1. Voskamp BJ, Fleurke-Rozema H, Oude-Rengerink K, et al. Relationship of isolated single umbilical artery to fetal growth, aneuploidy and perinatal mortality; systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;42:622–8.
2. HortonAL, BarrilhetL WolfeHM. Pregnancy outcomes in isolate single umbilical artery. Am J Perinatol. 2010;27(4):321–4.
3. Granese R, Coco C, Jeanty P. The value of single umbilical artery in the prediction of fetal aneuploidy: findings in 12,672 pregnant women. Ultrasound Q. 2007;23:117–21.
4. Araujo Júnior E1. Palma-Dias R, Martins WP, et al. Congenital heart disease and adverse perinatal outcome in fetuses with confirmed isolated single functioning umbilical artery[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;14:1–3.
5. Bugatto F, Quintero-Prado R, Melero-Jiménez V. Ultrasound pre-dictors of birth weight in euploid fetuses with isolated sisingleum-bilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36:724–7.
6. De Catte L, Burrini D, Mares C, et al. Single umbilical artery: analysis of Doppler flow indices and arterial diameters in normal and small-for-gestational age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1996;8:27–30.
7. Martínez-Payo C, Gaitero A, Tamarit I, et al. Perinatal results following the prenatal ultrasound diagnosis of single umbilical artery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005;84:1068–74.
8. Ratio L, Ghezzi F, Dinaro E, et al. Ductus venosus blood flow velocity characteristics of fetuses with single umbilical artery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003;22:252–6.
9. Murphy-Kaulbeck L, Dodds L, Joseph KS, et al. Single umbilical artery risk factors and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:843–50.
10. Crispi F, Gratac´os E. Fetal cardiac function: technical considerations and potential research and clinical applications. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32:47–64.
11. Baschat AA, Turan OM, Turan S. Ductus venosus blood flow patterns – more than meets the eye? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:598–9.
12. Baschat AA. Examination of the fetal cardiovascular system. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;16:2–12.
13. Turan OM, Turan S, Sanapo L, et al. Reference ranges for ductus venosus velocity ratios in pregnancies with normal outcomes. J Ultrasound Med. 2014;33:329–36.
14. Smrcek JM, Krapp M, Axt-Fliedner R, et al. Atypical ductus venosus blood flow pattern in fetuses with severe tricuspid valve regurgitation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:180–2.
15. 2019
Li Tian-gang, Nie fang, Li zhen-dong, et al. Evaluation of right ventricular function in fetuses with isolated single umbilical artery using spatiotemporal image correlation M-mode. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2019;19:14.
16. Kornacka MK, Madajczak D, Szymkiewicz-Dangel J. Myocardial performance index (Tei index) in term and preterm neonates during the neonatal period. Kardiol Pol. 2016;74(9):1002–9.
17. Respondek ML, Kammermeier M, Ludomirsky A, Weil SR, Huhta JC. The prevalence and clinical significance of fetal tricuspid valve regurgitation with normal heart anatomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171(5):1265–70.
18. Hassan WA, Brockelsby J, Alberry M, et al. Cardiac function in early onset small for gestational age and growth restricted fetuses. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;171:262–5.
19. Crispi F, Hernandez-Andrade E, Pelsers MM, et al. Cardiac dysfunction and cell damage across clinical stages of severity in growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:254.e1–8.
20. Rychik J, Tian Z, Bebbington M, et al. The twin-twin transfusion syndrome: spectrum of cardiovascular abnormality and development of a cardiovascular score to assess severity of disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:392.e1–8.
21. Kanzaki T, Chiba Y. Evaluation of the preload condition of the fetus by inferior vena caval blood flow pattern. Fetal Diagn Ther. 1990;5:168–74.
22. Seravalli V, Miller JL, Block-Abraham D, et al. Ductus venosus Doppler in the assessment of fetal cardiovascular health: an updated practical approach. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:635–44.
23. Morris RK, Selman TJ, Verma M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the test accuracy of ductus venosus Doppler to predict compromise of fetal/neonatal wellbeing in high risk pregnancies with placental insufficiency. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;152:3–12.
24. Turan OM, Turan S, Berg C, et al. Duration of persistent abnormal ductus venosus flow and its impact on perinatal outcome in fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38:295–302.
25. Hernandez-Andrade E, Benavides-Serralde JA, Cruz-Martinez R, et al. Evaluation of conventional Doppler fetal cardiac function parameters: E/A ratios, outflow tracts, and myocardial performance index. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;32:22–9.
26. Stirnemann JJ, Mougeot M, Proulx F, et al. Profiling fetal cardiac function in twin to twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;35:19–27.
27. Hofstaetter C, Gudmundsson S. Venous Doppler in the evaluation of fetal hydrops. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2010;2010:430157.
28. Nakagawa K, Tachibana D, Nobeyama H, et al. Reference ranges for time-related analysis of ductus venosus flow velocity waveforms in singleton pregnancies. Prenat Diagn. 2012;32:803–9.
29. Tachibana D, Glosemeyer P, Diehl W, et al. Time-interval analysis of ductus venosus flow velocity waveforms in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome treated with laser surgery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45:544–50.
30. Wada N, Tachibana D, Kurihara Y, et al. Alterations in time intervals of ductus venosus and atrioventricular flow velocity waveforms in growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46:221–6.