Mitogenome of the Palaeolithic remains
We successfully determined a highly accurate complete mitochondrial genome sequence of 20,000-year-old Minatogawa 1 (Minato1), a plausible direct descendant of the initial Out-of-Eurasia into the Japanese Archipelago (Fig. 1, Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). Its sequence obtained with average depth of 52 was classified into haplogroup M, and carries no substitutions that are defining subgroups of haplogroup M. Figure 2 shows a Bayesian phylogenetic tree of mitogenome of 18 ancient and 171 present-day individuals in the Japanese Archipelago. Figure 3 shows a Mutli Dimensional Scaling (MDS) plot of mitogenome of 1 Palaeolithic, 13 Jomon, 4 Yayoi, and 2,062 present-day individuals in the Japanese Archipelago. Minato1 has the potentially ancestral type of haplogroup M, which can be seen neither in 2,062 present-day Japanese samples newly obtained in this study nor in 21,668 present-day Han Chinese samples recently published [13]. Haplogroup M is found at high frequency in present-day Asians, Australasians, and indigenous Americans. The fact that Minato1 carried a mitochondrial genome that is potentially ancestral type of haplogroup M suggests (a) there is at least some population continuity from the late Pleistocene to present-day human populations in the Japanese Archipelago and (b) Minato1 is not only connected to present-day Japanese but also present-day East Asians. A 40,000-year-old Tianyuan individual, excavated from northern China, was reported to be the mitochondrial sequence of ancestral-type haplotype B having four singletons (private mutations), i.e. a common ancestor of present-day mitogenome belonging to haplogroup B. Afterwards it is shown that the Tianyuan individual is not from a population that is directly ancestral to any present-day East or Southeast Asians, but rather belonged to a population that diverged from the population that contributed to present-day East and Southeast Asians [14,15]. Due to fluctuating global warming, Palaeolithic period from the LGP is supposed to be a difficult time to survive in [11,12], and changes in the gene pool are expected to occur various populations all across the world. However, the results of phylogenetic network including Minato1 and Tianyuan individuals show that changes in gene pool during the LGP had not occurred in East Asia, in contrast with in Europe.
Mitogenome of the hunting-gathering Jomon remains
We further successfully determined highly accurate complete mitochondrial genome sequences with average depths of coverage from 11 to 5,891 using 8,300- to 2,300-year-old Jomon individuals (10 individuals from six archaeological sites, Fig. 1, Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). All of the Jomon individuals fall into the same clusters with present-day Japanese in phylogenetic network, Bayesian phylogenetic tree and Mutli Dimensional Scaling (MDS) plot (Figs. 2 and 3). This shows population continuity from Jomon period to present-day in the Japanese Archipelago, meaning no dynamic change in the gene pool of people living in the Japanese Archipelago from the Palaeolithic to Neolithic periods, unlike in West Eurasia. The results obtained also show that most of the Jomon individuals in our collection examined are of haplogroups M or N, and many of them are of sub-haplogroups M7a or N9b in the narrow taxonomic group (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). This is consistent with the previous observations from PCR-based typing [16,17]. Both haplogroups M7a and N9b characteristic of Jomon individuals have been inherited by the present-day Japanese individuals; 7.9% and 1.3% among the present-day Japanese population, respectively (Supplementary Table S2).
Mitogenome of the farming Yayoi remains
In addition, we too successfully determined highly accurate complete mitochondrial genome sequences of four individuals from Yayoi period with average depths of coverage from 13 to 5891 (each two individuals from the Hanaura and Doigahama Yayoi sites, respectively. Fig. 1, Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). The Yayoi period started by the life style of paddy rice farming that was brought into Japanese Archipelago by the Out-of-Eurasians. The results show that three of the Yayoi individuals belong to haplogroup D4 (Table 1). D4 is the most common haplogroup in present-day Japanese (34.3%) (Supplementary Table S2), which is also common throughout East Asia [13,18]. Like the Jomon individuals, all of the Yayoi individual fall into any of the clusters of the phylogenetic network, MDS and Bayesian phylogenetic tree that are constructed together with the present-day Japanese people, although the Jomon and Yayoi people have some mitochondrial sub-haplogroups characteristic to each of them (Figs. 2 and 3).
Estimating past demographic trends
Figures 4 shows the phylogenetic network and the Neighbor-Joining phylogenetic tree for 324 world-wide ancient and present-day individuals belonging to macrohaplogroup M (including C, D, G, M7, M8, M10, and Z), and macrohaplogroup N (including A, B, B5, F, N9, R9, R11, and Y), respectively. The gene pool of the present-day Japanese has been established, swallowing all of the genetic diversities of the people living in the Japanese Archipelago during more than 10,000 years, starting from the Palaeolithic period through the hunter-gatherer Jomon period, farming Yayoi period, and so on. These observations can suggest that there was no conflict between indigenous Jomon hunter-gatherers and migrating Yayoi farmers. This intercultural fusion from genetic points of view is quite different from observations in Europe [5-7,10].
Bayesian-Skyline Plot (BSP) analysis using 2,062 present-day Japanese found three large population increases, at 45,000-35,000 BP, 15,000-12,000 BP, and 3,000 BP (Fig. 5). These correspond with a rise in temperatures seen in the Late Pleistocene, the dawn of agriculture in East Asia, and the beginning of the Yayoi period, respectively. In a recent study relating to East Asia, demographic simulations were undertaken using complete mitochondrial DNA sequences from 21,668 present-day Han Chinese individuals [13]. The results showed that there was a population increase towards the end of the LGP around 45,000-35,000 BP, followed by another, more rapid increase during the Neolithic period 15,000-12,000 BP. The first two population increases seen in the present-day Japanese populations should have taken place before their ancestors migrated to the Japanese Archipelago, suggesting that these increases took place before Out-of-Eurasia. However, the population increase corresponding to the beginning of the Yayoi period was not observed on the mainland Han Chinese populations, and thus was considered to be a phenomenon unique to the Japanese Archipelago, namely that caused by the Out-of-Eurasians after the Yayoi period. It is easily expected that the Yayoi migrant bringing rice paddy farming should have a significant impact on the number of population and population structure in the Japanese Archipelago. And further population increase afterwards could be related to the introduction of ironware into the Japanese Archipelago, which allowed for more efficient rice paddy farming and a more stable food supply [19]. Given all the findings obtained, our results show that genetic makeup of the present-day Japanese populations is built after migrant Yayoi farmers coming over from the Asian mainland. But we cannot ignore contribution of the Jomon people to the present-day Japanese population structure.
This paper is the first genome paper that disclosed population dynamics since the initial Out-of-Eurasians into in the Japanese Archipelago in the Palaeolithic period, through the hunting-gathering Jomon and the farming Yayoi periods, until the present-day. We have determined the first complete mitochondrial genome sequences dating to the Palaeolithic period in the Japanese archipelago. Minato1 individual has skeletal characteristics that are different from those of the Jomon people and the present-day Japanese people, highlighting the necessity of further research on the relationship between Palaeolithic people and Jomon people from both morphological and genetic perspectives. We show (a) there were no drastic substitutions in the gene pool since the initial wave of Out-of-Eurasia into the Japanese Archipelago of Palaeolithic period, (b) ancestors of the present-day Japanese had experienced three large population increases, but the first two of them before Out-of-Eurasia into the Japanese Archipelago. The third increase was a sharp one occurred in relatively short period, (c) gene pool of the Jomon hunter-gatherers has survived, even after migration of the Yayoi farmers and its subsequent population explosion. The following key questions remains open such as whether the migrating Yayoi farmers genetically mixed with the indigenous Jomon hunter-gatherers at each stage after the Yayoi migration (and, if so, how type of mix occurred) and whether population transformation across cultural transitions observed in Europe was worldwide versus local phenomena [20-22]. Anthropological evidence indicates the presence of convivial society among Jomon and Yayoi peoples. Ancient Japanese Archipelago should be an ideal field to elucidate interaction between hunter-gatherers and farmers and its accompanying population structure transformations.