1. Tonsaker T, Bartlett G, Trpkov C. Health information on the Internet: gold mine or minefield? Can Fam Physician 2014;60:407-8. Accessed 7 May 2018. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24828994
2. Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, et al. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information. J Am Med Assoc 2003;289:2400.
3. Kitchens B, Harle CA, Li S. Quality of health-related online search results. Decis Support Syst 2014;57:454-62.
4. World Internet Users Statistics and 2016 World Population Stats. Internet Usage Statistics: The Internet Big Picture. http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm; 2016. Accessed 25 July 2019.
5. Clement J. Global digital population 2019. Statista, https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/; 2019. Accessed 15 April 2019.
6. Cancer Research UK. Worldwide cancer mortality statistics. Worldwide cancer statistics. http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/world/mortality/; 2014. Accessed 26 July 2019.
7. Obaid AR. Colon Cancer and Saudi Population 2017. www.ijcmr.com; 2017. Accessed 26 July 2019.
8. Alsanea N, Abduljabbar AS, Alhomoud S, et al. Colorectal cancer in Saudi Arabia: incidence, survival, demographics and implications for national policies. Ann Saudi Med 2015;35:196-202.
9. Rutten LJF, Arora NK, Bakos AD, et al. Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980-2003). Patient Educ Couns 2005;57:250-61.
10. Mekuria AB, Erku DA, Belachew S. Preferred information sources and needs of cancer patients on disease symptoms and management: a cross-sectional study. Patient Prefer Adherence 2016;10:1991-97.
11. Rozmovits L, Ziebland S. What do patients with prostate or breast cancer want from an internet site? A qualitative study of information needs. Patient Educ Couns 2004;53:57-64.
12. Shea-Budgell MA, Kostaras X, Myhill KP, et al. Information needs and sources of information for patients during cancer follow-up. Curr Oncol. 2014;21:165.
13. Mayer DK, Terrin NC, Kreps GL, et al. Cancer survivors information seeking behaviors: a comparison of survivors who do and do not seek information about cancer. Patient Educ Couns 2007;65:342-50.
14. Chua GP, Tan HK, Gandhi M. Information sources and online information seeking behaviours of cancer patients in Singapore. ecancer 2018;12:880-91.
15. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, et al. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc 2002;287:2691-700.
16. Wilson P. How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. BMJ 2002;324:598-602.
17. State of Digital. The Arabic Web: Numbers and Facts. https://www.stateofdigital.com/the-arabic-web/; 2020. Accessed 29 July 2019.
18. Wood J. Top languages of the Internet, today and tomorrow. Understanding with unbabel. https://unbabel.com/blog/top-languages-of-the-internet/; 2015. Accessed 29 July 2019.
19. Al Huziah M, Al Kahtany M, Al Ammari R, et al. Assessment of online health information for Arabic sites. http://www.hon.ch/Global/pdf/Press/Assessment_of_Arabic_Sites_Report_17-09-09.pdf; 2009. Accessed 2 May 2018.
20. Aldabbagh D, Alsharif K, Househ MS. Health information in the Arab world. Stud Health Technol Inform 2013;190:297-9.
21. Petrescu P, Ghita M, Loiz D. Google organic CTR study. Adv Web Rank 2014. https://www.advancedwebranking.com/ebooks/Google-Organic-CTR-Study-2014.pdf; 2014. Accessed 8 May 2017.
22. Alnaim L. Evaluation of breast cancer information on the Internet in Arabic. J Cancer Educ 2019;34:810-8.
23. Nilsson-Ihrfelt E, Fjällskog ML, Blomqvist C, et al. Breast cancer on the Internet: the quality of Swedish breast cancer websites. Breast 2004;13:376-82.
24. England CY, Nicholls AM. Advice available on the Internet for people with coeliac disease: an evaluation of the quality of websites. J Hum Nutr Diet 2004;17:547-59.
25. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN guidelines for patients®: colon cancer 2018. https://www.nccn.org/patients/guidelines/colon/; 2018. Accessed 27 November 2019.
26. Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling, and assuring the quality of medical information on the internet: caveant lector et viewor—let the reader and viewer beware. J Am Med Assoc 1997;277:1244-45.
27. Cline RJ, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res 2001;16:671-92.
28. Charnock D, Shepperd S, Needham G, et al. DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. J Epidemiol Community Health 1999;53:105-11.
29. Ademiluyi G, Rees CE, Sheard CE. Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet. Patient Educ Couns 2003;50:151-5.
30. Sanger S. DISCERN. Heal Expect 1998;1:135-6.
31. Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ. Patients’ use of the Internet for medical
information. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17:180-5.
32. Grewal P, Alagaratnam S. The quality and readability of colorectal cancer information on the internet. Int J Surg 2013;11:410-3.
33. Burke E, Harkins P, Saeed M, et al. “Dr. Google” will see you now—assessing the quality of information on oesophageal cancer on the Internet. J Gastrointest Surg 2020;24:2466-70.
34. Wasserman M, Baxter NN, Rosen B, et al. Systematic review of internet patient information on colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2014;57:64-9.
35. Popescu SD, Popescu AO, Dănilă M, et al. General characteristics and quality of stroke-related online information – a cross-sectional assessment of the Romanian and Hungarian websites. Acta Medica Marisiensis 2018;64:116-20.
36. Sajid MS, Shakir AJ, Baig MK. Information on the Internet about colorectal cancer: patient attitude and potential toward web browsing. A prospective observational study. Can J Surg 2011;54:339-43.