The Determinant Factors that Hinders Urban Planning Implementation in Nekemte Town: The Case of 2008 Structure Plan

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1428226/v1

Urban structure plan is widely used plan in the process of urbanization and rapid urban spatial expansion. However, rapidly growing urban centers of Ethiopia are facing challenges to implement their structure plan within the time horizon. Thus, this study aims to investigate the determinant factors that hinder structure plan implementation in Nekemte town. Questionnaire survey, interview, observation and land use survey were used to collect data. Descriptive data analysis and regression model were used to analyze the data. The main findings of the study show that all identified factors: lack of active participation, lack commitment, political instability and lack of sufficient budget significantly contribute for the failure of structure plan implementation at P-value of 0.05. The regression analysis further indicated that, lack of community participation; − 0.0499 coefficients is the most determining factors and followed by customary land tenure and lack of awareness − 0.0489 and − 0.0468 coefficients respectively. Hence, future structure plan implementation endeavors of Nekemte city must be underpinned by inculcating Community participation and awareness of structure plan required to implement the plan to the expected level. Furthermore, use of modern technology like GIS and appropriate man power are also equally recommended to enhance structure plan implementation of Nekemte city.

Citizen Participation

Urban Land Use

Urban Development

Urban Expansion

Urban Plan Violation

According to the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs’ (2018), 55% of the world population lives in urban areas in 2018 and expected to reach 68% by 2050. This makes urbanization the most transformative process in this 21st century and has caused urban areas to be hub of environmental, social and cultural interactions. As a result, cities and urban centers are facing a challenge for to provide sufficient urban housing, adequate infrastructure and basic services for its dwellers (Evans et al., 2016). As pointed out by Watson (2016), to address these challenges sustainably every cities and towns need to plan, design, finance and develop appropriate strategies.

Lwasa and Kinuthia-Njena (2012) demonstrated that, East African countries has experienced demographic shift towards urban character. This demographic shift portends immense challenges due to rapid urbanization occurred without a strong economic base to support it and thereby contributing to the creation of informal urban settlement at urban fringes. For instance, Cira et al. (2016) found that urban areas in Kenya has faced challenges such as provision of adequate development control, provision of basic services in informalities, and adequate urban housing and maintenance of urban infrastructures due to rapid population growth and urbanization.

In every urbanization process, urban growth requires a large scale of land for business, housing, services, public spaces and circulation that facilitates livable urban development. This large scale urban land allocation for every urban activity need appropriate and well managed urban structure plan preparation and implementation.

However, the rapidly growing urban centers of the developing countries are facing challenges in implementing their approved structure plan properly as proposed during document preparation. This failure of structure plan implementation results, problems such as poor waste management, inappropriate land management, shortage of infrastructures, shortage of affordable housing and development of housing in flood prone and inaccessible areas.

Urban planning conveys the government policies and delivers planning right to landowners to overcome the challenges of unplanned activities within urban centers. This means appropriate structure plan implementation is helpful to ensure sustainable urban development by minimizing problems that are related with rapid urban expansion (such as homelessness, shortage of urban infrastructure, social services at proper locations, poor waste management, inappropriate land use change, expansion of squatter settlement, loss of natural resources and deforestation).

Nekemte town is one of the towns in Ethiopia that has four consecutive structure plans since 1967 to 2022. Majority of the planned uses on structure plan has not implemented on the real ground properly. Planned land uses such as open spaces, green areas, collector streets, swampy areas, urban agriculture were not implemented and abused by informal illegal settlements. Due to lack of structure plan implementation, squatter settlements are rapidly and irregularly expanding Nekemte town horizontally in all direction. Thus, unsafe pedestrian ways, shortage of public spaces, loss of green features and open spaces, unplanned and irregular utility arrangements are obviously observed in the town. These problems hinders the sustainable development of the town by creating increased wastage of limited urban land, low tax base, weak socio-economic activities and unsatisfied residents which are not achieved unless proper urban plan implementation can be made.

Therefore, studying and identifying the determinant factors that hinders urban structure plan implementation in Nekemte town is crucial to understand the major mitigation measures and strategies for improved and proper urban structure plan implementation. Thus, the objective of this study is to identify the determinant factors of urban structure plan implementation in Nekemte Town and investigate the level of effects of identified factors.

2.1. Urban planning and its importance

Planning is defined by researchers as the making of an orderly sequence of actions that leads to the achievement of some specified or stated goals (Cirolia & Berrisford, 2017). Faludi (2004) stated that planning is essential to guide activities in the midst of uncertainty and provide the basis for future decision making. Urban planning is a framework that helps the urban leaders and administrators to transform their stated vision into reality and enhance livability, prosperity and equity (UN Habitats, 2014) in resource utilization. Harris (2008) and UN habitat (2014) found that urban planning is used by people to promote welfare of the current and future urban residents by creating healthful, attractive, efficient and convenient urban environment.

Cifuentes et al. (2001) and Chapman et al. (2016) demonstrated that action to enhance urban resilience improve the public health of the urban environment. This can be made by improving the urban environment through proper implementation of urban plan. In addition, fast growing urban areas need to steer planned investment towards low carbon (Freytag et al., 2014; Ye et al., 2017), climate resilient focusing on the provision of core services (Colenbrander & Barau, 2019).

2.2. The Types of Urban Planning

Master plan: as described by researcher master plans featured the land use plan of the present and proposed as well as development control restrictions. As stated by Arraiga et al., (2007); Nallathiga (2015) master plan preparation involves the estimation of future population, socio-economic conditions and their infrastructure needs and the preparation of land use for future development to ensure the necessary facilities are achieved when the development take place. According to Nanda (2012) master planning is an exercise of resource planning resource generation and management and is perceived to be a process rather than end statement (Nallathiga, 2015).

Practices of Urban Plan Implementation in Africa

As elaborated by Chenal (2013), the urban reality of African continent is less to accommodate demographic growth and territorial expansion, poverty, environmental degradation, and informality of a significant portion of urban activities. There is high increase in urban population in African cities and reached 400 million, which represent 40% of the total population of the continent (UN-Habitat, 2014). This figure is estimated to reach 58% in the coming 2050. This demographic growth and spatial expansion of African cities and its effects in terms of poverty, urban inequality, environmental degradation and urban insecurity should be the foundation of urban planning (Bolay & Kern, 2011).

In Africa, urban planning practice is yet to step into the arena of urban sustainability and built on design oriented approach to urban natural resource management (Okeke, 2015). Many African cities have common discontinuous territorial development dispersed in the periphery and influence the further continuous extension of urban area into the suburb arising questions on coherent and integrated regional development between the cities and countryside (Silva, 2015).

In developing counties like Ethiopia, implementation of urban plan is the toughest and more challenging stage of urban plan preparation process. As indicated by Hameed and Nadeem (2008), the challenges of poor urban implementation are resulted the problems such as wastage of money, time and human resources that are important in plan making process. Without proper plan implementation, plan making is nothing for development.

Ethiopia has an experience of more than sixty years in plan preparation with different emphasis given to it by the government (Belachew & Aytenfisu, 2010). Beside 60 years of experience in urban planning practice, its service provision is in a fragmented and uncoordinated manner.

Factors Determines Structure Plan Implementation

According to Cullingworth and Nadin (2002), planning urban area is defined as an attempt to manage and determine the competing uses of urban land for variety of activities. Wilson et al. (2019) identified that the central role of urban planning is to create policy related to the urban environmental, economic and social issues as well as to make decision based on the prepared policy. In order to achieve these roles of urban planning community participation is one of the most important factors. Urban resident should have more say in shaping their local area and create their own objectives on how to change their living neighborhoods (Baker et al., 2007; Evans-Cowley and Hollander, 2010). Therefore, the power of planning and implementing urban areas to make better and standard living for the present and future generation should shift away from the hand of the government officials and planners towards local resident and should have impact on the status of urban plan implementations (Clarke and Cochrane, 2013; Holman and Rydin, 2013).

As indicated by Hemphill et al. (2006) the process of urban development needs the closer interaction of the urban local resident and the government officials. In order to have a detail understanding of the urban problems and come up with strong solutions, analyzing the condition of local resident and their level of involvement is the important of resilient urban development (Haus and Klausen, 2011). According to Haus and Klausen (2011), this is the notion of leadership that consist collective practices of framing and targeting problems in which both the governmental actors and societal actors plays some crucial roles for the success of the development. Cobb (2012) and Da Cruz et al. (2019) also demonstrated that good leadership play crucial role for the successful urban project and always works important things to satisfy the needs of the residents in urban areas.

In order to bring sustainable urban solutions developing countries face variety of challenges. These challenges as identified by Dodman et al. (2017) are lack of locally specific data, shortage of finance and lack of critical capabilities in built environment professionals. Colenbrander and Barau (2019) also stated that urban financial capability has crucial role to play in responding sustainable urban development.

With the rapidly expanding pose of urban areas, technological advancement has changed the patterns of urban residents. According to the study by Goi (2017) implementation of urban plan framework or model for creating sustainable and livable city is usually more focused on specific urban center rather than all cities.

3.1. Study Area

Nekemte town is one of the oromia regional state towns found in eastern wollega zone. The town has an area of 5,380 hectares as of 2008 structure plan which covered six kebele with the total population of 76,917. According to the revised structure pal of 2020 the total area of Nekemte town reached 8,204 hectares with the total population of 128,268. The town has four main exits: to Amahara Region (Nekemte-Bure-Bahirdar), to Benishangul Gumuz (Nekemte-Gimbi-Asosa), to Gambela Region (Nekemte- Mettu-Gambela) and the exit to Addis Ababa (Nekemte-Ambo-Addis Ababa). There is an active neighbourhood linkage with Jimma, Dambidolo, shambu,Gimbi and Bedele.

Moreover, the city is a huge economic corridor for the great Ethiopian renaissance dam, coffee and crop production area of Wollega zones, Buno-bedelle, Ilu Aba Bora and Jimma zone and western Ethiopia in general. The recent developments like Wollega Multipurpose International Stadium in the North, Wollega University Referral Hospital in the West, and Nekemte Specialised Hospital in the South and WollegaUniversity in the East are important and active socioeconomic corridors of the city that helped as the pull factors of overall socio-economic developments. Location of the study area is provided below on Fig. 1.

3.2. Data Sources

For the purpose of this study, primary data were used to examine the determinant factors that affect the implementation of urban structure plan in Nekemte Town. Primary data were collected from site observation, field land use surveying and survey questionnaires. The observation was employed to collect data on real ground from the six kebeles of the town such as Bake-jama, Burka Jato, Chelaleki, Darge, Keso and Bakenisa Kase. The primary data such as the characteristics of urban expansion in relation to the proposed structure plan, the types of the land use on the ground in relation to the plan. Figure 2 shows the flow diagram depicting the methodology employed for the purpose of this study;

Figure 2: Research Flow Diagram

3.3. Methods

For the purpose of this research, field observation, proximate land use survey and questionnaire surveys were employed to collect important data from the sample blocks of six kebele administration. Observation and land use survey were used to understand the types of existing land use and characteristic of Nekemte town urban expansion during the working period of 2008 structure plan. In order to conduct field observation and land use survey in the study area, 2 separate sites (Site 2 and 4 of Fig. 3) were selected. Within each site 6 blocks were selected randomly to reduce the complexity and difficulty of on field land use survey. Before site visit, the Authors prepared and assigned numbers to each blocks of the sample area (refer Figs. 10 and 11) using 2008 structure plan as base map. Then, data were collected for three consecutive days starting from 12 August 2021 to 14 August 2021.

In this study, questionnaire survey was also employed to identify the factors that contribute in the failure of urban structure plan implementation in the case of Nekemte town. The Authors conducted semi-structured interviews and administered questionnaires starting from 10 June 2021 to 05 August 2021. This survey questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were designed to elicit the knowledge and opinions of urban planning experts and the local residents about the status and the hindering factors of Nekemte town structure plan. In the beginning, the questionnaires were prepared by English language. However, in order to make the prepared questionnaires more understandable and clear for the key informant and the respondent the researchers translate into the local language-Afan Oromo.

The structure and contents of the interview as well as survey questionnaires were based on prior literatures on urban development plan implementation challenges and composed of both closed ended and open ended questions. Participants were assigned to respond to our questionnaires using purposive sampling techniques. For urban and regional planning experts, we distributed and retrieved 20 questionnaires at a target governmental departments such as Oromia Urban Planning Institute western branch (N = 8), Nekemte Town land Development and management (N = 7), and Nekemte town Municipality (N = 5).

For local communities, 385 survey questionnaires were distributed and regained using purposive sampling methods based on the experience of the researchers and the location at which high structure plan violation is experienced. The questionnaires were distributed over the six kebeles of Nekemte town Administration among 35,182 households. For the purpose of this study, sample size was selected using the Kothari Formula of n = z²pq /E², where n is the required sample, P is population Proportion, z is the value that specify the confidence level (1.96 for 95% confidence level) and q is 1-p. After the determination of the sample respondents, we have distributed the total sample size over each kebeles using the following formula (see Table 1).

$$N=\frac{Total Number of Households at each Kebele*Sample size}{Total number of Households in the town}\dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots \dots ..1$$

Accordingly, the sample respondents from each kebele administration were taken as shown on Table 1 below.

Table 1

Sample Size of Households Selected for Questionnaire
No.	Name of Kebeles	Total number of Households	Formula to assign kebele level samples	Sample respondents from each Kebeles
1	BakanisaKase	7,292	7292*385/35182	80
2	Bake Jama	3,646	3646*385/35182	40
3	Burka Jato	6,563	6563*385/35182	72
4	Chalalaki	6,197	6197*385/35182	68
5	Darge	6,744	6744*385/35182	74
6	Kaso	4,740	4740*385/35182	52
	Total	35,182		385

Data Analysis Methods

This study adopted the use of both descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. Quantitative data was analyzed by SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 24.0 to generate measured and quantitative information about the area of the land use that violates the land use allocated on the 2008 structure plan of the town. Qualitative data from interview, observation and documents were analyzed qualitatively through detail description and interpretation of the data.

Descriptive statistics was used to describe the relationship between the independent variables (allocation of human resource, leadership support and public participation) and dependent variable (structure plan implementation). The study adopted descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation to describe the basic features of the data and to provide simple summaries about the sample and the measures.

Regression analysis was used to examine the extent of the relation of dependent variable with each independent variable. For the purpose of this study the Authors employed multiple linear regression analysis to analyze the cause and effect relationship of the dependent variable Y (structure plan implementation) and independent variables X₁, X₂, X₃, … and X₁₀ (Technological advancement, Lack of skilled man power, Quality of the structure Plan, and Lack of Good governance and Leadership) as of Table 2. The basic relationship between X and Y is given by Y = a + b₁X₁ + b₂X₂ + …+ bnXn.

Table 2

List of variables included in the regression model
Variable	Broad Definition	Unit of Measurement	Nature of the variable
Dependent Y	Structure plan implementation	M²	Continuous
Independent
X₁	Lack of Technological advancement	Scale	Ordinal
X₂	Lack of skilled man power	In Number	Continuous
X₃	Quality of the structure Plan	Scale	Ordinal
X₄	Lack of Budget	In number	Continuous
X₅	Lack of commitment/focus	Scale	Ordinal
X₆	Political instability	Scale	Ordinal
X₇	Customary land Tenure	M²	Continuous
X₈	Lack of Awareness	Scale	Ordinal
X₉	lack of Active Participation	scale	Ordinal
X₁₀	Lack of Good governance and Leadership	Scale	Ordinal

4.1. Socio-economic Characteristics of the Respondents

385 distributed questionnaires were properly attempted and returned from sample respondents. The sample (N) for each variable are indicated while narrating the results (refer Table 3). Accordingly, the result indicated that out of 385 samples 78% are males while 28% of them are females. Most of the samples (90%) confined between 18–55 age categories, where 18–35 and 36–55 age groups share about 42% and 48% respectively. 79% of them are married while 15% are singles and about of 84% of them attended first degree and secondary school (9–10). In terms of occupation 78% of the samples are government employed. In terms of their awareness about structure plan implementation and patterns of urban expansion about 26% of the respondents know and informed about urban structure plan implementation very well while 30% of know well.

Table 3

Socioeconomic characteristics of survey respondents
Variables	Category	Number of the Respondents	Percentage of the Respondent
Gender	Male	302	78.4
Gender	Female	83	21.6
Age Characteristics	18–35	160	41.6
	35–55	186	48.3
	55–65	33	8.6
	65 & above	6	1.6
Marital Status	Single	59	15.3
	Married	306	79.5
	Divorced	17	4.4
	Widowed	3	0.8
Education Level of the Respondents	1–8	2	.5
	9–12	11	2.9
	Level II_IV	16	4.2
	Diploma	31	8.1
	Degree& above	325	84.4
Respondents’ Occupation	Unemployed	6	1.6
	Private	29	7.5
	Government Employee	302	78.4
	Business man	11	2.9
	Student	19	4.9
	Others	18	4.7
Work Experience of the Respondents	No experience	13	3.4
	Less than 2	3	.8
	2–5	110	28.6
	5–10	49	12.7
	10–15	57	14.8
	More than 15	153	39.7
Year of stay in Nekemte town	< 2 yrs.	6	1.6
	2–5 yrs.	80	20.8
	5–10 yrs.	85	22.1
	10–15 yrs.	60	15.6
	> 15	154	40.0
Awareness of Urban plan implementation(N = 380)	Yes, I know very well	98	26
	Yes, I know well	115	30
	I informed a little	89	24
	no, I don’t know at all	76	20

4.2. Perception of the Resident on the level of Urban expansion

In order to understand the perception of the local resident towards the status of urban plan implementation in Nekemte town, 17 quality attribute were included in the survey questionnaires using 5-point Likert scale measurement. As shown on Fig. 4, the survey results showed that most of the respondents (about 64.67%) were strongly agree and agree on spatially rapidly expanding level of urban areas in Nekemte town. Only 27.79% of the respondents refuse the rapidly expanding state of the town by indicating strongly disagree and disagree from the Likert scale provided.

4.3. Status of Structure Plan Implementation

In order to investigate the status of structure plan implementation of the study town, the data collected using field land use survey and questionnaire survey were analyzed. The results of the questionnaire survey indicated that the road network, green areas and urban forests, open spaces commercial land uses and agricultural land were not properly implemented. As shown in Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 most of the respondents were disagree and strongly disagree (63.9%, 74.5%, 61.8, 76.9 and 63.1% respectively) on road network, green space and forest, urban agriculture, commercial areas and open space implementation status. This indicates that the physical expansion of the town; the development of basic infrastructure such as urban street, open space, urban agriculture and green area that are located on the structure plan of 2008 were not implemented in accordance with the proposed structure plan.

In similar manner, the result from land use survey of sample sites showed that there is violation of structure plan regulations in most of the allocated land on the structure plan of 2008. As a result, the researchers identified that there was mismatch between the existing land uses and proposed land uses of 2008 structure plan document. The sample land uses and their implementation status were shown by Figs. 10, 11 and Table 4

Table 4

Implementation Status of Sample Land Uses
Code No.	Proposed Land Use	Existing Land Use	Area (ha.)	Status of structure plan implementation
C01	Social Service	Commercial	0.67	Violated
C02	Sport field	Transport	1.88	Violated
C03	Park	Residential	3.23	Violated
C04	Mixed use	Residential	19.74	Violated
C05	Mixed Use	Residential	3.4	Violated
C06	Urban Agriculture	Market place	4.42	Reserved
C07	Mixed use	Residential	3.48	Violated
C08	Sport field	Residential	5.02	Violated
C09	Play ground	Play ground	2.76	Conform with structure plan
C010	Mixed use	Residential	12.58	Violated
C011	Play ground	Residential	2.43	Violated
C012	Park	Residential	8.53	Violated
Total			68.14

Figures 10, 9 and Table 4 shows that among the observed 68.14 ha of sample proposed land uses 65.38 ha or more than 95% were violated (against the proposed land use) which means land uses like proposed park, playground, mixed land uses and urban agriculture were occupied by other functions (residential units) and the proposed land uses were not implemented on the ground. This implementation problem results shortage of recreational area for children, youth and elders as green spaces, proposed parks and proposed play grounds were highly violated as shown on Figs. 10, 11 and Table 4. In addition to the shortage of recreational areas for the residents, improper use of proposed agricultural land brings the shortage of agricultural products and food insecurity on urban residents.

Generally, results of the observation and land use survey of Nekemte town indicates the violation of Nekemte town development plan for various activities is widely happened and currently happening. This plan violation is happened due to the emergence of new housing demand which needs sufficient land allocation the in entire structure plan. The structure plan violation of Nekemte town is happened in such a way that; the proposed formal green space mixed uses, urban agriculture and sport fields were changed to residential units through customary land tenure that has no legal title deed (see Figs. 10 and 11).

The data from government official interview questionnaires related to the status and factors that hinders Nekemte town structure plan implementation shows that the 2008 revised structure plan of the town is not implemented properly as prepared on the plan. The problems related with proper implementation of the proposed structure plan in Nekemte town are low awareness of the community, weak leadership, poor monitoring and evaluation of plan implementation, insufficient land supply for residential house, low manpower and poor customer service delivery in land use and management office, municipality and construction office. Among 20 key informants of the interview about eight informants mentioned weak leadership as the cause for inappropriate structure plan implementation in the town while the other 12 informants put poor monitoring and evaluation as well as insufficient supply of residential land as the major causes of the problem. In general, the data indicates weak leadership, poor monitoring and evaluation of plan implementation and insufficient residential land supply are the core causes of inadequate structure plan implementation in Nekemte town.

The interview informants also stated that with the current rapidly increasing population of Nekemte town, weak structure plan implementation is causing rapid horizontal expansion, overcrowding of the population, shortage of open space and green space as well as degradation of natural resources like land, swampy areas and water bodies.

The data from observation and interview of key informant shows that in the development of urban roads, infrastructure, open space, housing there was the violation of structure plan and urban planning laws and standards. This negatively affects the socio-economic wellbeing of the urban residents. Thus, this finding indicates the need for providing standardized roads, walkways, attractive formal green areas and open spaces as proposed on the structure plan to accommodate the rapidly growing population of the town.

4.4. Factors that hinders structure plan implementation in Nekemte town

In order to examine the major factors that hinder the implementation of structure plan implementation of the study town, the data collected using questionnaire survey were analyzed. The results of the questionnaire survey indicated that lack of good governance, lack of community participation, lack of awareness, customary land tenure, political instability, lack of commitment, lack of budget, quality of the structure plan, lack of skilled man power and lack of technological advancement were the major factors hindering urban planning implementation in Nekemte town. For instance, as shown by Figure 12, most of the respondents were agreed and strongly agreed that lack of public awareness, lack of active community participation in the process of urban planning and customary land tenure (58.7%, 58.4% and 56.9%, respectively) are the major factors hindering urban structure plan implementation in the town.

Figure 12: Perception of the resident on the factors that hinders urban planning implementation in Nekemte town

The responses from the interview question indicate that the common challenges of human resource allocation in the key informants’ office are insufficient man power, less technical capacity of the existing professionals, less commitment of existing professionals, and unrelated job positions. More than five respondents of the interview questions described that low number of man power and unrelated job positions as the main causes of poor structure plan implementation. For example, the first respondent from Land Use and Management office described that, “majority of the existing technical workers weren’t assigned on their related fields”. This can be expressed by delayance of project completion time, poor data management, inappropriate working procedure and communication gap between the community, professionals and the leaders.

4.5. Regression Analysis

In this study regression analysis was used to test the effect of skilled man power, technological advancement, awareness of the resident about structure plan, financial capacity, political instability, customary land tenure, good governance and leadership and public participation on structure plan implementation of Nekemte town.

Multiple linear regression analysis indicates that the independent variables have strong relationship at (R = 0.858) with the dependent variable (structure plan implementation). Moreover, the factors identified in this study were found to explain 73.5% of the challenges of structure plan implementation in Nekemte town at coefficient of determination (R² = 0.735). The adjusted R square (R²) of the model is 0.728. This means that 72.8% of the variance of dependent variable (structure plan implementation) was explained by the variation in the independent variables identified in the model. As such, 27.2% of the challenges of structure plan implementation in the town administration were because of other factors that are not investigated in this study (Refer Table 5).

Table 5

Regression Analysis of independent Variables) and dependent variable (plan implementation)
Regression statistics	Multiple R	R Square	Adjusted R Square	Stand. Error	Overall P-value (P < 0.05)
	0.858	0.735	0.728	0.185	0.0000
	Coefficients (β)	Standard Error	t-Test	P-value (P < 0.05)
Constant	1.3441	0.0496	27.0763	0.0000
X₁	-0.0244	0.0083	-2.9292	0.0036**
X₂	-0.0233	0.0079	-2.9458	0.0034**
X₃	0.0082	0.0067	1.2207	0.2230
X₄	-0.0450	0.0077	-5.8482	0.0000**
X₅	-0.0433	0.0082	-5.2602	0.0000**
X₆	-0.0373	0.0080	-4.6565	0.0000**
X₇	-0.0489	0.0079	-6.1820	0.0000**
X₈	-0.0468	0.0085	-5.5283	0.0000**
X₉	-0.0499	0.0082	-6.1035	0.0000**
X₁₀	-0.0380	0.0078	-4.8568	0.0000**
X₁ = Lack of Technological advancement; X₂ = Lack of skilled man power; X₃ = Quality of the structure Plan; X₄ = Lack of Budget; X₅ = Lack of commitment/focus; X₆ = Political instability; X₇ = Customary land Tenure; X₈ = Lack of Awareness; X₉ = lack of Active Participation; X₁₀ = Lack of Good governance and Leadership
** is significant at P < 0.05.

Furthermore, the results of the regression model (Table 5) revealed that all the independent variables such as X₁, X₂…...X₁₀ have statistically significant effect on structure plan implementation of Nekemte Town at P-value of 0.05. For instance, the regression analysis of the independent variable (lack of active participation) and the dependent variable (structure plan implementation) is statistically significant with P-value of 0.0000 and Negative coefficient of Determination (β) -0.0499. This implies, a one unit shift in community participation leads to 0.0499 units decrease in the challenges of structure plan implementation keeping the other independent variables constant.

Similarly, the results of the other linear multiple regression shows that the independent variables (X₁, X₂, X_4, X_5, X_6, X_7, X_8, X_9, X₁₀₎ and the dependent variable (Y = Master plan Implementation) is statistically significant with P-value of < 0.05 and negative Coefficient (Table 5). However, the independent variable X₃ is not statistically significant and has no effect on the implementation of

The analysis result of the data from open ended survey questions and interview questions argued that there is exclusive and passive public participation in implementing Nekemte town structure plan. This shows that the town residents have no sufficient information about the allocated land uses to protect them from illegal land holders. On the other hand, the residents have no chance to get sufficient awareness about the importance of structure plan implementation in order to push the town administration to implement the proposed land uses for their interest. This condition of poor public participation created laissez-faire leadership. In order to have well committed, transparent and responsive leadership active and inclusive public participation must be continuously ensured in the urban structure plan and implementation processes.

This finding was contradicting with the Ethiopian urban plan implementation guideline that stated as the local governments should prepare the required institutional set up for plan implementation and for implementing bodies, establishment of proper technical information communication, and setting up of a suitable channel for following implementation activities to planning bodies and other stakeholders at different level.

Reckein et al. (2015) found that institutional arrangement has a potential to act as a barrier to urban plan implementation. The authors demonstrated that institutions have a great potential to offer support for urban plan implementation by providing the needed political will, institutional capacity and technical know-how.

Ahmad and Anjum (2012) identified that urban plans were prepared in Pakistan starting from 1960s. However, they found that the plans were failed to yield the desired outcomes due to lack of strong legal support and institutional frameworks. The results of regression model (Table 5) also indicated that lack of active participation is the most influential factors with significance level (P- value) of 0.0000 and coefficient of determination (β) of -0.0499 and followed by customary land tenure and lack of awareness with a coefficient of determination − 0.0489 and − 0.0468.

Chirisan (2014) identified the challenges faced by developing countries in urban development plan implementation. The Author found that the greatest challenge of developing countries in implementing urban plans was the scarcity of reliable information and accurate statistical information during plan preparation.

According to the study of Lyles et al. (2016), the use of plan conformance, plan influence and plan performance is very important in urban development plans implementation in order to have a deep understanding of how and why the plans failed. Plan conformance needs highly qualified and technically skilled man power and strong institutional capacity to judge the success and failure of the plan based on criteria. In addition to Lyles et al. (2016), Riggs (2016) also found that advancement in technology provides the public an increased ability to access information and contribute data concerning their interaction with their urban environment and government. This increased access of information about their living environment will advance the productivity of the local resident and the planning staff. However, the results of the analysis indicated that technological and skilled man powers which are the most crucial in plan conformance and performance were the determinant factors that hinder the implementation of Nekemte 2008 structure plan. As a result, the local resident cannot easily understand the desired activities in their local area because they cannot easily have accessed the prepared urban structure plan.

Laurian et al. (2004) also sought to find out several determinants of urban development plan implementation. According to the Authors the factors that affect urban plan implementation may be the internal such as the quality of the plan and the external factors that are related planning organization/institution such as institutional structures and the interactions among the planning and administration staff. Similar to the above study, this study found that the quality of structure plan (internal), institutional structures (financial capacity, skilled man power, commitment of the staff and participations) are among the hindering factors of urban plan implementation in Nekemte town (Fig. 12).

According to Da Cruz et al. (2019), urban governance and leadership is all about how the government and the local resident decide on the way to plan, finance, develop and manage their urban areas. Similar to the above studies, this study found that the shortage of skilled man power, low technical capacity and lack of sufficient professionals in urban plan implementation leads to the increase of the violation of proposed activities. This indicates that inadequate manpower with poor professional skill is among the challenges of urban plan implementation.

The study used questionnaire survey, interview, field observation and land use survey in order to examine the status and challenges of urban structure plan implementation of 2008 in Nekemte town. Based on the analysis and generated results of descriptive, regression and qualitative data, in this study the following conclusions were drawn. There is high level of urban structure plan violation due to the rapid population growth in the town and physical urban expansion to meet the housing demand of the resident.

As a result, proposed basic infrastructure, commercial areas, green area, agricultural land and open space and urban forest were not implemented according to the structure plan of the town. The challenges of urban structure plan implementation of Nekemte town were influenced by the variety of factors. These factors are: lack of technological advancement, lack of sufficient skilled man power, the internal quality of the prepared structure plan, lack of budget, lack of commitment, political instability, awareness of the resident on the relevance of urban structure plan, customary land tenure, absence of active and interactive community participation in urban plan preparation and management as well as absence of urban good governance and leadership.

The linear multiple regression model in table mmm also revealed that, the independent variables (X₁, X₂, X₃, X₄, X₅, X₆, X₇, X₈, X₉ and X₁₀) have significant relationships with the dependent variable Y-structure plan implementation. So, it is safe to conclude that lack of active participation in the preparation and implementation of urban planning, quality of the plan, and lack of awareness and lack of sufficient budget are the major factors that hinders the implementation of the prepared structure plan in Nekemte town with the coefficient of regression − 0.042,, -0.0492, -0.0492and − 0.0425.

Based on the data and results acquired during the study, the following recommendations can be offered for future improvement of the current status of urban structure plan implementation of Nekemte town and the factors that hinders. Nekemte town Land Use and Management office, municipality should implement their duty based on the approved structure plan of the town. As responsible organ of urban plan implementation, Oromia Urban Planning Institute together with the legal bodies should continuously monitor and evaluate the implementation status of the approved structure plan. For the proper implementation of approved structure plan the city government should assign skilled, committed, transparent and responsive leadership.

Related to the gap in human resource, the city administration, particularly land use and management office should increase the existing gap by hiring trained and skilled manpower to enhance proper urban structure plan implementation.

The city government should encourage and facilitates the participation of the local resident in preparation and implementation of urban structure plan as active participation is the engine for urban plan implementation. The city government should develop and use the technology (GIS) that store, manipulate and display spatially referenced data including land use and population density as well as that can determine the physical availability and constraints of land based on various criteria. The city administration should develop urban data base to provide on time information about the violation of structure plan and making appropriate decision about urban structure plan implementation status.

The scope of this study can be extended to the socio-economic effects of the factors that hinder urban plan implementation by extending the sampling duration, size. In addition to the identified factors, other factors should be studied in order to understand their level of influence and prioritize to come up with strong and fruitful solutions of urban plan implementation challenges. Intensive studies on the factors that hinder the implementation of urban structure plan should be takes place in Nekemte town to develop strategies to mitigate the challenge. The times for observation and land use survey as well as sampling site we choose for the purpose of this study are limited. In order to get reliable results, future studies should consider long time horizon and more sampling sites.

Funding Statement

The Authors declare that no funds, grants or other support were received from any organization during the preparation of this manuscript.

Competing Interests

We the undersigned declare that this manuscript is original, has not been published before and is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been approved by all of us.

We confirm that each author has disclosed on the form below any conflict of interests. In addition, we declare that we have no financial interests.

Sincerely,

NAME	SIGNATURE	DATE	CONLICT OF INTEREST (State NONE if there is no conflict of interest)
Mulatu Dinsa		02/04/2022	None
Mulugeta Soruma*		02/04/2022	None
Sitotew Haile		02/04/2021	None

Authors Contribution

¹Mulatu Dinsa (MSc.)

Oromia Region Urban Inftrastructure and Institutional Development Program, Oromia, Ethiopia

²Mulugeta Soruma* (MSc.)

Wollega University, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Department of Urban and Regional Planning

²Sitotew Haile Erena (PhD)

School of Geography and Environmental Studies, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

We certify that we have participated sufficiently in contributing to the intellectual content, concept and design of this work or the analysis and interpretation of the data as well as writing of the manuscript, to take public responsibility for it and have agreed to have our name listed as a contributor. Accordingly, here is the contribution of the Authors:

Contributions of Author 1: Conceptualization, Data collection, Data Analysis, data encoding and validation, writing original draft and writing edited draft and finalization

Contributions of Author 2: Conceptualization, data encoding and validation, Data Analysis, revision draft writing and writing edited draft, graph production and finalization

Contribution of Author 2: Conceptualization, advising and correction and supervision

We believe that the manuscript represents valid work. Neither this manuscript nor one with substantially similar content under our authorship has been published or is being considered for publication elsewhere, except as described in the covering letter. We certify that all the data collected during the study is presented in this manuscript. We attest that, if requested by the editors, we will provide the data/information or will cooperate fully in obtaining and providing the data/information on which the manuscript is based, for examination by the editors or their assignees.

We give the rights to the corresponding author to make necessary changes as per the request of the journal, do the rest of the correspondence on our behalf and he/she will act as the guarantor for the manuscript on our behalf.

Data Availability Statement

The data sets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical Statement for Journal of Urban Ecosystems

Hereby, we Mulatu Dinsa, Mulugeta Soruma and Sitotew Haile consciously assure that for the manuscript entitled “The Determinant Factors that Hinders Urban Planning Implementation in Nekemte Town: The Case of 2008 Structure plan” the following is fulfilled:

This material is the authors' own original work, which has not been previously published elsewhere.
The paper is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere.
The paper reflects the authors' own research and analysis in a truthful and complete manner.
The paper properly credits the meaningful contributions of co-authors and co-researchers.
The results are appropriately placed in the context of prior and existing research.
All sources used are properly disclosed (correct citation). Literally copying of text must be indicated as such by using quotation marks and giving proper reference.
All authors have been personally and actively involved in substantial work leading to the paper, and will take public responsibility for its content.

The violation of the Ethical Statement rules may result in severe consequences. To verify originality, you can check the manuscript by originality detection software. We agree with the above statements and declare that this submission follows the policies of Journal of Urban Ecosystems as outlined in the Guide for Authors and in the Ethical Statement.

Date:10 march 2022

Corresponding author’s signature:

Code availability
Code for data cleaning and analysis is provided as part of the replication package. It is available at the hand of the corresponding author for review. It will be uploaded to the journal once the paper has been conditionally accepted.
Consent to participate

This study presents no more than minimal risk of harm to the subjects and involves no procedures for which written consent is normally required outside of the research context. This study involves survey questionnaires and interviews conducted by distributing papers and on face-to face. We haven’t used any photographs or video/biographic information of the informant in this paper.

Consent for publication

We the undersigned qualify as authors¹ to this manuscript and warrant that nobody who qualifies for authorship has been excluded. We agree to its submission to Journal of Urban Ecosystems and, if accepted, to its publication in this journal. We warrant that this article is original, does not infringe on any copyright or other proprietary right of any third party, is not under consideration by another journal and has not been previously published. Ethical approval has been sought and obtained as necessary and any conflicts of interest stated.

Manuscript entitled: The Determinant Factors that Hinders Urban Planning Implementation in Nekemte Town: The Case of 2008 Structure plan

Mulatu Dinsa ……………………… Signature

Mulugeta Soruma ……………………… Signature

Sitotew Haile ……………………… Signature

Ahmad, N., & Anjum, G. A. (2012). Legal and institutional perplexities hampering the implementation of urban development plans in Pakistan. Cities, 29(4), 271-277.
Arriagada, C., Moreno, J., & Cartier, E. (2007). Evaluación de impacto del subsidio de renovación urbana: estudio del Área Metropolitana del Gran Santiago 1991-2006. Santiago, Chile, Ministerio de Vivienda y Urbanismo.
Baker, M., Coaffee, J., & Sherriff, G. (2007). Achieving successful participation in the new UK spatial planning system. Planning, Practice & Research, 22(1), 79-93.
Belachew, M., & Aytenfisu, S. (2010). Facing the challenges in building sustainable land administration capacity in Ethiopia. Proceedings of the Facing the Challenges–Building the Capacity, Sydney, Australia, 11-16.
Bolay, J. C., & Kern, A. (2011). Technology and cities: What type of development is appropriate for cities of the south? Journal of Urban Technology, 18(3), 25-43.
Chapman, R., Howden-Chapman, P., & Capon, A. (2016). Understanding the systemic nature of cities to improve health and climate change mitigation. Environment international, 94, 380-387.
Chenal, J. (2014). The West-African City: Urban space and models of urban planning. EPFL Press.
Chirisa, I. (2014). Linking time use to implementation of spatial plans: what explains the dysfunctional urban landscapes in Zimbabwe? J Settl Spat Plann, 5(1), 49-60.
Cifuentes, L., Borja-Aburto, V. H., Gouveia, N., Thurston, G., & Davis, D. L. (2001). Assessing the health benefits of urban air pollution reductions associated with climate change mitigation (2000-2020): Santiago, São Paulo, México City, and New York City. Environmental Health Perspectives, 109(suppl 3), 419-425.
Cira, D., Kamunyori, S., & Babijes, R. (2016). Kenya urbanization review. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Cirolia, L. R., & Berrisford, S. (2017). ‘Negotiated planning’: Diverse trajectories of implementation in Nairobi, Addis Ababa, and Harare. Habitat International, 59, 71-79.
Clarke, N., & Cochrane, A. (2013). Geographies and politics of localism: The localism of the United Kingdom's coalition government. Political Geography, 34, 10-23.
Cobb, A. T. (2011). Leading project teams (2^nd ed): The basics of project management and team leadership. Los Angeles, Sage.
Colenbrander, S., & Barau, A. (2019). Planning and financing urban development in the context of the climate crisis. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 11(3), 237-244.
Cullingworth, J., & Nadin, V. (2002). Town and country planning in the UK 13th edn. London, UK, Routledge.
Da Cruz, N. F., Rode, P., & McQuarrie, M. (2019). New urban governance: A review of current themes and future priorities. Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(1), 1-19.
Dodman, D., Leck, H., Rusca, M., & Colenbrander, S. (2017). African urbanisation and urbanism: Implications for risk accumulation and reduction. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 26, 7-15.
Evans, B., Elisei, P., Rosenfeld, O., Roll, G., Figueiredo, A., & Keiner, M. (2016). HABITAT III–Toward a new urban agenda. Disp-the Planning Review, 52(1), 86-91.
Evans-Cowley, J., & Hollander, J. (2010). The new generation of public participation: Internet-based participation tools. Planning Practice & Research, 25(3), 397-408.
Faludi, A. (2004). The impact of a planning philosophy. Planning Theory, 3(3), 225-236.
Freytag, T., Gössling, S., & Mössner, S. (2014). Living the green city: Freiburg's Solarsiedlung between narratives and practices of sustainable urban development. Local Environment, 19(6), 644-659.
Goi, C. L. (2017). The impact of technological innovation on building a sustainable city. International Journal of Quality Innovation, 3(1), 1-13.
Habitat, U. N. (2014). A new strategy of sustainable neighbourhood planning: Five principles. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.
Hameed, R., & Nadeem, O. (2008). Challenges of implementing urban master plans: The Lahore experience. International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering, 2(12), 1297-1304.
Harris, W. (2008). How urban planning works. URL: http://science. howstuffworks. Com/environmental/green-science/urban-planning. htm (28. 8. 2013.)
Haus, M., & Erling Klausen, J. (2011). Urban leadership and community involvement: Ingredients for good governance? Urban Affairs Review, 47(2), 256-279.
Hemphill, L., McGreal, S., Berry, J., & Watson, S. (2006). Leadership, power and multisector urban regeneration partnerships. Urban studies, 43(1), 59-80.
Holman, N., & Rydin, Y. (2013). What can social capital tell us about planning under localism? Local government studies, 39(1), 71-88.
Laurian, L., Day, M., Backhurst, M., Berke, P., Ericksen, N., Crawford, J., ... & Chapman, S. (2004). What drives plan implementation? Plans, planning agencies and developers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47(4), 555-577.
Lwasa, S., & Kinuthia-Njenga, C. (2012). Reappraising urban planning and urban sustainability in East Africa. Urban development, 3-22.
Nallathiga, R. (2015). Assessing the Role of Master Plans in City Development: Reform Measures and Approaches. Vol. XLVII-XLVIII, Part 4 &1-4, Oct-Dec 2015, Jan-Dec 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3000908
Nanda, A. (2012). Urban Local Government In India: Challenges and Prospects. Anudhyan: an International Journal of Social Sciences (AIJSS). Volume 1, (1), 131.
Okeke, D. C. (2015). African Approaches to Spatial and Green Planning. For. Fish, 4(6).
Reckien, D., Flacke, J., Olazabal, M., & Heidrich, O. (2015). The influence of drivers and barriers on urban adaptation and mitigation plans—an empirical analysis of European cities. PloS one, 10(8), e0135597.
Riggs, W. (2017). Mobile responsive websites and local planning departments in the US: Opportunities for the future. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 44(5), 947-963.
Silva, C. N. (2015). Urban planning in Sub-Saharan Africa: an overview. Urban Planning in Sub-Saharan Africa, 30-62.
Silva, C. N. (2015). Urban Planning in Sub-Saharan Africa. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, & Population Division. (2019). World urbanization prospects: the 2018 revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). New York, United Nations.
Watson, V. (2016). Locating planning in the New Urban Agenda of the urban sustainable development goal. Planning Theory, 15(4), 435-448.
Wilson, A., Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Comber, R. (2019). Urban planning, public participation and digital technology: App development as a method of generating citizen involvement in local planning processes. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(2), 286-302.
Ye, H., Ren, Q., Hu, X., Lin, T., Xu, L., Li, X., & Pan, B. (2017). Low-carbon behavior approaches for reducing direct carbon emissions: Household energy use in a coastal city. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 128-136.

The Determinant Factors that Hinders Urban Planning Implementation in Nekemte Town: The Case of 2008 Structure Plan

Status:

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

1. Introduction

2. Related Literatures

2.1. Urban planning and its importance

2.2. The Types of Urban Planning

3. Research Materials And Methods

3.1. Study Area

3.2. Data Sources

3.3. Methods

4. Data Analysis And Results

4.1. Socio-economic Characteristics of the Respondents

4.2. Perception of the Resident on the level of Urban expansion

4.3. Status of Structure Plan Implementation

4.4. Factors that hinders structure plan implementation in Nekemte town

4.5. Regression Analysis

5. Discussion

6. Conclusions And Recommendations

Declarations

References

Status:

Version 1