The administration of third generation chemotherapy drugs such as docetaxel, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine has improved the overall survival of advanced patients with NSCLC to 8–10 months [11–13]. However, in 2002, Carney concluded that a plateau of efficacy in treating NSCLC had been reached and that no further improvement would be achieved with these conventional chemotherapeutic drugs [14]. From 2000, targeted therapy such as epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), anaplastic lymphoma kinase- tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ALK-TKI), ROS1-TKI, and v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF)/(mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors have been used to treat NSCLC and found to be extremely effective. These targeted therapies administered as neoadjuvant treatment have been shown to be capable of converting advanced NSCLC to an operable status [15, 16]. Furthermore, ICIs such as nivolumab, pembrolizumab, durvalumab, and atezolizumab have also been shown to achieve long-term survival in some patients with advanced NSCLC [1–5].
A randomized phase III study with preoperative cisplatin and gemcitabine achieved better survival of patients with stage IIB to IIIA NSCLC than did surgery alone [17]. Additionally, a meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage I–IIIA NSCLC showed that preoperative chemotherapy achieves significantly better overall survival, time to distant recurrence, and recurrence-free survival than does surgery alone in patients with resectable NSCLC [18]. Although these reports encourage the thoracic surgeon to administer neoadjuvant chemotherapy to patients with clinical stage IIIA NSCLC, the quality and quantity of evidence concerning preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy is inferior to that available for postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, such as that provided by the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer (IALT), JBR.10, and Adjuvant Navelbine International Trialist Association (ANITA) trials [19–21]. Therefore, neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not been strongly recommended for advanced NSCLC to date.
Antibodies that block programed death 1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein improve survival in patients with advanced NSCLC [1–5]. Recently, PD-1 blockade and neoadjuvant nivolumab have been shown to induce MPRs in 45% of tumors resected from patients with resectable clinical stage I to IIIA NSCLC [6], MPR being defined as tumors with no more than 10% viable tumor cells. Provencio et al. reported at the 2018 World Conference on Lung Cancer (19th WCLC; Toronto, Canada; abstract #OA01.05) that MPR was achieved in 64% of resected tumors by combination therapy comprising atezolizumab, carboplatin, and nab-paclitaxel. Additionally, Shu et al. reported at the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting (Chicago, IL, USA; abstract #8532) that MPR was achieved in 80% of resected tumors with combination therapy comprising nivolumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel. Combination therapy with ICI and platinum-based chemotherapy is currently considered to be a promising combination for treating advanced NSCLC [22, 23]. The increasing use of ICIs in the treatment of advanced NSCLC makes it important for surgeons to understand the potential indications for resection. Some recent studies reported that immunotherapy had achieved sufficient down-staging in eight patients with clinical stage III or IV NSCLC to enable salvage surgery [7–10] (Table 1). Amazingly, six of nine cases (these eight plus the present patient) were proven to have pathological Ef.3 disease. These findings indicate that neoadjuvant immunotherapy with or without cytotoxic chemotherapy could be administered as novel preoperative therapy in the near future, even in patients with clinical stage IV NSCLC. At this point, the indications for surgery for patients with stage IV NSCLC initially who achieve down-staging after chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy have not been clearly established. Our patient had maintained a partial response for 7 months after initial treatment with pembrolizumab. We therefore decided to perform salvage surgery after discussions with other physicians and obtaining informed consent to surgery from the patient and his family members. In this new era of chemotherapy, it is important to assess in a timely manner which patients in this category is have indications for surgery.
Another serious issue that needs to be resolved is the lack of reliable biomarkers for predicting the effect and prognosis of immunotherapy. Currently, there are several promising biomarkers, including PD-L1 expression, tumor mutation burden (TMB) and gene expression signatures [24]. However, these factors are not reliable. After reviewing the clinical value of the NLR in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs, Jiang et al. set an NLR cutoff value of 5 and concluded that a high blood NLR (more than 5) is associated with shorter progression-free survival and overall survival in patients treated with ICIs; they therefore suggested that the NLR has potential predictive and prognostic value [25]. In our patient, the NLR was less than 3 before immunotherapy and was persistently 1 to 2 during immunotherapy, increasing after surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first detailing changes in NLR throughout multidisciplinary treatment. In our patient, postoperative pathological examination revealed that CD4 positive T lymphocytes predominated over CD8 positive T lymphocytes. CD4 positive lymphocytes include effector T cells and regulatory T cells and the latter induce immunological tolerance. This proportion of T lymphocytes in the resected specimen is extremely interesting. When viable cancer cells are present, CD8 positive lymphocytes are the predominant tumor infiltration lymphocytes (TILs) that fight cancer cells. However, if the cancer cells are eliminated totally and only scar tissue remains, both CD8 and granzyme B-positive lymphocytes are not necessary and regulatory T cells would gather to regulate attacks on non-cancer tissues and create a new environment in the scar tissues. In our patient, granzyme B was weakly positive, which suggests that the cytotoxic abilities of T cells had already decreased. When immunotherapy achieves MPR or CR in patients with advanced NSCLC, the NLR would remain low during immunotherapy, CD4-positive lymphocytes would accumulate and cytotoxic CD8-positive T cells would disappear around the tumor/scar tissue to maintain immunological tolerance, as occurred in our patient.
The present findings indicate that pulmonary resection after ICI treatment is feasible and may be free of major complications. However, the optimal duration of ICI therapy and the best predictive biomarkers of response are still unknown. Clinical trials are needed to define the best criteria for duration of preoperative ICI therapy and timing of proceeding with resection in patients with advanced NSCLC, including clinical stage IV, receiving neoadjuvant ICI treatment.