Structure characterization of the PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites
FTIR tests were conducted to investigate and clarify the modifications in the functional groups of the microcomposites with different heat stabilizer ratios after the heat ageing at 100°C for 168 hours. From the FTIR spectra depicted in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, the characteristic bands of PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites are well shown and the assignments of these bands are in line with those provided by several researchers corresponding with composites based on PVC [35–37].
Figure 1 FTIR spectra of PVC microcomposites exposed to thermal ageing for t = 360 h under temperature T = 100°C:(a) OH water group superposed region, (b) CO carbonyl group superposed region
Figure 2 FTIR spectra of PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites exposed to thermal ageing for 360 h under temperature T = 100°C : (a) OH water group region, (b) CO carbonyl group region
The peaks in the region 2940–2960 cm− 1 correspond to symmetric stretching C-H in the adjacent CH-Cl, but the peak at 2849 cm− 1 in PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites is attributed to the asymmetric stretching, of C-H in -CH3 groups and in -CH2- groups. The peaks in the range 800–870 cm− 1 can be attributed to the calcium carbonate group CaCO3. Moreover, the asymmetric stretching of C-Cl can be related to the peaks in the range of 610–730 cm− 1. Furthermore, the weak bands around 3620 and 3660 cm− 1 in Fig. 1a and Fig. 2a, attributed to the hydroxyl group OH stretch of the water phase may result from adsorption of HCl by CaCO3 particles. A strong peak at 1732 cm− 1 in Fig. 1b and Fig. 2b is attributed to C = O stretch presented in DOP structure and it is probably due to the oxidation process during heat ageing test. Finally, we can conclude that PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites with different heat stabilizers concentrations are not significantly affected by thermal ageing at 100°C, as shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. The difference of FTIR peaks between PVC and PVC/r-LDPE micro composites are visible in the superposed intensity and shape of characteristic bands represented above.
Mechanical properties of the PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites
The Tensile strength, Elongation at break and Young’s modulus results of PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites before and after ageing are displayed in Fig. 3a and b and Table 2. It showed that pure PVC gets more brittle, as compared with the PVC matrix contained heat stabilizers, CaCO3, and r-LDPE polymer, which these additives make the material more mechanically stable.
Table 2
The mechanical results before and after heat ageing of PVC and PVC/LDPE microcomposites.
sample | Before ageing | After ageing |
Tensile Strength | Young’s Modulus | Elongation at break | Tensile Strength | Young’s Modulus | Elongation at break |
σ (MPa) | E (MPa) | Ɛ (%) | σ (MPa) | E (MPa) | Ɛ (%) |
MC0 | 15,55 ± 0,8 | 30,33 ± 1,1 | 301,02 ± 15,2 | 12,2 ± 0,5 | 20,4 ± 1,3 | 250,5 ± 16,2 |
MC1 | 17,38 ± 0,5 | 40,24 ± 0,9 | 340,3 ± 20 | 15,6 ± 1 | 37,23 ± 0,9 | 300,09 ± 17,9 |
MC2 | 18 ± 0,7 | 44,23 ± 0,8 | 344,14 ± 21 | 17,6 ± 0,6 | 40,2 ± 1,4 | 305,76 ± 18,9 |
MC3 | 18,5 ± 0,8 | 56,41 ± 1 | 351,5 ± 19,6 | 17,9 ± 0,9 | 52,7 ± 1,6 | 320 ± 14 |
MC4 | 19,6 ± 1 | 60,32 ± 1,3 | 381,62 ± 19 | 19 ± 0,7 | 56,4 ± 0,6 | 360,34 ± 16,5 |
MC5 | 16,84 ± 1 | 36,03 ± 0,9 | 313,05 ± 22,5 | 15 ± 1,5 | 31,1 ± 0,7 | 287,91 ± 16,5 |
MC6 | 16,5 ± 0,4 | 42,27 ± 1,2 | 314,11 ± 17 | 15,9 ± 0,3 | 39,2 ± 1,2 | 290,7 ± 16,5 |
MC7 | 6,06 ± 0,5 | 95.14 ± 5,1 | 11,52 ± 0,6 | 5,50 ± 0,4 | 90,26 ± 4,9 | 10,4 ± 0,5 |
MC8 | 5,98 ± 0,3 | 99.20 ± 4 | 13,72 ± 0,9 | 5,60 ± 0,4 | 96,22 ± 5,7 | 12,5 ± 0,8 |
MC9 | 5,38 ± 0,3 | 115.33 ± 8,3 | 17,06 ± 12 | 4,98 ± 0,2 | 110 ± 8,6 | 16,12 ± 1,1 |
NC10 | 7.00 ± 0,5 | 130.19 ± 9 | 18,11 ± 1,4 | 6,80 ± 0,3 | 127,21 ± 10 | 17,5 ± 1 |
MC11 | 3,73 ± 0,2 | 80.20 ± 7,2 | 11 ± 0,5 | 3,63 ± 0,5 | 75,03 ± 5 | 10 ± 0,7 |
MC12 | 4,61 ± 0,4 | 65.44 ± 5,5 | 13,3 ± 11 | 4,58 ± 0,3 | 62 ± 3,9 | 12,6 ± 0,9 |
Figure 3a shows the variation of tensile behaviors of PVC microcomposites at different heat stabilizers ratios. The mechanical performance is remarkably decreased in the sample without thermal stabilizer MC0 after ageing. In addition, the sample MC4 exhibit better mechanical performance than the pure PVC and other samples, before and after ageing. It revealed that the optimum concentration of mixed stearate CaSt2: ZnSt2 = 9 :1 for the highest tensile strength, elongation at break and young’s modulus is 5 phr, this concentration probably leads to the good dispersion of CaSt2 particles in PVC microcomposite. From a mechanical point of view, we can also see that 2 phr of thermal stabilizers MC1 and MC2 are slightly better than 10 phr, MC5 and MC6 with little favor of heat stabilizer with a high concentration of calcium, due to the interaction between the polar ends of Calcium stearate and the somewhat polar PVC chains [38].
Figure 3 Evolution of the mechanical properties of PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites before and after heat ageing
Figure 3b represents the influence of r-LDPE on the mechanical properties of the PVC microcomposites with 2, 5 and 10 phr of mixed metal stabilizers. It can be observed that the incorporation of r-LDPE into PVC decreases the tensile strength and elongation at break when it is compared with PVC micro composites. This deterioration is due to the crystalline structure part of the macromolecular chain of r-LDPE polymer and which makes the PVC polymer loses partially its flexibility [39]. On the other hand, Young’s Modulus values are doubly increased after addition of r-LDPE into PVC microcomposites. In addition, MC10 exhibits better mechanical properties than other samples, before and after ageing. In addition, it can be seen that the incorporation of r-LDPE enhances the mechanical stability of the PVC polymer after heat ageing. Hence, during the thermal treatment the PVC and short-chain r-LDPE radicals react to produce r-LDPE-g-PVC copolymers [26]. The mechanical properties of microcomposites based on PVC become higher with increasing the content of CaSt2.
Table 2 The mechanical results before and after heat ageing of PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites
Effects of thermal stabilizers and r-LDPE on stabilizing PVC microcomposites
Figure 4a and b shows the results of Thermal stability time (Congo red test) of PVC microcomposites at 180°C and discoloration photos of PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites at 180°C for 110 min of three different concentrations of thermal stabilizers with (CaSt2: ZnSt2 = 9:1 and CaSt2: ZnSt2 = 1:9), respectively. As shown in Fig. 4a, the PVC microcomposites MC4 and MC6, when the thermal stabilizer is rich in calcium, it can relatively improve the thermal stability time (t = 160 min) [40, 41]. Whereas, in Fig. 4b thermal stability increased with increasing heat stabilizer concentrations and delayed the discoloration of PVC samples with a significantly resistance to discoloration of PVC/r-LDPE samples MC10 and MC12 which the incorporation of r-LDPE into PVC showed much better antidiscoloration compared with PVC microcomposites. In addition, the samples rich in Zinc stearate MC1, MC3, MC5, MC7, MC9, and MC11 quickly turned to dark color, the reason is that ZnSt2 can remove initial coloration by substituting labile chlorine atoms from the PVC chain [42]. However, the heat stabilizer rich in calcium stearate increases the PVC stabilization time due to the inhibition of ZnCl2 which is responsible of dehydrochlorination process [43]. As is known, CaSt2 could react with ZnCl2 to regenerate ZnSt2 and CaCl2 via ester exchange reaction. On the other side, a detailed computational study is required to understand the dehydrochlorination process in presence of CaSt2 and ZnSt2.
Figure 4 (a) Thermal stability time (Congo red test) of PVC microcomposites at 180°C. (b) Discoloration photos of PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites at 180°C for 110 min
Thermal properties of the PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites
The thermo-gravimetric curves of PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposite with different metal mixed heat stabilizers ratios are plotted in Fig. 5a-d. The important temperatures and different thermal degradation levels of PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites are summarized in Table 3. As shown in the TGA graphs, thermal degradation of PVC and PVC/r-LDPE occurred in two major steps.
Table 3
Interested decomposition temperatures and weight loss levels of PVC and PVC/LDPE microcomposites
Sample | Decomposition temperature |
T Onset (°C) | T10% (°C) | First stage | Second stage |
Tmax (°C) | Mass loss (%) | Trange /(°C) | Tmax (°C) | Mass loss (%) | Trange /(°C) |
MC1 | 277.28 | 285.36 | 399.54 | 54.07 | 277–343 | 468.30 | 66.50 | 442–490 |
MC2 | 278.72 | 286.43 | 301.22 | 5 3.10 | 278–350 | 464.63 | 67.50 | 440–493 |
MC3 | 281.13 | 284.10 | 288.00 | 54.00 | 281–335 | 474.49 | 66.30 | 441–494 |
MC4 | 285.55 | 291.29 | 302.91 | 51.09 | 286–355 | 473.75 | 64.21 | 444–498 |
MC5 | 283.30 | 292.24 | 296.23 | 52.51 | 283–330 | 470.27 | 63.00 | 445–502 |
MC6 | 284.61 | 295.56 | 300.32 | 52.23 | 284–339 | 470.02 | 62.10 | 446–501 |
MC7 | 283.52 | 289.83 | 290.20 | 31.00 | 283–315 | 490.6 | 67.40 | 468–505 |
MC8 | 284.48 | 293.53 | 305.80 | 34.00 | 285–317 | 491.01 | 70.50 | 463–508 |
MC9 | 281.00 | 286.72 | 290.03 | 31.45 | 281–323 | 490.55 | 64.60 | 470–509 |
MC10 | 290.20 | 297.72 | 304.82 | 31.35 | 290–325 | 492.51 | 63.50 | 474–511 |
MC11 | 277.22 | 285.44 | 292.65 | 31.90 | 276–322 | 490.06 | 68.55 | 471–508 |
MC12 | 286.42 | 296.06 | 300.19 | 31.50 | 286–324 | 492.23 | 64.85 | 472–510 |
Figure 5a and b shows the first degradation of PVC begins around 277°C with remarkably lose weight which is attributed to the dehydrochlorination of PVC and the second degradation is related to the scission of polyene sequences [10, 44].The onset degradation temperatures of PVC microcomposites are in the range of 276–290˚C. It is observed that the samples MC1 and MC2 have lower decomposition temperatures as compared to any other PVC microcomposite, due to a small amount of heat stabilizer incorporated in the PVC matrix, moreover, as long as the heat stabilizer is increased, the PVC degradation is delayed significantly in the MC4, MC5 and MC6 samples, in which MC4 sample shifts to higher values. As expected, the thermal stability of samples containing high calcium concentration are much better than samples with high zinc concentration into mixed metal stabilizer, due to the ability of CaSt2 to absorb more HCl which indeed leads to much less the dehydrochlorination, and more stability of PVC microcomposites [45].
Figure 5 (a, b) TGA and DTG curves of PVC and (c, d) TGA and DTG curves of PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites
Figure 5c and d represented the influencing of r-LDPE on the thermal degradation of PVC, which plays the same role as heat stabilizer. Similarly to PVC degradation, it can be seen that the optimum concentration of mixed stearate CaSt2 : ZnSt2 = 9 :1 for the degradation of PVC/r-LDPE microcomposite is 5 phr, in addition, it can be concluded that the incorporation of r-LDPE into PVC enhances the values of onset degradation temperatures up to 290°C and retards the degradation process [36], accordingly to the mechanism which was proposed by Thongpin et al. [46], and Sombatsompop et al. [26], in particular through the starting of the initiation co-cross-linking process which results in macro-radical recombination reactions which lead to producing more short chains, PVC grafted with r-LDPE at high temperatures.
Table 3 Interested decomposition temperatures and weight loss levels of PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites
Fracture surface morphology of the PVC and PVC/r-LDPE microcomposites
Figure 6 presents SEM micrographs for fracture surfaces of PVC and PVC/r-LDPE with CaCO3 particles and CaSt2: ZnSt2 = 9:1. Figure 6a and c shows that the hydrophilic CaCO3 micro-particles were highly aggregated in the PVC matrix, with several voids present, leading to a decrease in the interfacial adhesion between CaCO3 particles and PVC matrix [47]. Figure 6b and d reveals a good compatibility between CaCO3 microparticles and PVC/r-LDPE mixtures compared with PVC matrix, due to the well distribution of CaCO3 in the blend. As the PVC was blended with r-LDPE, the CaCO3 were well dispersed in the PVC/r-LDPE blend, which led to a strong interfacial interaction between PVC/r-LDPE and CaCO3 microparticles [48]. These findings are in accordance with the mechanical behaviors of microcomposites.
Figure 6 SEM images of the fracture surfaces of (a,c) MC4 and (b,d) MC10 microcomposites
DFT calculation results
Geometries optimization of reactants, transitions state and products were depicted in Fig. 7a. PVC polymer, may be regarded as polar, interacted with the polar part of thermal stabilizers. The strong hydrogen bond between H of PVC and O of Cast2 and Znst2 is 2.29 and 2.35 Å, respectively, reveals the stability of reactants. In addition, Ca and Zn formed electrostatic bond with Cl by 2.87 and 2.49 Å, respectively. The simultaneous transfer of the chlorine and the hydrogen to the thermal stabilizers leads to the formation of unsaturated groups in PVC and takes place via TS1 and TS2 which lies 29.6 and 25.0 kcal/mol, respectively, above reactants. The free energy profiles of the dehydrochlorination process are displayed in Fig. 7b, we found that dehydrochlorination process can occur via a concerted mechanism with four- member ring transition state and the free activation energy with ZnSt2 is smaller than that with CaSt2. Our DFT results are consistent with previous theoretical and experimental results [45, 49].
Figure 7 (a) Optimized geometries of reactants, transition states and products for the thermal dehydrochlorination of PVC with different thermal stabilizers. Distance given in A°.Atom color code: H in white, C in grey, Cl in green, O in red, Ca in yellow and Zn in blue and (b) Relative free energies of the dehydrochlorination process with (blue) CaSt2 and (red) ZnSt2 at the M06-2X/6–31 + + G(p,d) level