3.1 Bioassays
The imidacloprid tolerance of B. tabaci was measured by the leaf dip method after 10 d of AAP (Fig. 2a). Viruliferous B. tabaci exhibited significantly lower corrected mortality rate than non-viruliferous B. tabaci (t = 2.131, df = 22, P = 0.045) (Fig. 2b). This indicates that CCYV improves the tolerance of B. tabaci to imidacloprid.
3.2 Screening of resistant B. tabaci
Under long-term imidacloprid treatment, the tolerance of B. tabaci to imidacloprid gradually increased. The expression level of CYP6CM1 was approximately 30-fold higher in resistant B. tabaci than in sensitive B. tabaci (Fig. 3a). According to the classification of resistance classes (Yan et al., 2012), the adults of B. tabaci screened in this study showed moderate resistance to imidacloprid, with a resistance multiplicity of 11.30 compared with the LC50 value of sensitive B. tabaci (Table 1).
Table 1
Toxicity regression equation and resistance multiplicity.
B. tabaci type†
|
Toxicity regression
equation
|
R2
|
LC50 (mg/L)
|
95% CI (mg/L)‡
|
Resistance multiplicity
|
Resistant (Rn)
|
Y = -9.621 + 3.521X
|
0.933
|
540.398
|
490.845–629.279
|
11.300
|
Resistant (R1)
|
Y = -4.427 + 1.921X
|
0.878
|
198.579
|
164.053–233.764
|
4.160
|
Sensitive (S0)
|
Y = -3.805 + 2.266X
|
0.913
|
47.769
|
32.813–58.680
|
-
|
†S0, susceptible B. tabaci population; R1, first-generation resistant population; Rn, resistant population cultured for multiple generations. ‡CI, confidence interval. |
3.3 Effects of CCYV on the expression of CYP6CM1 in B. tabaci
The CYP6CM1 gene was first up-regulated and then down-regulated in viruliferous B. tabaci (Fig. 3b). No significant difference was observed in the expression of CYP6CM1 between viruliferous and non-viruliferous B. tabaci after 1 d of feeding (t1d = 0.873, df = 8, P = 0.247) and 5 d of feeding (t5d = 1.862, df = 8, P = 0.076). The expression of CYP6CM1 showed an increasing trend in viruliferous B. tabaci. At 10 and 15 d, the CYP6CM1 gene was significantly up-regulated in viruliferous B. tabaci compared with the non-viruliferous group (t10d = 12.870, df = 8, P < 0.001; t15d = 7.243, df = 8, P < 0.001). However, CYP6CM1 expression was down-regulated in viruliferous B. tabaci at 20 d, and the difference in its expression between the two groups was not significant (t20d = 2.175, df = 8, P = 0.062), probably because of the senescence or death of adults. This indicates that CCYV affects the sensitivity of B. tabaci to imidacloprid by altering the expression of the CYP6CM1 gene.
3.4 Effects of CCYV on the upstream regulators of CYP6CM1
No difference was detected in the expression of the ERK gene between non-viruliferous and viruliferous B. tabaci, regardless of their resistance to imidacloprid, at both 1 and 10 d after feeding (Fig. 4a and 4b) (St1d = 0.502, df = 6, P = 0.633; St10d = 1.758, df = 6, P = 0.261). Although the p38 gene showed no difference in expression between resistant and sensitive B. tabaci at 1 d (St1d = 0.847, df = 6, P = 0.429), it was significantly up-regulated in viruliferous adults compared with non-viruliferous B. tabaci at 10 d (Fig. 4c and 4d ) (St10d = 4.993, df = 6, P = 0.002). The transcription factor genes CREB showed similar expression profiles, with significant up-regulation at 10 d in sensitive viruliferous B. tabaci (Fig. 4e and 4f) (St1d = 1.431, df = 6, P = 0.202; St10d = 5.587, df = 6, P = 0.001). The expression level of CYP6CM1 was significantly up-regulated at 10 d in susceptible B. tabaci (Fig. 5a and 5b) (St1d = 1.800, df = 6, P = 0.122; St10d = 24.020, df = 6, P < 0.001).. Therefore, we speculated that the effect of resistance on B. tabaci is greater than that of CCYV.
3.5 Effects of silencing CYP6CM1 on the acquisition of CCYV by B. tabaci
When dsCYP6CM1 and dsGFP were fed to B. tabaci at a concentration of 40 µg/mL by membrane feeding, the effect of dsCYP6CM1 on CYP6CM1 expression was significantly higher than that of dsGFP (t = 38.850, df = 4, P < 0.001) (Fig. 6a). The silenced B. tabaci were placed on CCYV-infected cucumber plants to acquire the virus, and were collected after 1 and 3 h of feeding. We found that the silencing of CYP6CM1 significantly decreased the amount of virus acquired by B. tabaci (t1h = 2.299, df = 14, P = 0.037; t3h = 3.110, df = 14, P = 0.0076) (Fig. 6b). These results suggest that the CYP6CM1 expression affects the virulence acquisition of B. tabaci.
3.6 Comparison of virus acquisition and retention
The ability of insect vectors to transmit the virus could be determined by measuring virulence acquisition and retention. We compared the differences in virulence acquisition and retention between resistant and sensitive B. tabaci. Resistant B. tabaci acquired significantly more copies of the virus than sensitive B. tabaci after non-viruliferous vectors were placed on CCYV-infected plants for 2 h and 6 h (t2h = 2.365, df = 26, P = 0.026; t6h = 2.940, df = 26, P = 0.030). We found that acquired virus copies no longer changed at 24 and 48 h for either resistant or sensitive B. tabaci (Fig. 7a). This indicated that, for the semi-persistent virus like CCYV, complete virus acquisition was possible from 24 to 48 h for B. tabaci. We investigated the virulence retention capacity of resistant and sensitive B. tabaci on cotton (a non-host of CCYV). When viruliferous B. tabaci were fed on cotton for 1 and 3 d, the resistant B. tabaci lost the virus more readily than sensitive adults, as indicated by a significant decrease in virulence retention capacity (t1d = 2.716, df = 30, P = 0.011; t3d = 3.240, df = 30, P = 0.003). At 9 d, the virus titer in resistant B. tabaci decreased significantly compared with that in sensitive adults (t9d = 3.646, df = 30, P = 0.001) (Fig. 7b). These results suggest that resistant B. tabaci possess a higher ability to acquire but lower ability to retain the virus compared with sensitive adults.