The current research investigates the difference in the opinion of Indian expatriates in Saudi Arabia at all elements of PERMA before and after the outbreak of COVID-19. Additionally, filler aspects like health and negative emotions are also measured. Calculated means in SPSS 23 are plotted in excel (Fig. 1).
Pre and post COVID-19 mean differences in psychological well-being are plotted in excel (see Figure 2). It is observed that COVID-19 drastically reduced the psychological well-being of Indian migrants living in Saudi Arabia. However, around 20 per cent of respondents' well-being has boosted during COVID to a praiseworthy range of 0.13 per cent to 22 per cent. Eighty per cent of respondents denote a decrease in psychological well-being in a range of 0.2 per cent to 41 per cent.
Gender Vs PERMA
Overall health and psychological well-being are computed by including the mean of PERMA aspects. An Independent sample T-test has been conducted to examine the difference in the well-being of different gender in the context of PERMA. A cross-sectional analysis of gender vs PERMA expresses a considerable change in the opinion of males and females regarding all elements of PERMA at both surveyed times. The significant difference in Table 1 exhibits (p = .197) value of health and psychological well-being vis-à-vis gender signifies that the statistical relationship between pillars of PERMA and gender before the outbreak of COVID-19 is not significant. Therefore, it is likely to accept the null hypothesis H01a.
Table 1
Overall Well-being Before and After Covid-19 (Independent Samples T-Test)
| gender | N | Mean | Std. Deviation | Sig. (2-tailed) |
overall_wellbeing_BC | male | 43 | 6.9931 | 1.02145 | |
female | 18 | 7.4792 | .11136 | .197 |
overall_wellbeing_AC | male | 43 | 6.7847 | 1.16055 | . |
female | 18 | 5.1667 | .93541 | .002 |
Further, the analysis of the difference in the health and overall well-being of both males and females after the outbreak of COVID-19 denotes a significant difference (p=.002). Therefore it is likely to reject the null hypothesis H01b that there is no significant difference in the mean scores of health and psychological well-being of Indian expatriates after the outbreak of COVID vis-à-vis gender.
The gender-wise macro analyses expound that before the outbreak of COVID-19, there was almost no difference in the opinions of males and females regarding positive emotions (p = 0.330), engagement (p = 0.644), relationships (p = .0688), meaning (p = 0.654), accomplishments (p = 0.891), health(p = 0.860), and happiness(p = 0.311). In comparison, women felt more lonely (µ = 9.00) than their male counterparts (µ = 4.72). In contrast, negative emotions were slightly low in females (µ = 4.66) in comparison to males (µ = 4.81) before the outburst of the pandemic (see Table 2).
Table 2
Gender vs PERMA (Independent T-Test)
| gender | N | Mean | Std. Deviation | Sig. (2-tailed) |
Positive Emotions_BC | male | 43 | 7.7037 | 1.25708 | .330 |
female | 18 | 8.1667 | .53452 |
Positive Emotions_AC | male | 43 | 6.1667 | 2.02678 | .043 |
female | 18 | 4.5000 | 1.24722 |
Engagement_BC | male | 43 | 7.1667 | 1.96123 | .644 |
female | 18 | 6.8333 | .53452 |
Engagement_AC | male | 43 | 6.5000 | 2.31576 | .016 |
female | 18 | 4.3333 | .35635 |
Relationships_BC | male | 43 | 7.8333 | 1.14475 | .688 |
female | 18 | 7.6667 | .00000 |
Relationships_AC | male | 43 | 6.7778 | 1.52109 | .001 |
female | 18 | 4.5000 | .89087 |
Meaning_BC | male | 43 | 7.9074 | 1.31261 | .654 |
female | 18 | 7.6667 | 1.06904 |
Meaning_AC | male | 43 | 7.0926 | 2.00589 | .023 |
female | 18 | 5.3333 | .35635 |
Accomplishments_BC | male | 43 | 7.9074 | 1.86402 | .891 |
female | 18 | 8.0000 | .35635 |
Accomplishments_AC | male | 43 | 6.9630 | 2.06397 | .000 |
female | 18 | 3.5000 | .53452 |
Negative Emotions_BC | male | 43 | 4.8148 | 1.66165 | .849 |
female | 18 | 4.6667 | 2.13809 |
Negative Emotions_AC | male | 43 | 6.4630 | 1.64551 | .002 |
female | 18 | 8.5000 | .17817 |
Health_BC | male | 43 | 7.8889 | .65679 | .860 |
female | 18 | 7.8333 | .89087 |
Health_AC | male | 43 | 7.7037 | .87738 | .000 |
female | 18 | 5.1667 | .17817 |
Loneliness_BC | male | 43 | 4.7222 | 3.62679 | .003 |
female | 18 | 9.0000 | 1.06904 |
Loneliness_AC | male | 43 | 6.6111 | 3.20182 | .492 |
female | 18 | 5.5000 | 4.81070 |
Happiness_BC | male | 43 | 7.3889 | 1.50054 | .311 |
female | 18 | 8.0000 | 1.06904 |
Happiness_AC | male | 43 | 5.5556 | 3.07212 | .626 |
female | 18 | 5.0000 | 1.06904 |
The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. |
At the contrast after the COVID-19 outbreak, at all components of PERMA except negative emotions and loneliness, both males and females are showing a decrease (see Table 2) positive emotions (p = .043), engagement (p = .016), relationships (p = .001), meaning (p = .023), accomplishments (p = .000), and health (p = .000). However, though negative emotions have increased both in males and females, an unexpected increase can be seen on the female side. Loneliness in females has decreased, as interviews denote that spouses and wards are at home during the lockdown. Therefore women were feeling less lonely. At the same time, loneliness has slightly increased in males after COVID-19, as they were missing their office environment. The survey indicates that the pandemic would have wide-ranging, adverse effects on the psychological well-being of Indian expatriates in general, specifically a very high impact on women compared to their male counterparts in Saudi Arabia.
Age Vs PERMA
ANOVA has been conducted to obtain the difference in mean (µ) scores of overall psychological well-being vis-à-visage. Table 3 elucidates a significant difference value (p = .002) between analysed age groups vis-à-vis the general well-being of expatriate Indians before the commencement of the COVID-19 pandemic. Moreover, a significant p-value of 0.000 is derived from the analysis after starting COVID. Therefore, the results reject the null hypothesis H02b that there is no significant difference in the mean scores of psychological well-being of Indian expatriates after the outbreak of COVID vis-à-visage.
Table 3
| N | Mean | Std. Deviation | Sig. |
Overall-well- being_BC | 20–30 | 10 | 6.6542 | .98602 | |
31–40 | 4 | 8.4167 | .00000 | .002 |
41–50 | 4 | 7.3750 | .00000 | |
51–60 | 8 | 7.0000 | .40089 | |
Total | 26 | 7.1426 | .87482 | |
Overall-well-being_AC | 20–30 | 10 | 6.4125 | .46500 | |
31–40 | 4 | 8.5417 | .00000 | .000 |
41–50 | 4 | 6.7500 | .00000 | |
51–60 | 8 | 4.7708 | .51225 | |
Total | 26 | 6.2869 | 1.31942 | |
The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. |
A cross-sectional analysis of each element of PERMA (overall well-being) before COVID-19 illustrates that there is not any significant difference between observed age groups at all aspects like positive emotions(p = .078), engagement(p = .069), relationships(p = .201), and meaning (.175). However, in accomplishment (p = .046) and negative emotions (p = .002) significant difference is found (Table 4).
Table 4
| N | Mean | Std. Deviation | Sig. |
Positive Emotions_BC | 20–30 | 22 | 7.3636 | .078 | .078 (NS) |
31–40 | 16 | 8.7083 | .685 |
41–50 | 9 | 7.3333 | .979 |
51–60 | 14 | 7.5714 | .034 |
Total | 61 | 7.7596 | |
Positive Emotions_AC | 20–30 | 22 | 6.2879 | | .000 (S) |
31–40 | 16 | 8.4167 | .000 |
41–50 | 9 | 5.4444 | .000 |
51–60 | 14 | 5.3333 | .005 |
Total | 61 | 6.5027 | .000 |
Engagement_BC | 20–30 | 22 | 7.2879 | | .069 (NS) |
31–40 | 16 | 8.0000 | |
41–50 | 9 | 6.4444 | .069 |
51–60 | 14 | 6.9048 | .106 |
Total | 61 | 7.2623 | .191 |
Engagement_AC | 20–30 | 22 | 6.2273 | .065 | .000 (S) |
31–40 | 16 | 7.9167 | |
41–50 | 9 | 7.0370 | |
51–60 | 14 | 4.8571 | .000 |
Total | 61 | 6.4754 | .016 |
Relationships_BC | 20–30 | 22 | 7.7121 | .041 | .201 (NS) |
31–40 | 16 | 8.6250 | .000 |
41–50 | 9 | 7.5926 | |
51–60 | 14 | 8.0952 | |
Total | 61 | 8.0219 | .201 |
Relationships_AC | 20–30 | 22 | 7.1818 | .941 | .001 (S) |
31–40 | 16 | 8.4583 | .701 |
41–50 | 9 | 7.9630 | .108 |
51–60 | 14 | 6.5714 | |
Total | 61 | 7.4918 | |
Meaning_BC | 20–30 | 22 | 7.5303 | .001 | .175 (NS) |
31–40 | 16 | 8.5417 | .094 |
41–50 | 9 | 7.4444 | .196 |
51–60 | 14 | 7.9524 | .000 |
Total | 61 | 7.8798 | | |
Meaning_AC | 20–30 | 22 | 6.8939 | | .000 (S) |
31–40 | 16 | 8.3333 | .175 |
41–50 | 9 | 8.8148 | .919 |
51–60 | 14 | 5.9524 | .672 |
Total | 61 | 7.3388 | .093 |
Accomplishments_BC | 20–30 | 22 | 7.6515 | | .046 (S) |
31–40 | 16 | 8.8333 | |
41–50 | 9 | 6.9630 | .000 |
51–60 | 14 | 7.8571 | .224 |
Total | 61 | 7.9071 | .320 |
Accomplishments_AC | 20–30 | 22 | 6.5455 | .000 | .000 (S) |
31–40 | 16 | 8.8750 | |
41–50 | 9 | 6.7778 | |
51–60 | 14 | 5.2381 | .046 |
Total | 61 | 6.8907 | .495 |
Health_BC | 20–30 | 22 | 7.5455 | .778 | .021 (S) |
31–40 | 16 | 8.7500 | .019 |
41–50 | 9 | 7.1111 | |
51–60 | 14 | 8.2857 | |
Total | 61 | 7.9672 | .000 |
Health_AC | 20–30 | 22 | 6.6667 | .002 | .012 (S) |
31–40 | 16 | 8.5833 | .011 |
41–50 | 9 | 8.4444 | .000 |
51–60 | 14 | 6.8095 | |
Total | 61 | 7.4645 | |
Negative Emotions_BC | 20–30 | 22 | 5.8485 | .021 | .002 (S) |
31–40 | 16 | 4.5000 | .715 |
41–50 | 9 | 5.5556 | .426 |
51–60 | 14 | 3.1429 | .010 |
Total | 61 | 4.8306 | | |
Negative Emotions_AC | 20–30 | 22 | 6.2879 | | .244 (NS) |
31–40 | 16 | 5.3750 | .012 |
41–50 | 9 | 7.1111 | .897 |
51–60 | 14 | 6.8095 | .665 |
Total | 61 | 6.2896 | .005 |
The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. |
Turning to the analysis after COVID-19, respondents' opinion for all aspects of health and well-being elucidates that significant difference is marked between observed age groups. Table 4 denotes significant difference in positive emotions (p = .000), engagement(p = .000), relationships (p = .001), meaning (p = .000), accomplishments (p = .000), and health (p = .012). However, negative emotions have increased in all age groups. Hence no significant difference is marked(p = .244) between observed respondents.
The figure is the plotting of µ of each age group's response before and after covid and clarifies that before COVID-19, there was minimal to no difference in the opinion of different age groups at the scales of PERMA. Still, after COVID-19, the most affected age group is 50 + years of age. However, negative emotions have increased in all age groups, a notable increase in the 50 + age group.
Income Vs. PERMA
One-way ANOVA has been conducted to obtain the difference in mean scores of PERMA(overall well-being) vis-à-vis income. In Table 5, the significant value (P = .294) for all elements of PERMA suggests a not significant difference in mean values of different income groups vis-a-vis the overall well-being of Indian migrants. Thus, evidence of a difference in Indian expatriates' responses leads to the failure to reject the corresponding hypothesis H03a that there is no significant difference in the mean scores of health and psychological well-being of Indian expatriates before the outbreak of COVID-19 vis-à-vis income.
Table 5
| Income (S.R.) | N | Mean | Std. Deviation | |
Sig. |
Overall-well- being_BC | < 5000 | 4 | 6.3750 | .00000 | .294 |
5001–15000 | 13 | 7.3045 | 1.12569 | |
15001–25000 | 4 | 7.3750 | .00000 | |
> 25000 | 5 | 7.1500 | .50312 | |
Total | 26 | 7.1426 | .87482 | |
Overall-well- being_AC | < 5000 | 4 | 6.4583 | .00000 | .082 |
5001–15000 | 13 | 6.6058 | 1.40298 | |
15001–25000 | 4 | 6.7500 | .00000 | |
> 25000 | 5 | 4.9500 | 1.47208 | |
Total | 26 | 6.2869 | 1.31942 | |
The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. |
The analysis of the during pandemic scenario reveals that though the difference of opinion of various income groups is not significant, the difference in the level of significance before COVID-19 (p = .294) and after the outbreak of COVID-19 (p = .082) is marked. Therefore, the
the study divulges that if we take the mean of all PERMA elements (health and overall well-being) and run a one-way ANOVA, the difference of opinion between all income groups is not significant.
As far as income groups vs PERMA differences are concerned, a cross-sectional analysis of mean(µ) discloses that the respondents who earn < 25,000 sr. are getting anxious after COVID-19. Hence, a significant decrease can be seen in the mean values of PERMA facets before and after the occurrence of COVID-19 in the people earning very high. Before the COVID outbreak, people of the very high-income group(< 25,000 sr.) had very high positive emotions. Engagement in work-life was good, meaning relationships, accomplishments, health, and happiness were commendable compared to other income groups. Whereas, the negative impact on almost all pillars of PERMA during COVID-19 is noticed in the people of higher-income groups ( 15,001–25,000 sr. & <25,000 sr.), hence denoting the anxiety among the group(see Table 6).
Table 6
| Income S.R. | N | Mean | Std. Deviation | Sig. |
Positive Emotions_BC | < 5000 | 10 | 7.9333 | 1.14180 | .012 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 7.1961 | 1.94385 | (S) |
15001–25000 | 6 | 8.3333 | .51640 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 9.0303 | .99392 | |
Total | 61 | 7.7596 | 1.72469 | |
Positive Emotions_AC | < 5000 | 10 | 7.6667 | 1.13312 | .184 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 6.2549 | 2.17896 | |
15001–25000 | 6 | 6.3333 | .51640 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 6.3030 | 1.25126 | |
Total | 61 | 6.5027 | 1.83245 | |
Engagement_BC | < 5000 | 10 | 7.0667 | 1.66889 | .335 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 7.1961 | 1.51561 | |
15001–25000 | 6 | 6.6667 | 1.03280 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 7.9697 | 1.67634 | |
Total | 61 | 7.2623 | 1.54094 | |
Engagement_AC | < 5000 | 10 | 7.7333 | 1.05175 | .004 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 6.2647 | 1.96395 | |
15001-25000sr | 6 | 4.2222 | 1.72133 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 7.2121 | 2.39570 | |
Total | 61 | 6.4754 | 2.09449 | |
Relationships_BC | < 5000 | 10 | 7.6667 | 1.45721 | .050 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 7.7255 | 1.50972 | |
15001–25000 | 6 | 8.5556 | .34427 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 8.9697 | 1.18748 | |
Total | 61 | 8.0219 | 1.44257 | |
Relationships_AC | < 5000 | 10 | 7.8667 | 1.05643 | .643 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 7.3431 | 1.19619 | |
15001–25000 | 6 | 7.2222 | .68853 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 7.7576 | 2.33377 | |
Total | 61 | 7.4918 | 1.39921 | |
Meaning_BC | < 5000 | 10 | 8.2000 | .61262 | .012 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 7.4020 | 1.64077 | |
15001–25000 | 6 | 7.8889 | .17213 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 9.0606 | 1.49680 | |
Total | 61 | 7.8798 | 1.52149 | |
Meaning_AC | < 5000 | 10 | 7.5333 | .65168 | .410 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 7.2059 | 1.89099 | |
15001–25000 | 6 | 6.4444 | 2.92625 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 8.0606 | 2.43501 | |
Total | 61 | 7.3388 | 1.98092 | |
Accomplishments_BC | < 5000 | 10 | 8.4000 | .56218 | .047 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 7.4510 | 2.04969 | |
15001–25000 | 6 | 7.6667 | .00000 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 9.0000 | 1.17379 | |
Total | 61 | 7.9071 | 1.72362 | |
Accomplishments_AC | < 5000 | 10 | 8.1333 | .68853 | .074 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 6.9608 | 2.12847 | |
15001–25000 | 6 | 5.6667 | 1.03280 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 6.2121 | 2.68855 | |
Total | 61 | 6.8907 | 2.08586 | |
Health_BC | < 5000 | 10 | 8.6000 | .84327 | .013 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 7.4314 | 1.66874 | |
15001–25000 | 6 | 8.2222 | .34427 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 8.9091 | 1.27446 | |
Total | 61 | 7.9672 | 1.52231 | |
Health_AC | < 5000 | 10 | 9.0000 | .54433 | 035 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 7.0980 | 2.17969 | |
15001–25000 | 6 | 6.2222 | 2.23772 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 7.8788 | 2.40496 | |
Total | 61 | 7.4645 | 2.16648 | |
Negative Emotions_BC | < 5000 | 10 | 5.3333 | 2.11986 | .111 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 5.0294 | 2.38170 | |
15001–25000 | 6 | 5.5556 | 2.40986 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 3.3636 | 1.47915 | |
Total | 61 | 4.8306 | 2.27028 | |
Negative Emotions_AC | < 5000 | 10 | 4.9333 | 2.14764 | .001 |
5001–15000 | 34 | 6.2353 | 2.30287 | |
15001–25000 | 6 | 4.8889 | .17213 | |
> 25000 | 11 | 8.4545 | 1.83347 | |
Total | 61 | 6.2896 | 2.35268 | |
The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level. |