3.1 Lineament Maps
Results of the lineament analysis based on the automatic lineament extraction from the SRTM DEM images show only a small number of lineaments (Figure 5). To reinforce these results, principal component analysis was applied to the Landsat 8 OLI images. The best principal component analysis band combination of the Landsat 8 bands was selected using eigenvector matrix statistics (Table 3) and the statistical calculation of the OIF. The eigenvector matrix statistics showed that PC1 is composed of positively weighted vectors in the seven bands, with 97.67% of the total variance of the different band images. This PC1 component contains most of the total variance of the information of this image compared to the other components with substantially lower percentages. In addition, the calculation of the OIF shows that the best band combination is B6, B5, B1; hence the assignment of the red, green and blue channels respectively to PC6, PC5 and PC1 to obtain the images that best show the lineaments. The initial blue, red and green color bands (B6, B5, B1) initially chosen for this study produce a lighter and more natural color image to better highlight the lineaments allowing the identification of urban areas in light grey (Figure 6).
The final lineament map results from combining the two image processing methods, SRTM DEM and Landsat 8 OLI (Han et al. 2018) of the study area (Figure 7). It presents linear and curved structures of varying size, length and orientation.
Table 3. PCA eigenvector matrix in seven bands of the Landsat 8 OLI image
Principal components
coefficients
|
B1
|
B2
|
B3
|
B4
|
B5
|
B6
|
B7
|
Variance percentages per band (%)
|
PC1
|
0.375
|
0.349
|
0.324
|
0.304
|
0.541
|
0.400
|
0.298
|
97.67
|
PC2
|
0.051
|
–0.037
|
–0.125
|
–0.293
|
0.742
|
–0.339
|
–0.479
|
1.61
|
PC3
|
–0.416
|
–0.397
|
–0.316
|
–0.231
|
0.285
|
0.625
|
0.210
|
0.58
|
PC4
|
0.556
|
0.202
|
–0.175
|
–0.551
|
–0.260
|
0.417
|
–0.272
|
0.08
|
PC5
|
0.171
|
0.020
|
–0.096
|
–0.493
|
0.081
|
–0.392
|
0.747
|
0.05
|
PC6
|
–0.376
|
0.109
|
0.783
|
–0.469
|
–0.035
|
0.084
|
–0.078
|
0.01
|
PC7
|
–0.452
|
0.816
|
–0.357
|
–0.044
|
0.008
|
0.013
|
0.013
|
0.00
|
3.2 Analysis of lineament density
In spatial analysis, lineament density “hot spots” are a relevant parameter for the identification of areas with high groundwater potentials (Sener et al. 2005). In this study, the final lineament map was used as a support to produce the lineament density map (Figure 8). This lineament density map shows that the north-eastern and south-western parts of Akak are high-density areas because of the intersection of several lineaments. Therefore, this higher lineament density on both sides of the NE–SW axis in the lineament map is indicative for potential groundwater sources.
3.3 Analysis of lineament directions
Understanding the orientation of lineaments is essential for the correlation between local tectonics and the lineaments identified by remote sensing. Often, lineaments are strongly correlated to geological deformation (fractures or faults) which are known to have a good groundwater accumulation and productivity. To analyse the lineament orientation, rose diagrams with angular classes of 10° were used. Though the rose diagram orientations of the lineaments show a heterogeneous statistical distribution (Figure 9), a clear trend can be identified.
Lineaments extracted from the SRTM DEM image are limited in number because of the topography, and most of these lineaments were concentrated in areas of higher topographical changes. However, the rose diagram indicates a NE–SW main direction supplemented by NNE–SSW, and ENE–WSW as minor directions. Despite some differences to the results from the SRTM DEM image, the orientation of the major lineaments in the Landsat 8 OLI image also shows two main (E–W, NE–SW) and two minor orientations (NNE–SSW and NW–SE). After the final lineament treatment, the main orientations are NW–SE and NE–SW, supplemented by NNE–SSW, ENE–WSW, N–S and E–W.
3.4 Structural field analysis and fracture potentials
The study area is composed of metasedimentary rocks belonging to the large-scale Pan-African Youngé nappe structure characterised by two types of metamorphic structures: brittle deformation in the form of fractures and ductile deformation in the form of folds crossed by quartzo-feldspathic veins (Figure 10). The results of the tectonic field measurements indicate four major orientations: N–S, NE–SW, SE–NW and NNE–SSW. Mvondo et al. (2007) showed that the study area belonging to the Yaoundé segment of the Neoproterozoic Central African Orogenic Belt consists of three major directional fractures (N–S, N–SE, NE–SW), representing the four ductile deformation phases D1–D4 of the belt. This main fracture orientation has a clear correlation with the main directions of the final lineament map, lineament orientation of field measurements and orientations of the geological map. Combining all the results of this study, five lineament orientations can be extracted: NNE–SSW, NE–SW, ENE–WSW, NW–SE and E–W with N–S, NW–SE and NE–SW being the primary orientations. They allowed assigning the fractures’ relevance for groundwater investigations. It is noteworthy to mention that comparing lineament orientations with structural field investigations and geological maps is relevant to validate the lineament analysis and to detect the lineaments that are associated with fractures in each study area.
The intersection zones of these fractures are the most promising targets for drilling, considering the underlying geology, recharge sources and topography of the area. Therefore, geoelectrical data in addition to drilling information was used to confirm the results predicted by the remote sensing and structural analysis and was conducted along identified sites of conductive main fracture systems.
3.5 Geophysical Characterization
3.5.1 Lateral electrical profiles
The lateral geoelectrical investigations helped to recognise relevant structural lineaments or bedrock fractures. These bedrock fractures were identified in the resistivity profiles by conductive anomalies (low resistivity zones) and have variable widths of 2 to 5 m based on the conductive anomalies and their ranges. Detailed analysis of the area’s lateral electrical profiles identified 14 major discontinuities (Figure 11).
2.5.2 Vertical electrical sounding
Fourteen vertical geoelectrical soundings were performed in conjunction with the conductive anomalies previously detected by the lateral electrical profiles (Figure 11) to obtain both qualitative and quantitative geoelectrical data at different measurement points. Quantitative interpretation of vertical electrical sounding data requires visual inspection of the sounding curves, while qualitative interpretation requires a partial matching and curve characterisation technique (Kayode et al. 2016). Regarding the distinctive features of the resistivity curves, the VES stations show four different aspects of morphological curves (Figure 12). These types of curves were established by the number of geoelectric layers and their respective apparent resistivity relationships.
Locations VES 1 and VES 5 were classified as KHA curve types and reflect the presence of five geoelectric layers where the resistivity relationship of the layers is p1<p2>p3<p4<p5. The VES 6 location reflects the presence of five geoelectric layers with a resistivity relationship of p1<p2>p3<p4>p5 and the curve type KHK. This proves the presence of a layer of low resistivity at the top of the section. Most of the locations in this study (VES 2, VES 3, VES 7, VES 8, VES 9, VES 10, VES 11, VES 12) were classified as HKH curve type, and reflect the presence of five geoelectric layers, where the resistivity relationship of the layers is p1>p2<p3>p4<p5. At some locations, the depth of the bedrock is greater. Therefore, locations VES 4, VES 13 and VES 14 show the presence of six geoelectric layers, where the layer resistivity relationship is p1>p2>p3<p4>p5<p6, and they are classified as QHKH curve types.
Interpretation of the qualitative technique generated the geoelectric parameters such as the apparent resistivities of the layers, the depths, and their corresponding thicknesses. Correlating these 1D geoelectrical cross sections with the data from experimental boreholes drilled by the national laboratory of civil engineering Cameroon (Labogenie) in the vicinity of several VES points allowed identifying the lithology of the various layers. Furthermore, geoelectrical sections have been constructed covering the whole area of investigation along the N–S (VES 1, VES 2, VES 3), E–W (VES 4, VES 5, VES 6), NE–SW (VES 7 and VES 8), ENE–WSW (VES 9 and VES 10), NW–SW (VES 11 and VES 12) and NNE–SSW (VES 13 and VES 14) directions (Figure 13). Overall, the geoelectrical cross sections revealed the detail of five to six subsurface layers with numbers of layers increasing from the south-western to the north-eastern parts of the area.
Based on the local geological situation and borehole information, these layers are characterized from top to bottom by topsoil (clayey layer), a ferruginous layer (nodular clay layer or sandy clayey), weathered gneiss layer, fractured gneiss and fresh gneiss basement.
In general, in the study area topsoil (clayey layer) is relatively thin and is the first layer, characterized by (resistivity ρ = 177–1011 Ωm, depth h = 0.7–3.1 m, thickness d = 0.7–3.1 m). The second layer is a nodular clay layer only available in the study area in the profile with six layers (VES 4, VES 13 and VES 14) due to the topography of the area (ρ = 659–896 Ωm, h = 2.8–12 m, d = 4.4–10.4 m). The resistivity of this layer is a diagnostic of the lateritic clay which sometimes plugs sandy clay and reflects the various compositions and moisture content of the topsoil. Sandy clay is the second most present layer in the study area for profiles with five layers, it includes (ρ = 363–892.3 Ωm, h = 3.1–29 m, d = 2.4–26.5 m). This layer acts as a superficial aquifer and, in the investigation area, is exploited in large-diameter wells, but it may be susceptible to pollution. It overlies the weathered gneiss (ρ = 101.8–1091 Ωm, h = 9–50 m, d = 10.3–40 m), while the low resistivity fractured gneiss basement (ρ = 113–651.2 Ωm, h = 16–56 m, d = 6.9–55 m). This layer was considered to be the major basement aquifer in Pan-African orogenic nappe of the study area as it reflects relatively low resistivity and appreciable thicknesses, being considered enough to be hydrogeological significant in some parts of the area.
Modelling of the VES data by the IPI2Win software used the hypothesis that the last layer’s depth and thickness (unweathered gneiss basement) cannot be determined by the software, just its resistivities (ranging up to ρ = 1000 Ωm). These results were confirmed by borehole data around the studied VES, confirming the number of identified layers and that the local aquifer is essentially made up of the fractured part of the gneiss basement. The more rock is fractured, the lesser important is its resistivity and the higher the thickness of the resulting aquifer.