Everolimus pre-treatment decreases cocaine-seeking only following incubation. Following 10 days of cocaine self-administration, rats were pretreated with VEH or 1.0 mg/kg Everolimus (E1.0) prior to a cue-elicited cocaine-seeking test on either WD3 or WD30. Prior to Everolimus treatment, no group differences were apparent for the average active- or inactive-lever presses or for the number of cocaine reinforcers earned (Suppl.Table 1). VEH-pretreated rats emitted more cue-reinforced lever-presses on WD30 versus WD3 (Fig.1a; p<0.0001), indicative of incubated craving. As depicted in Fig.1a, Everolimus blocked cue-elicited responding in rats tested on WD30 (p<0.0001), with no effect detected on WD3 (p=0.29). In contrast, inactive lever-pressing did not vary as a function of withdrawal in VEH-pretreated rats (Fig.1b; p=0.88) and Everolimus did not affect inactive lever-pressing on either WD3 or 30 (for WD3, p=0.76; for WD30, p=0.63). From this single-dose study, we concluded that Everolimus abolishes incubated cocaine-seeking, without altering cue-elicited cocaine-seeking during short-term withdrawal.
Everolimus pretreatment dose-dependently blocks incubated cocaine-seeking. Consequently, we determined the dose-response function for Everolimus suppression of incubated cocaine-seeking in late withdrawal. All groups exhibited comparable lever-responding and cocaine intake history prior to testing (Suppl.Table 1).
Acute Everolimus pretreatment dose-dependently reduced incubated cue-elicited responding (Fig.2a; Drug effect: F4,38=11.14, p<0.0001) and this effect persisted, unchanged, for at least 24 h (Fig.2b; Test effect and interaction: F4,38<1.0, p’s>0.09). Given the persistence of responding, the data were collapsed across cue tests for LSD post-hoc analyses. WD30-VEH rats exhibited significantly greater responding than WD3-VEH controls (p<0.0001), indicating the presence of an incubated response in protracted withdrawal. Relative to WD30-VEH controls, Everolimus significantly lowered incubated lever-responding at all doses (for 0.01 mg/kg, p=0.02; for 0.1 mg/kg, p<0.0001; for 1.0 mg/kg, p<0.0001). Further, the responding exhibited by the 30WD rats pretreated with the two higher Everolimus doses was not different from the 3WD-VEH controls (for 0.1 mg/kg, p=0.54; for 1.0 mg/kg, p=0.32), indicating a block of incubated cocaine-craving at these doses. The Everolimus effect was selective for active lever-responding as no group differences were detected for inactive lever-pressing on either cue test (Suppl.Fig.1a,b; Drug X Test ANOVA: F4,38<0.25, all p’s>0.40).
Everolimus post-treatment facilitates the consolidation of extinction learning. Next, we probed whether treating rats with 1.0 mg/kg Everolimus immediately following Cue Test 2 might facilitate the consolidation of extinction learning (see Fig.2, top). Pairwise comparisons of the active lever-pressing behavior between Test 2 (post-treatment) and Test 3 (no further treatment) confirmed no change in responding for VEH rats tested in late withdrawal (p=0.34), indicating its persistence. In contrast, Everolimus post-treatment significantly reduced responding exhibited on Cue Test 3 (Fig.2c; p=0.04), without affecting inactive lever-pressing (Suppl.Fig.1c; p’s>0.12). These latter data argue that the “anti-incubation” effect of Everolimus may involve a facilitation of extinction memory consolidation.
Everolimus pre-treatment does not alter sucrose-seeking. Finally, we determined the impact of Everolimus on sucrose-seeking at late withdrawal. No group differences in operant responding or reinforcement were noted prior to treatment with 1.0 mg/kg Everolimus (Suppl. Table 1). We detected no evidence of incubated sucrose-seeking in ad libitum-fed and –watered rats or effects of 1.0 mg/kg Everolimus upon cue-reinforced responding (Fig.2e,f; Drug X Test ANOVA: F1,20 or F2,20<0.70, all p’s>0.50) or inactive lever-pressing (Suppl.Fig.1d,e; Test effect: F1,20=6.00, p=0.02; Drug effect and interaction: F1,20 and F2,20<4.0, p’s>0.07). Thus, acute pretreatment with 1.0 mg/kg Everolimus does not impact cue-elicited sucrose-seeking.
Everolimus pretreatment blocks or reverses incubation-related changes in mTOR/Akt1 signaling within vmPFC subregions. Using the tissue obtained from Experiment 1 rats, we also determined Everolimus’ effects upon indices of mTOR/Akt1 signaling within the PL and IL and its temporal selectivity. No time-dependent changes were detected for the total protein expression of Akt1, P70S6K or rpS6 within either subregion of VEH-pretreated rats (Suppl.Table2) nor were any effects of Everolimus detected upon total protein expression at either withdrawal time-point (Suppl.Table2; Suppl.Fig.2).
A time-dependent increase in p(Ser473)-Akt1 levels was observed within both the PL (Fig.3a; p=0.04) and the IL (Fig.3b; p=0.03) of VEH-pretreated rats. Everolimus did not alter p(Ser473)-Akt1 expression within either subregion on WD3 (for PL, p=0.7; for IL, p=0.82), lowered phospho-protein levels within both subregions on WD30 (for PL, p=0.0001; for IL, p=0.002) (Fig.3a,b). Similarly, p(Thr389)-P70S6K expression also incubated within the PL and IL of VEH controls (Fig.3c,d; for PL, p=0.003; for IL; p=0.03). However, Everolimus pretreatment lowered the PL levels of p(Thr389)-P70SK6 at both withdrawal time-points (Fig.3c; for WD3, p=0.02; for WD30, p=0.001), without altering phospho-protein expression within the IL (Fig.3d; p’s>0.11). The time-dependent increase in expression within vmPFC subregion exhibited by VEH controls was statistically unreliable (Fig.3e,f; for PL, p=0.08; for IL, p=0.1). Everolimus pretreatment lowered p(Ser235/236)-rpS6 within the PL at both withdrawal time-points (Fig.3e; for WD3, p=0.4; for WD30, p=0.003), but only lowered phospho-protein expression within the IL in rats tested on WD3 (Fig.3f; for WD3, p=0.02; for WD30: p=0.98). These immunoblotting data support the brain-penetrance of Everolimus and confirm that acute oral dosing with 1.0 mg/kg Everolimus inhibits incubation-related increases in Akt1 and P70S6K activation within both the IL and PL subregions of the vmPFC.
Everolimus pretreatment reverses incubation-related changes in mGlu1/5 expression within the PL. VEH-pretreated rats exhibited a time-dependent reduction in the PL levels of the monomer (Fig.4b; p=0.02), but not the dimer (Fig.4a; p=0.12). forms of mGlu1, with reductions detected also for both the dimer and monomer forms of mGlu5 ((Fig.4c,d; for dimer, p=0.048; for monomer, p=0.01. In contrast, mGlu1 monomer expression within the IL increased as a function of withdrawal (Fig.4f; p=0.006), while no other time-dependent receptor changes were detected in the IL of VEH-pretreated rats (for mGlu1 dimer, p=0.13, Fig.4e; for mGlu5 dimer, p=0.56, Fig.4g; for mGlu5 monomer, p=0.15, Fig.4h). Although Everolimus pretreatment did not affect PL levels of mGlu1/5 on WD3 (p’s>0.30; see Suppl.Table2), pretreatment elevated both the monomer and dimer forms of mGlu1 and mGlu5 on WD30 (Fig.4a-d; p’s≤0.0001; see Suppl.Table2). With the exception of an increase in mGlu1 dimer expression (Fig.4e, p=0.001), no Everolimus effects were detect for receptor expression within IL (Fig.4f-h; p’s>0.45; see Suppl.Table2). Taken together, these immunoblotting data indicate that incubated cocaine-craving is associated with a PL-selective reduction in mGlu1/5 expression and that acute, oral, dosing with 1.0 mg/kg Everolimus is sufficient to reverse this neuroadaptation and to augment mGlu1 expression within the IL.
Everolimus pretreatment reverses incubation-related changes in Homer expression within the PL. Time-dependent increases in both Homer1b/c (Fig.5a; p=0.001) and Homer2a/b (Fig.5b; p=0.005) were observed within the PL of VEH-pretreated rats, with no changes detected within the IL (Fig.5c,d; p’s>0.40, see Suppl.Table2). On WD3, Everolimus pretreatment did not alter Homer1/2 expression within either the PL (p’s>0.55) or the IL (p’s>0.06; see Suppl.Table2). In contrast, pretreatment on WD30 significantly lowered Homer2a/b expression within the PL (Fig.5b; p=0.002), with less statistically reliable reductions detected also for Homer1b/c within the PL (Fig.5a; p=0.09) and for Homer2a/b within the IL (Fig.5d; p=0.06). No Everolimus effect was detected for IL expression of Homer1/c on WD30 (Fig.5c; p=0.64). These immunoblotting results for Homer proteins indicate that incubated cocaine-seeking is associated with elevated Homer1b/c and Homer2a/b expression selectively within the PL subregion of the vmPFC, the latter of which is reversed by acute, oral, dosing with Everolimus.
Protein correlates of cocaine-seeking within vmPFC subregions. When the entire vmPFC is examined, cue-elicited cocaine-seeking is positively correlated with indices of PI3K/Akt1 signaling (4) and Homer2 expression (25), but inversely correlated with the expression of the monomer forms of mGlu1 and mGlu5 (3). To determine the subregional selectivity of these correlates of cocaine-seeking, comparable correlational analyses were performed on the PL and IL tissue from the rats in Experiment 1. As detailed in the Supplement, we replicated a predictive relationship between cocaine-seeking and indices of mTOR/Akt1 activation within both the PL and IL (Suppl.Fig.4). Homer2 expression in the PL also predicted drugs-seeking (Suppl.Fig.6), while an inverse relationship between cocaine-seeking and mGlu1/5 monomer and dimer expression was detected in the PL only (Suppl.Fig.5). Thus, just as incubated cocaine-seeking generalizes across long- versus short-access self-administration procedures, so too do their biochemical correlates.