Cell lines and cell culture
ES-2 (CRL-1978) was purchased from ATCC (Manassas, Virginia, USA), and RMG-1 (JCRB0172) was purchased from JCRB Cell Bank (Osaka, Japan). These cell lines are derived from human ovarian clear cell carcinoma and are often used in mouse xenograft models[14, 15]. Cells were maintained in Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin/streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere comprising 5% CO2. Semi-confluent cells were dissociated using 0.05% trypsin/0.02% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA). Centrifugation was performed for 3 min at 180 × g at room temperature to obtain a cell pellet.
Cancer Dissemination Model
All animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Experiment Committee (Approval No. 01–07). Female BALB/c-nu/nu mice aged 6–8 weeks (Charles River Japan, Yokohama, Japan) were used for the experiments. We injected either 1 × 106 ES-2 cells or 1 × 107 RMG-1 cells intraperitoneally. The tumor-injected mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation following anesthesia after 2 weeks (ES-2) or 5 weeks (RMG-1). Except supplementary information, we used ES-2 in the present study because of the rapid growth and massive dissemination phenotype. For the hypoxia study, a HypoxyprobeTM-1 solution (Hypoxyprobe Inc., Burlington, MA, USA) in saline was injected intraperitoneally into the mice at a dosage of 60 mg/kg, 30 minutes before sacrifice.
Spatial Sectioning Method
The workflow for preparing the specimens is shown in Fig. 1a. Disseminated cancer with a few ascites developed either two weeks (in the case of the ES-2 cells) or five weeks (in the case of the RMG-1 cells) after injecting the cancer cells into the peritoneal cavities of the mice. The mice were euthanized under general anesthesia at that time-point. The abdominal organs enclosed in the parietal peritoneum—including the erector spinae muscles, the vertebrae, and the skin—were extracted en bloc. Then, 1–2 ml of 10% neutral buffered formalin was injected into each peritoneal cavity. Thereafter, the organs in the parietal peritoneum were further soaked in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 1 day in a plastic tube. Subsequently, the 10% neutral buffered formalin in both the peritoneal cavity and the tube was replaced with neutral EDTA to decalcify the vertebrae. After 1 week, the EDTA in the peritoneal cavity was replaced with 1–2 ml of 3–10% agarose gel (#E-3120-500 Gene Pure LE, ISC BioExpress, Kaysville, Utah, USA), and the organs in the parietal peritoneum were soaked in a 50 ml tube filled with 10% agarose gel. The tube was stored at room temperature (24–26°C) until the gel hardened. The organs in the parietal peritoneum were carefully removed from the tube and serially sliced into uniform 3-mm-thick sections. The sliced organs were then embedded in paraffin and sectioned for histopathological analysis. We also utilized another method involving abdominal organs extracted en bloc without the parietal peritoneum (Fig. S1).
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Each formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimen (4-µm thick) was placed on a glass slide and stained with H&E. The deparaffinized and rehydrated slides were immersed in 0.01 M citrate at pH 6.0 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA), and heat-induced antigen retrieval was performed in an autoclave at 110°C for 15 min. The slides were put on the tabletop to cool to room temperature, washed in phosphate-buffered saline, and immersed in 3% H2O2 diluted with methanol. Background Sniper (Biocare Medical, Pacheco, CA, USA) was used for blocking as required. Primary antibodies against hypoxia-inducible factor-α (HIF1α) (EP1215Y, diluted at 1:100, rabbit monoclonal IgG; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), hypoxyprobe-1 (PAb2627AP, diluted at 1: 250, rabbit polyclonal IgG antibody; Hypoxyprobe Inc., Burlington, MA, USA), CD31 (D8V9E, diluted at 1:100, rabbit monoclonal IgG; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), UCP1 (ab234430, diluted at 1:100, rabbit monoclonal IgG; Abcam), FABP4 (ab92501, diluted at 1:100, rabbit monoclonal IgG; Abcam), CD36 (ab252923, diluted at 1:100, rabbit monoclonal IgG; Abcam), fatty acid synthase (FASN; 3180S, diluted at 1:100, rabbit monoclonal IgG; Cell Signaling Technology), and human leukocyte antigen (HLA; ab52922, diluted at 1:250, rabbit monoclonal IgG; Abcam) were used for IHC in the present study. Histofine® high stain PO (MULTI) (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) or Histofine® simple stain mouse MAX-PO (R) (Nichirei) and a Histofine® DAB substrate kit (Nichirei) were used to detect the labeled antigens. Non-specific mouse or rabbit IgG was used as a negative control. We used ImageJ software (version 1.52a)[16] to analyze the IHC slides.
RNA- in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH)
We performed RNA-ISH on the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded slides. An RNAscope™ kit (Advanced Cell Diagnostics, Hayward, CA, USA) was used for RNA-ISH. RNA-ISH was performed according to manufacturer’s protocol. mRNA expression in the specimens was detected using a negative control probe, positive control probe and anti-FABP4 probe (310043, 313901 and 470641-C2, Advanced Cell Diagnostics).
Acquisition Of Histological Images
The specimen slides were scanned with an Aperio SC2 scanner (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and imaged with an Aperio eSlide Manager (Leica Biosystems). The sections were digitally imaged at 20× magnification and saved as TIFF files.
Evaluation Of Immunohistochemical Staining
Vascular regions (i.e., tumor areas within 100 µm of CD31-positive vessels) and avascular regions (i.e., tumor area 100 µm away from CD31-positive vessels) that stained positive for HIF1α and hyopoxyprobe-1 were analyzed using Image J software (Version 1.52a)[16]. Briefly, we took 26 color images from randomly selected vascular or avascular areas in the stained specimens at 20× magnification. The non-tumor regions and necrotic regions were removed. The color images were converted to 8-bit grayscale, and an appropriate threshold was set prior to Image J analysis.
Evaluation Of The Accuracy Of Our System For Preserving Spatial Information By Mri Imaging (Mri)
We performed MRI to evaluate the accuracy of the anatomical information obtained and preserved using our method at the Central Institute for Experimental Animals (Yokohama, Japan). The mice were anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane. Respiration and rectal temperature were monitored during the measurements. MRI was performed using a 7.0 tesla MRI system equipped with actively shielded gradients at a maximum strength of 700 mT/m (BioSpec 70/16; Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany) and with a 38 mm volume coil. T2-weighted images of the axial plane were acquired using a rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement method with the following parameters: effective echo time (TE), 40 ms; repetition time (TR), 3500 ms; rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement factor, 8; number of averages, 4; spatial resolution, 150 × 150 µm; slice thickness, 0.75 mm; and number of slices, 36.
Statistical analysis
In the present study, statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics version 19 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). The statistical significance was determined using an unpaired t-test. The variables were compared using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.