W. S. & Zhang, F. Identification of antiangiogenic and antiinflammatory proteins in human amniotic membrane. Cornea 19, 348-352, doi:10.1097/00003226-200005000-00018 (2000).
13 Gomes, M. F., dos Anjos, M. J., Nogueira, T. O. & Guimaraes, S. A. Histologic evaluation of the osteoinductive property of autogenous demineralized dentin matrix on surgical bone defects in rabbit skulls using human amniotic membrane for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16, 563-571 (2001).
14 Semyari, H. et al. Evaluating the bone regeneration in calvarial defect using osteoblasts differentiated from adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells on three different scaffolds: an animal study. Cell and tissue banking 17, 69-83, doi:10.1007/s10561-015-9518-5 (2016).
15 Robiony, M., Polini, F., Costa, F., Zerman, N. & Politi, M. Ultrasonic bone cutting for surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion (SARME) under local anaesthesia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 36, 267-269, doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2006.08.013 (2007).
16 Vercellotti, T. & Pollack, A. S. A new bone surgery device: sinus grafting and periodontal surgery. Compend Contin Educ Dent 27, 319-325 (2006).
17 D'Agostino, A. et al. Does Piezosurgery Influence the Severity of Neurosensory Disturbance Following Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy? J Craniofac Surg 30, 1154-1162, doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000005251 (2019).
18 Spinelli, G., Lazzeri, D., Conti, M., Agostini, T. & Mannelli, G. Comparison of piezosurgery and traditional saw in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery. Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 42, 1211-1220, doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2014.02.011 (2014).
19 Li, W. et al. Investigating the Potential of Amnion-Based Scaffolds as a Barrier Membrane for Guided Bone Regeneration. Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids 31, 8642-8653, doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02362 (2015).
20 Fenelon, M., Catros, S. & Fricain, J. C. What is the benefit of using amniotic membrane in oral surgery? A comprehensive review of clinical studies. Clin Oral Investig 22, 1881-1891, doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2457-3 (2018).
21 Preti, G. et al. Cytokines and growth factors involved in the osseointegration of oral titanium implants positioned using piezoelectric bone surgery versus a drill technique: a pilot study in minipigs. J Periodontol 78, 716-722, doi:10.1902/jop.2007.060285 (2007).
22 Vercellotti, T. et al. Osseous response following resective therapy with piezosurgery. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 25, 543-549 (2005).
23 Spinato, S., Rebaudi, A., Bernardello, F., Bertoldi, C. & Zaffe, D. Piezosurgical treatment of crestal bone: quantitative comparison of post-extractive socket outcomes with those of traditional treatment. Clinical oral implants research 27, 361-366, doi:10.1111/clr.12555 (2016).
24 Trombelli, L. et al. Modeling and remodeling of human extraction sockets. J Clin Periodontol 35, 630-639, doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01246.x (2008).
25 Malizos, K. N., Hantes, M. E., Protopappas, V. & Papachristos, A. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for bone healing: an overview. Injury 37 Suppl 1, S56-62, doi:10.1016/j.injury.2006.02.037 (2006).
26 Li, J. K. et al. Comparison of ultrasound and electromagnetic field effects on osteoblast growth. Ultrasound Med Biol 32, 769-775, doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.01.017 (2006).
27 Smith, W. L. & Marnett, L. J. Prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase: structure and catalysis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1083, 1-17, doi:10.1016/0005-2760(91)90119-3 (1991).
28 Rinastiti, M., Harijadi, Santoso, A. L. & Sosroseno, W. Histological evaluation of rabbit gingival wound healing transplanted with human amniotic membrane. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery 35, 247-251, doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2005.09.012 (2006).
29 Martelloni, M., Montagner, G., Trojan, D. & Abate, R. Amniotic Membrane In Palatal Epithelial-Connective Tissue Reconstruction. International medical case reports journal 12, 349-354, doi:10.2147/IMCRJ.S213275 (2019).
30 Kumar, S., Sugandhi, P., Arora, R. & Pandey, P. K. Amniotic membrane transplantation versus mucous membrane grafting in anophthalmic contracted socket. Orbit 25, 195-203, doi:10.1080/01676830600575527 (2006).
31 Grzywocz, Z. et al. Growth factors and their receptors derived from human amniotic cells in vitro. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 52, 163-170, doi:10.5603/FHC.2014.0019 (2014).
32 Velez, I., Parker, W. B., Siegel, M. A. & Hernandez, M. Cryopreserved amniotic membrane for modulation of periodontal soft tissue healing: a pilot study. J Periodontol 81, 1797-1804, doi:10.1902/jop.2010.100060 (2010).