3.1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis:
Figure 2 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of undoped ZnO (Figure 2.a) and Al-doped ZnO thin film deposited on silicon substrates with concentration (Al: 3 wt. %) is presented on Figure 2.b. The XRD patterns shown in Fig. 2a exhibits several peaks located at 31.75°, 34.44°, 36.30°, 47.01°, 56.95° and 62.96°, corresponding to ZnO at orientations (100), (002), (101), (102), (110) and (103) respectively, with preferential orientation at (100). In addition, we observed that all peaks were in good agreement with the data base of standard ZnO (JCPDSN° 00-005-0664) with space group P63mc [40]. This analysis reveals the existence of a ZnO single-phase with a hexagonal wurtzite structure. The comparison of all XRD patterns of as prepared samples with the ASTM specifications ZnO confirmed that we have only the peaks of ZnO phase in the XRD spectrum. This result suggests that the deposited AZO films are polycrystalline with (002) as preferential orientation located around 34.40° (Fig. 2b). The intensity of the peak (002) increases proportionally with the concentration of Al up to achievement the maximum which is 3 wt% of Al. There is no extra peaks related to Al or secondary phase was observed before and after incorporation of (Al) in the ZnO thin films. This is due to difference in ionic radii of Zn2+ (0.74 Å) and Al3+ (0.54 Å) which it replaces their sites without changing the wurtzite structure of ZnO [41].
The lattice spacing of undoped and Al doped ZnO thin films were calculated using the Bragg’s formula [42]:
$${2\text{d}}_{\text{h}\text{k}\text{l}}\text{s}\text{i}\text{n}{\theta }=\text{n}{\lambda }$$
1
Where (h k l) are Miller indices; dhkl is the lattice spacing; θ is half of Bragg angle; and λ is the wavelength of the target XRD. Further, the lattice parameters (a,c) values calculated from the spectra obtained, determined from relation [43]:
$$\frac{1}{{\text{d}}_{\text{h}\text{k}\text{l}}^{2}}=\frac{{\text{h}}^{2}+{\text{k}}^{2}}{{\text{a}}^{2}}+\frac{{\text{l}}^{2}}{{\text{c}}^{2}}$$
2
The average crystallite size was decreased with increasing Al doping concentration and calculated using the Debye– Scherrer’s formula [32]:
$$\text{D} =\frac{\text{K}.{\lambda }}{{\beta } \text{c}\text{o}\text{s}{\theta }}$$
3
Where: « D » is the crystallite size; « λ » is the wavelength of the incident X-rays used (1.54059Å); « k » is the Scherrer constant; « β » is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the diffraction peak and « θ » is half of Bragg angle in degrees. The calculated structural parameters such as the position, FWHM, the lattice parameters "a" and "c", the grain size "D" and the average crystallite sizes are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. XRD parameters of ZnO undoped and Al-doped ZnO (Al: 3 wt. %).
As illustrated in Table 1, it was found that the grain size "D" of the undoped ZnO film is estimated to be 22.62, 20.77 and 41.57 nm according to the (100), (002) and (101) orientation while it is estimated to be 29.60 and 19.63 nm according to the (100) and (002) orientation of the Al doped ZnO thin films, respectively. Consequently, the average crystallite sizes of undoped and Al-doped ZnO (Al: 3 wt. %) were 28.32 nm and 24.61 nm, respectively [45–47]. Hence, the sharp peaks of the Al-doped ZnO (Al: 3 wt. %) film indicated high quality crystal growth, with relatively large crystallites according to the (002) orientation compared to that of undoped ZnO. Also, the values of lattice parameters (a, c) are distinctly show that for 3% Al the "c" parameter decrease while the "a" parameter increase, meaning the good insertion of Al atoms in the substitutionnal Zn sites, as mentioned above.
3.2. Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) analysis :
Figure 3(a) and Figure 3(b) show typical 3D AFM images for 02 µm x 02 µm scanning of undoped ZnO and Al-doped ZnO (Al: 3 wt. %) semiconductor thin films deposited by dip coating method. It is observed that the Al-doping (Al: 3 wt. %) significantly affect the morphology and rougness of the ZnO films. The surface roughness (Arithmetic Average,Ra and Root Mean Square,Rq) increases from (Ra=1.1, Rq=1.3) to (Ra=2.13, Rq=2.68) with Al-doping concentration. This implies that the films have a smooth surface. It was also observed that the undoped ZnO film tend to form clusters.
It is worth noting that this lowers roughness and smoothness of the surface can assist transmit further light into absorber layer [48].
3.3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis:
The morphology of undoped ZnO and doped with 0.2 and 3 wt.% of Al thin films was analysed by Scanning Electronique Microscope (SEM). From Fig. 4, one can see that the surfaces of all films exhibit a wrinkles-like morphology. The wrinkles-like formations are interconnected with each other, and do not have a particular orientation. Additionally, increasing the doping rate causes the morphological change of layers that affect the mechanisms of the nucleation and on wrinkles growth. Their length exceeds 10 µm. The wrinkles-like formations are thinner in the case of ZnO thin film doped with 3 wt% Al. This morphology is similar to that observed by other researchers [49]. Other scientific researchers have also suggested a link between the size of wrinkles and the percentage of dopants [50].
3.4. Optical (UV-vis-NIR) analysis :
Figure 5 shows the optical transmittance versus wavelength spectra of AZO films taken in the wavelength range, 350–1200 nm. As can be seen from Fig. 6, all the films were highly transparent in the visible range (400–700 nm) with a high transmittance. The undoped ZnO films showed an optical transmittance of > 70% while the Al-doped ZnO films with higher dopant concentration (> 1 at.% exhibited slightly high optical transmittance (> 85%) than films with lower doping concentration (≤ 1 at.%) of aluninium. In the present study, the absence of interference peaks in the transmittance spectra might be attributed to low film thickness and small grain size of the grown films [51].
From transmittance measurements can be estimated by the optical band gap considering a direct gap semiconductor. The band gap (Eg) was calculated by using the relation [52, 53]:
$${\left({\alpha }\text{h}\text{v}\right)}^{2}=\text{K}\left(\text{h}\text{v}-{\text{E}}_{\text{g}}\right)$$
4
Where « h » is Planck's constant, « υ » is the frequency of the incident radiation, « K » is a constant and Eg is the band gap energy. The absorption coefficient α could be calculated using equation [54]:
$${\alpha }=\frac{-\text{l}\text{n}\left(\text{T}\right)}{\text{d}}$$
5
Where « T » is the transmittance and « d » is the thickness of the film.
Figure 6 shows the plots of (αhν)2 against (hν) for the undoped and Al-doped ZnO thin films. The energy band gap (Eg) of as prepared samples can be determined by extrapolating the linear part of the straight lines onto the energy axis to reach (αhν) = 0. As can be seen from Fig. 6, Eg (pure ZnO) is equal to 3.09 eV. This value increased slightly with increasing Al doping concentration. The highest optical band gap, 3.26 eV, was achieved in the ZnO thin films doped with 3% Al [49]. The estimated optical band gaps are identical to those reported by several authors; this enables undoped and doped ZnO thin films to be a transparent material and justifies their use as front windows in optoelectronic devices [49, 50, 55].
3.5. Photoluminescence (PL) analysis:
The luminescence emission spectra are shown in Fig. 7 emitted from the samples of undoped and Al-doped ZnO (Al: 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 wt. %) thin films. Under the same conditions in range of 300 to 550 nm, all photoluminescence spectra were performed using He-Cd laser as an excitation source operating (325 nm) at room temperature. In this figure, it can be seen that there are different PL bands, including the Ultraviolet (UV) emission 377 nm, Violet-II emission 436 nm, Blue emission 473 nm and Green emission 518 nm. The intensity of UV emission at ~ 377 nm increased as the Al doping increased up to 2 wt.% and then decreased at 3 wt.% Al. The high intensity of a green emission band at ~ 518 nm was obtained in ZnO:Al (Al: 1, 2 and 3 wt. %) thin films as compared with that of undoped films. Nevertheless, the incorporation of alumunium in ZnO affects the photoluminescence significantly. Also, there are many other emission bands corresponding to the visual field, mainly emanated from some defects such as Zinc interstitial and oxygen deficiency etc [45, 56–61].
3.6. Electrical Properties
The nature of the charge carriers were measured by the hot probe method. Pure and Al doped ZnO exhibits n-type conductivity. Fig. 5 shows the variation of electrical resistivity with different aluminium (Al) concentrations (Al: 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 wt.%). The resistivity decreases with increase in aluminium doping and varied from 54.61 to 04.592 MΩ/□. Increasing the concentration of aluminum leads to an increase in the amount of aluminum atoms and their incorporation into the ZnO thin films, leading to a decrease in sheet resistance [62]. AZO film with the concentration of (Al: 3 wt.%) showed excellent electrical and optical properties with the lowest sheet resistance of 4.59 MΩ/sq and highest values of the optical gap (3.26 eV) and transparency (> 85%), respectively.