3.2. Physical and optical properties
The density is indeed a significant physical characteristic which shares insights about solids; such evidence will be more beneficial if the structure is properly understood [19, 20]. The volume of structural units contained in the glass may be determined using the density data of the samples. The density values in the current BCAPM glass system were dropped nonlinearly from 4.072g/cc (BCAPM0) to 4.009g/cc (BCAPM4). The molar volume (Vm) was calculated using the measured density and molecular weight (M) data (Table 2). In Fig. 2, the fluctuation of ⍴ and Vm with MoO3 is displayed.
Table 1
Sample code and the glass compositions
Sample Code | Composition in mole % |
| B2O3 | CdO | Al2O3 | PbF2 | MoO3 |
BCAPM0 | 60 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 0 |
BCAPM1 | 60 | 20 | 5 | 14.5 | 0.5 |
BCAPM2 | 60 | 20 | 5 | 14 | 1 |
BCAPM3 | 60 | 20 | 5 | 13.5 | 1.5 |
BCAPM4 | 60 | 20 | 5 | 13 | 2 |
Table 2
Physical and optical parameters of BCAPM glasses
Physical & Optical parameters | Sample Code |
BCAPM0 | BCAPM1 | BCAPM2 | BCAPM3 | BCAPM4 |
Average molecular weight | 141.754 | 141.248 | 140.742 | 140.235 | 139.729 |
Density (ᵨ) gm/cc | 4.072 | 4.057 | 4.041 | 4.025 | 4.009 |
Molar Volume (Vm) cc/mol | 34.80 | 34.81 | 34.82 | 34.83 | 34.84 |
Optical band gap (Eopt) eV | 3.063 | 3.049 | 3.013 | 3.002 | 2.951 |
Refractive index (n) | 2.379 | 2.383 | 2.393 | 2.396 | 2.410 |
Dielectric constantnt (ε) | 5.660 | 5.682 | 5.728 | 5.743 | 5.809 |
Molar refractivity (Rm) cm− 3 | 21.17 | 21.21 | 21.30 | 21.34 | 21.45 |
Electronic polarizability (αm) 10− 21 cm− 3 | 8.38 | 8.40 | 8.44 | 8.45 | 8.50 |
Urbach energy (ΔE) eV | 0.257 | 0.191 | 0.213 | 0.216 | 0.223 |
The density of the BCAPM glasses drops non - linearly as the mole percentage of MoO3 grows, as seen by the respective crystal densities of MoO3 (4.70gm/cc) and PbF2 (8.44gm/cc). Fractional substitution of PbF2 (245.2 g/mol) by MoO3 (143.94 g/mol) might potentially explain the reduction in density. The fall in density values might potentially be due to the conversion of [BO4] units to [BO3] units where [BO4] is denser than [BO3], according to the literature[21, 22].
Absorption spectra of BCAPM glasses are presented in Fig. 3. The analysis of the valence and conduction band transitions using the primitive absorption edge in the UV-Visible zone is a fascinating method. The prime aspect of the absorption edge in non-crystalline solids is the absorption coefficient α(ν) with smaller values as a function of the photon energy hν [23].
$$\alpha \left(\vartheta \right)= Cexp\left(\frac{h\vartheta }{\varDelta E}\right)$$
1
where ΔE is Urbach energy and C is a constant. The α (ν) can be obtained from the absorbance A by using the equation below;
$$\alpha \left(\vartheta \right)=2.303\frac{A}{d}$$
2
where ‘d’ is the thickness. Davis et al [24] and Tauc et al [25] suggested relation:
(\({\alpha }\text{h}\upsilon\)) =\({B}^{2}{(\text{h}\upsilon -{E}_{g})}^{2}\) (3)
Figure 4 shows the Tauc plot of BCAPM glasses. The optical band gap (Eg) values (see Table 2) are acquired by extrapolating the linear region of the curve. With the enhancement of MoO3 from x = 0 to 2 mole% in the current BCAPM glasses, Eg declines from 3.063 eV (BCAPM0) to 2.951 eV (BCAPM4). With the insertion of MoO3, the bandgap drops, indicating that localised states for electrons near the conduction band are established. The bandgap can indeed be reduced by associating these localised states with the conduction band. Conversion of Mo6+ ions to Mo5+ ions may have caused the reduction in band gap. Increases in Mo5+ ions, which occupy octahedral positions and function as modifiers in the glass network, can lead to an increase in non-bridging oxygens and a drop in bandgap[11, 26].
The inverse slope of the linear section of the Urbach plot, as illustrated in Fig. 5, is used to calculate Urbach energy. The magnitude of disorder present in the glass network can be accessed by the Urbach energy. These values were found to be much lower for the BCAPM glass system, indicating that the glass structure had less disorder [27].
The other parameters such as refractive index (n), molar electronic polarizability (αm), and molar refraction (Rm) are evaluated using the following relations [28–30].
$$\frac{{n}^{2}-1}{{n}^{2}+2}=1-\sqrt{\frac{{E}_{g}}{20}}$$
4
$${\text{R}}_{\text{m}}=\frac{{\text{n}}^{2}-1}{{\text{n}}^{2}+2}\text{*}{\text{V}}_{\text{m}}$$
5
$${{\alpha }}_{\text{m}}=\left(\frac{3}{4\text{П}{\text{N}}_{\text{A}}}\right)\text{*}{\text{R}}_{\text{m}}$$
6
With an excess of MoO3 in BCAPM glasses, the n values were elevated from 2.379 (BCAPM0) to 2.410 (BCAPM4). As both Rm and \({{\alpha }}_{\text{m}}\)are related to molar volume, they show a raising trend with composition.
3.3. FTIR spectroscopy:
FTIR spectroscopy is the measurement for acquiring infrared absorption or transmission spectra in order to detect the presence of various functional groups in materials. The influence of MoO3 on the structural characteristics of BCAPM glasses containing lead fluoride may be studied using FTIR spectra. The infrared absorption spectra of BCAPM glasses are shown in Fig. 6 in the wave number range of 400 to 1600 cm− 1. The various IR bands observed from FTIR spectra are 423, 461, 517, 579, 673, 724, 901, 995, 1061, 1116, 1168, 1279, 1376, 1466, and 1549 cm− 1. In general, the IR examination reveals two distinct frequency zones. The stretching vibrations BO3 and BO4 borate units are attributed to the ranges from 1200 to 1600 cm− 1 and 800 to 1200 cm− 1, respectively[31–33]. Significant differences in the infrared spectra during analysis revealed the emergence of three primary broad bands at around 670, 1050, and 1380 cm− 1. The widths of the bands become wider as the MoO3 concentration increased, although the spectra indicated no change in the centre of the bands. Relying on their valence states, molybdenum ions can join the glass network as network modifiers or network formers, with Mo5+ ions claiming the modifying sites and Mo6+ ions claiming the former sites. By converting the hexavalent molybdenum ions to the pentavalent ions, the addition of MoO3 at the expense of PbF2 in BCAPM glasses increases Mo5+ ions (which function as modifiers).
The bands between 423–517 cm− 1 in BCAPM glass system are attributed to Pb2+and Cd2+ vibrations and vibrations of AlO6 octahedral[5, 6, 34]. The peak near 579 cm− 1 might be attributed to the Mo-O bond vibrations in distorted MoO4[13, 35]. IR band positions observed 673 cm− 1 in BCAPM glasses indicates the elongations of B–O–B bonds in BO3 units groups[36]. The peak at around 724 cm− 1 is assigned to the bending vibrations of B–O linkages. The structure's Mo–O–Mo bridging bonds are responsible for the band at 900 cm− 1. [13]. B-O stretching vibrations of tetrahedral BO4 units, cause the bands between 995 and 1060 cm− 1[37, 38]. Stretching vibrations of tetragonal BO3 units from different borate groups cause the bands between 1116 and 1279 cm− 1. The stretching elongations of the B–O of trigonal (BO3)3− units are assigned to the band at approximately 1376 cm− 1. Anti-symmetrical elongations B–O–B groups are responsible for the IR band at 1476–1549 cm− 1 [39–41].
3.4 Raman spectroscopy:
Vibrational spectroscopy is amongst the best means for understanding the structure of glasses. Glasses comprise structural units that are equivalent to crystalline examples and may be positioned freely in a 3D network while being amorphous. Among the most powerful vibrational spectroscopy approaches for exploring glass structure is Raman spectroscopy. Raman spectra of BCAPM glasses is shown in Fig. 7 and deconvolution spectra for BCAPM1 sample is depicted in Fig. 8 to locate exact Raman band positions. The various Raman bands observed from Raman spectra are 344cm− 1, 498cm− 1, 674cm− 1, 789cm− 1, (983cm− 1 shift 925 cm− 1), 1079cm− 1, 1229cm− 1, (1347cm− 1 shift 1337cm− 1), 1437cm− 1, and 1738cm− 1. The Raman band rising sharply at 344cm− 1 is ascribed to corner-shared MoO6 octahedra[42, 43]. Another band existing at 498cm− 1 is due to isolated diborate groups[44]. Anti-symmetric elongations of O-Mo-O linkages were observed in BCAPM glasses due to the presence of the Raman band at 674cm− 1[45]. Another Raman band present at 789cm− 1 is attributed to stretching vibrations of Mo-O-Mo linkages and the formation of AlO4 tetrahedra[5, 42]. An important band increasing sharply in BCAPM glasses is observed at ~ 950cm− 1 and is ascribed to the vibrations of Mo-O and Mo = O bonds in single and paired MoO6 units [46, 42]. The two Raman peaks, one at 344cm− 1 and the other at 950cm− 1, are clearly rising sharply with increasing MoO3 in the current BCAPM glass system, as seen by Raman spectra. Furthermore, the Raman band at 950cm− 1 is migrating from 983cm− 1 to 925cm− 1, and the intensity of this Raman band is growing with the concentrations of MoO3. This might be due to the replacing of PbF2 with MoO3, which has a low molecular weight. The change of [BO4] units to [BO3] with MoO3 concentration might be responsible for the shifting behavior towards lower frequencies and increased intensity in BCAPM glasses. This finding backs up the fact that increasing MoO3 doping concentration reduces density variation in BCAPM glasses. The Raman band at 1079 cm− 1 is due to the existence of diborate groups. When the PbF2 is replaced with MoO3 in BCAPM glasses, the intensity of the Raman bands at 789 cm− 1 and 1229 cm− 1 were observed to be diminished from BCAPM0 to BCAPM4 glass samples and finally merged with the neighborhood Raman bands. An intense Raman band in BCAPM glasses at 1340 cm− 1 is assigned to pyroborate groups and elongated B-O bands coupled to the borate groups[49, 48]. The bands near 1437cm− 1 in this glass system are ascribed to B–O− vibrations of the BO3 units and the band at 1738cm− 1 is due to chain and ring type metaborate units[49–51].