REIIBP is expressed in t(4;14)+ myeloma cells independent of other MMSET isoforms, FGFR3 or ACA11 expression and harbored oncogenic activity
To elucidate the biological role of REIIBP in myeloma, we first examined the endogenous expression of REIIBP in human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs). We optimized an antibody that recognizes the C-terminus region of MMSET and detected a band that corresponded to REIIBP at ~62kDa. Using a different N-terminus antibody, we probed for MMSET I and MMSET II. Consistent with previous reports, we detected the longest isoform of MMSET II in KMS11 and KMS34 cells, and these cells harbored the highest expression for MMSET I (Figure 1A). On the contrary, REIIBP expression was lower in KMS11 and KMS34, but abundantly expressed in other t(4;14)+ cells, while the t(4;14)- cells showed little to null expression of REIIBP (Figure 1A). Interestingly, abrogating MMSET II led to an upregulation of REIIBP, in turn, overexpression of REIIBP downregulated MMSET II (Supplementary Figure 1A). Next, we compared REIIBP transcript levels against other gene products that were reported to be associated with t(4;14) locus, namely FGFR3 and ACA119,21, but no clear correlation were observed (Figure 1B). Additionally, in t(4;14) negative cells, we could detect REIIBP mRNA which was not translated into REIIBP protein (Figure 1A and 1B), suggesting a post-transcriptional regulatory mechanism of REIIBP in myeloma cells. Another MM cell line frequently used to study MMSET isoforms is the TKO (translocation knockout) cells generated from the parental KMS11 with the exon 7 on t(4;14) translocated MMSET II allele deleted16,22. This results in almost undetectable protein levels of MMSET I and II, and TKO cells also lacked the protein expression of REIIBP (Figure 1C).
To examine the physiological functions of REIIBP, we engineered RPMI8226 to stably overexpress REIIBP given its low expression of all MMSET gene products (Figure 1D). In consideration of its proposed role as a histone methyltransferase, we first checked whether REIIBP could be found in the nucleus. Ectopically expressed and endogenous REIIBP were detected in both the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments of the cell (Figure 1E). This contrasts with the exclusive expression of MMSET I and II in the nucleus. Compared to control (8226 V-Con), overexpression of REIIBP promoted myeloma cell growth in a short-term viability assay (Figure 1F) and a significant increase in soft agar clonogenic growth (Figure 1G). These were attributed to an increased cell-cycle progression (Figure 1H) with little effect on apoptosis (Supplementary Figure 1B). To exclude cell specific observations, we transiently overexpress REIIBP in two other t(4;14)- cells, KMS12BM and U266, where REIIBP similarly promoted cell viability (Supplementary Figure 1C). Altogether, REIIBP conferred growth and survival advantage to myeloma cells independent of other t(4;14) products.
REIIBP has histone methyltransferase activity centered on histone 3 lysine 27, lysine 4 and lysine 79 in vitro
Till date, whether the SET domain of REIIBP is enzymatically active and its substrate specificity remains unclear. To examine whether REIIBP has a direct effect on histone methylation, we performed an in vitro histone methyltransferase assay using the methyl donor S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), the substrate H3 and purified REIIBP (Figure 2A). After incubation, the methylated products were visualized by immunoblot. We first performed the assay using bacterial cell extracts23 where we expressed a recombinant GST-tagged REIIBP, and detected a specific modification of H3K27me3 (Figure 2B). As bacterially-purified enzymes might not be fully activated either because of absence of post-translational modifications or other mammalian complex proteins, we repeated with 293T-purified REIIBP. We confirmed a catalyzation of trimethylation on H3K27, additionally, we also detected modifications on H3K4 and H3K79 residues (Figure 2C). To exclude the possibility of contamination with other histone modifying enzymes, we probed for EZH2 that catalyzes H3K27me324 and H3K79 methyltransferase DOT1L25, which were both undetected in the extracts (Figure 2C). We performed further validation by directly measuring the enzymatic activity of nuclear extracts from the isogenic cells in a H3K27 and H3K4 histone methyltransferase reaction, where increased activity could be seen with REIIBP overexpression (Figure 2D and 2E).
REIIBP has different preferences for histone 3 substrates from MMSET II in vivo
To complement the in vitro assay, we performed a series of in vivo immunoblot panel screening of histone methylation marks. REIIBP increased the global abundance of H3K4, H3K9, H3K27 and H3K79 trimethylation, with lesser effects on dimethylation (Figure 3A). To identify SET-dependent modifications, we transfected the cells with SET mutant R357Q, which saw an efficient abolishment of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 histone marks (Figure 3B). We then reconstituted the expression of REIIBP in the KMS11-TKO cells, and observed a consistent increase in H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 modifications by REIIBP (Figure 3C). As a direct comparison of the catalytic activities among MMSET II, MMSET I and REIIBP, we overexpressed these proteins in RPMI8226 cells in parallel. We observed the most significant increase in H3K36me2 by MMSET II, which was consistent with previous report11. Conversely, H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 were increased by REIIBP, but not MMSET I and II (Figure 3D). The modifications by REIIBP on these histone marks were reproducible in two other myeloma cells, U266 and KMS12BM (Figure 3E). Collectively, our in vitro and in vivo histone methylation assays indicated a SET-dependent activity of REIIBP on H3K4 and H3K27 trimethylation.
EZH2 is an upstream regulator of REIIBP and mediated through microRNAs
EZH2 is a key H3K27me3 enzyme, and previous reports linked EZH2 upstream of MMSET II13,26. To define the relationship between REIIBP and EZH2, we first checked the expression of EZH2 in our isogenic cells. Similar levels of EZH2 suggested that the upregulation of H3K27me3 is unlikely attributed to a modulation of EZH2 levels (Figure 4A). Next, we overexpressed REIIBP in a K562-EZH2 null cell line (EZH2∆/∆), which led to a restoration of H3K27me3 levels in the absence of EZH2 (Figure 4B). We further checked a panel of other histone methyltransferases and demethylases. Most were unchanged except for downregulation, and not upregulation, of H3K4 methyltransferases MLL4 and SMYD1 (Figure 4C). Overall, these data indicated that H3K27 and H3K4 trimethylation mediated by REIIBP were independent of other enzymes.
Next, we inhibited EZH2 via two different mechanisms, siRNA-mediated abrogation of EZH2 levels, and pharmacological inhibitors (EPZ-6438 and GSK-126) known to affect EZH2-mediated H3K27me3 but leave EZH2 levels unchanged27. Knockdown of EZH2 showed an almost complete abrogation of MMSET II and H3K36me2, thus acting as a positive control in our system. Notably, REIIBP was also abrogated but not MMSET I, and REIIBP-associated H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 were reduced (Figure 4D). This indicated that EZH2 not only regulated MMSET II, but REIIBP as well. Treatment with EZH2 inhibitors (EZH2i) provided alternative insights as it reduced H3K27me3 levels in wild-type cells but not in REIIBP-overexpressing cells (Figure 4E). The residual H3K27me3 in EZH2i-treated REIIBP-overexpressing cells confirmed that REIIBP could modulate H3K27me3 levels that was not targetable by EZH2i. Here, EZH2i did not affect REIIBP levels and correspondingly, H3K4me3.
EZH2 regulated MMSET II expression level through microRNAs (miRNAs)26. Given the identical 3’UTR of MMSET II and REIIBP, this prompted us to determine whether REIIBP expression level is likewise regulated by miRNAs and the specific EZH2-repressed miRNAs that might be targeting REIIBP. In OPM2, depletion of Dicer using two independent shRNAs rescued the mRNA and protein levels of REIIBP (Figure 4F). There were other cell lines whereby Dicer knockdown led to a downregulation of EZH2, resulting in the depletion of REIIBP (Supplementary Figure 2), strengthening our hypothesis that EZH2 was upstream of REIIBP. Lastly, we overexpressed the three EZH2-regulated miRNAs that were previously reported to target the 3’UTR of MMSET gene26, namely miR-26a, miR-31, and miR-203. These miRNAs resulted in the abrogation of both MMSET II and REIIBP levels (Figure 4G).
Gene Expression Profiling identified an upregulation of BTK and its putative upstream regulator TLR7 in REIIBP-overexpressing cells
To investigate transcriptional reprogramming by REIIBP, we performed gene expression profiling on our RPMI8226 isogenic cells (Figure 5A, Supplementary Table 1). We identified 365 downregulated and 256 upregulated genes upon REIIBP overexpression (Figure 5B). The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were subjected to gene ontology analysis, and functional annotation clustering revealed an enrichment in processes such as immune response, cell growth regulation and metabolism (Figure 5C). To uncover potential targets that could drive REIIBP oncogenic phenotype, we selected five upregulated genes (CYBB, TLR7, FAIM3, BTK, PDIA2) and validated them using qRT-PCR in RPMI8226, KMS12BM and U266 cells (Figure 5D). Additionally, WB validation was further performed for Toll-like receptor 7 (TLR7) and Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) (Figure 5E) as it was interesting that both BTK and its putative upstream regulator TLR728 were upregulated by REIIBP. BTK is involved in BCR signalling and activates NF-kB signalling pathway to promote B-cell survival29. Pharmacological inhibitors of BTK have shown single-agent efficacy in various B-cell malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)30-32, indicating the importance of BTK signaling. Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia and DepMap portal (Broad Institute) comparison of the expression of BTK and BTK dependency scores across lineages revealed that BTK is also an important target in MM (Supplementary Figure 3A and 3B). For clinical relevance, we found that TLR7 expression was associated with overall survival (OS) in CoMMpass dataset, although BTK showed a less significant association with OS (Figure 5F). However, there was a positive correlation (r=0.401, p =0) between REIIBP and BTK expression specifically in MMSET group but not in the overall cohort (Figure 5G).
Altered distribution of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 on TLR7 and BTK by REIIBP activates the BTK signaling axis
Next, we performed genome-wide mapping of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 histone marks using ChIP-sequencing. At the global level, we observed an increased enrichment of H3K4me3 near the TSS in REIIBP-overexpressing cells, while H3K27me3 was higher near the TSS and lowers with distance away from TSS (Figure 6A). To establish whether TLR7 and BTK expression were associated with histone changes, we examined their representative gene tracks. Higher H3K4me3 signals were observed on both gene loci near the promoter region, with broad lower H3K27me3 distribution across the gene body, indicating transcriptionally active chromatin (Figure 6B). We further examined CYBB, FAIM3 and PDIA2. PDIA2 was the only gene that did not show the presence of H3K4me3 on the promoter of its gene locus between the isogenic samples (Supplementary Figure 4), suggesting that it might not be a direct target of REIIBP.
Given the increased expression of TLR7 and BTK by histone methylation, we next examined whether they are functionally required for REIIBP oncogenesis. We observed elevated levels of phospho-BTK and phospho-NFĸB with reduction in the inhibitory molecule IĸBα33, indicating an activation of downstream BTK signaling pathway (Figure 6C). In the absence of BCR, we hypothesize that TLR7 may be the functional receptor in BTK activation. shRNA-mediated gene silencing of TLR7 significantly reduced both BTK and phospho-BTK (Figure 6D), while stimulation with a TLR7 agonist, loxoribine, phosphorylated BTK in myeloma cells in a dose- and time-dependent manner (Figure 6E). Hence, our results indicated that REIIBP-mediated TLR7 upregulation was required for a fully activated, phosphorylated BTK.
TLR7-BTK activation conferred bortezomib resistance through aberrant pro-inflammatory cytokine production and can be targeted using Ibrutinib
Bortezomib resistance is a clinical challenge in the treatment of MM. Our data indicated that REIIBP overexpression contributed to bortezomib insensitivity (Figure 7A). This insensitivity was reliant on TLR7 activation as induction of TLR7 with loxoribine could reproduce bortezomib resistance in a similar manner to REIIBP overexpression (Supplementary Figure 5A), even when loxoribine alone did not confer viability advantage (Supplementary Figure 5B and 5C). The contribution of REIIBP expression towards bortezomib-based treatment response was clinically validated with the MMRF CoMMpass dataset. REIIBP expression was highest in progressive disease (PD) compared with the others in a six-level description (Figure 7B). Notably, the differences in REIIBP expression was also pronounced in a two-level segregation of negative versus positive response groups (Figure 7C). To understand the underlying mechanism, we measured the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines as previous studies suggested that BTK activation elicits a pro-inflammatory response to support myeloma cell survival and drug resistance34. Consequently, we found a significant dysregulation of cytokine gene expression, especially IL-6 upon REIIBP overexpression (Figure 7D), with increased secretion of IL-6 into the supernatant by the myeloma cells (Figure 7E).
Next, we examined whether BTK activation could give rise to a new vulnerability that can be therapeutically targeted using Ibrutinib, a first-in-class oral inhibitor of BTK35-37. t(4;14) myeloma cells with high levels of REIIBP such as OPM2, H929 and KMS18 were significantly inhibited as compared to t(4;14) cells harbouring lower REIIBP like KMS11 and KMS34, while t(4;14)-negative U266 was the most unresponsive to Ibrutinib (Figure 7F). This efficacy was confirmed in RPMI8226 with REIIBP overexpression, but not control cells (Supplementary Figure 6A-C), demonstrating that REIIBP expression segregates response towards Ibrutinib. Moreover, the inhibitory effects of Ibrutinib were potentiated when used in combination with Bortezomib as assessed by cell viability assay (Figure 7G), apoptosis (Figure 7H), and Western blotting of apoptotic markers (Figure 7I). In vivo, NSG mice engrafted with RPMI8226-REIIBP cells developed tumors and randomized treatment with Ibrutinib-Bortezomib combination demonstrated superior results to single drug or DMSO control groups (Figure 7J). These results collectively indicated that BTK is a good druggable target against REIIBP and is a promising candidate for Bortezomib combination.