Light Microscopy
Three-dimensional optical micrographs and topological images were recorded using a digital microscope VHX-6000 by a VH-Z100 objective with a zoom lens of 1000x. The 3D images of the paint surfaces (Figures 2, 3, and 4) show how the morphology of the paint layers changes during the light ageing process.
Observing the PB29 alkyd samples in Figure 2, the unaged areas of the samples show a glossier surface with the increase of the polymer component in the mixture (1:6). Moreover, the pores are more visible than in the sample with more pigment (1:2).
After a total of 1008 h of light ageing, different morphological changes are detectable, depending on the pigment/binder (P/BM) ratio. In the P/BM 1:6 mixture, the surface colour does not present evident changes; nevertheless, the pores number and their size increase. In the P/BM 1:2 mixture, the surface results dustier and opaque, the pigment grains are sharper, and the blue shade tends to discolour over time. This ageing effect is more noticeable when the pigment amount is high (1:2). In the colourimetric measurements chapter, the discussion about the colour changes is reported.
A similar behaviour is also observed for the PG18 alkyd samples (Fig. 3). In the 1:6 mixture, after 1008 h of ageing, the surface is less glossy and more porous. As for the blue sample, also in the green 1:2 mixture, the opacity increases over time probably due to the degradation of the binder and the pigment accumulation on the surface. However, contrary to the PB29 pigment, the PG18 tends to darken and this effect is especially visible in the mixture with a high amount of pigment (1:2). This morphological and colourimetric behaviour is also observable for the PY37 alkyd sample (Fig. 4).
ATR-FTIR results of alkyd paint degradation
ATR-FTIR spectra of alkyd binder (Alkyd Medium 4, Lukas) in mixtures with inorganic pigments (PB29, PG18, PY37) at different P/BM ratios (1:2, 1:3, and 1:6) were collected after 0, 168, 336, 504, 672, 840, and 1008 h of artificial sunlight ageing.
For the determination of the light degradation effects of alkyd binder mixed with inorganic pigments (PB29, PG18, and PY37), the ATR-FTIR absorption bands of the alkyd binder are labelled according to Table 2 [17, 18]. Using the ATR-FTIR spectrum of unaged alkyd paint (P/BM 1:2), mixed with PB29, it is possible to characterise the main absorption bands, as shown in Figure 5.1. The unaged spectra of the other mixtures (P/BM 1:3 and 1:6) are not depicted as they show the same absorbance bands but with different intensities depending on the binder content. In this case, a significant contribution from the oil and phthalic component is identified. The main absorption bands that identify these two components are at 1724 cm-1 related to the C=O stretching vibration, and at 2926, 2854, 1465, 1451, and 1388 cm-1 related to the CH2 and CH3 stretching and bending (asymmetric and symmetric).
However, the phthalic groups can be identified mainly by absorption bands at 1600 and 1588 cm-1 corresponding to C=C stretching aromatic ring, at 1260 and 1114 cm-1 related to C-O-C symmetric stretching, and at 741 and 709 cm-1 due to the aromatic out-of-plane bending [19, 20]. By comparing the unaged and 1008 h light aged results, significant chemical changes on the surface are detected.
The results are evaluated according to the type of pigment used, the P/BM ratios and also the contribution of the inorganic components to the degradation process. In the case of alkyd binder with PB29 (Figure 5.1), after 1008 h of ageing the intensity of the broad OH stretching band at 3244 cm-1 is quite increased, above all in the sample with high amount of binder (Figure 5.1d), whereas the (C-H)CH2 asymmetric and symmetric stretching at 2926 and 2854 cm-1 decreased. It is due to the hydrogen abstraction and the oxidation of the double bonds, respectively [21]. The same decreasing trend is observed for the carbonyl band at 1724 cm-1. Only in the paint with a high amount of binder, this band can still be detected after 1008 h of exposure. Furthermore, the shape of the band gets broader due to the ageing of the oil component in the alkyd binder, which is caused by hydroperoxides and peroxides reactions during photochemical degradation, forming oxidation products such as aldehydes, ketones, and carboxylic acids (at 1735, 1720, and 1710 cm-1) [22].
Considering the spectral changes of the inorganic pigment PB29 in the mixture, the band at 1068 and 984 cm-1, related to the Al,Si-O4 asymmetric stretching, increases depending on the ageing time and its amount in the paint mixture [23]. As shown in Figure 5.1b, additional pigment bands at 691 and 656 cm-1 absorption vibrations, related to the Al,Si-O4 symmetric stretching, are registered. Moreover, after the maximum exposure time performed, the small band at 470 cm-1 is increased. It is identified as the O-Si-O bending vibration [24]. The apparent increase of the spectral signal of PB29 characteristic absorption bands indicates that the oxidation of the alkyd binder functional groups causes an accumulation of the pigment particles on the surface of the paint layer [25, 26]. This chemical-physical phenomenon is so prominent in the alkyd paints because of the oil component. The latter is very reactive to the oxidative elements present in the surrounding environment (such as oxygen, sunlight, and O3) leading to Norrish photo-cleavage reactions and the formation of free-radicals able to make the polymeric film unstable [27].
In Figure 5.2, the ATR-FTIR spectra of alkyd binder in mixture with PG18 in different P/BM ratio (1:2, 1:3, and 1:6) aged for 1008 hours are presented in comparison to the unaged P/BM 1:2 mixture. In general, all the main absorption bands of the alkyd binder are present (Table 1) but, after the light ageing, the spectra show a decreasing trend of the binder absorption bands. The worst degradation is observed for the mixtures with a high amount of pigment (Figure 5.2b). Similar to the PB29 results, the intensity of the PG18 bands at 552 and 493 cm-1 (of the oxide part) increase over time, due to the degradation and partial evaporation of the binder compounds. Comparing the spectrum of the unaged sample with the aged ones, the OH stretching band at 3066 cm-1 increased with an increasing amount of pigment in the paint (Figure 5.2b), contrary to the results obtained for PB29 mixtures. It is due to the fact that this absorption band is mainly assigned to the hydrated component of the pigment which, as previously described, increase after ageing. Another absorbance band which is assigned to the pigment at 1283 cm-1 is registered during the light-ageing process. In combination with the band at 1252 cm-1, which is still present after ageing, it can be related to the low content of chromium borate necessary for the production of the hydrated chromium oxide green pigment [28, 29].
In the case of alkyd paints mixed with PY37, the ATR-FTIR spectra are quite different from the results obtained for PB29 and PG18. Furthermore, the OH stretching band in this case at 3230 cm-1 increases with ageing time, especially in the paint sample with a higher amount of binder (Figure 5.3d). However, by comparing the spectrum of the alkyd sample in Figure 5.3d (P/BM ratio 1:6) with the paint sample mixed with the PB29 (Figure 5.1d), it is possible to observe that the carbonyl group C=O at 1724 cm-1 decreases more in the blue paint sample, whereas in the yellow paint it tends to be broader.
Table 2
ATR-FTIR absorption band assignment of binders and pigments employed acrylic.
Alkyd Wavenumber (cm-1)
|
Assignment
|
2926 – 2854
|
(C-H)CH2 asymmetric - symmetric stretching
|
1724
|
C=O stretching (oil and phthalate)
|
1600 – 1588
|
C=C stretching aromatic ring (phthalate)
|
1465 – 1451
|
CH2 and CH3 asymmetric bending
|
1388
|
CH3 symmetric bending
|
1260 – 1114
|
C-O-C symmetric stretching (phthalate)
|
741 – 709
|
Aromatic out-of-plane bending (phthalate)
|
Inorganic pigment
|
Wavenumber (cm-1)
|
Assignment
|
|
Artificial ultramarine blue (PB29)
|
1068 – 984
|
Al,Si-O4 asymmetric stretching
|
|
|
691 – 656
|
Al,Si-O4 symmetric stretching
|
|
Hydrated chromium oxide green (PG18)
|
3066
|
O-H stretching
|
|
|
552 – 493
|
Cr-O vibrations
|
|
Cadmium yellow (PY37)
|
< 450
|
Below detector cut-off
|
|
Photodegradation kinetics
The time-dependent behaviour of the alkyd binder in the paint samples was evaluated by the integration of the carbonyl group C=O band (1724 cm-1) over time (Fig. 6). This specific band was chosen for the integration as it shows strong intensities, is not overlapping with other bands and is the most representative band for the binder. In Figure 6, the degradation behaviour of the different pigments with alkyd binder mixed in ratios 1:2, 1:3, and 1:6 are presented. Generally, the degradation of the binder, shown by a decrease of the C=O area values, is already observed after 168 h of ageing for all three pigment mixtures at P/BM ratios 1:2, whereas for those with P/BM ratios 1:6, it can be observed approximately after 336 h. The kinetic trend changes depending on the type of pigment used.
In mixtures with PB29, the degradation of the organic binder is higher than for PG18 and much higher than for PY37. The contribution of the pigments is important as they enhance (with PB29) or decrease (with PY37) the effect of light irradiation on the degradation process of the binder. Comparing the blue and the yellow mixtures with P/BM 1:2, the decrease of the binder at 1724 cm-1 is much faster in the blue paint. On the other hand, increasing the binder amount (P/BM 1:6) in all paint mixtures, the degradation of the organic component is reduced.
For a more detailed evaluation of the binder degradation rate, according to the pigment and the P/BM ratio used, the different numerical values obtained by the integration of the C=O carbonyl band in the paint mixtures were compared (Table 3). The area values (considering the integration of the carbonyl group C=O around 1724 cm-1) of each sample for every week (168 h) of ageing were evaluated [30].
The values obtained were subsequently evaluated according to the difference between the area value of the unaged sample and after 1008 h of exposure Δ(C=Ounaged/aged).
The evaluation showed (Fig. 6) that there is a direct correlation between light exposure time and degradation. In fact, with high values of Δ(C=Ounaged/aged), the process of photo-oxidation on the surface is more damaging, with the consequent decrease of the C=O band over time. In particular, according to the values Δ(C=Ounaged/aged), it is possible to notice that in the samples with a high amount of binder (P/BM 1:6) the photo-oxidative process is reduced, while in the samples with an high amount of pigment (P/BM 1:2), the values Δ(C=Ounaged/aged) increase, suggesting a more oxidative effect. However, this trend changes according to the pigments used. Comparing the three different coloured paints, this difference is more significant in PB29 paints than in PY37. Moreover, with the increase of the amount of binder, these values Δ(C=Ounaged/aged) remain quite stable for PB29 and PG18, while for PY37 they decrease more quickly. This numerical difference indicates that with the same amount of pigment, the PB29 facilitates the interaction of light irradiation with the surface of the paint through a more rapid decomposition of the alkyd binder.
Table 3
Integrated ATR-FTIR band areas of C=O stretching band at 1724 cm-1 of alkyd resin in unaged and 1008 h aged samples. The Δ area values indicate the difference between the C=O values of unaged and 1008 h aged paint samples.
Sample
|
Ageing (time)
|
Area value C=O
|
Δ(C=Ounaged/aged)
|
PB29 + Alkyd Medium 4 (1:2)
|
Unaged
|
18.7
|
17.2
|
|
1008 h
|
1.54
|
|
PB29 + Alkyd Medium 4 (1:3)
|
Unaged
|
16.8
|
16.5
|
|
1008 h
|
0.25
|
|
PB29 + Alkyd Medium 4 (1:6)
|
Unaged
|
10.5
|
10.4
|
|
1008 h
|
0.14
|
|
PG18 + Alkyd Medium 4 (1:2)
|
Unaged
|
24.2
|
12.5
|
|
1008 h
|
11.7
|
|
PG18 + Alkyd Medium 4 (1:3)
|
Unaged
|
18.8
|
10.8
|
|
1008 h
|
8.02
|
|
PG18 + Alkyd Medium 4 (1:6)
|
Unaged
|
16.9
|
9.2
|
|
1008 h
|
7.7
|
|
PY37 + Alkyd Medium 4 (1:2)
|
Unaged
|
21.7
|
7.7
|
|
1008 h
|
14.0
|
|
PY37 + Alkyd Medium 4 (1:3)
|
Unaged
|
22.1
|
6.4
|
|
1008 h
|
15.7
|
|
PY37 + Alkyd Medium 4 (1:6)
|
Unaged
|
22.6
|
1.4
|
|
1008 h
|
21.2
|
|
Colourimetric measurements
In Table 4, the colourimetric results of unaged and 1008 h UV-aged alkyd paint samples are shown. The results include the colourimetric changes in the values of the lightness/darkness (L*), red/green (a*), yellow/blue (b*), and the total colour change from 0 h to 1008 h exposure (ΔE*). The ΔE* values obtained from each coloured paint and P/BM ratio were kinetically evaluated and compared. Observing Figure 7, the greatest change of colour is recorded for PB29 paint in P/BM ratio 1:2 that tends to decrease with the increase of binder amount. A similar trend is detected for PG18 and PY37 paints but less significant than for the blue paint. Generally, a quite significant difference in the shift of the L*, a*, and b* coordinates between the unaged and aged paint samples is observed in the alkyd paints, which confirm the instability of this binder when exposed to the artificial light (Table 4).
Comparing all the colourimetric values of the three inorganic pigments, the PB29 alkyd paint samples have the most significant shift of a* and b* between unaged and aged samples, showing a strong reduction in red and blue, respectively. The decreasing of a* and b* values, and the overall increase of the L* parameter might be due to changes in the surface roughness of the paints [31]. In fact, after ageing the macroscopic properties of the film change, becoming stiffer and more brittle, probably due to cross-linking of the residual olefinic unsaturation [32].
Another deterioration factor is the colour shift, which tends to lighten (PB29) or darken (PG18 and PY37) over time. This behaviour was studied by evaluating the L* values according to the different pigment and P/BM ratio used. During the light exposure, the L* values for alkyd paints mixed with PB29 and PY37 increase whereas with PG18 they decrease. As reported in the literature [33, 34], artificial ultramarine blue (PB29) has a significant loss of its blue colour when mixed with alkyd resin after light irradiation.
This effect is probably due to the chromophoric S-anions release after the opening of the sodalite cages of pigment, leading to the discolouration of the pigment itself. Cadmium yellow (PY37) and hydrated chromium oxide green (PG18) are generally considered lightfast pigments, so their different brightness changes (L*) are not completely clear [35]. During ageing, some chemical properties of the paints are lost as the paint film is gradually attacked by oxidising agents, leading to the breakdown of the polymer molecules into smaller fragments. This phenomenon increases if the pigment concentration is high, as during light exposure the pigment particles placed on the surface will be more subject to the action of photodegradation leading to the fading or darkening of the colour [36]. In some cases, the loss of the chemical-mechanical properties of the binders mixed with some pigments (as for PB29) leads to the highest fragility of the paint on the surface, becoming almost powdery (chalking).
The colour and morphological changes can be also explained by taking into account specific chemical-physical factors, characteristic for each pigment, namely the refractive index and the particle size. Depending on the refractive index (R.I.) of the different materials and their different particle size (P.S.), it is possible to evaluate the effect of the light irradiation to the paint surface enhancing or limiting the degradation of the polymeric medium. If a paint film contains a pigment with a high refractive index, the light tends to be more bent or refracted at the surface [37]. Observing the R.I. values of the analysed pigments [38-42], PY37 has a higher R.I. (approx. between 2.35-2.48) than the other two inorganic pigments (PB29 1.5, PG18 1.62-2.12). Therefore, the light radiation will have a higher impact on the blue paints followed by the green paint sample. These results are in accordance with the ATR-FTIR measurements, indicating a more aggressive degradation of the polymeric binder. Moreover, the light scattering imparted by diffraction is further affected by the particle size. In fact, the smaller the particle size and the higher R.I. are, the more the light beam has a tendency to be scattered [43, 44]. In particular, the granulometric values of the inorganic pigments (reported from Kremer Pigmente) reveal that the particle size is smaller in PY37 (0.5 μm) and higher in PB29 and PG18 (both 2.50 μm), confirming the previous considerations [45, 46]. However, being a mixture, it is also necessary to consider the influence of the refractive index of the binding medium, the dispersion level of the pigment (i.e. the degree of aggregation of the particles), the proportion of pigment in the vehicle, called pigment volume concentration (PVC), and the thickness of the paint layer [47].
Furthermore, the refractive index is not a constant value, but changes over time, also influenced by the P/BM ratio in the mixture and the type of pigment employed. Therefore, from the physical point of view, the different morphological and colourimetric changes should be investigated in more detail, taking into account the various components present in the paints and their importance in the degradation process.
In the examined case of study, the significant degradation of the alkyd binder is not entirely associated with the R.I. aspect, but predominantly the autoxidation of unsaturated bonds of the fatty acid portion contributes to the photo-degradation of the whole paint layer [5, 6].
Table 4
L* a* b* values related to unaged, and 1008h aged alkyd paints. Total colour change, calculated as the difference of unaged and aged samples after 1008 h (ΔE*), is indicated.
Mixtures
|
|
Unaged
|
1008 h
|
ΔE*
|
Alkyd+ PB29
(P/BM 1:2)
|
L*
a*
b*
|
28.43
29.23
-60.66
|
28.66
15
-41.55
|
23.8
|
Alkyd + PB29 (P/BM 1:3)
|
L*
a*
b*
|
26.62
10.30
-22.87
|
29.5
9.23
-40.49
|
18.5
|
Alkyd + PB29 (P/BM 1:6)
|
L*
a*
b*
|
27.58
15.55
-32.73
|
25.86
10.42
-33.6
|
5.48
|
Alkyd + PG18 (P/BM 1:2)
|
L*
a*
b*
|
28.35
-11.09
-0.62
|
24.01
-19.6
-2.60
|
9.81
|
Alkyd + PG18 (P/BM 1:3)
|
L*
a*
b*
|
30.80
-11.09
-0.60
|
25.27
-16.75
-1.93
|
8.02
|
Alkyd + PG18 (P/BM 1:6)
|
L*
a*
b*
|
22.74
-21.58
0.32
|
28.15
-15.85
-0.94
|
7.98
|
Alkyd + PY37 (P/BM 1:2)
|
L*
a*
b*
|
76.04
28.79
87.93
|
76.95
28.14
84.34
|
19.8
|
Alkyd + PY37 (P/BM 1:3)
|
L*
a*
b*
|
75.95
27.90
95.11
|
77.01
25.39
84.45
|
11.01
|
Alkyd + PY37 (P/BM 1:6)
|
L*
a*
b*
|
73.16
22.16
101.47
|
75.75
22.23
81.65
|
3.76
|