The primary finding of the present study was that a higher ratio of the tibia length to femoral length correlated with better IAAF score in 400-m sprinters, but not 100-m sprinters. A maintenance of step frequency during 400-m sprinting is required for achieving superior long sprint performance [16, 23]. Morphological factors appear to contribute to the maintenance of step frequency, potentially by occurring economical sprinting [5, 6]. The ratio of the tibial length and femoral length may be useful in reducing the leg’s moment of inertia and positive work of the hip flexors during the swing phase while sprinting. Thus, this favorable morphology may help achieve superior long sprint performance, potentially by maintaining step frequency and performing economical sprinting and in 400-m specialized sprinters.
The present study determined no correlation between the ratio of the tibia length to femur length and IAAF score in 100-m sprinters. Generally speaking, superior 100-m sprint performance may not require being economical because sprint velocity during 100-m sprinting does not decrease significantly compared with that during 400-m sprinting [11, 24]. Additionally, previous studies determined that superior 100-m sprint performance is related to greater ground reaction force during 100-m sprinting [15, 40]. An increase in ground reaction force during 100-m sprinting is associated with larger sizes of some leg muscles because of the positive relationships between these muscle sizes and 100-m sprint performance [1, 3, 7]. In particular, previous studies determined that greater thigh muscles, including the quadriceps femoris and hamstring, correlated with better 100-m sprint performance in sprinters [1, 3, 7]. When having a higher ratio of the tibial length to femoral length in 100-m sprinters, this morphology may be modeling smaller thigh muscles due to a necessary shortening of the thigh length, which may be disadvantageous in achieving superior 100-m sprint performance. Therefore, the ratio between the leg bone lengths may not influence 100-m sprint performance in 100-m specialized sprinters.
We previously reported that MRI-measured leg bone length correlated with running performance in endurance runners [14]. By contrast, in the present study, we found that absolute and relative leg lengths of the femur and tibia did not correlate with sprint performance in both 100-m and 400-m sprinters. Moreover, the absolute and relative total length of the femur and tibia also did not correlate with sprint performance in both groups. Despite it is the fact that longer leg is associated with an increase in step length during sprinting [9, 10], step length, compared to step frequency, may be a less important kinematic factor for superior sprint performance during both 100-m and 400-m sprinting [15-17]; in other words, an increase in step length may be not required for achieving superior sprint performance. In only one study, Morin et al. [15] reported that relative leg length, which normalized to body height, did not correlate with 100-m sprint velocity. Therefore, the present findings collaborate with their result by showing the absence of the relationship between leg length and sprint performance in 100-m specialized sprinters. Furthermore, the present study is the first to determine that longer leg may not be required for achieving superior long sprint performance in 400-m specialized sprinters.
In a recent study, we reported that longer forefoot bones correlated with better long sprint performance in 400-m sprinters [5]. Moreover, we demonstrated that a positive relationship between greater knee extensor moment arm and better long sprint performance in 400-m sprinters [6]. To the best of our knowledge, no other studies besides our previous studies have reported important morphological factors for long sprint performance in 400-m sprinters. The favorable morphological factors (i.e., forefoot bone length and knee extensor moment arm dimension) for superior 400-m sprint performance obtained in our previous studies are also determinants in achieving superior 100-m sprint performance [2, 4]. By contrast, a higher ratio of the tibia length to femoral length was determinant only of 400-m sprinters, but not 100-m sprinters. Therefore, the present study is also the first to find a specific morphological factor contributing superior long sprint performance in 400-m specialized sprinters. The information may be useful for selecting sprint events and for understanding the individual features in sprinters, particularly 400-m specialized sprinters.