Education has important effects on the physical and psychosocial development of children. A healthy society requires that all children have access to healthy, efficient education. However, 1 in 10 children (in total, 63 million girls and 97 million boys) worldwide engage in child labour, and over one-third of child workers aged 5 to 17 years do not attend school (1,2). The highest prevalence of child labour is in sub-Saharan Africa, while the lowest is in Europe and North America. Among European countries, Turkey has the highest prevalence of child labour (1,3). The reasons that children work differ. However, poverty, migration, and lack of schooling opportunities are reported as the most common reasons for non-schooling (1,2,4). Recent studies have shown that economic contribution to family is a common reason that children work (3,5). In of Turkey, both immigrant and non-immigrant children with low socioeconomic status are victims of socio-political problems resulting from unplanned migration due to the war in Syria. According to the latest (2019–2020) TUIK data, Turkey had over 5 million students in secondary school (6) but also over 700 thousand child and adolescent workers in 2019. Overall, 80% of these workers were 15–17 years of age, 16% were 12–14 years of age, and 4% were 5–11 years of group. Among them, 71% were boys, and 68% were both working and continuing formal education. Almost 31% of child workers laboured in agriculture, 24% in industry, and 45.5% in the service sector (3). There may be more child workers than is reported, as it is forbidden to employ children under the age of 14 according to regulations in Turkey. Beyond that, the COVID-19 pandemic may have a high impact in increase of the child workers’ prevalence, especially in low-middle income countries such as Turkey, due to its large impact on economies, working conditions, and education systems (7).
Child labour gravely impacts physical health (8–10), mental health (10–14), childhood maltreatment such as abuse and neglect (15,16), and nutritional status (9). According to recent studies, levels of depression and anxiety among children are already high, and they are increasing (11,12,17). Suicide ideation and attempts are also on the rise (18). However, child labourers are under higher risk of health problems due to unequal life and working conditions(19). Children who have to work may also have difficulties in acquiring and maintaining healthy lifestyle behaviours such as healthy eating and exercise (9). In addition, they are more likely to be exposed to labour violations, fatal and non-fatal work accidents, and injury at the workplace compared to adults or peer groups attending school full-time (9,20). For example, nearly 2,500 workers lost their lives in 2020 due to work accidents in Turkey, among whom 3% were younger than 17 years of age (22 workers were younger than 14, and 46 were 15–17 years in age). In the same year, 101 migrant workers lost their lives in a work accident (21). Recent studies have also shown a significant association between the prevalence of occupational accidents and injuries and child labour (9,22), but migrant child workers experience accidents and injuries more frequently (20). It is known that these children, who are exposed to conditions and responsibilities that are not suitable for their biopsychosocial developmental period, experience malnutrition, low levels of academic success, and greater difficulty in establishing a healthy future (13,14,23).
Every child should have healthy living conditions and free, accessible educational opportunities, which are their most basic rights from birth. However, some children, especially those with low socioeconomic status (whether displaced immigrants or non-immigrants), seem to be deprived of these basic rights (20,24,25). On the other hand, migrant child workers are much more vulnerable relative to non-migrant child workers due to linguistic and other barriers, such as lack of residency and lack of knowledge regarding occupation, education, and health systems (20). Work has a multifaceted, negative effect on children's health and quality of life (13,14,23). However, according to a literature review conducted in the relevant field, studies examining the multifaceted health status of migrant and non-migrant child workers with a valid, reliable measurement tool, especially in Turkey, are limited. The current study was carried out because it is essential to identify the problems of children working in countries such as Turkey, which has recently experienced rapid socio-political and economic changes and has an increasing immigrant population, and to develop preventive programmes and initiatives. As mentioned, Turkey has the highest prevalence of child workers among European countries (1,26). In this context, the Omaha System was used to determine the physiological and psychosocial health behaviours and environmental problems of working children in order to follow up and find solutions. This system is comprehensive and evidence based, and it is currently used by nurses, physicians, and other health staff internationally in schools, clinics, and community and occupational health centres. It is a standardised taxonomy providing a systematic approach to identifying the health problems and sociodemographic characteristics of individuals, families, and communities for the planning of reliable interventions. The Omaha System consists of the Problem Classification Scheme, Intervention Scheme, and Problem Rating (27,28) (Fig. 1).
The aim of this descriptive-correlational and observational study was to determine the physiological, psychosocial, and health-related behaviours, as well as the environmental problems of migrant and non-migrant child workers in lower-secondary schools in a suburb of Istanbul, Turkey, using the Omaha System Problem Classification Scheme.
The following research questions were addressed in this study:
Research question 1
What are the health problems of migrant and non-migrant child workers in lower-secondary schools residing in a suburb of Istanbul, Turkey?
Research question 2
Is there an association between sociodemographic characteristics and health problems?
Research question 3
Is the Problem Classification Scheme of the Omaha System suitable for defining the health problems of migrant and non-migrant lower-secondary school children?