PINK1 Participated in the Protective Effect of BMSCs on Kidney Tissues with IRI-AKI.
PINK1 was closely related to the repair of kidney tissues by BMSCs in IRI-AKI mice
Firstly, the pathological changes of kidney tissues in IRI-AKI mouse model were subjected to an observation. It was demonstrated in the histological examination of HE staining that the kidney structure of mice in the sham group was normal under physiological conditions, while the renal tubular injury was obvious in the mouse kidney of the IRI group. Among the three BMSCs intervention control groups (the BMSCs group, the OE PINK1 group and the Anti PINK1 group), the OE PINK1 group had the most moderate kidney injury, followed by the IRI group, and the Anti PINK1 group had the most serious kidney injury (Figure
1a). Among them, based on the kidney injury score ,the degree of renal tubular injury in the OE PINK1 group (1, 1) was significantly lower than that in the IRI group (3, 1) (P<0.001) and the Anti PINK1 group (4,1) (P<0.001), and there was no significant difference between the OE PINK1 group and the sham group (0,1) (P=0.167), and the OE PINK1 group was lower than the BMSCs group (2, 1) (P=0.056), but there was no statistical difference as well(Figure
1b). Consistent with the results of histological analysis, the OE PINK1 group had a lower concentration of SCR (11.22±1.48µmol/L) and BUN (11.57±0.83mmol/L), and there was a significant difference between the OE PINK1 group and the IRI group (SCR: 25.45±3.10µmol/L, BUN: 21.61±2.08mmol/L) (P<0.001; P<0.001). There was also a significant difference in the expression level of BUN between the OE PINK1 group and the BMSCs group (17.10±1.69mmol/L) (P<0.05); While, the concentrations of SCR and BUN in the IRI group and the Anti PINK1 group (SCR: 22.24±4.36µmol/L, BUN: 20.08±5.21mmol/L) were significantly increased (Figure
1c and d). These results indicated that renal dysfunction occurred in mice with IRI, BMSCs could improve renal function and repair injured kidney tissues; Besides, overexpressed PINK1 could enhance the repair effect of BMSCs, and neutralized PINK1 could make BMSCs lose its repair effect.
Besides, The characteristics of BMSCs targeting injured kidney tissues were verified by infusing BMSCs with fluorescent labels into the mouse caudal vein in the unilateral kidney injury model and observing the number of fluorescent cells in injured and normal kidneys of the same mouse, as shown in Figure 1f. It was found that the number of fluorescent cells on the injured side was relatively higher (83.75±26.26 /mm2), with a significant difference compared with the control side (8.75±8.5 /mm2, t=5.432, P=0.002), as shown in Figure 1g. These results indicated that BMSCs could target injured tissues.
PINK1 was closely related to the inhibiting effect of BMSCs on apoptosis in kidney tissues of IRI-AKI mice.TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) was adopted to detect apoptosis in kidney tissues of mice, and the effect of overexpressed and neutralized PINK1 on apoptosis of kidney tissues was subjected to an observation. As shown in Figure
2, the OE PINK1 group had the least number of TUNEL-positive cells in kidney tissues (41.5±17.93 /mm
2), while the IRI group (156.87±26.38 /mm
2) and the Anti PINK1 group (194.22±67.79 /mm
2) had an increased number of these cells. These results indicated that the apoptotic cells in the BMSCs group (86.32±18.44 /mm
2) were significantly lower than those in the IRI group (P<0.001), and the TUNEL-positive cells in kidney tissues in the OE PINK1 group and the Anti PINK1 group were significantly different from those in the BMSCs group (P<0.001, P<0.001) (Figure
2b). The results suggested that BMSCs could play a protective role in the kidney tissues of IRI-AKI mice and reduce the apoptosis induced by IRI. Besides, overexpressed PINK1 overexpression could enhance the effect of BMSCs on the apoptosis of injured tissues, while neutralized PINK1 could weaken the protective effect of BMSCs.
PINK1 participated in the alleviating effects of BMSCs on the inflammatory reaction of kidney tissues in IRI-AKI mice.
Inflammation plays an important role in the occurrence and progression of IRI-AKI. Therefore, renal inflammation was evaluated by observing the infiltration of renal immune cells (macrophages, monocytes, T cells, B cells and so forth) by immunohistochemical staining, as shown in Figure 3a. In terms of the expression of CD3+, the IRI group (170.98±31.39 /mm2) had a significantly higher level than the sham group (49.80±22.73 /mm2) (P<0.001); the BMSCs group (89.64±23.03 /mm2) (P<0.001) and the OE PINK1 group (43.16±25.85 /mm2) (P<0.001) had a relatively lower level than the IRI group; the OE PINK1 group had a relatively lower level than the BMSCs group (P=0.01) and the Anti PINK1 group (91.30±24.20 /mm2) (P=0.008), as shown in Figure 3b. In terms of the expression of CD14+, the IRI group (605.90±59.56 /mm2) had a significantly higher level than the sham group (317.06±54.55 /mm2) (P<0.001); the OE PINK1 group (873.16±105.87 /mm2) had a relatively higher level than the IRI group (P=0.017) and the Anti PINK1 group (609.22±37.40 /mm2) (P=0.023), and the OE PINK1 group had a higher level than the BMSCs group (715.46±73.87 /mm2), but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.192), as shown in Figure 3c. There was a similar changing trend in the expression level of CD20+ and CD3+, and the differences were not significant. Compared with the IRI group (64.74±12.31 /mm2), the sham group (34.86±18.93 /mm2) (P=0.01) and the OE PINK1 group (38.18±19.11 /mm2) (P=0.019) had a significantly lower level in their expression; the Anti PINK1 group (69.72±19.11 /mm2) had a slightly higher level than the BMSCs group (44.82±11.14 /mm2) (P=0.027) and the OE PINK1 group (P=0.007); the OE PINK1 group had a lower level than the BMSCs group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.532), as shown in Figure 3d. In terms of the expression of CD68+, the IRI group (175.96±31.28 /mm2) had a significantly higher level than the sham group (79.68±27.28 /mm2) (P=0.007) and the BMSCs group (81.34±24.48 /mm2) (P=0.007), and had a significantly lower level than the OE PINK1 group (640.76±86.73 /mm2) (P<0.001); the OE PINK1 group had a relatively higher level than the BMSCs group (P<0.001) and the Anti PINK1 group(179.28±42.56 /mm2) (P<0.001), as shown in Figure 3e. The above results demonstrated that IRI could induce the infiltration of lymphocytes, macrophages, monocytes and B cells in injured tissues, while BMSCs infusion could reduce the infiltration of lymphocytes, B cells and macrophages and increase the infiltration of monocytes; PINK1 enhanced the promoting effect of BMSCs on decreasing the infiltration of lymphocytes and B cells, and increased the infiltration of macrophages and monocytes; PINK1 neutralization inhibited this effect.
Moreover, the expression of inflammatory cytokines interleukin-10 (IL-10) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) in peripheral blood serum of IRI-AKI mice was analyzed by ELISA. The results showed that compared with the sham group(IL-10: 120.27±11.81 pg/ml; TNF-α: 80.90±10.90 pg/ml ), the IRI group had an increased expression level of IL-10 (549.42±12.58 pg/ml, P<0.001) and TNF-α (116.69±13.06 pg/ml, P=0.01); the BMSCs group (IL-10: 175.54±11.69 pg/ml, P<0.001; TNF-α: 45.70±10.60 pg/ml, P<0.001) had a significantly decreased level compared with the IRI group; The OE PINK1 group (73.32±11.72 pg/ml, P<0.001) had a lower expression level of IL-10 compared with the BMSCs group, and there was no significant difference in the expression level of TNF-α (58.14±10.60 pg/ml, P=0.176) between both groups; The Anti PINK1 group (IL-10: 575.38±11.18 pg/ml, P<0.001; TNF-α: 221.70±14.30 pg/ml, P<0.001 ) had a higher expression level of both inflammatory cytokines than the BMSCs group,as shown in Figure 3f and g. These results indicated that BMSCs could alleviate the inflammatory reaction of kidney tissues in IRI-AKI mice, and PINK1 can further enhance the Anti-inflammatory effect of BMSCs; These results suggested that the Anti-inflammatory effect of BMSCs on IRI-AKI enhanced by PINK1 may be related to macrophages and monocytes.
Stress Response of BMSCs under Hypoxia-reoxygenation Conditions
PINK1 participated in the apoptosis of BMSCs under hypoxia-reoxygenation conditions.
The in vitro hypoxia-reoxygenation model was established to simulate the in vivo IRI environment. FCM method was adopted to evaluate the apoptosis of BMSCs, overexpressed PINK1-BMSCs and neutralized PINK1-BMSCs under hypoxia-reoxygenation conditions, as shown in Figure 4a. Compared with the control group (13.50±0.58), the IRI group (21.50±2.08, P<0.001) had a significantly increased apoptosis rate, the OE PINK1 group (8.05±1.07, P<0.001) had a significantly decreased apoptosis rate than the IRI group, and the Anti PINK1 group (18.00±0.53, P=0.002) also had a decreased apoptosis rate compared with the IRI group, as shown in Figure 4b. These results indicated that the apoptosis rate of BMSCs increased under hypoxia stress, and PINK1 could reduce the apoptosis of BMSCs under hypoxia-reoxygenation conditions.
PINK1 participated in the inflammatory response of BMSCs under hypoxia-reoxygenation conditions.
In this study, the in vitro hypoxia-reoxygenation model was established to simulate the in vivo IRI environment. The FCM method was employed to evaluate the expression level of inflammatory factors in BMSCs, overexpressed PINK1-BMSCs and neutralized PINK1-BMSCs under hypoxia-reoxygenation conditions, among which there was no significant change in the expression level of IL-10 (P=0.834). In terms of the expression level of TNF-α, compared with the control group (52.49±2.22 pg/ml), the IRI group (65.94±8.71 pg/ml, P=0.027) had a significantly increased level, the OE PINK1 group (28.90±1.76 pg/ml, P=0.030) had a significantly decreased level, and the Anti PINK1 group (38.22±1.98 pg/ml, P<0.01) also had a significantly decreased level, as shown in Figure 4c and d. These results indicated that BMSCs had increased pro-inflammatory factors under hypoxia stress, and PINK1 could reduce the release of pro-inflammatory factors under hypoxia-reoxygenation conditions.
PINK1 participated in the stress response of BMSCs against RTECs under hypoxia-reoxygenation conditions
PINK1 participated in the effect of BMSCs on reducing apoptosis of RTECs under hypoxia-reoxygenation conditions
In this study, the in vitro hypoxia-reoxygenation model was established to simulate the in vivo IRI environment. The RTECs of three BMSCs intervention control groups (the BMSCs group, the OE PINK1 group and the Anti PINK1 group) were evaluated before and after hypoxia and reoxygenation. Those RTECs co-cultured with BMSCs after ischemia-reperfusion injury were divided into the IRI-Co culture group; while, those co-cultured RTECs before hypoxia and reoxygenation were divided into the Co culture-IRI group. Their effects on apoptosis of RTECs were observed after 24h, 48h and 72h, respectively, as shown in Figure
5a. Among them, Our study found that the apoptosis rate decreased gradually with time, as shown in Figures
5b-d. At 24H and 48H, the apoptosis rate of each group was significantly different from that of the IRI group (24H: 16.33±0.12, 48H: 12.93±0.55), regardless of the order of co-culture, the apoptosis rate of the OE PINK1 group was significantly lower than that of the BMSCs group (P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001)(shown in Fig.
5b-c); the apoptosis rate of the IRI-Co culture-BMSCs group (11.37±0.21) was significantly lower than that of the Co culture-IRI-BMSCs group (14.90±0.56) (P<0.001) at 48h, and the apoptosis rate of the IRI-Co culture-OE PINK1 group (8.77±0.40) was significantly lower than that of the Co culture-IRI-OE PINK1 group (11.67±0.29) (P<0.001), as shown in Figures
5c. The results of 48H showed that BMSCs without hypoxic reoxygenation stimulation may have better anti-apoptotic ability; and these results indicated that OE PINK1 can reduce apoptosis induced by hypoxia and reoxygenation and enhance the survival function of BMSCs during the stress response.
Overexpressed PINK1 in vitro enhanced the resistance of BMSCs to the inflammatory response of RTECs under hypoxia-reoxygenation conditions, including changing the release of inflammatory factors and promoting the proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells
Based on the grouping in above-mentioned, the influence of inflammatory factor release in the supernatant of co-culture was observed after 24h, 48h and 72h, respectively, as shown in Figure 6a-f. Among them, there was no significant difference in the release of inflammatory factors after 48h (P =0.26) ; ELISA analysis revealed that the expression level of IL-10 in the IRI-Co culture group was higher than that in the Co culture group at all three time periods, and the change was significant at 24h (P<0.001). The expression level of IL-10 in the IRI-Co culture-OE PINK1 group (26.16±2.94 pg/ml) was higher than that in the Co culture-IRI-OE PINK1 group (19.35±2.24 pg/ml) after 24h (P=0.049) and the expression level of IL-10 in the OE PINK1 group was significantly lower than that in the Anti PINK1 group regardless of co-culture sequence (P=0.002; P=0.006). While, the expression level of TNF-α changed significantly at 72h (P<0.001), the expression level of TNF-α in the Co culture-IRI-OE PINK1 group (11.11±2.67 pg/ml) was significantly lower than that in the Co culture-IRI-BMSC group (20.13±3.12 pg/ml) (P=0.003) and the Co culture-IRI-Anti PINK1 group (26.33±2.99 pg/ml) (P<0.001). These results indicated that PINK1 overexpression could reduce the release of inflammatory factors induced by hypoxia and reoxygenation.
Moreover, after extracting peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in mice, the proliferation of PBMCs was evaluated by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8). Normal BMSCs and hypoxia-reoxygenation BMSCs were co-cultured with the PBMCs isolated from normal mice and mice with IRI, respectively. The changes in the proliferation of PBMCs were measured, in an attempt to explore the Anti-inflammatory effect of BMSCs in vivo, as shown in Figure 6g. It can be observed that the IRI in kidney tissues could cause changes in PBMCs (P=0.017). Compared with the IRI PBMCs, BMSCs (P=0.088) and hypoxia-reoxygenation BMSCs (P=0.059) could promote the proliferation of PBMCs, but there were no statistical difference; Anti PINK1-induced BMSCs (P=0.023; P=0.030; P=0.007) could promote the proliferation of PBMCs; while, overexpressed PINK1-induced BMSCs (P=0.206; P=0.199; P=0.405) could not promote the proliferation of PBMCs. These results indicated that there were rapid changes in PBMCs during the response to external oxidative stress; while, BMSCs would generate a series of effects during the response to oxidative stress, and these effects could stimulate the proliferation of PBMCs as well.
PINK1 Participated in IRI-AKI through Targeting Mitophagy.
PINK1 regulated mitophagy, and IRI-AKI was closely related to autophagy. The immunohistochemical results shown in Figure 7a-c indicated that compared with the IRI group (LC3-B: 1738.02±50.35 /mm2; mTOR: 312.08±30.27 /mm2), the expression level of light chain 3 (LC3)-B in the sham group (1442.54±37.76 /mm2) decreased (P<0.001), and the expression level of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) (494.68±23.91 /mm2) increased (P<0.001); While, the expression level of LC3-B in the BMSCs group (1163.66±21.48 /mm2) decreased (P<0.001), and the expression level of mTOR (630.80±36.18 /mm2) increased (P<0.001). Compared with the BMSCs group, the expression level of LC3-B in the OE PINK1 group (1371.16±33.92 /mm2) increased (P<0.001), and the expression level of mTOR (496.34±31.28 /mm2) decreased (P<0.001), which was similar to the results in the Anti PINK1 group (LC3-B: 1900.70±24.20 /mm2; mTOR: 434.92±17.21) (P<0.001; P<0.001). These results indicated that BMSCs could enhance mitophagy and repair injured tissues by increasing the expression level of LC3-B and decreasing the expression level of mTOR. PINK1 regulated mitophagy on the basis of BMSCs and better participated in the repair of IRI-AKI injuries.