The protocol for the pilot RCT (v1.2) is registered with the ISRCTN registry (65109397). The protocol manuscript confirms to items recommended in the SPIRIT checklist and CONSORT statement extension for pilot trials (19)
We will conduct a pragmatic, individually randomised multi-country pilot RCT of BISCA and NRT. A preliminary economic assessment and process evaluation will be incorporated. The feasibility trial will use a 2x2 factorial design (Table 1) incorporation the following interventions:
Table 1
Schematic diagram for 2x2 factorial trial of Interventions A (NRT) and B (BISCA)
|
Intervention A
Nicotine Replacement therapy (8 weeks, 4/6mg)
|
Intervention B
Behavioural support intervention for ST cessation (BISCA)
|
|
Negative
|
Positive
|
Negative
|
No intervention
(VBA + self-help material)
(Trial arm 1)
|
Intervention A only
[8 week NRT in addition to standard VBA + self-help material in arm 1)
(Trial arm 2)
|
Positive
|
Intervention B only
Behavioural support intervention for ST cessation-BISCA (incorporates VBA and self-help)
(Trial arm 3)
|
Interventions A and B
(Trial arm 4)
|
1. Intervention A (4 or 6 mg NRT chewing gum for 8-weeks),
2. Intervention B (BISCA: face-to-face behavioural support for South Asian ST cessation),
3. A combination of Interventions A and B,
4. Usual Care (VBA).
The factorial design is generally considered to be more efficient than parallel arm trials, as it allows the simultaneous investigation of the effects of two or more treatments, as well as the effects of both in combination (20).
Study settings:
This pilot trial will be conducted in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan which are the three South Asian countries with the highest regional prevalence of ST use. It will be conducted in an urban setting in one administrative site per country. Trial settings have been identified based on the availability of research infrastructure and the local prevalence of ST use. Settings meeting these criteria were identified in Mirpur and Pallabi areas located in Dhaka (Bangladesh), the Essa Nagri Union Council in Karachi (Pakistan), and in Noida, adjacent to Delhi (India). All settings are predominantly low resource settings with a high population density.
Study participants and eligibility criteria:
The trial aims to recruit adult, exclusive users of ST products who are interested in making a quit attempt. We will screen individuals to identify individuals who i) use ST products on a daily basis, ii) are aged 18 years or above, iii) able to provide informed consent and iv) motivated and willing to quit ST in the next month. We define daily use as self-reported ST use on at least 25 days in a month over the past six months (21).
We will exclude i) dual tobacco users who either self-report combustible tobacco product use (cigarettes, bidis, hookah) in the past month, or those having a carbon monoxide (CO) level greater than 10ppm on a breath test (22), measured using the Bedfont piCO™ smokerlyzer ii) individuals who are currently receiving treatment for tobacco cessation, iii) individuals whose circumstances might contra-indicate NRT use, such as pregnancy and/or breastfeeding women, and iv) those reporting unstable episodes of angina pectoris or myocardial infarction or stroke in the past three weeks (23).
Details of Interventions:
As described above, trial participants will receive Nicotine replacement therapy (Intervention A) or BISCA (Intervention B), either alone or in combination. Participants not randomised to receive these interventions will receive usual care in the form of VBA (24) offered by a trained cessation advisor. The VBA will last approximately 1-1.5 minutes. It incorporates the 3A’s approach (Ask, Advise, Act) previously used for delivering smoking cessation in healthcare settings (24). During this brief interaction, the advisor will i) ask about the type of ST product consumed, ii) identify ST related harms and advise on stopping its use and iii) act by providing a self-help leaflet to prompt quit planning. Participants receiving VBA will have no further interactions with the cessation advisor. VBA will also be offered to other ST using individuals who are either ineligible for trial participation or those who do not provide informed consent. Details of interventions A and B are provided in further detail below:
Intervention A: Nicotine Replacement therapy:
NRT will be provided to trial participants alongside VBA and the self-help leaflet (described above). Following randomisation, participants will undertake an eight-week course of NRT chewing gum (Nicorette or its generic equivalent, as per availability in each country); they will receive either 4mg or 6 mg NRT supplies depending on their baseline assessment. A cessation advisor will assess each participant’s tobacco use through two items of the heaviness of Tobacco Use Index (25): i) time to first ST use and ii) average number of daily ST intakes (chews/dips). All participants will receive a standard 4mg dose, however, those who report their first ST intake within 30 mins of waking, or consuming ST >10 times/day) will receive a 6mg dose. The 6mg dose will be given as a combination of 4mg and 2mg nicotine chewing gums taken together.
NRT will be provided by the cessation advisor at the time of recruitment. The participants will be instructed to start using NRT on an hourly basis, up to 15 doses in a day starting from their planned quit date. The first dose will be taken within the hour of waking or as soon as craving develops. They will be instructed to perform the “park and chew” method (26), which involves chewing the gum until a peppery or flavoured taste emerges, “parking” it between cheek and gum to facilitate nicotine absorption through the oral mucosa for approximately 30 minutes or until taste dissipates. A leaflet providing this information in written form will also be provided.
All participants will be provided with an initial two-week NRT supply following randomisation; subsequent two weekly supplies of NRT will be provided by a trained research officer to participants who report and demonstrate consumption of NRT on at least five days in the previous week. Any adjustments to participants’ NRT dosing, if necessary, will be made in light of participants’ experiences in the first week of its use. Where available, participants will be provided the option to choose alternate NRT flavours in order to maximise their adherence to treatment.
Intervention B: BISCA:
BISCA is a face-to-face behavioural support intervention that will be provided to trial participants. BISCA is a theory based, culturally modified intervention which has previously been developed and tested among South Asian ST users in the UK and Pakistan, and adapted for wider testing in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan (27). BISCA comprises a set of 23 activities that target evidence-based behaviour change techniques (BCTs) that attempt to change ST behaviour through modifying the underlying mechanisms of action (MoA’s) (figure 1: BISCA causal model). Intervention resources consist of an advisor flipbook, client booklet and a self-help calendar for ST users. The delivery of BISCA is structured into pre-quit, quit and post-quit sessions which are delivered by trained cessation advisors. The flipbook resource contains a set of slides presenting a set of scenarios and incorporating photographs for advisors to initiate contact and dialogue with participants. The client pack, a take-home resource given to participants, comprises the client booklet and an eight-week, self-help calendar. The client booklet reinforces the key messages delivered in the face-to-face session while the calendar prompts participants to self-monitor and record their ST use over time
Participants receiving BISCA will be scheduled for an initial (pre-quit) contact session on the day of randomization, or on another convenient day in the same week. Activities delivered in this session focus on building knowledge around the ST ingredients and harms related to ST use, building self-efficacy and preparing participants for making a quit attempt. Participants will receive one pre-quit session prior to the quit date, however, those who are unable to proceed with a quit attempt will be eligible to receive an additional pre-quit session.
The quit session will be scheduled in the week of the participants’ quit date (either on the same day or 2-3 days preceding the quit date). Each participant will receive one quit session which will focus on strengthening their ex-user identity, identify triggers and withdrawal symptoms and discuss strategies to manage these. They will also be provided a self-help calendar on this day for monitoring progress and setting self-incentives.
After the quit session, participants will receive six weekly post-quit sessions with their cessation advisor. These sessions will focus on the reinforcement of key messages delivered in pre-quit and quit sessions, as well as support in avoiding relapse and minimising withdrawal effects.
The pre-quit session will be conducted at the recruitment centres, while the quit and post-quit sessions will either be delivered at the same place or in participants’ homes. The sessions will be scheduled in advance, and a reminder will be issued to participants ahead of the visit. Those who are unable to attend or have to cancel their scheduled visit will be rescheduled on a convenient date within the same week. A log of delivered sessions will be maintained by the advisors to record the total number of contacts made with each participant. Participants who report lapses on two consecutive weeks will receive no further post-quit sessions, however, they will be provided VBA to plan and execute their next quit attempt. Participants who are non-responsive to phone calls or home visits on three separate occasions will be considered as being lost to follow-up and continuing their ST use.
Identification and screening of trial participants:
Trial participants will be identified from health facilities located in the respective study locations in each country. These are two NGO based primary healthcare facilities in Mirpur/Pallabi (Bangladesh) and two primary care clinics based in Essa Nagri (Karachi). The selected facilities were identified from a list of Primary care and General practices which, following assessment, were selected by country trial teams for the feasibility of conducting research activities. In Noida (India), eligible participants will be identified through health and well-being clinics that offer general health promotion and screening services. In order to maximise the identification and recruitment of participants through each of these facilities, country teams will undertake community mobilisation using a range of techniques in catchment areas. These techniques include public announcements, distribution of brochures and information leaflets, as well as the promotion of the trial at health facilities ahead of the trial start. Participants seeking primary care, or those self-referring themselves to the health facilities following community mobilisation will be screened for eligibility. The screening process will be carried out by a research officer, who will administer a screening checklist to determine eligibility and a CO breath test to rule out concomitant smoking. A daily log of screening activities will be maintained at each health facility which will be used to record the number of individuals assessed and their eligibility for the trial. For non-eligible individuals, the reasons for ineligibility will be recorded.
Recruitment of trial participants:
Eligible individuals will be provided with an information sheet detailing a) the purpose of the trial and the study procedures, b) potential benefits and risks of participation, c) data handling procedures for privacy and confidentiality, d) participants rights, including the right to discontinue participation at any time in the trial and e) relevant contact details for those who wish to seek more information or clarity on the study. They will be provided sufficient time and opportunity to clarify their queries with the research officer and to include their peers or family members in consideration trial participation.
An informed consent process will be followed during recruitment. Eligible individuals will read the information sheet, or have it read out to them if they are unable to read. They will then be asked to sign the consent sheet or alternatively, provide a thumb impression to indicate their consent in the presence of an impartial witness. A copy of the signed consent form will be provided to all trial participants for their records.
Randomisation and treatment allocation:
A centrally prepared computer-generated randomisation sequence will be used to randomly allocate eligible and consenting trial participants to interventions. The sequence will be created using software R v3.4 (28) and enable country-stratified, permuted block randomisation with varying block sizes to be carried out. Eligible participants will be assigned on an equal allocation basis into one of the three interventions or usual care. We will additionally stratify recruitment by health facilities in Pakistan and Bangladesh. The intervention assignment codes will be shared directly with the respective country trial coordinators.
Treatment allocation will be concealed in sealed envelopes. For the recruitment of an eligible participant, the field-based research officer will place a phone call to the country coordinating centre, where the country trial coordinator will generate a trial ID by running the pre-specified code in an R file. Both the trial coordinator and the research officer will be unaware of the treatment associated with each trial ID. Once the trial ID has been provided, a concealed envelope with the corresponding trial ID will be opened to reveal the participant’s allocation. As this is a pilot trial the objective is not to conceal to either participants or researchers an allocation to a particular intervention. The above process will ensure, however, allocation concealment up until the point of delivery.
Data collection and follow-up procedure:
After recruitment, enrolled trial participants will complete an interviewer-administered Case Report Form (CRF) at baseline. Collected data will include participants’ socio-demographic and household information, current tobacco use, mood and physical symptoms, nicotine dependence, contact with health providers, attempts to quit ST, motivation to quit ST and mediators of ST cessation. These assessments will also be repeated at 6, 12 and 26 weeks following their quit date. (Table 2: schedule of assessments)
Table 2
Schedule of research activities
|
Stage of study
|
|
Recruitment
|
Intervention
|
Follow-up
|
|
Pre-enrolment
|
Post-enrolment
|
Pre-quit
|
Quit
|
Post quit
|
6 weeks
|
12 weeks
|
26 weeks
|
Activity/assessment
|
Study member
|
screening & consent
|
Baseline /Randomisation
|
Pre-quit session(s) (BISCA)
|
Quit session
(BISCA)
|
6 Weekly BISCA sessions
|
Follow up 1
|
Follow up 2
|
Follow up 3
|
Screening log
|
Research staff
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eligibility form
|
Research staff
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Informed consent
|
Research staff
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Random allocation
|
Research staff
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baseline CRF
|
Research staff
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health resource use Questionnaire
|
Research staff
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
Quality of life assessment (EQ-5D-5L)
|
Research staff
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
VBA for ST cessation
|
Advisor
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BISCA sessions
|
Advisor
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
Adverse/serious adverse events checklist
|
Research staff/
Advisor
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
|
Follow up CRF
|
Research staff
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
X
|
Salivary cotinine (biochemical verification)
|
Research staff
|
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
CO assessment
|
Research staff
|
X
|
X
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
X
|
Qualitative interviews for process evaluation
|
Research staff
|
|
|
|
|
|
X
|
|
|
Health resource utilization and quality of life (using the EQ-5D-3L instrument(29)) will be measured at baseline and 26 week follow-up as part of a preliminary economic assessment. Taking healthcare provider and patient perspectives, health resource use will include costs of delivering the specified intervention in each arm (including staff time, materials and logistics), any health service use (including visits to a healthcare provider, primary or tertiary care facility) and any out-of-pocket costs (including travel costs, fees paid to healthcare providers and costs of medicines including any smoking cessation pharmacotherapy bought over-the-counter).
Saliva samples for biochemical verification of tobacco abstinence will be collected from all participants at baseline, and those self-reporting abstinence to all forms of tobacco at 12 and 26-week follow-ups. Self-reported continued NRT use at these follow-ups will delay the collection of a saliva sample until participants report its use as discontinued. A CO breath test will also be administered at these time points to these participants to rule out any smoked tobacco use. Saliva samples from Bangladesh and Pakistan will be transferred to a specialist laboratory (ABS laboratories, York, UK) for biochemical analysis for salivary cotinine while those collected in India will be analysed locally through an accredited laboratory.
Outcomes:
The primary outcome is self-reported continuous abstinence to all forms of tobacco at 26 weeks post quit date, verified by CO breath test (<10ppm) and salivary cotinine assessment (<15ng/ml). Secondary trial outcomes include 7- day point prevalence of tobacco use (smoked and smokeless) at 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 26 week follow-ups. The feasibility outcomes of the study and their reporting are described further under statistical analysis.
Sample size:
We calculated the sample size in line with recommendations by Viechtbauer et al. (30), which state that the sample size should be sufficiently large to capture at least one incidence of a range of anticipated and unanticipated outcome events. Assuming the probability of these outcome events to lie between 5-10%, we estimated at least 60 participants in each country, using a confidence level of 95%. We increased this number to 80 participants per country in order to have at least 20 participants per trial arm, and further inflated this figure by 10% to account for potential loss to follow-up. In total, we thus require 88 participants per country (22/trial arm) with a combined total of 264 participants in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan.
Statistical analysis:
Descriptive data analyses will be performed in line with the feasibility objectives of the study, in order to inform a future definitive trial of ST cessation. Reported measures will include summary statistics such as mean and standard deviation for continuous variables and frequencies (absolute and relative) for categorical variables. These statistics will be reported for the overall sample and where relevant, for each country. We will estimate Risk Ratios and 95% confidence intervals as a preliminary assessment of effect. In addition to the baseline characteristics of recruited participants, we will report on the following feasibility objectives:
Intervention delivery:
- The proportion of participants attending the pre-quit quit and post-quit sessions, the number of quit and post-quit sessions conducted per participant.
- The proportion of trial participants receiving low (4mg) vs high (6mg) dose NRT, the proportion of participants retaining their medication charts and demonstrating their adherence to NRT at follow-up visits.
Recruitment, Randomisation, Retention:
- Number of participants screened, eligible, and successfully recruited into the trial, along with characteristics of non-consenting and ineligible participants.
- Total number of participants enrolled in the allocated recruitment period and time to complete recruitment in each country.
- Retention of trial participants in their original trial arms following randomisation, and the proportion of participants attending data collection follow-ups at 6, 12 and 26 weeks along with number and reasons for dropping out.
Data collection methods
- Proportion of completed baseline and follow-up assessments in each arm
- Total number of participants eligible to provide saliva samples at 12 and 26 weeks, and number of trial participants successfully providing a saliva sample.
All statistical analysis will be performed on STATA version 16 (31).
Process evaluation:
The process evaluation will be informed by the Medical Research Council guidance (32). This identifies three components: implementation, mechanisms of impact and context.
Implementation (feasibility and context):
All cessation advisors (1-2 per country) will be interviewed to explore their experiences, including barriers and drivers to intervention delivery. These interviews will also explore how contextual factors such as the community environment and other social, economic, cultural, environmental and political factors have influenced the delivery and perceived impact of BISCA and NRT.
Implementation (fidelity):
Fidelity to delivering the BISCA/NRT interventions will be assessed using a fidelity index adapted from the original BISCA study (18). All cessation sessions will be audio-recorded and a research officer will perform the fidelity checks using the audio-recordings of nine randomly selected participants per country (3 per intervention arm, excluding those allocated to receive VBA) who have completed their allocated intervention.
Mechanisms of impact (acceptability, mediators):
To capture the views and experiences of participants, all participants will complete a short questionnaire at 6-week follow-up. Depending on their trial arm allocation, this will explore which components of the BISCA and NRT interventions they engaged with, the acceptability of each session and any perceived benefits/dis-benefits to themselves and their families including those, which were unanticipated. Participants in all four trial arms will complete some acceptability questions on trial processes. A purposive sample of 24 participants in each country (8 from each intervention trial arm), a mix of men and women who have/have not quit ST will be interviewed to explore key issues that emerged in the questionnaire, for example, any BISCA sessions that were seen to be particularly influential or inappropriate. Data on potential mediators (see Figure. 1) will be collected at all time points.
All interviews will be conducted face-to-face using a topic guide and digitally audio-recorded. The quantitative data from the fidelity index and questionnaire will be analysed using descriptive statistics, including means and standard deviation for continuous variables, and absolute and relative frequencies for categorical variables. The qualitative data from the questionnaire will be analysed using content analysis (33). Interviews will be transcribed verbatim and translated into English and analysed using the Framework Approach (34) which is designed to address applied program and policy-related questions. Excel software will aid data handling. The integration of interview findings with respective questionnaire data will be done using a ‘triangulation protocol’ (35).
Health economics:
The analysis of economic data will include a preliminary assessment of the costs associated with implementing BISCA (alone or in combination with NRT) and NRT alone as well as a change in EQ-5D-3L scores between the baseline and 26 weeks post-baseline. The overall assessment will include a commentary on the suitability/feasibility of an economic evaluation alongside a future definitive trial.
Data management:
Each country site will hold data in accordance with both the UK (General Data Protection Regulation (36), Data Protection Act 2018 (37) and any additional country-specific requirements. Collected data will be identified by a unique identification number (i.e., the Trial ID number) only. Study files will be stored in accordance with UK Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines (38). The collected data will be stored separately from the consent sheets, to maintain the anonymity of data. Research staff at the University of York will develop and maintain an electronic database that will be used to enter data by research staff in each participant country. The database will be uploaded to a secure server provided by York University IT services and accessible only to researchers directly involved in the study or by representatives of the Trial Data Management and Ethics Committee in the event of a study audit. Similarly, all audio files and anonymised transcripts will be uploaded and kept secure throughout the duration of the study. Paper versions of study documents at the participating sites, the country coordinating centers and the University of York will be retained in a secure (locked when not in use) location, during and after the trial has finished. All essential documents, including source documents, will be retained for a minimum period of five years after study completion.
Trial monitoring Procedures:
Mechanisms for trial monitoring include collection and reporting of adverse events, regular trial audits and safety monitoring by an independent Data Management and Ethics Committee (DMEC).
Adverse Events:
A standardised approach for adverse events will be followed for their identification, recording and reporting. Checklists will be completed each week, either face-to-face or via a phone call, to assess the frequency and severity of Adverse (AEs) and Severe Adverse Events (SAEs). All participants will also have access to a central number to report any sudden onset AEs. Reported AEs will be assessed by the country trial coordinator for seriousness, severity and relatedness to the intervention. AEs related to the intervention will also be assessed for their expectedness. Those with the potential to become SAEs will be monitored till resolution. SAEs which are related to the intervention will be reported to the DMEC and Trial Steering committee within three days and the local Ethics Committees within 15 days. Participants who experience serious unexpected AE’s related to the intervention will be withdrawn from treatment but will continue to be followed up in their respective trial arm.
Trial Audit:
Trial coordinators in each country will carry out regular monthly audits, using monitoring checklists, to ensure all staff are complying with standard operating protocols (SOPs) for implementation of all trial procedures and that appropriate documentation is held at each trial site. In addition, a lead investigator will make at least one planned visit to each country coordinating centre during recruitment and follow-up. Additional unplanned visits by the trial coordinators may also be triggered if specific concerns are raised by the trial management team in order to address any potential issues around data queries, compliance with the trial procedures or any other logistic issues at trial sites.
Data Monitoring and Ethics:
An independent DMEC, consisting of an independent trial statistician and two subject experts, will oversee progress in recruitment, safeguard the interests of trial participants, assess the safety and futility of the interventions during the trial and monitor the overall conduct of the trial. The DMEC will convene around recruitment milestones and will provide recommendations and advice to the Trial Steering Committee and Trial Sponsor on the basis of submitted reports. Possible recommendations include:
1) No action needed, trial continues as planned
2) Early stopping due, for example, to clear harm of treatment, futility, or external evidence
3) Extending recruitment activity to additional sites in countries with low recruitment
4) Stopping or suggesting a modification to any arm of the trial
5) Sanctioning and/or proposing protocol changes in line with patient safety