Chlorhexidine base (≥99.5%) and other chemicals including L-glutamic acid γ-benzyl ester (≥99.9%), poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid – PLGA; 50/50, mol wt 30,000-60,000), triphosgene reagent grade, 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APS), N-cetyltri-methylammonium bromide (CTAB), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), phosphate buffered saline (PBS), MTT assay kit were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Lousi, MO, USA). Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive, adhesive microbrush applicator, and Filtek™ Supreme XTE composite universal restorative material was purchased from 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA.
Fabrication of nanoparticles
Fabrication of BLG-NCA
A suspension of 20 mL of ethyl acetate mixed with 1.2 gm of triphosgene (0.0042 mol) and 2.0 gm of L-glutamic acid γ-benzyl ester (BLG) (0.0084 mol) was prepared, respectively. Both mixtures were stirred for 2 h at 75 °C to achieve a clear solution that was later evaporated under reduced pressure and crystallized three times using ethyl acetate and n-hexane. This mixture was subsequently dried at room temperature under vacuum and yielded a total of 1.7 g (80%) of BLG-NCA.
Preparation of MSN and MSN-APS
Nanoparticles were prepared according to the procedure as previously described [10]. In this study, MSN-PLGA/CHX at two different concentrations of CHX (25 and 50 mg) were fabricated. As a control, MSN-PLGA-Blank and MSN-CHX (25 and 50 mg) were fabricated. CTAB (1 g) was added into a solution containing 400 mL of distilled water and 2.5 mL of 2 N NaOH and vigorously stirred at 75 °C for 3 h. Later, 2.5 mL of TEOS was rapidly added into the solution and incubated for 2 h. The subsequent white precipitate was filtered and rinsed with ethanol and dried overnight under vacuum at 40 °C that produced a white powder (MSN-CTAB). MSN-CTAB (0.1 g) was dispersed in 20 mL of ethanol and heated to 85 °C. To functionalize MSN with glutamic acid, 0.1 mL APS was added into the dispersion. The obtained mixture was centrifuged, washed again with ethanol for several times, and dried overnight under vacuum at 45 °C for 12 h to produce another white powder of MSN-CTAB-APS. CTAB was separated from MSN-CTAB and MSN-CTAB-APS by refluxing in ethanol solution of ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3/C2H5OH, 10 mg/mL) for 6 h at 80 °C. The CTAB-removed product was extracted and dried to produce MSN and MSN-APS as white powder, respectively.
Synthesis of poly(γ-benzyl-L-glutamate) grafted over MSN (MSN-PBLG)
Synthesized BLG-NCA of 0.8 g was added in 10 mL of dry DMF and mixed with a solution of 0.1 g MSN-APS in 20 mL of dry DMF. Continuous stirring of the mixture was carried out over the period of 3 days at 40 °C. The mixture was centrifuged, washed with ethanol, and dried overnight under vacuum for 12 h at 45 °C, to form a white powder of MSN-PBLG.
Preparation of MSN-PLGA and chlorhexidine loading
MSN-PBLG of 0.1 g was dispersed in 10 mL trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in an ice bath and HBr (1 mL, 33 wt% in acetic acid) was added dropwise within 10 min and stirred for 2 h. The reaction mixture was poured into 40 mL ice-cold dry ether, followed by centrifugation, washing with distilled water, and drying over-night under vacuum at 45 °C for 12 h, to form white powder of MSN-PLGA. The incorporation of CHX into MSN and MSN-PLGA was adopted and modified from previous protocols [9, 13]. In brief, 25 and 50 mg of CHX was dissolved in 5 mL of dichloromethane added with 50 mg of MSN or MSN-PLGA, respectively, and sonicated for 12 min and slowly shaken at room temperature for 24 h, followed by centrifugation and vacuum drying.
Percentage of drug (CHX) encapsulation/loading
The obtained free CHX was separated from encapsulated CHX by centrifuging the mixture at 25°C at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was conserved for evaluating the drug loading content. The quantity of free CHX was estimated using a spectrophotometer (UV-1900i UV-VIS, Shimadzu, Japan) at 289 nm wavelength. All sampling with their measurements were performed in triplicate. The drug encapsulation-efficiency (DEE) and drug loading (DL) were calculated using the respective formulas:
Percentage of DL = Weight of CHX / Weight of CHX-loaded/MSN-PLGA x 100% (1)
Percentage of DEE = Weight of CHX / Weight of CHX used for encapsulation x 100% (1)
Nanoparticles were synthesized where CHX was loaded within MSN and PLGA to produce five different types of groups according to the percentage of the CHX as:
MSN-PLGA/Blank; 25:50 CHX-loaded/MSN; 50:50 CHX-loaded/MSN; 25:50:50 CHX-loaded/MSN-PLGA and 50:50:50 CHX-loaded/MSN-PLGA
Dynamic light scattering
The control (MSN-PLGA/Blank) and experimental nanoparticles (25:50 and 50:50 CHX-loaded/MSN and CHX-loaded/MSN-PLGA at ratios of 25:50:50 and 50:50:50) were subjected to dynamic light scattering (DLS) (Malvern Mastersizer Nano ZS, UK) for determination of z-average particle-diameter, zeta-potential, and size-distribution. Nanoparticles diluted in distilled water (1:100 wt/v) were analyzed at 37°C with a scattering angle of 90° (n = 10/group). All sampling with their measurements were performed in triplicate.
Morphological characterization of the nanoparticles
The morphological features of all types of nanoparticles were examined under scanning electron (Verios, XHR SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM, FEI Titan G2 80-200 Tokyo, Japan) coupled to energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS - Oxford Instruments AZtecEnergy software, USA) for elemental analysis. Nanoparticles were cleaned using absolute ethanol for any surfactants and sonicated for 5 minutes. A droplet of aqueous particle dispersion was allowed to evaporate on a round carbon-coated copper mesh grid (Emgrid, Australia) stabilized by the help of Dumont tweezer (ProSciTech, Australia). The samples were imaged at 200 kV under the TEM.
pH directed chlorhexidine release from the nanoparticles
To study the in-vitro CHX release, nanoparticles were suspended in 5 mL of PBS solution at room temperature with constant slow stirring. To emulate different biological environments, two PBS solutions with two different pH values: 7.4 and 5.0 were investigated up to 24 h. The volume of the solution was kept constant by collecting 3 mL of the solution and at the same time replacing with 3 mL of fresh PBS at appropriate time intervals. Subsequently, the specimens were centrifuged and the percentage of released CHX was measured using a spectrophotometer (UV-1900i UV-VIS, Shimadzu, Japan) at 289 nm wavelength. All sampling with their measurements were performed in triplicate.
Spectral analysis of the nanoparticles
Raman signatures were recorded using Raman spectroscopy (WITec Alpha300+, GmbH, Ulm, Germany) to confirm the inclusion of CHX into the nanoparticles. The instrument was calibrated using a silicon wafer at a magnification of 20 x 0.5. Nanoparticles were fixed on the transparent glass slide (spread dimensions: 0.8 cm width and 1 cm length) and placed on the microscope sample stage. After choosing a 100 x 0.5 objective lens and focusing the sample surface, an optical image was taken of the sample area. All Raman analyses were performed after calibration by selecting 50-micron fiber 532 nm laser. The fitting of the Raman spectrum was done using a Voigt line shape function via non-linear least squares (GRAMS32 AI Version 6.00 Peak Fit). The Raman images acquired were transferred into CytoSpec software where the entire data between 400-3200 cm-1 were pre-processed and normalized in addition to the removal of cosmic rays. Twenty spectra were recorded per specimen to establish reproducibility of the wavelength of at least ±1.5 cm-1. The resolution within the order of the system was averaged to 5 cm-1 while keeping the spectrometer slit at 100 µm width measuring the Raman at 520 cm-1 of the silicon spectrum.
To further confirm the spectral characteristics, Fourier transformed infrared (FTIR) analysis using attenuated total reflection (ATR) was used with the spectrum range between 400 and 4000 cm-1 at a resolution of 4 cm-1. For the analysis, 10 mg of each nanoparticles was placed onto the diamond crystal on potassium bromide slab. The powder was pressed against the diamond crystal with a flat pressure anvil connected to a pressure device and spectrum were recorded for all the powders. Each sample was run in triplicate to view if there was any difference recorded.
Biofilm characterization and MTT assay
The MTT solution totaling 0.5 mg/ml from 3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide kit] (MTT, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Lousi, MO, USA) was prepared. The bacterial suspensions of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) (ATCC UA159) were prepared from the inoculum of overnight cultures and adjusted to OD600 of 0.5McFarland turbidity (∼108 bacteria/mL). S. mutans were incubated anaerobically for 24 h at 37°C in Brain-Heart infusion (BHI) and suspensions adjusted to 1 x 108 CFU/ml. All suspensions were transferred into 24-well plates. Later, 10 µL of the bacterial suspension was transferred into each well containing 2 mL of BHI and 1% sucrose and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The non-adherent bacterial cells were washed away by PBS solution. For antibacterial evaluation, sterile filter paper-disks impregnated with 25 µL of MSN-PLGA, 25:50 CHX-loaded/MSN, 50:50 CHX-loaded/MSN, 25:50:50 CHX-loaded/MSN-PLGA, and 50:50:50 CHX-loaded/MSN-PLGA nanoparticles (n=9), were placed inside 12-well plates followed by incorporation of 2 mL of MTT solution and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. The MTT solution was pipetted out and exchanged with 2 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The well-plates were gently shaken for 15 min and the absorbance read in spectrophotometer (UV-1900i UV-VIS, Shimadzu, Japan) at 560 nm wavelength.
Cytotoxicity evaluation
The cytotoxicity of the nanoparticles was investigated as described in a previous protocol (n = 9) [13] using dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) (Alameda, California, USA). Cells were seeded at 1 x 104cells/well (passage 4) in a 96-well plate, incubated overnight and exposed to 25, 50 and 75 µg/mL of MSN-PLGA, 25:50 CHX-loaded/MSN, 50:50 CHX-loaded/MSN, 25:50:50 CHX-loaded/MSN-PLGA, and 50:50:50 CHX-loaded/MSN-PLGA nanoparticles for 24, 48 and 72 h (n=7/group at each concentration and incubation time). Untreated DPSCs without any treatment were used as control. The MTS [(3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium)] reagent (CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Assay, Promega, USA) prepared in DMEM was added to each well followed by a 2 h incubation in 37◦C with 5% CO2. The microplates were read at 560 nm in a spectrophotometer (UV-1900i: UV-Vis Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and the cell viability (expressed in percentage) was assessed after 0 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h [14]. All tests were performed in triplicates.
Delivery of nanoparticles to demineralized dentin specimens
Sound human molars (21–35 years) were used for investigating delivery of nanoparticles to demineralized dentin substrates through micron-sized dentinal-tubules. Following extraction, teeth were stored in 0.2% sodium azide at 4°C to inhibit microbial growth and were used within 2 months from the time of extraction. Dentin specimens were prepared for nanoparticle treatment as described previously [15]. Following preparation, specimens were randomly grouped to be treated with MSN-PLGA, CHX-loaded/MSN and CHX-loaded/MSN-PLGA (at CHX/MSN-PLGA ratios of 25:50:50 and 50:50:50) carried on distilled water at a nanoparticles/carrier ratio of 2/1 (w/v) for further investigations. The exposed outer dentin-surfaces were etched with 35% phosphoric acid gel for 15 s, rinsed with distilled water for15 s and dried with air-syringe for 2 s leaving the dentin surface slightly moist. A drop-wise application of 25 µL of nanoparticles/carrier suspension to each dentin specimen for 60 s was followed by surface rubbing for 5 s with a microbrush applicator. Following nanoparticles application, the dentin surface was left undisturbed for 15 s, gently air-blown for 3 s and blot-dried by absorbent paper to remove excess water. The dentin specimens were then prepared for SEM examination (Ziess 1555 VP-FESEM, Japan) and resin/dentin bonding procedure.
Resin/Dentin bonding and SEM investigation
Following nanoparticles delivery to demineralized dentin-substrates, a two-step etch-and-rinse dentin bonding system was applied according to manufacturer’s instructions. Subsequently, each tooth specimen was restored to a 4-mm resin composite restoration in equal increments with each increment light-cured for 20 s (Curing Light 2500; 3M ESPE, MN, USA). The restored teeth specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 h at 37 °C to accelerate polymerization reaction followed by occluso-gingival sectioning into 1 mm slabs using a low-speed diamond saw under running water. Each obtained resin-dentin slab was polished with increasingly fine diamond pastes (3 µm and 1 µm) and cleaned ultrasonically for 10 min. Further, the slabs were air-dried for 48 h, gold sputter-coated and viewed by FESEM (Ziess 1555 VP-FESEM, Japan) and for respective EDX analysis (EDS - Oxford Instruments AZtecEnergy software, USA).
Micro-tensile bond strength
To test micro-tensile bond strength (µ-TBS), 5 wt.% of all the nanoparticles were added separately in the commercial adhesive (ScotchbondTM bond, 3M ESPE, USA) [9]. The restored teeth were sectioned using a low-speed diamond saw (Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA) under water coolant into resin–dentin beams (0.9 x 0.9 mm) and stored in artificial saliva (pH 7.4) for one week. The artificial saliva was used as the testing medium and prepared according to the protocol described by Levallois et al. [16] that involves the dissolving of reagents (0.125M NaCl, 0.964M KCl, 0.189M KSCN, 0.655M KH2PO4, 0.2M Urea, 0.229M CaCl2 2H2O, 0.76M Na2SO4 10H2O, 0.178M NH4Cl and 0.631M NaHCO3) in distilled water (pH=7.4) to produce a total volume of 1.0 L. The beams in each group (n=75) were then randomly divided into 5 subgroups (n=15 in each subgroup). The samples were tested for µ-TBS immediately following the one-week and 9 months storage in the artificial saliva (pH 7.4). The artificial saliva solution was replenished every 7 days and the pH was re-checked using pH meter (Orion 818 pH meter, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). For bond strength testing, each beam was mounted on a metallic jig fixed to a universal testing machine (Instron E3000, Microtester, Instron Corp., Canton, MA) using cyanoacrylate adhesive (Zapit; Dental Ventures of America, Corona, CA, USA). A tensile load was applied at a crosshead-speed of 0.5 mm/min-1 until failure. For determining µTBS in MPa, the de-bonded beams were removed, and the cross-sectional area was measured at the site of fracture to the nearest 0.01 mm by the help of a digital caliper (Model 500-196-20, Mitutoyo Digimatic Caliper).
MMP-8 and Cathepsin profilometry
The dentin was cut from the extracted teeth (n = 16) and segments pulverized using liquid nitrogen to obtain powder using a mortar and pestle (Reimiller, Reggio Emilia, Italy). Five 1 g aliquots of dentin powder were demineralized with 10wt% H3PO4 for 24 h at 27°C and later thoroughly rinsed in deionized water with constant stirring at 4°C for 1 h. The groups were further treated with all nanoparticles by introducing a slurry made from PBS (0.1 mM). The dentin powder was suspended in an extraction buffer for 24 h to extract the proteases. Supernatants were collected after centrifugation at 25,000 rpm for 25 min at room temperature. The supernatants were dialyzed in bags with 30-kDa molecular cut-off overnight, lyophilized and frozen at -20oC until they were analyzed for MMP-8 and cysteine cathepsin (CTX) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Human MMP-8 ELISA Kit – Lot #5619 for MMP-8; Human CTSK/Cathepsin K ELISA Kit – Lot #5614 for cathepsin K, both from Lifespan Biosciences, Seattle, WA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions.
Statistical analysis
Data were presented in means and their standard deviations. Normality testing was performed before running any statistical test. A specialized statistical software was used to analyze data using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test. Significance level was set at p<0.05.