Study design
This cross-sectional study was conducted in a cement factory in the south of Iran. There were 180 workers working in different parts of this factory in which 49 workers were selected from different units of the factory through stratified random sampling. The factory included the raw material, furnace, cement production, repair, filtration, and services units. According to the population in each unit, a fraction of each unit was randomly selected. Overall 49 workers were selected from these 6 units. But 9 workers were excluded based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The inclusion criteria included at least 5 years of work experience and working in fixed shifts. The exclusion criteria included, people who used food supplements or vitamins. Eventually, 40 workers were selected as the exposed group. The unexposed group were office workers, randomly selected from different administrative departments. In order to select randomly, 47 personnel codes were drawn from the complete employee list, and 40 persons who matched the inclusion and exclusion criteria entered the study.
The 40 workers in the exposed group were all exposed to silica, cement dust and >85 dB noise. The 40 office employees were not exposed to silica or cement dust and their noise exposure was less than 85dB which is the threshold recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH).Data were collected using a general demographic questionnaire including age, gender, work experience, disease history, smoking, tobacco consumption, drug or vitamin intake, education, and marriage.
Cement dust exposure assessment
Exposure to cement dust was measured according to the US National Institutes of Health, Method 0600 (NIOSH 0600), using a personal sampling pump (Model 224-PCXR8 SKC US). Sampling was performed by a 10 mm nylon cyclone and a 5 micrometer PVC filter during the whole shift. The pumps were calibrated before and after sampling by a digital calibrator with a flow rate of 2.2 l/min and inhalable dust density (particles with a diameter less than 5 micron) was measured. The filters were desiccated for 8 hours before and after sampling and weighed with a 0.1 mg sensitivity scale (Model AND HR-200). Cement dust exposure was calculated in milligrams per cubic meter during the work shifts and compared with the threshold limit value (TLV) as recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (1 mg/m3)[22].
Exposure assessment to free silica
Exposure to crystalline silica was assessed according to the US National Institute of Health and Safety (NIOSH 7601) method 7601. Sampling was performed during the work shift using a personal sampling pump (Model 224-PCXR8 manufactured by SKC USA) equipped with a 10 -mm nylon cyclone with a 37 mm-PVC filter and 5 micrometer pore size. After preparing the filters, silica was measured by a Spectrophotometer (Model Cary 60 UV-VIS, Agilent, USA) at 820 nm wavelength. The amount of silica exposure for each person was calculated in mg/m3 and compared to the TLV- TWA recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (0.025 mg/m3)[22].
Noise exposure assessment
Noise exposure was assessed through a personal dosimetry method, according to the ISO9612 standard. In order to measure noise exposure, a personal calibrated TES-1354 (TES Taiwan Manufacturing Company) with a precision measurement of ±1.5% dB was attached to each worker during the entire work shift. Then, the sound equivalent level (SEL) was calculated for each worker during the work shift. The 85 dB noise level, recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH)was considered as the Threshold Limit Value (TLV)[22].
Blood sampling and analysis of oxidative stress biomarkers and biochemical parameters
Blood sampling was performed by a trained nurse, at 7am to 12 am, before beginning the last working shift, in the end of the week, after at least 9 hours fasting. 10 ml of blood was taken from each worker and transferred into sterile tubes. Later the samples were transferred by a cold box to the Laboratory of the Pharmacy Faculty of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Then the test tubes were centrifuged for 10 min at 3000 rpm to separate the serum, for chemical analysis[23].
Measuring the serum level of MDA
MDA was measured as a lipid peroxidation index. It was measured based on its reaction with thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) using fluorimetry. Its absorption was read at 187 nm[24].
2.8. Measuring the serum level of TAC
Measuring TAC was performed by FRAP (ferric reducing ability of plasma) method. The basis of this method, is measuring the plasma's ability in reducing Fe+3 (ferric) to Fe+2 (ferrous) in the presence of a substance that is called TPTZ(2,4,6-tripyridyl-s-triazine).The complex formed by ferric and the Fe+2-TPTZ is blue in acidic environments, and its maximum absorption is at 593 nm [25].
Measuring SOD activity levels
In order to measure the activity of superoxide dismutase, the SOD ZellBio GmbH (Ulm Deutschland) kit was used. This kit determines the activity of SOD in the range of 5-100 U/L with a sensitivity of 1 u/ml. SOD activity was calculated based on the amount of mass that catalyzes the decomposition of 1 μmolO-2 to H2O2 and O2. Final SOD activity was determined by using a calorimeter at 420 nm [26].
Measuring the catalase activity levels
In order to measure the activity of the CAT (catalase enzyme), the CAT ZellBio GmbH (Ulm Deutschland) kit was used. This kit determines the amount of catalase activity in biological samples at a sensitivity of 0.5 U/mL. One catalase activity unites the amount of mass which catalyzes the decomposition of 1 μmol of H2O2 into water and O2 over a period of one minute. Final catalase activity was determined using a calorimeter at 405 nm [27].
Measuring biochemical markers
In order to measure biochemical parameters including alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), high density lipid (HDL), low density lipid (LDL), triglyceride (TG), total bilirubin, glucose, albumin and creatinine; standard kits and an auto analyzer system (Mindray BS-200®, China and Pars Azmun®, Tehran, Iran) were used [28, 29].
Assessment of depression, anxiety and stress
To assess the state of depression, anxiety and stress the short form of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) was used[30, 31].The DASS-21 questionnaire consists of 21 questions; each of the questions was assessed on a 4 points Likert-type scale including 0 (never), 1 (sometimes), 2 (often) and 3 (almost always). In this questionnaire, the participants indicate their response about each of the symptoms during the previous week. Each of the depression, anxiety, and stress scales consists of seven questions out of twenty-one. In order to complete the questionnaires, all individuals were interviewed face to face and every question was read for them. Because the DASS-21 questionnaire is the short form of the main DASS-42 questionnaire, the final score of each subscale (which is from 0 to 21), should be doubled and the final score of each subscale is reported from 0 to 42.
The psychometric properties of the Persian version of DASS-21 has been reported in Iran by Sahebi et al. and the Cronbach’s alphas were 0.7, 0.67, and 0.49 for depression, anxiety, and stress respectively[32].
The workers were almost similar in terms of economic class and received a similar meal in the factory.
Statistical analysis
The sample size was estimated using the mean difference and standard deviations of biochemical parameters, reported in Al Salhen’s study[33]. In Al Salhen’s study the mean difference between biochemical parameters was high, and the calculated samples sizes were all under 10. Nevertheless, in this study 80 people were enrolled in two groups.
Data normality was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize the quantitative variables, and for qualitative variables, the frequency was reported. One sample t-tests were used to compare the noise level pressure, ambient silica and cement dust levels with their permissible threshold. In order to compare the mean difference of oxidative stress biomarkers, biochemical parameters, depression, anxiety, stress/tension, noise, cement dust and silica dust between the two groups, independent t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used, for normal and skewed data respectively. Chi-square was used to compare qualitative variables between the two groups.
Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the relation between cement dust, silica and noise exposure with oxidative stress and biochemical markers. The significance level was set at 0.05 for all of tests. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS 22.