Severe headaches often result in a visit to the emergency department. In many countries, headache is the most common complaint in the emergency department [6–8]. In the United States, headache was the fifth most common cause of emergency visits by patients, while it was the fourth most common symptom reported in 2011 [9]. Four percent of cases are non-traumatic headache [10]. The proportion of emergency visits caused by headache ranged from 2.9% in 2012 to 3.2% in 2011. Moreover, the incidence of headache is higher in middle-aged and young people and low-income group; thus, headache causes these patients to be unable to work and increases their economic burden [9]. Compared with the United States, emergency headache accounts for 11.9% of all patients seen in the emergency department in underdeveloped areas, such as western Kenya [11].
The Chinese Headache Association has increasingly focused on the epidemiological investigation of headache. Previous studies have shown a high prevalence of primary headache in China. According to the study by Yu Shengyuan, the estimated prevalence of primary headache in one year is 23.8%, migraine is 9.3% [13]. Primary headache (78.4%) was divided into migraine (39.1%), tension headache (32.5%), trigeminal autonomic headache (5.3%) and other primary headache (1.5%). Among the other patients, 12.9% were diagnosed with secondary headache, 5.9% were diagnosed with cranial neuralgia, and the diagnosis of 2.5% was not clear or classified [14]. This finding mainly represents the situation of headache patients in North China. An outpatient investigation conducted by our research group in western China in 2010 showed that patients with headache accounted for 19.5% of all outpatients in the Neurology Department: 50.1% patients were diagnosed with primary headache and 27% were diagnosed with secondary headache [15]. In addition, according to the study by Shuu-Jiun Wang, the incidence of migraine in Taipei is 9.1% (F/M 14.4%/4.5%) [16]. Seven thousand eight hundred sixty subjects aged 15 years and older were investigated in Fujian Province, Southeast China. Notably, 9.1% of them were diagnosed with migraine, of which 12.6% were women and 5.3% were men [17]. However, data on emergency headache in China are lacking. Therefore, unlike previous studies, this paper analyses the diagnosis and treatment of patients with emergency headache in 17 general hospitals in Chongqing, China.
As shown in previous studies, primary headache is the most common type of emergency headache (approximately 90%), and secondary headache accounts for 10% [18]. Migraine is the most common type of primary headache treated in the neurology clinic. The incidence of migraine in western countries is 7.9–20% [19–21]. Based on the findings from a study conducted in 2016, migraine, was one of the main reasons for the high incidence of years lived with disability (YLDs) in women [22].
Patients with headache who visit the emergency department are still mainly diagnosed with migraines. Additionally, 21.80% of the patients whose chief complaint was an emergency headache were initially diagnosed with migraine. Among 398 patients with an undiagnosed headache, 274 (68.84%) were diagnosed with migraine. Patients with migraine accounted for 52.19% of all patients with an emergency headache. These data are consistent with other studies [23]. Emergency department physicians are often unable to determine the exact diagnosis of a patient's headache, and thus they are only able to provide a “pending headache” diagnosis. In fact, many patients were subsequently diagnosed with primary headache, such as migraine. Although patients with an emergency headache were treated by a psychiatrist in our study, less than 50% of the patients were diagnosed. Even neuroscientists have difficulty diagnosing headaches correctly.
Generally, emergency doctors are very experienced in treating secondary headache. As long as they closely monitor its early warning signs, these headaches will not be misdiagnosed. Conditions such as a cerebral haemorrhage, cerebral infarction or tumour are able to be quickly diagnoses with advanced imaging systems. Therefore, for some headaches caused by intracranial infection, the correct diagnosis is achieved by examining the neurological signs (meningeal stimulation sign) and cerebrospinal fluid. However, the diagnosis of the primary headache encounters many difficulties. First, most patients with primary headache have no obvious nervous system signs, and the auxiliary examination does not reveal abnormal findings. Emergency patients often require rapid diagnosis and treatment in a short period, which is difficult for busy emergency physicians. If the emergency physician is not a neurologist, the diagnosis is more difficult. The main difficulty in diagnosing a severe acute headache in the emergency department is the potential misdiagnosis of primary headache syndrome or failure to identify the cause of secondary headache. If clinicians fail to determine the correct diagnosis for primary headache, they will reduce the chance of successful treatment; if they neglect the causes of secondary headache, disastrous consequences may occur.
The misdiagnosis rate and missed diagnosis rate of patients with emergency headache were high in the present study. Patients with an emergency headache were all diagnosed and treated by neurologists, but the initial diagnosis was unclear. Notably, migraine, the most common primary headache treated in the outpatient Department of Neurology, is extremely painful for patients. Many clinical manifestations were similar to migraine and migraine was misdiagnosed as secondary headache; many patients with migraine were diagnosed with other types of secondary headache because the diagnosis of headache is very complicated.
In terms of imaging examinations, although CT is overused to assess acute headache, a CT examination is essential for patients with recent a history of head injury or suspected intracranial mass and subarachnoid haemorrhage. MRI, a non-invasive examination, also has important implications for some headaches [24]. In our study, most of the patients underwent skull imaging using CT (53.60%) or MRI (38.28%). Excessive protection of these patients by doctors was noted. Some emergency physicians clearly diagnosed migraine or cluster headache, but allowed the patients to undergo the relevant imaging examination. Because they were worried about an error in their own diagnosis and decided to perform an imaging examination mainly to exclude secondary headache caused by intracranial lesions. At the same time, patients with headache and their families often also requested a relevant imaging examination. In the current tense relationship between doctors and patients in China [25–26], patients often believe that only an objective examination is accurate. The anxiety of patients and their families is only alleviated when a definite structural abnormality is not observed using cephalography.
On the other hand, the early warning signs identified by an imaging examination also ensured that some atypical secondary headaches were diagnosed and treated. The CT-positive rate in the emergency department was 26.5 times higher than in the outpatient department [27]. From 1998 to 2008, the use of CT/MRI to assess non-invasive headache in patients in emergency departments in the United States increased dramatically [28]. The prevalence of intracranial pathology (ICP) in patients receiving CT/MRI decreased at the same time, suggesting that clinical decision support has a guiding role in using imaging more wisely.
However, the conditions of some patients are difficult to diagnose, even when they have undergone an MRI and/or CT. Patients with acute severe headache, a normal neurological examination and normal non-enhanced head computed tomography (NCCT) might still have a subarachnoid haemorrhage, cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT), carotid dissection or reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS). The diagnosis rate of a subsequent computed tomography angiography (CTA) is still low. However, the use of CTA in an emergency may be reasonable due to possible disease consequences. Of course, these results must be studied prospectively, including a cost-benefit analysis [29]. Therefore, the correct diagnosis rate of primary headache by emergency physicians is low, and a lack of understanding of primary headache has been noted. Even if secondary headache was excluded, some patients were unable to receive a correct diagnosis of the primary headache.
Regarding the analgesic treatment of emergency headache, in our study, most patients (1233/1826) were administered an acute analgesic treatment. Most of the drugs were nonsteroidal analgesics. Even if some patients were diagnosed with primary headache, they were unable to receive the most effective treatment in a timely manner. For example, cluster headache can be relieved rapidly by oxygen inhalation in the emergency department, but patients often received a head CT or MRI and other imaging examinations when the headache is severe. Some patients were even admitted to the hospital. The examinations of these patients wasted medical resources. Headache treatment should be standardized. The most recent guide has become available to help physicians treat headache better. These updated recommendations provide doctors with a modern, standardized and evidence-based treatment for headache attacks [30–31].
In our study, the total hospitalization rate of patients with emergency headache was 40.1%, of which the hospitalization rate of patients with primary headache was 12.2%, the hospitalization rate of patients with secondary headache was 60.3%, and the hospitalization rate of patients with an undiagnosed emergency headache was 41.5%. Overall, the hospitalization rate is very high, which is very different from the United States. According to an American survey of emergency doctors, headache doctors usually do not let their patients visit the office within 24 hours after calling for an appointment. Only 12% of participants stated that they saw patients in the office most of the time, and only 10% stated that they saw patients in the office almost all or all of the time [32]. In some areas, the hospitalization of patients with headache is more difficult.
In the 17 hospitals analysed in our study, the doctor on duty usually visits the emergency department. Notably, 41949 emergency patients were treated in the Department of Neurology, with an average of 7 emergency patients per physician, including 16434 patients with emergency headache or 3 patients with emergency headache per physician. The emergency attendance rate for headache was 2.3%. This value is similar to the United States. In China, the population base is large and medical resources are relatively insufficient. These doctors also must consider their extensive daily medical work, and the time for emergency treatment is limited. In the major hospitals participating in the survey, as long as the patients believe a visit to the hospital is necessary for treatment, they are generally able to obtain a diagnosis and treatment from a physician as soon as possible. In particular, patients can be registered quickly and receive treatment from emergency doctors at night as long as they meet certain requirements. Our patients and emergency doctors, when the diagnosis is unclear, emergency physicians ordered a variety of auxiliary tests to further diagnose the patients in our study, requiring a greater time investment of physicians, and thus the patients tended to be hospitalized. On the one hand, these tests are performed for the sake of medical security; on the other hand, the tests are related to our current medical insurance system. Inpatients are often reimbursed by health insurance. In China, a standard for emergency treatment and hospitalization for headache is not available. On the one hand, a large number of patients are treated and the time physicians have available to treat these patients is limited.
In the emergency department, the focus is to identify those patients with early warning symptoms, distinguish between primary headache and secondary headache, and attempt to identify patients with life-threatening headaches. Laboratory tests and imaging tests provide important information and guide the next steps, but abuse should be avoided. The treatment of emergency headache depends on the diagnosis of headache, and the uncertainty of the diagnosis leads to treatment errors. Most of the primary headaches still require follow-up by headache experts. Currently, China is conducting medical reform to further clarify the service functions of medical institutions at all levels and to achieve a three-level hospital diagnosis and treatment. The main goal is to improve the medical and health services provided at the grass-roots level and strengthen the medical and health talents at the grass-roots level, which is expected to reduce the emergency burden of the second and third level hospitals and the financial burden on patients.
Limitations
The 17 hospitals analysed in this study are all general hospitals in the underdeveloped region located in southwestern China that are mainly designed to treat adults but are less effective at treating children. Thus, this study only represents the diagnosis and treatment of adults with emergency headache in the real world in western cities of China. Further research is needed to understand the diagnosis and treatment of headache in children in the emergency department.