In this study, all English-language articles published in electronic databases that were related to the research objective were evaluated. In the first phase, 2132 articles (databases = 2038) and (registers = 94) /one article in manual search) were extracted by primary search. Finally, after excluding duplicate articles, 8 articles were analyzed with a total sample size of 464. (Including 217 women and 247 men). (Table 1). The search was conducted without time limitation. Four studies reported the effect of vitamin D on male sexual function, and 4 studies reported the effect of vitamin D on female sexual function (Tables 1 and 2, respectively). Based on the search of the Cochrane Library database, 7 clinical trial protocols related to the present study were published. After electronic connection with the authors of the correspondence, only one of the authors sent the published article, which was excluded because it did not meet the inclusion criteria.
Table 1. Summary of studies on men’s sexual function
Author/year/country/trial design
|
Participants (T1/C2)
|
Mean age (range)
|
Trial duration
(Weeks or months)
|
Vitamin D-25OH level (nmol/L)
|
Intervention vitamin D type, dose, frequency
|
Co interventions
|
Outcome measures
|
Outcome
|
Ahn et al. 2019
Korea, single-arm pilot study [29]
|
28 men with erectile dysfunction
|
65.1 ± 6.5; (54-84)
|
3 months or 12 months
|
11.2 ± 3.9 ng/mL
|
vitamin D3 1,000 IU/day
|
zinc 12mg/day
|
IIEF-53
|
The IIEF-5 score was increased significantly in men with VD deficiency (from 11.2 ± 4.9 to 14.2 ± 5.8, p<0.01), while it does not observe in men without VD deficiency (from 9.3 ± 6.4 to 8.3 ± 4.6, p <0.526).
|
Culha et al. 2019
Turkey, single-arm study [25]
|
42 men with erectile dysfunction
|
51.10 ± 9.71 (31-70)
|
1 month
|
-
|
100,000 IU / week Vitamin D3 oral
|
tadalafil 5 mg daily
|
IIEF-EF
IPSS4
|
IIEF-EF (pre-treatment: 11.02 ± 5.50, post-treatment:23.00 ± 4.96; p = 0.001) and IPSS (pretreatment: 7.81 ± 5.67, post-treatment: 3.43 ± 1.13; p = 0.003) scores were significantly improved.
|
Canguven et al. 2017
a prospective, Interventional trial [18]
|
102 men with deficient serum VD level
|
53.2 ± 10.4
|
three, six, nine, and 12 months
|
Baseline:15.16 ± 4.64 ng/mL
3 m: 31.90 ± 15.99 ng/mL
6 m: 37.23 ± 12.42 ng/mL
9 m: 44.88 ± 14.49 ng/mL
12 m: 48.54 ± 11.62 ng/mL
|
Ergocalciferol; oral solution 600 000 IU/1.5 ml
|
-
|
(IIEF)-5
|
Serum VD exhibited significant increments from baseline (15.16 ± 4.64 ng/mL) to three (31.90 ± 15.99 ng/mL), six (37.23 ± 12.42 ng/mL), nine (44.88 ± 14.49 ng/mL), and 12 (48.54 ± 11.62 ng/mL) months, and there was significant stepladder increases in both serum TT level (12.46 ± 3.30 to 15.99 ± 1.84 nmol/L) and erectile function scores (13.88 ± 3.96 to 19.85 ± 3.24).
|
Pandey et al. 2021
India, [22]
|
75 Erectile dysfunction Patients with Vitamin D Deficiency
|
A:
37.44±10.85
B:
39.08±9.78
C:
37.96±9.66
|
Baseline, 12 weeks
|
-
|
T1: Tadalafil 10mg once a day plus Vitamin D 60,000 IU once a week
T2:
Vitamin D 60,000 IU once a week only
C: Tadalafil 10mg once a day
|
C: Tadalafil 10mg once a day
|
IIEF-5
|
After 12 weeks of treatment, in group C patients, IIEF-5 scoring was nearly same as that of the base line with no significant difference. However, IIEF-5 scoring was significantly improved in group A and B patients (P<0.001). On comparing group A and B patients there was significant improvement in group B compared to group A (P < 0.05).
|
1 T= Treatment group
2 C= Control group
3 International Index of Erectile Function
4 International Prostate Symptom Score
Table 2. Summary of studies on women’s sexual function
Author/year/country/
trial design
|
Participants (T5/C6)
|
Mean age (range)
|
Trial duration
(Weeks or months)
|
Vitamin D-25OH level (nmol/L)
|
Intervention vitamin D type, dose, frequency
|
Co-interventions
|
Outcome measures
|
Outcome
|
Jalali-Chimeh et al. 2019
Iran, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial [26]
|
76 women (38/38)
|
T: 34.9±6.2
C: 35.9±6.7
|
Baseline, 4 and 8 weeks
|
14.4 ± 3.2 ng/ml
|
T: intramuscular injection of 300,000 IU cholecalciferol
C: placebo
|
-
|
FSFI7
|
The Female Sexual Function Index score was higher in the intervention group at the 4th (19.6 vs. 16.3, P=0.002) and 8th (25.0 vs. 17.1, P <0.001) weeks of the study
|
Krysiak et al. 2018
Poland, RCT [30]
|
47 women
(16/17/14)
|
T1: 30±6
T2: 31±5
C: 30±5
|
Baseline and 6 months
|
T1: 11±4 ng/dl
T2: 24±3 ng/dl
C: 24±4 ng/dl
|
T1: oral vitamin D (4000 IU daily)
T2: oral vitamin D (4000 IU daily)
C: not receiving vitamin D therapy
|
-
|
FSFI
|
Vitamin D improved sexual desire in women with both vitamin D deficiency and vitamin D insufficiency, increased the total FSFI score and scores for orgasm and sexual satisfaction, and decreased the total BDI-II score, in women with vitamin D deficiency.
|
Rad et al. 2015
Iran, double-blind clinical trial [24]
|
44 women (22/22)
|
T: 54.04±5.2
C:54.38±3.2
|
Baseline,2, 4 and 8 weeks
|
-
|
T: vitamin D suppositories 1000 IU vitamin D
C: placebo suppositories
|
-
|
VAS8
|
The mean pain significantly reduced after 8 weeks in the treatment group (1.23 ± 0.53) compared to the control group 1.95 ± 0.74 (P < 0.001).
|
Vitale et al. 2018
Italy, a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study [27]
|
50 menopausal women (25/25)
|
T: 52.72±4.02
C: 52.48±3.4
|
Baseline,3 ,6 and 12 months
|
T: 30.48±5.15 ng/ml
C: 31.32±5.46 ng/ml
|
T: vitamin D (300 UI)
C: -
|
T: isoflavones (40 mg), calcium (500 mg) and inulin (3 g)
C: placebo
|
MENQOL9
FSFI
|
After 12 months, sexual domain scores (p<0.05) and a significant increase in all FSFI domain scores (p<0.05) were observed in treatment group.
|
5 T= Treatment group
6 C= Control group
7 Female Sexual Functioning Index
8 Visual Analouge Scale
9 Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire
The effect of vitamin D on male sexual function
A randomized trial by Canguven et al (2017) reported the effect of vitamin D supplementation on improving sex hormones, metabolic syndrome, and erectile dysfunction in 102 middle-aged men with vitamin D deficiency. Erectile dysfunction status was assessed with the International Erectile Function Index (IIEF-5) at baseline and then at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the intervention. Vitamin D was administered as ergocalciferol at a dose of 600,000 units in 1.5 ml. The results of this study showed that with the administration of vitamin D, serum levels of vitamin D, testosterone, and erectile function index increased significantly (P < 0.001) [18].
Ahn et al (2019) reported the efficacy of vitamin D and zinc supplements for erectile dysfunction in a single arm study. In this study, 28 men with erectile dysfunction received 1000 units of vitamin D and 12 units of zinc daily as dietary supplement for 12 weeks. The International Erectile Performance Index (IIEF-5) was used to assess erectile dysfunction status at baseline and then 12 weeks after the intervention. The results of this study showed that 67.9% of patients were vitamin D deficient and the mean vitamin D level at baseline was 11.2 ± 3.9 ng/ml. In patients with vitamin D deficiency, the IIEF-5 score increased significantly with vitamin D and zinc supplementation (p < 0.01), whereas this change was not significant in the group with normal vitamin D levels [20].
In the study by Culha et al (2019), conducted with the aim of investigating the effect of vitamin D supplementation on sexual dysfunction as a single-arm study, 42 men with erectile dysfunction were studied. These men received oral vitamin D supplementation of 100,000 units per week for 4 weeks; in addition to the vitamin D supplementation, they received 5 mg of oral tadalafil tablets. The International Erectile Dysfunction Index (IIEF-5) and the International Score of Prostate Symptoms (IPSS) were used to assess the erectile dysfunction status at baseline and then 4 weeks after the intervention. The results of this study showed that one month after taking vitamin D, the IIEF-5 and IPSS improved significantly (p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively) [21].
In the study by Ali et al (2021), which aimed to evaluate the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in erectile dysfunction patients with vitamin D deficiency, 75 patients in the age group of 20 to 60 years had severe vitamin D deficiency and erectile dysfunction. They were randomly divided into three groups. The first group (A) with tadalafil 10 mg once a day, the second group (B) tadalafil 10 mg once a day with vitamin D 60,000 international units once a week and the third group (C) vitamin D 60,000 units was given only once a week. The efficacy of the drugs was assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks based on the IIEF-5. After 12 weeks of treatment, the IIEF-5 value in group C patients was almost the same as the baseline value and there was no significant difference. On the other hand, the IIEF-5 score improved significantly in patients in group A and B (P < 0.001). When patients in groups A and B were compared, significant improvement was observed in group B compared with group A (P < 0.05) [22].
The effect of vitamin D on female sexual function
In a double-blind clinical trial by Jalali-Chimeh et al (2019), aimed at investigating the effect of vitamin D on female sexual function, 76 women in the intervention and control groups (38 in each group) were studied. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) was used at baseline, and 4 and 8 weeks after the intervention. The intervention group received 300,000 units of vitamin D (intramuscular injection) and the control group received placebo. Female sexual function index score in the intervention group were significantly higher at 4 and 8 weeks after the intervention (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively [2].
Krysiak et al (2018) conducted a study in the Netherlands to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on sexual function and depressive symptoms in young women with low vitamin D levels. This study was conducted in three groups: The first group consisted of 16 women with vitamin D deficiency (serum vitamin D level below 20 ng/ml) who received vitamin D supplementation at a dose of 400,000 units per day, the second group consisted of 17 women with insufficient vitamin D level (serum vitamin D level 20–30 ng/ml) who received vitamin D supplementation at a dose of 400,000 units per day and the third group includes 14 women with insufficient vitamin D level who did not receive any supplementation. To assess the women's sexual function, the Female Sexual Performance Index (FSFI) was used at baseline and 6 months after the intervention. Results showed that the FSFI total score and scores in the three domains of libido, orgasm, and sexual satisfaction were lower in women with vitamin D deficiency than in women with inadequate vitamin D levels. Vitamin D supplementation improved libido in both intervention groups and increased total FSFI score, orgasm, and sexual satisfaction in vitamin D deficient women (P < 0.05) [11].
The study by Vitale et al (2018) aimed to determine the effect of isoflavone, calcium, vitamin D, and inulin on improving quality of life, sexual function, and metabolic parameters in postmenopausal women as a randomized controlled trial with two parallel groups. In this study, 50 postmenopausal women were studied in two intervention groups (300 units of vitamin D, 40 mg of isoflavones, 500 mg of calcium, and 3 g of inulin) and one control group (placebo). Sexual function was assessed using Female Sexual Performance Index (FSFI) at baseline, and 3, 6, and 12 months after the intervention. The results showed that scores on all domains of the sexual function index and its total score had increased after the intervention (P < 0.05) [23].
A double-blind study by Rad et al (2015) examining the effect of vitamin D on vaginal atrophy in postmenopausal women was conducted with 44 women who had been menopausal for at least one year. In this study, vitamin D was administered at a dose of 1000 units in the vaginal suppository intervention group and placebo in the control group for 8 weeks (every night for the first 2 weeks, and every night in between for the next 6 weeks). The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess the degree of pain during intercourse before the intervention and at the end of 2, 4, and 8 weeks after the intervention. In this study, the mean score of pain during intercourse was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the placebo group (p = 0.001) [24].
Quality Assessment Report
The assessment of the quality of the studies is based on the Review Manager program (RevMan 5.3), which presents the quality of the studies in Fig. 2. Selection bias in 5 articles was low risk [18, 25–28], and 3 article was unclear [25, 29, 30]. Performance bias was low risk in 4 articles [18, 26–28], high risk in 3 article [25, 30, 31]and unclear in 1 articles [29]. The process of key individuals blinding was low risk in 3 articles [26–28], high risk in 3 articles [18, 25, 29], and unclear in 2 article [30, 31]. Detection bias was low-risk in 5 articles [26–28, 30, 31] and unclear in 3 articles [18, 25, 29]. Attrition bias was low risk in 6 studies [18, 26–28, 30, 31] and unclear in 2 study [25, 29], and all of predetermined outcomes were reported [18, 25–31]. Other biases were unclear in 6 studies [18, 25, 26, 28–31] and low risk in 1 studies [27].