Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in livestock in North of Morocco

doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-15742/v1

Download PDF

Research article

Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in livestock in North of Morocco

https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-15742/v1

This work is licensed under a CC BY 4.0 License

Journal Publication

published 14 Aug, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Infectious Diseases →

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Background : In Morocco, data of LA-MRSA nasal carriage are still limited. The objectives of this study were to determine for the first time the nasal carriage rate, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles and virulence genes of S aureus isolated from animals and breeders in close contact. Methods : From 2015 to 2016, 480 nasal swab samples were collected from 27 different Livestock areas in Tangier. The antimicrobial susceptibility phenotypes were determined by disk diffusion according to EUCAST 2016. The presence of nuc , mec A and his homologue mec C, lukS/F-PV, and tst genes were determined by PCR for all isolates. Results : The overall S. aureus nasal carriage rate was low in animals (9.97%) and high in breeders (60%) with a statistically significant difference, (OR = 14.321; 95% CI = 7.484- 27.405; p< 0.0001). In general, S. aureus strains were susceptible to the majority of antibiotics and the higher resistance rates were found against tetracycline (16.7% in animals and 10% in breeders). No MRSA was detected in animals and breeders. A high rate of tst and lukS/F-PV genes has been found only in animals (11.9% and 16.7%, respectively). Conclusion : Despite the lower colonization rate of S. aureus and the absence of MRSA strains in our study, S. aureus strains harbored a higher frequency of tst and lukS/F-PV of virulence genes, which is associated to an increased risk of infection dissemination in humans. This highlights the need for implementing adequate approaches for prevention. Further larger and multi-center studies are needed to validate and confirm our findings. Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus , nasal carriage, animals, breeders, MRSA, Morocco

Infectious Diseases

Staphylococcus aureus

nasal carriage

animals

breeders

MRSA

Morocco.

Nasal carriage was been shown to be a predisposing factor for infections followed by inter individual transmission and dissemination in different environments [1].

The emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus strains (MRSA) is linked to the acquisition of the mecA gene [2] or its mecC variant encoding a variant of the Penicillin-Binding Protein (PBP) gene [3]. MRSA appeared firstly in a hospital in the early 1960s [4]. Since then, it has been established around the world as an endemic hospital pathogen (Hospital Acquired-MRSA: HA-MRSA).

The late 1990s and 2000s saw the emergence and worldwide spread of particular strains of this microorganism known as Community-Acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) [5]. CA-MRSA strains are different from typical hospital strains in many ways including, in terms of clinical expression, toxic and genotypic characteristics [5]. Over the past two decades, MRSA has emerged in a variety of animal populations, mainly in pigs and veal calves [6], but also in pets and horses [7]. These strains known as Livestock associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) strains had a genetic origin different to that of human strains previously described with isolates mainly belonging to clonal complex CC398 [8]. In the last decade, MRSA clones with a divergent mecA homolog, named mecC (formerly mecALGA251), have been detected in different animal species and also humans [3].

In African countries, studies about colonization of LA-MRSA seem to be scarce. The first report of ST398 in humans in Africa was described by Elhani et al [9] who isolated one MRSA-ST398-t899 in the nasal sample of a farmer in Tunisia. In Morocco, a study conducted by Mourabit et al [10] revealed that the nasal carriage colonization rate of MRSA was 1.4% in humans. Interestingly, this work identified for the first time one isolate characterized as ST398-MRSA-IV spa t011 that exhibited multidrug resistance and was not SmaI typeable.

The objective of this work was to determine the nasal carriage of S. aureus, and the antimicrobial resistance and virulence genes in healthy farm animals and their breeders in Tangier.

Isolation and identification of nasal S. aureus isolates

Livestock sampling areas included 16 small farms, one stable (unique public equestrian center of Tangier, which provides trained horses and 10 local sheep and goat farms in different parts of Tangier. In general, the preference for selection of sampling sites was given to small farms or premises near the most populated areas of the city. This study was carried out between 2015 and 2016 and focused on clinically healthy animals and volunteers in close contact with these animals. No antibiotics were used on them during the previous month. Likewise, none of the volunteers had any chronic illness during the sampling period, nor had they used any antibiotics or had been hospitalized in the last three months.

A nasal swab of both nostrils was done simultaneously for each of the animals and volunteer breeders.

Consent and ethics approval: As the majority of breeders were illiterate, informed oral consent was obtained from all participants following the explanation of the objectives of the study and this was approved by our institution. Confidentiality of the participants was maintained using unique code.

Phenotypic and molecular identification

To increase the chances of isolating the strains, the nasal samples were grown on BHI liquid and then incubated at 37° for 24 hours. The isolation was carried out by successive subcultures on Chapman medium (Biorad) and on chromogenic media (Biorad), then incubated for 24 to 48 hours at 37°C

Suspicious colonies were identified as S. aureus by colony morphology, catalase, and Dase tests. Presumptively S. aureus were confirmed by PCR for 16S rRNA and nuc genes, as previously described [2]. Susceptibility testing was performed with the disk diffusion method according to the recommendations of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing [11] for cefoxitin (30 µg), erythromycin (5 μg), lincomycin (15 μg), pristinamycin (15 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), tobramycin (10 μg), kanamycin (30 UI), tetracycline (30 UI), rifampicin (30 μg), chloramphenicol (10 μg), cotrimoxazole (23.75 ± 1.25 μg) and fusidic acid (10 μg). Inducible or constitutive lincomycin resistance was determined by the double disk diffusion test (D-test). To avoid underestimating the prevalence of methicillin resistance, the presence of the mecA and mecC gene was determined by PCR in all these isolates, as previously described [2, 3]. All of the S. aureus isolates have been tested for the presence of lukS/F-PV and tst genes by PCR [12]. S. aureus strains ATCC 43300 (mecA-positive), ATCC 2011S359 (mecC-positive), ATCC 29213 (nuc-positive), MW2 (lukS/F-PV -positive) and FRI913 (tst-positive) were used as positive controls for PCRs.

All phenotypic and molecular test were carried out in the Biotechnology and Biomolecule Engineering Research Laboratory.

Statistical analyses

Comparisons between proportions were drawn with Fisher’s exact test and the Chi-squared test. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were also calculated. Differences showing a p value <0.05 were considered significant. Calculations were performed using SPSS version 20.0 software.

Prevalence of S. aureus in farm animals

A total of 480 different animals (wild Boar, horses, cattle, sheep and goats) and 50 breeders were nasally screened. Phenotypic and molecular study has permit to isolate 42 (9.6%) and 30 (60%) strains from animals and breeders, respectively. S. aureus has only been identified in farm animals (goats, cattle and sheep). None of the 16 horses and the six wild Boar were found to be carriers of S. aureus.

Sensitivity to antibiotics

Thirty-three S. aureus strains in animals and breeders had no resistance (78.5%). All isolated strains were susceptible to cefoxitin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole, tobramycin, gentamycin and chloramphenicol. The higher resistance rates were found for tetracycline (16.7% and 10%) and erythromycin (11.9% and 10%) in animals and breeders, respectively (Table 1). The search for the mecA and the mecC genes did not identify any MRSA strain.

Exotoxin search

Molecular tests based on multiplex PCR research of genes coding for Panton Valentin Leucocidin toxin (PVL) and Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin (TSST-1), has permit to identify in animals seven (16.7 %) strains producing PVL toxin and five (11.9 %) strains producing the toxin TSST-1. However, in breeders no strains carrying the pvl gene or tst gene have been identified.

In Morocco, livestock represents a large share of the Gross Domestic Product, which is between 25 and 30% according to the Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Rural Development, Water and Forests [13]. This activity, which still plays an important socio-economic role, involves nearly 70% of the rural population [13]. However, animal farming also develops around urban centers where several farms with less than 20 to 60 heads or more are located in working-class areas or on the outskirts of the city (Figure 1). These animals are housed in premises of different nature and surface. On the social level, livestock in urban areas contributes to income generation and coverage of milk and meat needs of a local layer of the urban population. Livestock feeding consists mainly of market vegetable waste, pieces of bread left by people or corn. Animal health was not controlled and antibiotics may be overused which increase the risk of human infection, which is even more pronounced if breeding conditions were not suitable (non-vaccination, bad atmosphere conditions in the buildings…).

In Tangier no data of LA-MRSA nasal carriage has been reported yet. Our results revealed statistically lower prevalence of colonization by S. aureus in animals compared to breeders (OR= 14.321; 95 % CI = 7.484- 27.405; p< 0.0001). Furthermore, we showed that all strains were MSSA. Unfortunately, we could not compare our results to Moroccan studies due to the lack of such data at the national scale. In a report from Tunisia including 261 healthy animals, a relatively lower rate of S. aureus (6.5 %) was reported with different rates depending on animal species. Similar to our findings, this group showed that all S. aureus isolates were MSSA [14].

In contrast, some western studies reported various MRSA strain rates [15,16,17]. A Dutch study reported a MRSA colonization rate of 32 % in calf-contact persons and 32 % in hospitalized patients with contact with pigs and calves [15]. These rates are concerning, given that the prevalence of colonization in the general Dutch population did not exceed 1% [18]. In Switzerland, the pathogen was isolated from only 1 % of calves and 0.3 % of adult cattle [16], whereas in Denmark, the rate exceeds 64% in goats [17]. Moreover, a recent study conducted by Dweba et al [19], in South African livestock production systems identified MRSA isolates in 27% with a significant relationship (p < 0.001) with the host animal.

In our study, none of the 16 horses were found to be S. aureus carrier, whereas only one monitor was colonized by a multi-sensitive S. aureus. In fact, this could be due to the low number of volunteer participants who were recruited from one equestrian center in Tangier. Some studies from Europe and Canada identified colonization rates up to 7.9% in horses on farms or in veterinary hospitals [20, 21].

We did not identify any significant differences in antimicrobial resistance between LA-strains and human isolates (p>0.05) (Table 1). The higher resistance rates were found against tetracycline; 16.7% in animals and 10% in breeders. Indeed, resistance to tetracycline and erythromycin is widely reported in the world [22]. These important rates, could be explained by the over-use of theses antibiotic in humans as well as in animals [23] which may cause the selection of resistant mutants strains and afterwards their dissemination between different species [24]. This use of tetracycline and other antibiotics has become a major global burden for the healthcare system [22]. Substantial efforts were made by World Health Organization and The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in order to overcome the spread of antibiotics resistance and protect the global health and food security, as well as to optimize the overall use of antibiotics both in humans and animals through the implementation of one-health approaches [22].

In this study, animal strains harbored more virulence genes than human ones. The detection of LA-SA PVL and TSST positive is relevant due to the important role that these toxins seem to play in serious infections [25, 26], and due to the possibility of spread between animal-resistant strains and humans and the environment [25]. Similar strains from Healthy Farm Animals and Pets have been previously reported [14, 27].

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study carried out in Morocco in order to determine nasal colonization rate of S. aureus and MRSA in animals and breeders in Tangier, as well as to study the antibiotic resistance profile and the virulence genes of the isolates. The current study shows several limitations. The nasal carriage of S. aureus could be transient and therefore some cases may go unnoticed at the time of our investigation. Furthermore, even though the nasal cavity is the most common site for the carriage of S. aureus, other unexplored sites including the extra nasal ones could also host this germ. The limited size of the sample is another limitation of our work, which probably influenced the statistical results.

Our results clearly indicate the presence of S. aureus colonizing animals, which are used for food production. However, no MRSA has been isolated from these animals, which hinders the ability to obtain an overview of MRSA prevalence in the animal population in Tangier. In addition, we revealed that S. aureus strains colonizing animals share some resistances with human strains, enhancing thus the spread and persistence of resistant strains, which represent a potential risk to human and animal health. This risk is further increased by the presence of the two genes tst and pvl. This highlights the need for raising awareness about strain dissemination across different hosts “One Health concept”.

Further larger and multi-center studies are needed to validate and confirm our findings. Interestingly, molecular typing of the MSSA strains, pvl and tst positive strains seems to be of paramount importance.

Ethics approval: Our study was submitted and approved by the internal committee.

Consent to participate: As the majority of breeders were illiterate, informed oral consent was obtained from all participants following the explanation of the objectives of the study and this was approved by our institution. Confidentiality of the participants was maintained using unique code.

Data Availability statements

All data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflict of interests:

No conflict of interests is declared.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author Contributions

MN designed, organized, collected the nasal samples and wrote the first draft of the paper. MB and AA performed data analysis and interpretation. ZZ and JB drafting the work and revising it critically for important intellectual content. AL designed the study, helped with data analysis and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript and were responsible for all aspects of the work.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the breeders, the monitors and a health officer from the equestrian center and the person who allowed us to collect samples for this research.

[1] Wertheim HF, Melles DC, Vos MC, VanLeeuwen W, Van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, Nouwen JL. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infec Dis. 2005;5:751-62.

[2] Maes N, Magdalena J, Rottiers S, De Gheldre Y, Struelens MJ. Evaluation of a triplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to discriminate Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) and determine methicillin resistance from blood cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:1514-17.

[3] Garcia-Alvarez L, Holden MT, Lindsay H, Webb CR, Brown DF, Curran MD, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: A descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:595–603.

[4] Jevons MP, Coe AW, Parker MT. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Lancet. 1963;1:904-07.

[5] Vandenesch F, Naimi T, Enright MC, Lina G, Nimmo GR, Heffeman H, et al. Community acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes: worldwide emergence. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:978 84.

[6] Leonard FC, Markey BK. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in animals: a review. Vet J. 2008;175:27–36.

[7] Catry B, Van Duijkeren E, Pomba MC, Greko C, Moreno MA, Pyorala S, et al. Reflection paper on MRSA in food-producing and companion animals: epidemiology and control options for human and animal health. Epidemiol Infect. 2010;138:626-44.

[8] Guardabassi L, Stegger M, Skov R. Retrospective detection of methicillin resistant and susceptible Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in Danish slaughter pigs.Vet Microbiol. 2007;21:122(3-4):384-6.

[9] Elhani D, Gharsa H, Kalai D, Lozano C, Gomez P, Boutheima J, et al. Clonal lineages detected among tetracycline resistant MRSA isolates of a Tunisian Hospital, with detection of lineage ST398. J Med Microbiol. 2015;64:623-32.

[10] Mourabit N, Arakrak A, Bakkali M, Laglaoui A. Nasal carriage of sequence type 22 MRSA and livestock-associated ST398 clones in Tangier, Morocco. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2017;11:536-42.

[11] European Committee on Antimicrobial Suscebtibility Testing (EUCAST). Breakpoints tables for EuroReference. 2014. No 5:ER05-11M01.

[12] Denis O, Deplano A, De Beehouwer H, Hallin M, Huysmans G, Garrino MG, et al. Polyclonal emergence and importation of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains harbouring Panton-Valentine leucocidin genes in Belgium. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56:1103-06.

[13] Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Rural Development, Water and Forests (MAF). 2014. http://www.agriculture.gov.ma/en.

[14] Gharsa H, Ben Slama K, Gomez-Sanz E, Lozano C, Zarazaga M, Messadi L, et al. Molecular Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus from Nasal Samples of Healthy Farm Animals and Pets in Tunisia. Vbz. Feb 2015 https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2014.1655

[15] Graveland H, Wagenaar JA, Broekhuizen-Stins MJ, Oosting-Schothorst I, Schoormans AH, van Duijkeren E, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in veal calf farmers and veal calves in the Netherlands. American Society for Microbiology (ASM) Conference on Antimicrobial Resistance in Zoonotic Bacteria and Foodborne Pathogens, Copenhagen. 62-63. 2008.

[16] Huber H, Koller S, Giezendanner N, Stephan R, Zweifel C. Prevalence and characteristics of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in humans in contact with farm animals, in livestock, and in food of animal origin, Switzerland, 2009. Euro Surveill. 2010;15(16):19542. Published 2010 Apr 22.

[17] Eriksson J, Espinosa-Gongora C, Stamphoj I, Larsen AR, Guardabassi L. Carriage frequency, diversity and methicillin resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in Danish small ruminants. Vet Microbiol. 2013;12:110-15.

[18] Wulf MW, Sorum M, van Nes A, Skov R, Melchers WJ, Klaassen CH, et al. Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among veterinarians, an international study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:29-34.

[19] Dweba CC, Zishiri OT, El Zowalaty. Isolation and Molecular Identification of Virulence, Antimicrobial and Heavy Metal Resistance Genes in Livestock-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pathogens. 2019;8(2):79. doi:10.3390/pathogens8020079.

[20] Burton S, Reid-Smith R, McClure JT, Weese JS. Staphylococcus aureus colonization in healthy horses in Atlantic Canada. Can Vet J. 2008;49(8):797-99.

[21] Islam MZ, Espinosa-Gongora C, Damborg P, Sieber RN, Munk R, Husted L, et al. Horses in Denmark Are a Reservoir of Diverse Clones of Methicillin-Resistant and -Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:543. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.00543

[22] World Health Organization Antibiotic Resistance. Geneava, Switzerland. Available online:https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance. Accessed 27 February 2019.

[23] Landers TF, Cohen B, Wittum TE, Larson EL. A review of antibiotic use in food animals: perspective, policy, and potential. Public Health Reports. 2012;127:4-22.

[24] Aarestrup FM. Association between the consumption of antimicrobial agents in animal husbandry and the occurrence of resistant bacteria among food animals. Int J Antimicrob. Agents. 1999;12:279-85.

[26] Melles DC, van Leeuwen WB, Boelens HAM, Peeters JK, Verbrugh HA, van Belkum A. Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Genes in Staphylococcus aureus. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2006;12:1174–75.

[25] Otto M. Staphylococcus aureus toxins. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2014;17:32–37.

[27] Van Duijkeren E, Wolfhagen MJ, Heck ME, Wannet WJ. Transmission of a panton-valentine leucocidin-positive, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain between humans and a dog. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:6209-11.

Table 1. Comparison of antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of isolates

	Animals n=42 (%)	Breeders n=30 (%)	p-value	OR (95% CI)
kanamycin	0 (0)	1 (3.3)	0.41	NA
tobramycin	0 (0)	0 (0)	NA	NA
gentamycin	0 (0)	0 (0)	NA	NA
Erythromycin	5 (11.9)	3 (10)	0.55	0.822 (0.181-3.740)
Ciprofloxacin	0 (0)	0 (0)	NA	NA
Tetracyclin	7 (16.7)	3 (10)	0.32	0.556 (0.131-2.351)
cotrimoxasol	0 (0)	0 (0)	NA	NA
Chloranphénicol	0 (0)	0 (0)	NA	NA
Fusidic-acid	1 (2.4)	3 (10)	0.19	0.566 (0.450-46.112)

OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable (cannot be calculated due to zero cell)

Download PDF

Journal Publication

published 14 Aug, 2020

Read the published version in BMC Infectious Diseases →

Editorial decision: Major revision
23 Mar, 2020
Review #1 received at journal
22 Mar, 2020
Reviewer #2 agreed at journal
07 Mar, 2020
Review #2 received at journal
07 Mar, 2020
Reviewer #1 agreed at journal
06 Mar, 2020
Reviewers invited by journal
28 Feb, 2020
Editor assigned by journal
18 Feb, 2020
Submission checks completed at journal
17 Feb, 2020
Editor invited by journal
17 Feb, 2020

You are reading this older preprint version

Read the latest preprint version →

Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in livestock in North of Morocco

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1

Abstract

Figures

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

Declarations

References

Table 1

Status:

Journal Publication

Version 1