Subjects and PCD diagnosis
Five PCD patients, together with control individuals, were enrolled in the study from 2008 to 2020. Patients were diagnosed with PCD according to the classic characterization and guidelines [11]. The control subjects included in the study were the healthy siblings or parents of patients and unrelated healthy individuals. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics committee of the Shenzhen People’s Hospital (Guangdong, China), as per the ethical standards recommended in the 1964 Helsinki Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from each subjects enrolled in the study. High-resolution computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and TEM examination were conducted to investigate chronic sinusitis, bronchiectasis, situs inversus, and ciliary ultrastructural defects.
Identification of variants by whole-exome sequencing (WES) and bioinformatic analysis
Genomes from all subjects were sequenced using the NovaSeq platform (Illumina). Variants revealed using WES data were analyzed using the Genome Analysis Toolkit and Annovar [12]. Subsequently, all variants were filtered based on minor allele frequency (MAF<0.1%), using the following databases: 1000 genomes, CG69, and gnomAD (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/). Sorting Intolerant From Tolerant, MutationTaster, Polymorphism Phenotyping v2 (PolyPhen-2), and Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion were used to assess the pathogenicity of variants. Further, an in-house filtering pipeline was used to identify candidate variants.
Pathogenicity assessment and validation of candidate variants
Gene function- and frequency-based filtering analyses were conducted for all variants. In total, 46 pathogenic genes highly associated with PCD were selected as candidate gene variants, as described previously [13]. Variant pathogenicity assessment was conducted using bioinformatic software and ACMG [14]. The classification and interpretation of variants followed the ACMG guidelines. Identified candidate causative variants were validated in patients with PCD and control subjects using the Sanger sequencing platform. The Chromas software was used to analyze the sequencing results (Technelysium Pty Ltd.).
PCR and sequencing confirmation of the CCDC40 splicing variant
Total RNA was extracted from whole blood of the PCD patients and reverse-transcribed using the RR036A kit (TAKARA, Japan). Primers for CCDC40 exons were designed using the IDT PrimerQuest tool (https://sg.idtdna.com/Primerquest/Home/Index). cDNA segments transcribed from exon CCDC40 mRNA were amplified using standard PCR. The primers for exon 13 to exon 14 transcripts were as follows: primer 4 F- 5ʹ GGACCAGGACGTGAAGAAAG 3ʹ, and R- 5ʹ CTGTGTCACCTTGACCATCTC; and for exon 14 to exon 15 transcripts: primer 6 F- 5ʹ GATCGACGAGCACGATGG 3ʹ, and R- GAGCTTCTTCAGGTCGTTGT 3ʹ. Transcript products of the splicing variant in patient KT8 were confirmed by Sanger sequencing and agarose gel electrophoresis.