Table 1: The pairwise comparison matrix of each thematic layers.
|
LI
|
DL
|
IR
|
DD
|
SL
|
LULC
|
Wi
|
LI
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.356
|
DL
|
1/2
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
0.203
|
IR
|
1/2
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.203
|
DD
|
1/3
|
1/2
|
1/2
|
1
|
|
|
0.122
|
SL
|
1/5
|
1/3
|
1/3
|
1/2
|
1
|
|
0.075
|
LULC
|
1/7
|
1/5
|
1/5
|
1/4
|
1/3
|
1
|
0.037
|
Table 2: Scale for the pairwise comparison.
Intensity of importance
|
Definitions
|
1
|
Equal importance
|
2
|
Equal to moderate importance
|
3
|
Moderate importance
|
4
|
Moderate to strong importance
|
5
|
Strong importance
|
6
|
Strong to very strong importance
|
7
|
Very strong importance
|
8
|
Very to extremely strong importance
|
9
2, 4, 6, 8
|
Extreme importance
Intermediate values between two adjacent numbers
|
Table 3: Random consistency index.
N
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
RI
|
0
|
0.52
|
0.9
|
1.12
|
1.24
|
1.32
|
1.41
|
1.48
|
Table 4: The pairwise comparison matrix and normalized weights (Ri) of the features with ratings (ri) and (Cr) consistency ratios.
Class
|
(a)
|
(b)
|
(c)
|
(d)
|
(e)
|
Cr
|
ri
|
Ri
|
Lithologie (LI)
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.036
|
|
|
Sedimentary cover
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
0.514
|
Micaschist
|
1/3
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
0.245
|
Gneiss and amphibolite
|
1/5
|
1/2
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
3
|
0.132
|
Gneiss and TTG
|
1/7
|
1/5
|
1/2
|
1.0
|
|
|
2
|
0.072
|
Charnockitic suite
|
1/9
|
1/7
|
1/5
|
1/3
|
1.0
|
|
1
|
0.035
|
Lineament’s density (DL)(km/km²)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 – 0.63
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
0.019
|
1
|
0.046
|
0.63 – 1.75
|
2
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
0.098
|
1.75 – 3.16
|
3
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
3
|
0.184
|
3.16 – 5.24
|
5
|
3
|
2
|
1.0
|
|
|
4
|
0.227
|
5.24 – 8.97
|
7
|
5
|
4
|
3
|
1.0
|
|
5
|
0.442
|
Infiltration rate (IR) (mm/h)
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
0.011- 0.23
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
0.435
|
0.23 – 0.34
|
1/2
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
0.264
|
0.34 – 0.5
|
1/3
|
1/2
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
3
|
0.154
|
0.5 – 0.75
|
1/5
|
1/3
|
1/2
|
1.0
|
|
|
2
|
0.09
|
0.75 – 1.54
|
1/6
|
1/5
|
1/3
|
1/2
|
1.0
|
|
1
|
0.055
|
Drainage density (DD) (km/km²)
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.027
|
|
|
0 – 0.66
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
0.435
|
0.66 – 1.46
|
1/2
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
0.26
|
1.46 – 2.34
|
1/3
|
1/2
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
3
|
0.189
|
2.34 – 3.52
|
1/6
|
1/4
|
1/4
|
1.0
|
|
|
2
|
0.068
|
3.52 – 6.55
|
1/7
|
1/5
|
1/5
|
1/2
|
1.0
|
|
1
|
0.046
|
Slope (SL)(°)
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.019
|
|
|
0 – 4
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
0.501
|
4-10
|
1/3
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
0.194
|
10-20
|
1/4
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
3
|
0.142
|
20-30
|
1/5
|
1/2
|
1.0
|
1.0
|
|
|
2
|
0.108
|
>30
|
1/7
|
1/5
|
1/3
|
1/2
|
1.0
|
|
1
|
0.052
|
Land use/ land cover (LULC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.026
|
|
|
Water
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
0.568
|
Agriculture
|
1/3
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
0.241
|
Vegetation
|
1/5
|
1/2
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
2
|
0.133
|
Built up Area
|
1/7
|
1/5
|
1/3
|
1.0
|
|
|
1
|
0.057
|
Table 5: physicochemical parameters and well discharge of the samples
Samples
|
Lon (°)
|
Lat (°)
|
Total alkalinity (mmol/l)
|
Hydrogen carbonates (mg/l)
|
Calcium (mg/l)
|
Total hardness (°F)
|
Magnesium (mg/l)
|
Well discharge
(m3/h)
|
W1
|
9.9768
|
2.3809
|
3.2
|
195.2
|
48.0
|
14.0
|
8.0
|
1.0
|
W2
|
9.9640
|
2.3761
|
3.7
|
225.7
|
50.0
|
15.0
|
10.0
|
1.2
|
W3
|
10.349
|
2.4417
|
3.6
|
219.6
|
52.0
|
15.0
|
8.0
|
1.5
|
W4
|
10.037
|
2.5147
|
3.4
|
207.4
|
48.0
|
15.0
|
12.0
|
1.5
|
W5
|
9.9501
|
2.3719
|
3.4
|
207.4
|
48.0
|
14.0
|
8.0
|
0.7
|
W6
|
9.9422
|
2.3747
|
3.6
|
203.6
|
50.0
|
15.0
|
10.0
|
1.0
|
W7
|
9.8551
|
2.3759
|
3.5
|
225.3
|
45.0
|
15.0
|
15.0
|
1.00
|
W8
|
9.8306
|
2.3776
|
3.2
|
203.8
|
50.0
|
14.0
|
6.0
|
0.80
|
W9
|
9.8304
|
2.3775
|
3.6
|
225.8
|
48.0
|
15.0
|
12.0
|
1.00
|
W10
|
9.8274
|
2.3822
|
3.0
|
195.6
|
50.0
|
14.0
|
6.0
|
1.50
|
W11
|
9.8361
|
2.4064
|
3.3
|
202.6
|
50.0
|
14.0
|
6.0
|
1.00
|
W12
|
9.8261
|
2.5477
|
3.4
|
223.5
|
52.0
|
14.0
|
6.0
|
0.8
|
W13
|
9.8248
|
2.3692
|
3.0
|
223.6
|
52.0
|
15.0
|
14.0
|
2.00
|
W14
|
9.8337
|
2.3868
|
3.0
|
196.6
|
48.0
|
15.0
|
12.0
|
1.5
|
W15
|
9.8330
|
2.3781
|
3.4
|
202.6
|
50.0
|
14.0
|
6.0
|
1.5
|
Minimun
|
|
|
3
|
195.2
|
45
|
14
|
6.0
|
|
Maximun
|
|
|
3.7
|
225.8
|
52
|
15
|
15
|
|
Mean
|
|
|
3,4
|
210.5
|
49.4
|
14.5
|
9.3
|
|
Standard deviation
|
|
|
0.2
|
11.5
|
1.8
|
0.5
|
3.1
|
|
NormWHO
|
|
|
------
|
--------
|
-------
|
< 30
|
< 50
|
|
Table 6: Variability of the factors.
|
F1
|
F2
|
F3
|
F4
|
F5
|
Eigenvalue
|
2.48
|
1.29
|
0.82
|
0.36
|
0.03
|
Variability (%)
|
49.7
|
25.9
|
16.4
|
7.4
|
0.6
|
% Cumulated
|
49.7
|
75,6
|
92
|
99.4
|
100
|
Table 7: statistics of map removal sensibility analysis.
Parameter removed
|
Mean
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
SD
|
LI
|
3.06
|
0.000065
|
16.6
|
3.03
|
LD
|
2.26
|
0.000922
|
16.6
|
1.81
|
IR
|
2.17
|
0.000061
|
16.6
|
1.97
|
DD
|
2.56
|
0.000193
|
16.6
|
2.06
|
SL
|
2.02
|
0.001805
|
16.6
|
1.22
|
LULC
|
2.31
|
0.000264
|
16.6
|
0.94
|
Table 8: statistics of single parameter sensibility analysis
Parameter
|
Mean
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
SD
|
LI
|
25.83
|
0
|
100
|
19.52
|
LD
|
17.02
|
0
|
100
|
14.50
|
IR
|
18.53
|
0
|
100
|
14.59
|
DD
|
20.76
|
0
|
100
|
15.94
|
SL
|
12.03
|
0
|
100
|
10.83
|
LULC
|
5.81
|
0
|
100
|
6.18
|