Participant characteristics
Six women agreed to be interviewed for this study; all were newly diagnosed with HBV during the original study, and none tested positive for HIV. The ages of participating women ranged from 19 to 35 years with a median age of 25 (Table 1). Four of these women were seen at the Binza Maternity Center, and two were seen at the Kingasani Maternity Center. The current pregnancy was first for one woman, the second for four women, and the eighth for one woman. Almost all women (five of six) were married or in a marriage-like relationship. Three of six women had achieved post-secondary education. Two of the six women reported a source of employment at the time of TDF therapy.
Table 1
Individual and household characteristics of the interview participants
ID
|
Maternity center
|
Age (years)
|
Total pregnancies
|
Gestational age at AVERT enrollment
|
Household size*
|
Marital status
|
Education
|
Wealth quartile†, ‡
|
Employment
|
1
|
Binza
|
35
|
8
|
24
|
6
|
Married
|
Secondary
|
Upper-to-middle
|
Self-employed
|
2
|
Kingasani
|
25
|
2
|
12
|
2
|
Married
|
Higher education
|
Highest
|
Not currently working
|
3
|
Binza
|
26
|
2
|
22
|
9
|
-
|
Higher education
|
Lower-to-middle
|
Not currently working
|
4
|
Kingasani
|
25
|
1
|
24
|
1
|
Married
|
Primary
|
Highest
|
Someone else
|
5
|
Binza
|
19
|
2
|
20
|
5
|
Marriage-like relationship
|
Secondary
|
Highest
|
Not currently working
|
6
|
Binza
|
23
|
2
|
22
|
2
|
Married
|
Higher education
|
Lower-to-middle
|
Not currently working
|
*Household size taken from enrollment at the parent study and does not include the child with whom the women were pregnant in the parent study. |
†Quartiles taken from distribution of the entire parent study population. |
‡Wealth index calculated by principal components analysis of individual and household characteristics. Full methods are available in the Supplementary material of Thompson et al. LGH 2021. |
The six women interviewed were either virally suppressed at delivery or had decreased viral loads at delivery compared to enrollment (Table 2). Four (IDs 1-4) of the six women interviewed had detectable TFVdp in blood samples collected at delivery (Table 2), two of whom (IDs 3 and 4) initiated TDF within 28 days of delivery. The two women with detectable TFVdp who initiated TDF >28 days before delivery (IDs 1 and 2) reported the most consistent adherence; they were also observed to have the largest increase in creatinine, a marker of kidney function, and known side effects of TDF therapy (Table 2).17 Two women with detectable TFVdp who initiated TDF within 28 days of delivery (IDs 3 and 4) reported poor adherence in the first week of therapy, but consistent adherence thereafter. The two women with undetectable TFVdp (IDs 5 and 6) reported intermittent adherence at the beginning of therapy.
Table 2
Qualitative and quantitative measures of tenofovir adherence
ID
|
TDF initiation (days from delivery)
|
Number of completed weeks on therapy prior to delivery
|
Pill bottle check at monthly visits
|
Self-reported adherence*
|
TFVdp at delivery
|
Viral load trend †
|
Creatinine change
|
1
|
≥28
|
7
|
Empty at all visits
|
Yes
|
Detectable
|
Increased at delivery but still virally suppressed
|
0.38 to 0.57 (+50.0%)
|
2
|
≥28
|
9
|
Empty at all visits
|
Yes
|
Detectable
|
Reached viral suppression at delivery and sustained at 6-months
|
0.60 to 0.96 (+60.0%)
|
3
|
< 28
|
1
|
Empty at all visits
|
Yes except week 1
|
Detectable
|
Decreased at delivery but not virally suppressed
|
0.72 to 0.59 (-18.1%)
|
4
|
< 28
|
2
|
Empty at all visits
|
Yes except week 1
|
Detectable
|
Decreased and virally suppressed by 6-months
|
0.76 to 0.68 (-10.5%)
|
5
|
≥28
|
6
|
Empty at all visits
|
Intermittent initially, and improved with time
|
Undetectable
|
Decreased at delivery, rebound at 6-months but remained virally suppressed
|
0.52 to 0.47 (-9.6%)
|
6
|
≥28
|
5
|
Empty at all visits
|
Intermittent initially, and improved with time
|
Undetectable
|
Decreased at delivery, rebound at 6-months but remained virally suppressed
|
0.57 to 0.69 (+21.1%)
|
*Responses from the interviews analyzed in this qualitative study. |
† Viral suppression defined as <200,000 IU/mL. |
The IMB+ model for tenofovir adherence
Responses from the six participants who shared their experiences taking tenofovir were mapped to show how information, motivation, and behavior skills influenced TDF adherence. All participants discussed personal and contextual factors beyond the traditional IMB model that affected their adherence are grouped as modulating factors (Figure 1).
Information
The information component of the IMB model for TDF adherence was represented in the participants’ understanding of the regimen, the purpose of treatment, perceived side effects, and the HBV disease process. A key component of this concept is the patient’s comprehension of their diagnosis with HBV. Many of the participants highlighted that the first time they had heard of HBV was at study enrollment. One participant discussed the poor awareness of HBV she had prior to being tested, a theme shared by four of the six participants.
“…[maternity center staff] informed me that I have hepatitis and [they] explained well to me what hepatitis is, and then [they] gave me appointments, and we met with them at each appointment and four months after I started this treatment if I hadn't forgotten.” (ID 1)
“I knew when [maternity center staff] say to take a drug during pregnancy, I guess it's already been proven that it won't have a negative effect on the child, so I had total confidence in the team that was treating me, so I had no fear on that side.” (ID 6)
Participants also shared their knowledge of the benefits of TDF therapy and daily medication adherence in preventing MTCT of HBV. One participant shared her advice for other HBV+ pregnant women considering TDF therapy and discussed how she felt the regimen would cure her disease.
“What I can say as advice to pregnant women, if you get hepatitis if you give them the medication, that they take it every day is for their own good, so that it treats them and cures them of this disease.” (ID 2)
Adherence-related information was also represented in participants’ discussion of perceived side effects of TDF. Half of the participants interviewed mentioned fatigue as a side effect after starting TDF therapy. One mother described this side effect in detail.
“I felt a little uncomfortable and when I took this medication. I felt tired, sleepy… I would need a little rest, I would have to sleep for a few minutes, and when I woke up, I could feel much better… all that was just the effects of the medication.” (ID 2)
Motivation
The concept of motivation was represented by participants’ discussion of the social influences and their personal incentives contributing to TDF adherence. One form of social motivation for adherence mentioned was an overall trust in healthcare workers. One participant illustrated this concept by discussing how other women living with HBV should share her trust in healthcare workers, in the benefits of TDF adherence for her health. The idea of having trust in health workers was a narrative shared by two other participants.
“[Future pregnant mothers] should trust you, the health care team, and that if you give them the medication, it is for their health and that they should take the medication well to have a complete recovery and they should avoid listening to everything we hear in the city.” (ID 1)
Another participant also demonstrated the same sentiment of trust by discussing how her trust in the medical team helped spur her adherence to TDF during the study.
“I wasn't afraid [of taking tenofovir] because I know that when the doctor says something, it is for the well-being of the patient. That's why I wasn't afraid, and I was obliged to take the medicine, it was for my own healing.” (ID 2)
An additional social motivation for adherence was the emotional support of family members, specifically when participants shared their new diagnosis. Many participants shared how family members encouraged them at the time of diagnosis. One participant shared how her initial interactions with her partner eased her anxiety about her new diagnosis and encouraged her TDF adherence.
“When I came home, I explained to my husband that I had caught hepatitis and I was panicking the day I spoke with you; As my husband is a laboratory technician, he started to comfort me, ‘there is nothing to worry about, you are not going to die today, you are going to take the medication, and you are going to feel better.” (ID 2)
Internal motivation for medication adherence was primarily defined by participants’ perceived positive outcomes to themselves and their unborn children. All participants shared that their perceived personal benefits of TDF adherence as the primary motivation for adherence.
“[The medical staff] had explained to me the advantage of taking the medication and especially that I was still pregnant, I was protecting the health of my future child.” (ID 1)
“I wasn't afraid [of taking tenofovir]; I trusted the doctor about the medication he had given me, and I knew it was going to be for the well-being of my health and my baby” (ID 2)
“It was because I had been caught with the microbe, and the doctor told me that I had to take this medicine for my healing. That's why I was motivated to take it so that I would be healed quickly. I don't like the disease, and I don't want it to get worse is what motivated me to take the medication.” (ID 6)
Behavioral Skills
Women in this study described behavioral skills they used to assist them in taking TDF daily. Strategies included prayer, social support, and visual cues to remind them to take the daily dose. One participant described the routine she developed with her mother after she first came home with her diagnosis, which involved prayer to help ease her anxiety when taking the medication.
“I didn't feel afraid [to take the medication] as [the maternity center staff] had explained to me how to take the medication. When it’s time for me to take the medication, I take the water and the medication, I pray, and then I swallow the medication until I had reached the end. I didn't really feel afraid.” (ID 2)
The same participant also described asking her sister to help her to maintain adherence during the study period.
“My little sister lives with me, and I showed her the medicine. I told her if I did not take [the medicine] to please remind me. (ID 2)
One woman reported that she had difficulty remembering to take the medication. To remind herself, she placed the bottle in a location where she would remember to take the medication every day.
“I put it [the bottle] next to my baby's stories so that I could see it every time I took it, so that I would always remember to take it.” (ID 4)
Modulating Factors
In addition to information, motivation, and behavioral skills that influenced treatment adherence, we found several general modulating factors that influenced adherence. A main modifying factor that emerged from the data was the barrier of social stigma of HBV. A participant discussed the stigma she felt while taking the medication, causing her to hide the medication and her condition from her community.
“I just didn't want people to see my medication to avoid too many questions about it, knowing my environment, people always talk badly. That's why I didn't want other family members to see me with this medication.” (ID 6)
The same woman described an incident during the study period where a visit by study staff was followed by rumors about her illness, causing her embarrassment and a missed follow-up appointment at the maternity center. Despite this social influence, she reported maintaining TDF adherence.
“Yes, in fact, there was a time when I didn't come to the center for follow-up, [the study nurse] had sent someone from the center to pick me up, and when the man arrived at my house, he met my cousin, and I stayed with her, and this cousin was able to turn the message into saying that I have HIV all over the [place], and it had weakened me a lot, and I was very worried when I took the medication, but then I didn't care about that, I remained objective when I took my medication until I was cured.” (ID 6)
Another woman also shared her experiences with social stigma and embarrassment in relation to HBV and TDF adherence, which was quelled by interactions with healthcare workers.
“…the first day I was given the medication, I felt embarrassed with a fear that people would find out that I had the disease, but after some explanations from [maternity center staff] I had finally gotten rid of that embarrassment.” (ID 2)
Medication characteristics and side effects were also mentioned as factors influencing treatment adherence. One participant mentioned that she had difficulty with the pill size as an initial barrier to adherence, though she became more comfortable with the medication over time. Another participant described fatigue in her experience with taking the medication:
“At the beginning of the treatment, I forgot to take it. I was taking it with difficulty because the tablets were large.” (ID 4)
“I felt a little uncomfortable, and when I took this medication I felt tired, sleepy and especially as I was still big [pregnant] and I would need a little rest, I would have to sleep for a few minutes, and when I woke up I could feel much better until I had given birth I kept on taking it, so it was more fatigue, but for a while, I came back strong, all that was just the effects of the medication.” (ID 2)
Reasons for non-adherence
While most women took the medication as prescribed, a few participants described missing doses. One woman reported a lack of having food as a reason for missing doses, as she perceived taking medication on an empty stomach would make her feel bad.
“Yes, I have missed days to take the medication. It's hunger, sometimes I missed something to eat, and as you know the medicine with hunger doesn't work. When you take the medication on an empty stomach, you will feel very bad.” (ID 3)
Another participant reported that she simply forgot to take the medication initially; however, she could take it just like paracetamol when she became more familiar with the medication.
“Yes, a little bit of forgetting, but that didn't happen several times. I took my medication every day. At first, I tended to forget, but as time went by, when I became familiar with this medication, I took it like paracetamol. I don't remember how many times I missed taking the medication, but it wasn't much, I think it was only 3-4 days. [The reason I didn’t take the medication every day] is forgetting, and also I didn't have the courage to take the medication at the beginning of the treatment.” (ID 6)
A woman reported that the size of the pills led her to forget to take the medication. However, as she continued to receive refills at follow-up visits throughout the course of treatment, she adjusted to taking it, hoping it would address the disease.
“...at times I also forgot to take the medication for three days, but when I saw that she kept giving me the bottle of medication all month long, I said to myself, ‘Good, as I am taking their medication, I think it's a reality and that maybe with this medication this disease will be able to end, that's when I became aware of it, and I began to respect the medication.” (ID 4)