Mice
A total of 228 10-month-old C57BL/6 male mice (30-35 g) and 27 Nrf2−/− mice (3-month-old, 20-25 g) were used in our study. Mice were purchased from the Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co. Ltd. (NO.11400700282075) and housed in a specific pathogen-free environment with a 12h light-dark cycle and controlled temperature (24 ± 1°C) and relative humidity (60 ± 10 %). Nrf2−/− mice were generated by Dr. Masayuki Yamamoto (on a C57BL/6 background). Genotype was determined by PCR amplification of genomic DNA extracted from tail snips of the mice. Three to five mice per cage were housed with free access to standard food and water. All animal protocols were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Zhengzhou University. All experiments were performed and reported according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th edition (2011) and the ARRIVE guidelines (http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/arrive-guidelines). All mice were randomly assigned to different groups by using the randomizer form at http://www.randomization.com[20, 21].
ICH mouse model
Mice were anesthetized with isoflurane (70% N2O and 30% O2, 4% induction, 2% maintenance) and placed in a stereotaxic frame for aseptic surgery. A 1-cm long incision was made over the midline of the scalp. A mouse adaptor was used to drill a borehole 2 mm left and 0.5 mm anterior to the bregma, with a depth of 3.1 mm. ICH was induced by injecting collagenase VII-S (sterile-filtered, relatively endotoxin-free, 0.05 U in 0.5 μL sterile saline, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) into the left striatum as previously described[22, 23]. The collagenase was infused with a micro-infusion pump at a constant rate of 0.1 μL/min. Body temperature was maintained at 37 ± 0.5°C during surgery. After surgery, the mice were returned to their home cages. The sham control group underwent a surgical incision but was infused with saline. Animals that died or were euthanized within 24h after surgery were excluded from the sample size. Otherwise, all animals proceeded into the final analysis.
EE conditions
On day 1 after surgery, mice in the ICH+EE group were housed in a box with an enriched environment that we made ourselves (120 cm x 90 cm x 76 cm) based on a published method[24]. The box contained two mouse cages with food and water, running wheels, igloos with saucer wheels, plastic tubing, and other toys (Supplementary Fig. 1). Six to eight mice were housed in an EE box for 6 h/day (8:00 am-2:00 pm) until day 28 after ICH (Supplementary video) [25]. The devices were rearranged and renewed every day to stimulate the exploratory behavior of the animals and to maintain the novelty of the environment. Control to ICH+EE mice and sham mice were housed in groups of 3 to 5 in standard cages (30 cm x 45 cm x 20 cm) without toys, defined as a standard environment (SE). All animals had free access to food and water. The items that were used in EE included: 1) two cross pipes (interface diameter: 5.5 cm), 2) eight straight pipes (interface diameter: 5.5 cm), 3) six frisbee running wheels (diameter: 18 cm, height:11 cm), 4) six windmill running wheels (diameter: 13 cm, height:14.5 cm, width: 7.5 cm), and 5) the large cage (120 cm x 90 cm x 76 cm) with an EE that was made by the aluminum alloy panel (Zhengzhou Welding Factory, Zhengzhou, China). An illustration of the EE condition of toys is shown in Supplementary Fig. 1 and displayed in Supplementary video 1.
Brain lesion volume
On day 3 after ICH, the mice were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane and perfused through the left ventricle with saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde. Then the brain was removed. Coronal sections through the entire striatum were stained with Cresyl violet acetate (CV, for Nissl bodies) and Luxol fast blue (for myelin). Image J software was used to quantify the hemorrhagic injury volume. Sections were analyzed by an investigator blind to the experimental cohort as previously described [22, 26].
Brain edema measurement
On day 3 after ICH, mice were sacrificed under deep anesthesia with 3% isoflurane. Their brains were harvested and dissected along the sagittal fissure into the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres and cerebellum. Brain tissue was immediately weighed to get the wet weight and then heated to 100°C in a drying oven for 72h to obtain the dry weight. We determined brain edema by calculating brain water content as follows: brain water content (%) = (wet weight –dry weight) / wet weight × 100% [22, 26].
Neurologic function
According to a previously published method [23],we tested each mouse for neurologic deficit scores on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, and 21 after ICH. Scores were summed on six subtests, body symmetry, gait, climbing, circling behavior, front limb symmetry, and compulsory circling. Each test was ranked from 0 to 4, establishing a maximum deficit score of 24.
Forelimb and hind limb placing test
On days 3, 5, 7, 14, and 21 after ICH, forelimb and hind limb placing tests were carried out based on our previous studies [23, 27, 28]. Mice were placed facing the edge of a desktop and the contralateral hind limb was pulled down. The ability of the mouse to place the hind limb back onto the desktop was quantified as follows: immediate and complete pullback of limb = 0, delayed pullback (> 2 s) = 1, inability to pull back = 2. Placing was determined in 10 consecutive trials. The video of the forelimb and hindlimb placing tests were displayed in supplementary videos 2, 3.
Corner turn test
On days 3, 5, 7, 14, and 21 after ICH, the mouse was directed into a 30° corner as previously described [20]. The mouse had the option to turn either right or left to exit the corner. The number of turns in each direction was recorded in 10 repeated tests. Then the percentage of right turns was calculated. Normal mice exhibit approximately 50% of turns in each direction [29].
Morris water maze (MWM)
The MWM test evaluated spatial learning and memory ability in rodents based on an established standard procedure [30]. The system used consisted of a circular black swimming pool (120 cm in diameter), an escape platform (10 cm in diameter) submerged 0.5 cm under the water surface in the center of one of four imaginary quadrants, and a SMART 3.0 animal behavior analysis system (Panlab, Spain). The mice were released into the pool facing the wall in random positions and had to swim to find the submerged platform. In the training phase, mice underwent 1 trial/day over 4 consecutive days beginning on day 24. On day 28, the spatial memory was estimated using trajectory and navigation parameters in the testing phase.
Novel object recognition test
On days 27 and 28 after ICH, the novel object recognition test was performed according to an established protocol [31]. In short, mice were allowed to explore two identical new objects (violet cubes, 4×4×3 cm) in an open field (47×26×20 cm) for 10 min on the first day (day 27). The following day (day 28), the mice were exposed to one new object (white ball, 5 cm in diameter) and one familiar object (violet cube) in the field for 5 min. The behaviors displayed by each mouse were recorded on video. The discrimination index was calculated to assess cognitive ability: Discrimination index (%) = (total time devoted to new object/total time spent exploring objects) × 100%. Exploring object was identified as direct contact with the paw, nose, or mouth, or the nose directed at the object at < 0.5 cm.
Depression-like behavior
Forced swim test (FST)
The FST was conducted according to the previously described method [31]. The swimming apparatus was a glass cylinder (20 cm high × 22 cm in diameter) containing 10 cm of water at 24 ± 1℃. On day 28 after ICH, mice were forced to swim for 6 min, and the duration of immobility in the last 4 min was video recorded. The mice were defined as immobile when they were motionless or made only slight movements to maintain their head above the water.
Tail suspension test (TST)
The TST was carried out on day 28 after ICH as previously described [32, 33]. Each mouse was placed in the testing room for a period of acclimatization (generally at least 1 h) prior to the behavioral procedure. The mice were individually suspended by the tail from a bar 55 cm above the floor with a piece of adhesive tape (17 cm long, 2 cm from the tip of the tail). A polycarbonate tube (4 cm in length, 1 cm in diameter, 1.5 g) was placed around the tail to prevent mice from climbing their tails. A camera was used to record the movement of the mice for 6 min, and the duration of immobility was calculated.
Sucrose preference test (SPT)
The SPT evaluated anhedonia based on an established protocol [31]. On day 25, mice were placed into separate cages with two bottles, one containing water and the other a 1% sucrose solution. The bottles were weighed at the start of the test, and their positions in the cage were changed daily. On day 28, the two bottles were reweighed and the amount of liquid consumed was measured. The sucrose preference was calculated as a percentage of the sucrose solution consumed relative to the total amount of liquid consumed: sucrose preference (%) = sucrose consumption (g) / [water consumption (g) + sucrose consumption (g)].
Light/dark transition test
On day 28, a light/dark transition test was performed as previously described [34]. The apparatus consisted of a cage (100 cm) divided into two chambers of equal size by a barrier with a door. One chamber was light and the other dark. The mice were placed in the dark chamber and allowed to move without restraint between the two chambers through the door for 10 min. The total number of times the mouse traversed, and the time spent in each chamber (seconds) were analyzed by a SMART 3.0 animal behavior analysis system.
Anxiety-like behavior
Open Field Test
On day 28, the open field test was used to assess anxiety [35]. Each mouse was allowed to acclimate to the testing room for 2 h before the test. Then it was placed into the center of the open field box to explore freely for 5 min. After each test, we used alcohol to clean the box to prevent smells from influencing the behavior of the next mouse. Smart Video Tracking Software was used to track and analyze each mouse’s movements. The time spent and the distance traveled in the center and the periphery of the box was analyzed [36].
Elevated Plus-Maze (EPM)
The EPM is one of the most extensively used tests to assess anxiety-like behavior in mice [37]. The apparatus consists of a pair of open arms (50 cm × 5 cm) perpendicular to a pair of arms with walls but no ceiling (50 cm × 10 cm × 40 cm) and a connected central area (10 cm × 10 cm). The maze is situated 50 cm above the ground. The mouse was placed into the center of the maze facing one of the closed arms and allowed to explore for 5 min. A computer recorded the number of times the mice entered open and closed arms and the time spent in the open and closed arms. An arm entry was defined as a mouse having all four legs in one arm of the maze.
Western blot analysis
On day 28, Western blotting was performed to evaluate Nrf2 and BDNF protein expression levels in the mouse brain the injured area [30, 38]. Brain tissues collected from around the injured area were lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (RIPA: PMSF=100:1) with a protease inhibitor cocktail. A bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay kit (PC0020, Solarbio Science& Technology Co, Ltd. Beijing) was used to measure the protein concentration. We separated 35 μg of protein from each sample by SDS-PAGE and transferred the proteins to nitrocellulose membranes. After being blocked with nonfat milk for 2h, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against Nrf2 (1:1000, Abcam, Cambridge, MA), BDNF (1:500, Abcam), and tubulin (1:250, Abcam) at 4°C overnight. Subsequently, the membranes were incubated with HRP-labeled anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (1:10,000, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX) at room temperature for 2h. The immunoglobulins were then detected with a FluorChem imaging system (San Jose, CA) with the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) technique. Image J software was used to normalize the intensities of the target bands to those of the corresponding loading control.
Immunofluorescence staining
Immunofluorescence was carried out as previously described [39]. Three mice in each group were anesthetized with an overdose of 10% chloral hydrate and transcardially perfused through the left ventricle with saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde on day 28. Brains were dissected out, post-fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h, and then dehydrated with 20% and 30% sucrose successively. The brain tissues were serially sectioned into 20-µm-thick sections with a freezing microtome (Leica CM1950, Germany). The sections were blocked with 5% goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline with 0.1% Triton-X 100 for 2 h at room temperature. Slices were incubated with rabbit anti-BDNF (1:500, Abcam) primary antibody at 4°C overnight followed by Cy3-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (1:100, Boster Biological Technology, Wu Han) for 2 h at 37°C. Labeled tissues were counterstained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, D8417, 1:1000, Sigma). The sections were examined and photographed with a fluorescence microscope (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Four fields from each section were selected, and five consecutive brain sections were used. The numbers of positive cells in each field were determined, and mean values were calculated from 20 fields to represent BDNF-positive cells in one mouse.
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) analysis
Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem triple four-stage mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS) was used to measure glutamate concentration in brain tissue from around the hematoma on day 28 after ICH [40]. Brain tissue collected around the hematoma (approximately 3 mm thick) was lysed in methanol solution (7g/ml) on ice. It was homogenized by a tissue grinder (XIN-M48, Shanghai Xinwen Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) at the speed of 9424g for 1 min. The homogenate was then centrifuged at a speed of 15078g for 10 min and the supernatant was diluted 50 times with 0.5% formic acid. Next, the mixture was dried by using nitrogen evaporator (N-EVAP, Organomation, MA, USA) at 35℃ and 100 μL initial mobile phase complex (2.5 mol/L ammonium acetate and 0.1% formic acid) was added as the sampling solution. Glutamate purchased from Sigma-Aldrich was used to create the standard curve. We then injected 2 μL of the sampling solution into a Porosell 120 EC-C1 column (Phenomenex, St. Louis, Missouri) in the HTEC-500. We eluted it with a buffer consisting of 2.5 mmol/L of ammonium acetate with 0.1% formic acid solution and acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid solution. The peak of neurotransmitter chromatograms was identified by the retention time in the standard solution. The concentration was calculated according to the peak area in the standard solution. The data were analyzed using Chemstation software (Agilent, Santa Clara, USA).
Glutaminase activity
The tissue around the injured area of the brain was collected on day 28 after ICH, Glutaminase activity was measured with commercial glutaminase activity kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, Nanjing, China).
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD), dot plot, or bar graphs. We used a t-test, one-way or two-way ANOVA, and Bonferroni post hoc test to compare differences among multiple groups. A p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyzes were performed with GraphPad Software (GraphPad Prism 5.0, GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). The outlying data points were defined with statistical software assuming a normal distribution (the threshold was 2.0 times the SD from the mean).