1.
Almaqrami BS, Alhammadi MS, Cao B. Three dimensional reliability analyses of currently
used methods for assessment of sagittal jaw discrepancy. J Clin Exp Dent.2018;10(4):e352-e60.
2.
Pelo S, Correra P, Gasparini G, Marianetti TM, Cervelli D, Grippaudo C, et al. Three-dimensional
analysis and treatment planning of hemimandibular hyperplasia. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(6):2227-34.
3.
Rossini G, Cavallini C, Cassetta M, Barbato E. 3D cephalometric analysis obtained
from computed tomography. Review of the literature. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2011;2(3-4):31-9.
4.
Montúfar J, Romero M, Scougall-Vilchis RJ. Automatic 3-dimensional cephalometric landmarking
based on active shape models in related projections. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2018;153(3):449.
5.
Gupta A, Kharbanda OP, Sardana V, Balachandran R, Sardana HK. A knowledge-based algorithm
for automatic detection of cephalometric landmarks on CBCT images. Int J Comput Assist
Radiol Surg. 2015;10(11):1737.
6.
Ye N, Long H, Zhu S, Yang Y, Lai W, Hu J. The Accuracy of Computer Image-Guided Template
for Mandibular Angle Ostectomy. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39(1):117-23.
7.
Lee JW, Lim SH, Kim MK, Kang SH. Precision of a CAD/CAM-engineered surgical template
based on a facebow for orthognathic surgery: an experiment with a rapid prototyping
maxillary model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;120(6):684.
8.
Lo L-J, Weng J-L, Ho C-T, Lin H-H. Three-dimensional region-based study on the relationship
between soft and hard tissue changes after orthognathic surgery in patients with prognathism.
PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0200589.
9.
Kamburoglu K, Murat S, Kolsuz E, Kurt H, Yuksel S, Paksoy C. Comparative assessment
of subjective image quality of cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography scans.
J Oral Sci. 2011;53(4):501-8.
10.
Ye N, Jian F, Xue J, Wang S, Liao L, Huang W, et al. Accuracy of in-vitro tooth volumetric
measurements from cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;142(6):879-87.
11.
Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based
diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26(4):813-20.
12.
Sang YH, Hu HC, Lu SH, Wu YW, Li WR, Tang ZH. Accuracy Assessment of Three-dimensional
Surface Reconstructions of In vivo Teeth from Cone-beam Computed Tomography. Chin
Med J (Engl). 2016;129(12):1464-70.
13.
Hassan B, Couto Souza P, Jacobs R, de Azambuja Berti S, van der Stelt P. Influence
of scanning and reconstruction parameters on quality of three-dimensional surface
models of the dental arches from cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig.
2010;14(3):303-10.
14.
Nagarajappa AK, Dwivedi N, Tiwari R. Artifacts: The downturn of CBCT image. J Int
Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(6):440-5.
15.
Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts
in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40(5):265-73.
16.
Baumgaertel S, Palomo JM, Palomo L, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam
computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(1):19-25.
17.
Teeter MG, Brophy P, Naudie DD, Holdsworth DW. Comparison of micro-computed tomography
and laser scanning for reverse engineering orthopaedic component geometries. Proc
Inst Mech Eng H. 2012;226(3):263-7.
18.
Lemos LS, Rebello IM, Vogel CJ, Barbosa MC. Reliability of measurements made on scanned
cast models using the 3Shape R700 scanner. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(6):20140337.
19.
Kaplan DJ, Patel JN, Liporace FA, Yoon RS. Intraoperative radiation safety in orthopaedics:
a review of the ALARA (As low as reasonably achievable) principle. Patient Saf Surg.
2016;10:27.