Materials
To synthesize of the dyes, p-anisidine-sulfonic acid, 2,5-dimethoxyaniline, 2-methoxy-5-methylaniline, 2,5-dimethylaniline, 7-anilino-4-hydroxy-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid, sodium hydroxide, an aqueous of hydrochloric acid, sodium nitrite, and acetic acid were used. Various VOCs such as n-hexane, n-octane, cyclohexane, benzene, toluene, chlorobenzene, p-xylene, ethylbenzene, nitrobenzene, chloroform, dichloromethane, acetylene dichloride, dichloroethane, trichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene, ethylether, methyl t-butylether, formaldehyde, 1,4-dioxane, ethylacetate, propylene oxide, methanol (MeOH), iso-propanol (2-PrOH), acetone, methylethylketone, tetrahydrofuran (THF), acetic acid, acetaldehyde, acetonitrile, diethylamine, pyridine, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), ethylene glycol, and water were used. For solvatochromism experiments, several solvents with different dielectric constants were especially selected. All reagents and solvents were commercially available and used without further purification.
Cotton standard fabric (ISO 105-F02, warp; 35 threads/cm, weft; 31 threads/cm, weight; 115 g/m2) was used as a cellulosic substrate for the fabricated sensors. A practical polycationic fixing agent was used for the aftertreatment to improve the wash fastness of the dyed fabric.
Instrumentation
HPLC from Waters 510 was utilized, and the column specification was C18, 5µm, 4.6 ×150 mm and the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min with 55% methanol and 45% water added ammonium phosphate dibasic (20 mM) and UV detector spectrum was 254 nm. 1H NMR (500 MHz) data were analyzed with Avance III 500, Bruker using DMSO-d6 as solvents and TMS as an internal standard. The mass data (m/z) were obtained on a XEVO-TQS micro, Waters LC/MS (ESI, Negative mode) with 3 kV of capillary voltage and 40 V of cone voltage, which flow rate was 0.2 mL/min under 50% methanol and 50% water. The absorption spectra and molar absorption coefficient were investigated by ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (Optizen 2010UV). X-ray diffraction analysis was performed using Malvern Panalytical EMPYREAN operating in the reflection mode with Cu-Kα radiation (λ; 1.540598 nm, 2° ≤ 2θ ≤ 100°).
Synthesis of dyes
Synthesis scheme of the three dyes 5a-c is shown in Scheme 2. All three dyes were synthesized by twice diazotization and twice coupling.
Sodium 3-((E)-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-((E)-(4-methoxy-2-sulfonatophenyl)
diazenyl)phenyl)diazenyl)-4-hydroxy-7-(phenylamino)naphthalene-2-sulfonate (5a, DiMo)
To substitute a sulfonic acid group to sodium sulfonate in p-anisidine-sulfonic acid (1), the p-anisidine-sulfonic acid (1, 0.01 mol) was dissolved in sodium hydroxide (0.01 mol) aqueous solution (20 mL) and stirred at room temperature until a clear solution was obtained. Sodium nitrite (0.01 mol) aqueous solution (5 mL) was added to the mixture solution. The solution was placed in an ice-water bath and lowered temperature to 0 ~ 5ºC and then an aqueous of hydrochloric acid (0.03 mol) was slowly put into the solution while maintaining 0 ~ 5ºC and stirred for 1h. As the diazonium reaction proceeds, the mixture turned into a white opaque solution. After the diazonium reaction, the reactant was slowly added to 2,5-dimethoxyaniline (2a, 0.01 mol) as the first coupler dissolved in acetic acid (5 mL) while maintaining 0 ~ 5ºC. Upon addition, the reactants underwent azo coupling reaction and the solution turned red. After stirring for an hour, the product was filtered and washed with water several times. The product was dissolved in methanol (300 mL) and filtered to remove impurities and then the methanol with the product was partially evaporated to obtain a saturated solution, and an excess of ethylacetate (500 mL) as a non-solvent was added to precipitate a monoazo compound (3a, yield; 22%) and dried under vacuum. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6); δ (ppm) = 3.85 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.92 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.96 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.42 (s, 1H, ArH), 6.92 (dd, 1H, ArH, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.20 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.37 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 8.8 Hz), and 7.43 (st, 1H, ArH, J = 2.9 Hz). Mass spectrometry (ESI, negative mode); m/z for C15H16N3O6S− (M-H)−: calculated: 366.1, found: 366.0.
As the second diazotiation step, a sulfonic acid group of the monoazo compound (3a, 0.001 mol) was substituted to sodium sulfonate in sodium hydroxide (0.001 mol) aqueous solution (30 mL) and sodium nitrite (0.001 mol) aqueous solution (5 mL) was mixed and then an aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid (0.003 mol) was dropwise added with keeping 0 ~ 5ºC. The mixture solution was slowly added to 7-anilino-4-hydroxy-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid (4, 0.001 mol) solution (10 mL), which sulfonic acid was substituted with sodium sulfonate in an aqueous sodium hydroxide as above, while maintaining 0 ~ 5ºC and pH 9 ~ 10 with the aqueous sodium hydroxide (0.004 mol, 2 mL). The reaction was continued for an hour at that temperature and sodium chloride (20 g) was added to help precipitation of the synthesized dye (5a). After filtering, an excess of methanol (300 mL) was poured to dissolve DiMo and unreacted compounds except for sodium chloride, followed by filtering again. The methanol solution was partially evaporated to obtain a saturated solution, and then about 0.5 mL aqueous of hydrochloric acid were added to substitute sodium sulfonate with sulfonic acid to diminish ionization of the dye. An excess of water (500 mL) as a nonsolvent was added to precipitate a blue disazo compound named DiMo (5a, yield; 9%) and dried under vacuum. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6); δ (ppm) = 3.74 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.92 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.65 (s, 1H, ArH), 6.99 (dd, 2H, ArH, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.05 (t, 1H, ArH, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.29 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.37 (t, 2H, ArH, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.49 (sd, 1H, ArH, J = 2.7 Hz), 7.5 (dd, 1H, ArH, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.64 (s, 2H, ArH), 7.94 (s, 1H, ArH), and 8.10 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 8.3 Hz). Mass spectrometry (ESI, negative mode); m/z for C31H25N5NaO10S2− (M-Na)−: calculated: 714.1, found: 714.0, C31H26N5O10S2− (M-2Na + H)−: calculated: 692.1, found: 692.0.
Sodium 4-hydroxy-3-((E)-(2-methoxy-4-((E)-(4-methoxy-2-sulfonato
phenyl)diazenyl)-5-methylphenyl)diazenyl)-7-(phenylamino)naphthalene-2-sulfonate (5b, MoMe)
The p-anisidine-sulfonic acid (1, 0.01 mol) was dissolved in an aqueous of sodium hydroxide (0.01 mol, 10 mL) and stirred at room temperature. Sodium nitrite (0.01 mol) aqueous solution (5 mL) was added to the mixed solution. The solution was placed in an ice-water bath and lowered the temperature to 0 ~ 5ºC and then an aqueous of hydrochloric acid (0.03 mol) was slowly added to the solution while maintaining 0 ~ 5ºC and stirred for 1h. After the first diazonium reaction, the reaction solution was slowly put into the first coupler (2-methoxy-5-methylaniline (2b, 0.01 mol)) which was dissolved in acetic acid (3 mL) while maintaining 0 ~ 5ºC. After stirring for an hour, the product was filtered and washed with water several times. The product was dissolved in methanol (300 mL) and filtered to remove impurities and then the methanol solution was partially evaporated to make a saturated solution, and an excess of water (500 mL) was poured to precipitate a monoazo compound (3b, yield; 16.1%) and dried under vacuum. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6); δ (ppm) = 2.37 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.83 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.88 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.72 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.05 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.08 (dd, 1H, ArH, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.30 (sd, 1H, ArH, J = 2.9 Hz), and 7.68 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 9.0 Hz). Mass spectrometry (ESI, negative mode); m/z for C15H16N3O5S− (M-H)−: calculated: 350.1, found: 350.0.
In the second diazotization step, the sulfonic acid group of the monoazo compound (3b, 0.001 mol) was substituted to sodium sulfonate in an aqueous of sodium hydroxide (0.001 mol, 20 mL) and sodium nitrite (0.001 mol) aqueous solution (5 mL) was added and then an aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid (0.003 mol) was dropwise added with keeping 0 ~ 5ºC. The mixture solution was slowly added to the 7-anilino-4-hydroxy-2-naphthalenesulfonic acid (4, 0.001 mol) solution (10 mL), which sulfonic acid was substituted with sodium sulfonate in an aqueous sodium hydroxide as above, while maintaining 0 ~ 5ºC and pH 9 ~ 10 with the aqueous sodium hydroxide (0.004 mol, 2 mL). The reaction was continued for an hour at that temperature and sodium chloride (20 g) was added to help precipitation of the synthesized dye (5b). After filtering, an excess of methanol (300 mL) was poured to dissolve MoMe and impurities except for sodium chloride and filtered again. The methanol solution was partially evaporated to obtain a saturated solution, and then 0.5mL of hydrochloric acid were added to substitute sodium sulfonate with sulfonic acid for the same reason as above and an excess of water (500 mL) was added to precipitate a purple dye, MoMe (5b, yield; 38%) and dried under vacuum. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6); δ (ppm) = 2.67 (s, 3H, CH3) 3.86 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.95 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.01 (dd, 1H, ArH, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.04 (tt, 1H, ArH, J = 7.3 Hz), 7.12 (dd, 1H, ArH, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.17 (sd, 1H, ArH, J = 2.3 Hz), 7.29 (dd, 2H, ArH, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.37 (m, 2H, ArH), 7.49 (sd, 1H, ArH, J = 2.9 Hz), 7.55 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.64 (s, 2H, ArH), 7.90 (s, 1H, ArH),and 8.11 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 8.8 Hz). Mass spectrometry (ESI, negative mode); m/z for C31H25N5NaO9S2− (M-Na)−: calculated: 698.1, found: 698.0, C31H26N5O9S2− (M-2Na + H)−: calculated: 676.1, found: 676.0.
sodium 4-hydroxy-3-((E)-(4-((E)-(4-methoxy-2-sulfonatophenyl)
diazenyl)-2,5-dimethylphenyl)diazenyl)-7-(phenylamino)naphthalene-2-sulfonate (5c, DiMe)
The synthesis procedure was the same as compound 5b (MoMe). For the monoazo compound and disazo compound colored violet were obtained 13% and 32%, respectively. 1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6); δ (ppm) = 2.22 (s, 3H, CH3), 2.33 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.97 (s, 3H, CH3), 7.17 (sd, 1H, ArH, J = 2.3 Hz), 7.29 (dd, 1H, ArH, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.64 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.91 (s, 1H, ArH), and 8.12 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 8.8 Hz). Mass spectrometry (ESI, negative mode); m/z for C15H16N3O4S− (M-H)−: calculated: 334.1, found: 334.0.
1H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6); δ (ppm) = 2.43 (s, 3H, CH3) 2.69 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.85 (s, 3H, CH3), 6.99 (dd, 1H, ArH, J = 9.0 Hz), 7.05 (tt, 1H, ArH, J = 7.4 Hz), 7.13 (dd, 2H, ArH, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.20 (sd, 1H, ArH, J = 2.3 Hz), 7.30 (td, 2H, ArH, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.50 (d, 2H, ArH, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.61 (s, 2H, ArH), 7.99 (s, 1H, ArH), and 8.14 (d, 1H, ArH, J = 8.7 Hz). Mass spectrometry (ESI, negative mode); m/z for C31H25N5NaO8S2− (M-Na)−: calculated: 682.1, found: 682.0, C31H26N5O8S2− (M-2Na + H)−: calculated: 660.1, found: 660.0.
Solvatochromism
To investigate solvatochromism, nine solvents such as water (78.40), DMSO (47.24), ethylene glycol (41.40), DMF (38.25), acetonitrile (36.64), MeOH (33.00), acetone (21.01), pyridine (13.26), and THF (7.52) with different dielectric constants were selected. The three dyes were dissolved in each solvent and absorption spectra were investigated and color change according to the dielectric constants was observed.
To obtain a deeper insight into the solvatochromic properties of the dyes, density function theory (DFT) calculation was performed. Geometry optimization was performed at the B3LYP/6–31 + G(d,p) level. Electron transitions were also calculated using the time dependent DFT method at the B3LYP/6–31 + G(d,p) level and additionally using solvation model, the integral equation formalism variant polarizable continuum model (IEFPCM), at the 9 kinds solvents. From the calculation, the HOMO and LUMO energy values were obtained and compared to the experimental values of maximum absorption wavelength of the dyes in each solution.
Application of the dyes to cellulosic substrates
To determine the optimal concentration of the dyes to show the largest color change when exposed to VOCs, the three dyes were applied at concentrations of 0.5 ~ 30% owf. A certain concentration of dye and 3g of sodium sulfate were added to 60 mL of deionized water and stirred for 30 min at room temperature. The 1.2g of cellulosic substrates were dyed in the solutions at 100ºC for an hour. After dyeing the dyed fabrics were washed 5 times with water at room temperature.
Measurement of color strength and color change
The color strengths and spectra of cotton-based VOC sensors were measured using a color measurement instrument (spectrophotometer CM-3600, Konica Minolta) and expressed by K/S values based on the reflectance (R) of a single wavelength obtained at every 10 nm in the range of 360 ~ 740 nm using Eq. (1). The viewing angle was 10º and illuminant was the standard light D65 (Koh 2006; Baumann et al. 1987).
K/S = (1-R) 2 / 2R (1)
To measure a color change upon exposure to VOCs, the concept of color difference (ΔE) was employed. There are several color formulas for specification of color differences. Herein, the CIELAB color space was used, which comprises L*, a*, and b* factors. The three values are plotted at three dimensions corresponding to the lightness (L*), red to green (a*), yellow to blue (b*) of the color vision. The color difference (ΔE) was calculated by Eq. (2) (Hunt 1991; Fairchild 2005):
$$\varDelta E= \sqrt{{\left({\varDelta L}^{*}\right)}^{2}+{\left({\varDelta a}^{*}\right)}^{2}+{(\varDelta {b}^{*})}^{2}}$$
2
,where Δ indicates the difference before and after exposure to VOCs. To examine the detection of 32 VOCs qualitatively, 2mL of VOCs were added in a 20mL vial and a cotton samples (15 mm × 20 mm) dyed with the three dyes was hanged inside each vial under the condition of saturated vapor without direct contact with the liquid phase of VOCs at the bottom of the vials. The vials were sealed completely with sealing film and left for 24 hours at room temperature. Then, the color difference values of the samples before and after exposure were measured. The selected 5 from 32 VOCs, which showed relatively strong color change, were quantitatively investigated at various concentration of 10 ~ 300ppm at exposure time range of 10 ~ 200min. Since the boiling points of the 5 VOCs are different and higher than room temperature, the test vials containing a cotton-based sensor (dyed sample) and the VOCs were heated in the quantitative experiment up to 30℃ for acetone, MeOH, and acetonitrile, 50℃ for pyridine, and 70℃ for DMF, respectively. The maximum concentration, 300ppm, of the VOCs was completely vaporized at those temperatures during experiments.
Adsorption of VOCs for cellulosic substrates
The concept of this study is to detect VOCs by adsorbing to cotton-based sensor and changing color. Therefore, the amount of adsorption of VOCs may have a great influence on the sensing performance. The amounts of VOCs adsorbed to the pristine cotton fabrics were obtained by a gas chromatography (GC-2030, Shimadzu, column; dimethylpolysiloxane, 30 m, 0.25 mm, I.D. 0.25 µm, PerkinElmer, detector; FID). To obtain a calibration curve of the VOCs, various concentrations of VOCs were prepared and measured their area of the gas chromatography. To verify the relationship between the adsorption amount of VOCs on cotton fabrics and color change, the especially selected 11 VOCs ranging from the well-detected and the poorly-detected were used. They were as follows; acetone, acetonitrile, benzene, dichloromethane, DMF, 1,4-dioxane, ethylacetate, n-hexane, MeOH, pyridine, and THF. The pristine cotton fabrics (0.05g) were exposed to the 11 VOCs (300ppm) without direct contact for 200min at 30 ~ 70℃ as described above. After that, the fabrics containing VOCs were immersed in extraction solvent, DMF, to desorb the VOCs out of the cotton fabrics. However, in case that a VOC itself is the DMF, MeOH was used as the extraction solvent not to interfere between the VOC and an extraction solvent in gas chromatography. By analyzing the area of the VOCs extracted from the cotton fabrics in gas chromatography, the adsorbed amounts of the VOCs could be obtained quantitatively.
Repeatability and reusability of the cotton-based VOC sensors
One of the practical demands for cotton-based sensors, repeatability or reusability was examined. The one cotton-based sensor was exposed to 300ppm of DMF, which was the best detected VOC, at 70℃ for 200min, and measured it color change. And then the sensor kept inside a vacuum chamber for minimum 24 hours to desorb the adsorbed DMF from the sensor completely. The process was repeated 10 times.
Aftertreatment
To improve wash fastness, the cotton-based sensor was aftertreated with a conventional polycationic fixing agent generally used for direct dyes. The 5% of the polycationic fixing agent was used (liquor ratio; 1:30) at 40℃ for 20 min. To confirm the color change property after this treatment, the color difference of the samples was measured after exposure to 300ppm of DMF at 70℃ for 200min and compared with the color difference before treatment. The durability of the dyed fabrics against washing, rubbing, and light fastness were examined by the procedure of textile standard test methods, ISO 105-C06 A1S, ISO 105-X12, and ISO 105-B02, respectively.