Since the incidence of IBD is rising world-wide with cure in sight, it is imperative to recognize and diagnose the disease at a early stage to ensure effective control of the disease and avoid complication. In this context, it is important to know the awareness of the lay public about IBD and identify any ignorance that may help to implement appropriate education plan. This in order may enlighten the lay person to seek prompt healthcare assistance for early diagnosis. Hence, the present study aimed to assess the awareness of the general population in Saudi Arabia towards inflammatory bowel diseases (CD and UC). The study demonstrated that the average score of our population was 1.72 ± 1.19, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 3.
There was a significant difference between males and females, were females showed a significantly higher average score compared to males (p-value < 0.001) and, different age groups had a significantly different awareness of inflammatory bowel disease (p value = 0.002), with the age group between 31 to 40 showing the highest average score.
Moreover, the awareness level differed significantly over different educational levels. Participants with a Ph.D. showed significantly higher mean scores compared to the other educational degrees (p value < 0.001),. Furthermore, participants who dealt with CDr or UC patients, showed significantly higher scores than their peers, with p values < 0.001 for both.
Disease specific knowledge of IBD patients has been widely studied in different countries using a validated questionnaire of Chrons and Colitis Knowledge score [13]. The knowledge of IBD, in addition has been evaluated in specific settinge like primary health care. Alharbi et al noted that the knowledge level of 200 primary care physicians in the western region of KSA was low (Leong Knowledge mean 5.53) and through education of IBD the awareness improved (mean 6.62) significantly (p = 0.002). IBD specific education did translate into better management, by making physicians more comfortable at using specific IBD therapy like steroids and immunomodulators ( OR = 8.25 and 6.03, respectively). Moreover, physicians with higher qualification were much more comfortable in prescribing medicines for IBD [14]. However, in another study by Tan et al carried out in Australia showed that the Leong knowledge score among 409 PHC physicians was higher with median scores of 9, even without being educated on IBD specific knowledge [15]. These difference could be due to various reasons. PHC physician in Australia usually look after stable chronic disease patients like IBD, this is not the case in KSA. The lower prevelance of IBD, minimal availability of information in Arabic language and patient supportive organizations may be the other reasons.
However, there is scarcity of literature evaluating the awareness of inflammatory bowel disease in the general public. We identified only a couple of studies that did evaluate awareness of the public about IBD. Groshek et al carried out a national on-line survey of 1200 participants in United States of America on the awareness of IBD and demonstrated that the lay public scored a mean of 5.5 (SD 2.7) on “familiarity” scale of 10 and was considered to be a low score. In addition, low awareness was associated with high stigmatization of IBD, that was worse than other diseases like alcoholoism and HIV. Furthermore, the level of knowledge was tested on 12 questions of causes, symptoms and cures of IBD and only 55% (mean 6.58/12) responded correctly with 86% responding inappropriately to nearly 8 of the 12 questions. Though those with higher education had statistically better score. [16]. Our study showed a similar level of knowledge among the public ( 1.73/3 = 57%), that was significantly better in people with higher qualification.
Another study, a nation-wide survey by Angelberger et al. evaluated the public awareness towards IBD in 1001 individuals from the Austria and concluding that the knowledge of the population was poor [12]. 69% and 80% had not heard or didn’t know about CD and UC respectively, similary 64% and 73% did not know the organ affected by CD and UC, respectively. In contrast, only 40% and 36% of our study population had not heard or didn’t know about CD or UC, respectively, and only about a third did not know the organ affected in CD or UC. These difference may be a reflection of a high proportional of females and younger participants in our study who were more knowledgable. In addition, the survey in Austria was exclusively in person, wheras our study used a combination of personal and on-line survey.
Though our questionnaire used to test public awareness has not been externally validated, it nevetherless does capture the basic knowledge that might be accepted of a lay person and has been previously used. In addition, the questionnaire lacked a clear cut-off score to identify appropriate level of awareness. This is a challenge that questionnaire based studies like these face [13]. Nevetheless, this study may inspire further such research with refinement leading to more accurate questionnaires.