Till date, natural clinical infection with SFTSV has been reported only in two dogs (Han et al. 2020; Nam et al. 2020). In the present observational study, we investigated the clinical features of SFTS infection in 14 dogs in the ROK. The results suggested that dogs show a clinical course different from that observed in humans and cat. Moreover, all dogs recovered and survived.
According to the new classification method for the SFTSV genome, eight (8/13, 61.5%) of the sequences identified in this study were confirmed to be genotype B, which is the most prevalent in the ROK (Yun et al. 2020). The remaining five (38.5%) were identified as genotype D, which has not been recently identified in the ROK and is a genotype mainly found in China. All genotypes of Dog 1 and Dog 12, after virus isolation and full genome sequencing, were genotype B, and they were confirmed to correspond to subgenotypes B-3 and B-2, respectively. The subgenotype B-3, to which the sequences of Dogs 1, 2, 3, and 4 in the present study belonged, is not only a human isolate (MK301482, ROK); horse (MT989463, ROK), wild boar (MT502543, ROK), goat, chicken, and cat (MW004853, ROK) have been confirmed to be in the same cluster. This means that subgenotype B-3 is dominant in various animals in the ROK. In our follow-up study, Dog 12, which showed the SFTSV antigen in its urine sample, was identified as genotype B-2, with confirmation of 96.4% similarity to a human isolate (KP663742, ROK). Dogs 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, identified as genotype D, showed 99.4–100.0% similarity, and a human isolate sequence (KP663733, ROK) and a wild boar sequence (MT502563, ROK) were confirmed in the same cluster. When the sequence of a Chinese domestic dog (JQ693003, China) was compared with the sequences of Dogs 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 in this study, the similarity was found to be quite consistent at 99.8–99.1%.
Human and feline SFTS patients present with symptoms such as fever, thrombocytopenia, encephalitis, multiple organ failure, and death (Kim et al. 2013; Takahashi et al. 2014; Yu et al. 2011). The dogs in the present study showed some similar symptoms, although there was no case of encephalitis, multiple organ failure, or death. Clinical symptoms occurred as early as 1 day after exposure to ticks. Fever was observed in 57.1% dogs, with severe fever (over 40°C) only in two dogs. In a previous study in which dogs were experimentally infected with SFTSV, immunosuppressed dogs showed high fever (above 40°C) while immunocompetent dogs showed slightly high fever (above 39.5°C) (Park et al. 2021). Only one immunocompetent dog had high fever. It can be assumed that the host’s immune status influences the severity of fever. In our study of dogs with natural infection, 42.9% did not have fever; however, SFTS was considered because they were exposed to ticks. Thrombocytopenia was present in 45.5% dogs, with 27.3% showing a decrease within the reference range. Only one dog showed hematuria and hematochezia. In feline SFTS, thrombocytopenia was seen in 91.7% (22/24) (Matsuu et al. 2019). Similar to the results observed in the previous study of canine SFTS, in our study, even when thrombocytopenia occurred, severe anemia occurred in only one dog, and most of the dogs did not show anemia (Han et al. 2020; Nam et al. 2020; Park et al. 2021). This result is similar to that reported for feline SFTS (Matsuu et al. 2019). In human SFTS, a link between the platelet count and clinical outcome has been suggested; this may be related to activation of the cytokine network, the vascular endothelium, and the coagulation/fibrinolysis system, rather than virus attachment to platelets (Li et al. 2020).
In all studies of canine SFTS, including the present study, there was no case of death from SFTS infection (Han et al. 2020; Nam et al. 2020). In the present study, only symptomatic treatment with drugs such as doxycycline and metronidazole was administered, and only one dog with severe anemia required blood transfusion while two dogs were hospitalized for 1 day. All other dogs were managed as outpatients, and most clinical symptoms resolved within 2 weeks. Cats are highly sensitive to SFTSV, with a mortality rate of 62.5% (Matsuno et al. 2018; Matsuu et al. 2019; Park et al. 2019; Sakai et al. 2021; Seto et al. 2020). Moreover, the mortality rate for humans is approximately 20% (Seo et al. 2021). Reported factors associated with poor survival in feline SFTS infection included fever (> 39.5°C; P = 0.020) and elevated creatine phosphokinase (CPK) levels (P = 0.002), SFTSV copy numbers (P = 0.027), and IgG levels (P = 0.004) (Matsuu et al. 2019). All cats also developed jaundice, although it was not related to survival (P = 0.179). In our study, severe fever was observed in only two dogs, and quantitative IgG using ELISA and the CPK level were not measured; therefore, comparisons cannot be made with cats. IgG was confirmed using IFA, and two dogs showed positivity. Because all dogs survived, it was difficult to determine risk factors for mortality. The severity of fever and disease in viral infections, including SFTS, are cytokine-related, and cytokine storm is associated with patient prognosis (Deng et al. 2012; Ding et al. 2014b; Hu et al. 2018; Sun et al. 2014; Sun et al. 2012). In human SFTS, an increase in several cytokines such as interferon (IFN)-α (IFN-α), IFN-γ, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), macrophage inflammatory protein-1α, interleukin-6, and IFN-inducible protein-10 was associated with disease severity. In animals, such studies are limited. It is necessary to study a larger number of dogs and determine if they exhibit disease characteristics consistent with our findings.
There were no instances of dogs transmitting SFTSV to other dogs or owners in this study. In Korea and Japan, cases of SFTSV transmission from companion animals such as dogs (Chung et al. 2020; Kim et al. 2021; Park et al. 2021) and cats (Kida et al. 2019; Tsuru et al. 2021; Yamanaka et al. 2020) to other animals or humans in close contact, such as owners or veterinarians, have been reported. The seropositivity rate for veterinarians and nurses working in veterinary hospitals has been reported as 2.2–4.2%, with positivity despite the absence of clinical symptoms, and it was significantly higher than that reported for healthy blood donors (Ando et al. 2021; Kirino et al. 2021). Human-to-human transmission occurs through close contact with infected body fluids (Kim et al. 2015; Liu et al. 2012; Yoo et al. 2016; Yoo et al. 2018), and it can be assumed that transmission between animals occurs in a similar manner (Park et al. 2021). In our study, viral antigen testing was performed for various samples, namely serum and urine samples and oral, eye, nose, and rectal swab samples. For one dog, the antigen was detected in the urine. In a previous study of dogs, SFTS viral shedding in the urine and rectal swabs persisted until 16 days after infection (Park et al. 2021). SFTSV invades multiple organs (Huang et al. 2019; Park et al. 2019; Park et al. 2020). Dogs can function as a reservoir host for SFTSV (Wang et al. 2021), and even if animals and humans are not directly bitten by ticks, infection can occur through various indirect routes. Despite these risks, no treatment strategy has been established for humans and animals. Depending on the patient’s symptoms, symptomatic treatments such as fluids, antibiotics, transfusion, antipyretics, G-CSF, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and monoclonal antibodies are available. In humans, antiviral agents such as ribavirin and favipiravir have been tested, but their effectiveness was insufficient (Seo et al. 2021). Because cytokine storm is an important pathological process in SFTS, steroids have also been tested; however, there is no well-established treatment protocol, and steroids should be used with caution as the incidence of complications may increase (Jung et al. 2021; Kim et al. 2016; Nakamura et al. 2018). It is necessary to establish a treatment protocol for SFTS and develop effective antiviral agents and vaccines.
In our study, all dogs infected with SFTSV were exposed to ticks in urban parks and trails. This was confirmed by checking the aerial photos obtained by tracking their locations. Therefore, even if it is an urban area, an area with bushes is likely to be inhabited by ticks because of the entry of abandoned animals and wild animals. Accordingly, even an urban area is not safe in terms of SFTS infection, and parental education, such as instructions to avoid places with bushes or avoid the use of tick repellents during outdoor activities, is necessary to reduce exposure to ticks. When handling tick-exposed animals, personal protective equipment and infection control should be given prime importance, and awareness among veterinary personnel should be increased.
This study has some limitations. First, the sample size was small. The clinical characteristics of SFTS may change if a larger scale study is performed. Second, this was not a controlled study in terms of time of diagnosis, examination items, and treatment methods; it was an observational study of patient samples and data from several different veterinary hospitals. It is necessary to study the clinical characteristics and risk factors for survival while testing and treating a larger number of patients in the same environment.