Ethics declaration
All mice were maintained in our animal facility under specific pathogen free (SPF) conditions following guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University. All experimental procedures on animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Tokyo Medical and Dental University (A2019-207C5), also all experiments were conducted under approved guidelines.
Rice
Oryza sativa L. subsp. japonica cv. Yukihikari and Kirara397 were used in this study. Seeds were sown in a greenhouse at Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine on April 25, 2018. Seedlings aged 36 d were transplanted into paddy fields of Kamikawa Agricultural Experiment Station (Pippu, 43°51′N, 142°48′E) at densities of one plant per hill and a spacing of 30 × 15 cm (22.2 plants/m2) on May 31, 2018. Plants were fertilized using 8 kg N/10a and 9.7 kg P2O5/10a. At maturity, the rice grains were harvested, bulked, air-dried, and dehulled. By sieving, brown rice grains smaller than 1.9 mm were removed. The remaining were polished using a rice-polishing machine (TOYO TESTER Seimaiki MC-90A, Toyo Rice Co., Ltd.) until 90% of the grains by weight were white. After which rice powder was prepared from the polished white rice.
Cells and mice
Spleen cells of C57BL/6 mice were prepared as previously described 9.
IgA–/– mice 21 (10-week-old) were fed modified AIN-93G (white rice powder 30.0%, a-corn sugar 22.9486%, casein Lactic 20.00%, granular sugar 10.00%, cellulose 5.00%, AIN-93 Mineral Mix 3.50%, AIN-93 Vitamin Mix 1.00%, L-cystine 0.30%, choline bitartrate 0.25%, soy oil 7.00%, and t-butylhydrochione 0.0014%) (Crea, Japan) for 4 weeks under SPF conditions.
In vitro immunological assay
A total of 1 × 106 spleen cells were cultured in 1-mL RPMI1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) with or without 10 μg of the rice powder for 2 d. The activation cell surface markers—CD69 and CD86—on spleen cells were evaluated by flow cytometry.
Flow cytometry
Cells were analyzed using MACSQuant Flow Cytometer (MiltenyiBiotec) as described previously 8,9 with the following specific antibodies: VioletFluo 450-labeled anti-B220 antibodies (clone; RA3-6B2) and APC-labeled anti-CD86 antibodies (clone; GL-1), which were purchased from TONBO biosciences as well as Brilliant Violet 510 anti-mouse CD4 antibodies (clone; RM4-5) and phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled anti-CD69 antibodies (clone; H1.2F3) purchased from BioLegend. Dead cells were eliminated using propidium iodide staining. Data were analyzed using FlowJo (FLOWJO, LLC). When detecting CD19 instead of B220, VioletFluo 450-labeled anti-CD19 antibodies (clone; 1D3, TONBO biosciences) were used. Intracellular staining of cytokines was conducted as previously described using anti-FoxP3 (clone; MF23, BD Pharmingen).
Measurement of the anti-DNA antibody levels
Immunoglobulin levels were measured as previously described 9 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). Sonicated herring sperm DNA (Sigma-Aldrich, 10 µg/ml) was coated on ELISA plates. The following antibodies were used: alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-IgM and anti-IgG (Southern Biotech).
Transcriptome analyses
A total of 4 × 106 spleen cells were cultured in 4-mL RPMI1640 medium containing 10% FCS with 20 μg of rice powder for 2 d. Total RNA was prepared from spleen cells using ISOGEN II (Nippon Gene). Gene expression analysis was performed using DNA microarray and RNA sequencing.
For DNA microarray analysis, the measurement was entrusted to Macrogen Japan. Microgen provided the method as follows. Microarray results were extracted using the feature extraction software v11.0 (Agilent Technologies). Raw data for a similar gene were then summarized automatically using the Agilent feature extraction protocol to generate a raw data text file, providing expression data for each gene probed on the array. The array probes with Flag A in samples were filtered out. The selected gProcessedSignal (gpS) value was transformed logarithmically and normalized using the quantile method. Statistical significant difference of expression data was determined using fold change. For DEG set, the hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using complete linkage and Euclidean distance as a measure of similarity. Gene-enrichment and functional annotation analysis for the significant probe list was conducted using gene ontology (www.geneontology.org/). Data analyses and visualizations of differentially expressed genes were conducted using R v.3.5.1 (www.r-project.org). The SurePrint G3 Mouse Gene Expression 8x60K microarray kit was used for DNA microarray analysis (Agilent Technologies). Finally, data were analyzed using the genetic manifested software R v.2.15.1.
For RNA sequencing analysis, total RNAs were subjected to RNA sequencing analysis (GENEWIZ). RNA-Seq library construction, next-gen sequencing and following bioinformatics analyses were conducted by GENEWIZ. Briefly, total RNA was quantified and qualified by Qubit RNA Assay (Invitrogen), and RNA ScreenTape (TapeStation; Agilent Technologies). Poly(A) mRNA was enriched using magnet beads-conjugated oligo(dT) and following library preparation for high-throughput sequencing was conducted according to the manufacturer’s procedure (NEBNext Ultra II RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina; New England BioLabs). Approximately 250 ng of total RNA was used as initial input for mRNA selection and adapter-ligated double stranded cDNA fragment was amplified 12 cycles PCR, which incorporates Illumina P5/P7 adapters and sample-specific barcode sequence. Fragment size and quantity of libraries established were confirmed by Qubit DNA Assay (Invitrogen) and DNA ScreenTape (TapeStation; Agilent Technologies). Libraries with unique sample barcodes were pooled together and loaded onto an Illumina HiSeq/NovaSeq instrument according to manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina). Sequencing was carried out using 150 bp paired-end (PE) configuration. Image analysis, base calling and demultiplex were conducted by the Illumina standard software. Approximately 20M PE reads (6 Gb output in 150 bp PE configuration) per samples were obtained. The raw sequencing reads were filtered to remove adapter and low quality reads. The resulting clean reads were used for mapping to the reference genome (Mus musculus; Ensembl/GRCm38), quantifying gene expression, studying differential gene expression and further downstream analyses.
Statistical analysis
Experimental data are presented as the mean ± standard deviations (S.D). Statistically significant differences were evaluated using a two-tailed Student’s t-test for unpaired data. P values <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant difference was considered as P < 0.05.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, T. A., upon reasonable request.