The study settings
This is a prospective cohort study of women based in two hospitals in Tanzania – Mbeya Zonal Referral Hospital in Mbeya region which is located in the Southern Highlands of Tanzania and Mount Meru Hospital in Arusha which is located in Northern Highlands. These two hospitals were amongst the six selected for implemention of the FIGO PPIUD Initiative which started in December 2015 in Tanzania. The intention was that PPFP counselling and PPIUD services would become routine practice in these hospitals by training of health care providers on postpartum Family Planning counselling, provision of Family Planning Information to clients (health talk, leaflets, posters, and video) as well as Post Partum insertion of TCu380A IUD within 48 hours of delivery [3].
The current study hospitals were chosen because they had demonstrated the best turn-up of follow-up clients, had excellent record of PPIUD insertions in the past two years and are well equipped with laboratory and ultrasound machines. Since all other implementing hospitals under this project use the same standards in providing PPIUD services, we hoped the study findings emanating from these two study hospitals would be fairly generalizable to other women who receive the services under this program elsewhere in Tanzania.
The Cohort groups
Two cohort groups (Exposed and Unexposed) were identified among women who delivered in the two hospitals between 14th February and 13th May 2018. The Exposed group comprised of women who received PPIUD insertion within 48 hours of delivery in the two study hospitals as confirmed by the routine post-partum interviews and procedure documentation. The Unexposed cohort group comprised of women who delivered in same hospitals but did not consent for PPIUD placement or any other form of modern postpartum contraception.
The two cohort groups were matched in terms of time of delivery. The Exposed women were selected from a complete list of clients who had PPIUD placement on that day, often using table of random numbers if there were many eligible women at that time. Once an Exposed woman was recruited and consented to participate, the Unexposed was that woman, who according to delivery records gave birth immediately after the selected Exposed woman on that day. The selected participants in both cohort groups were given information about the study and asked for their written consent to participate.
Criteria for selection of participants
In order to become eligible for enrolment, a woman fulfilled all of the following: no evidence of chorioamnionitis or purulent vaginal discharge; not ruptured membranes for 18 hours or more before delivery; delivered a singleton term pregnancy without instrumentation, delivered in the hospital within 48 hours; not developed Post Partum Haemorrhage; has no severe or clinically advanced HIV disease (WHO stage 3 or 4); no condition suspected to distort the uterine cavity such as uterine fibroid; not known to have Wilson’s disease; did not consent for any other longterm method of postpartum family planning except for PPIUD among the Exposed. In the case of two or more women who fulfil the criteria for selection in Unexposed group, a ballotte technique was used to select one among them. Upon agreeing to participate in the study, both the Exposed and the Unexposed were given details about the study and asked to sign a written consent.
Sample size
A calculated sample of at least 250 women (125 Exposeds and 125 Unexposed) was needed in order to adequately answer the primary objective. This was calculated assuming prolonged lochia discharge beyond 6 weeks of 40% in the Exposed and 20% in the Unexposed group[14, 16], 80% power or greater, a two-sided significance level of 95% and 20% loss to follow.
Follow-up procedure
Each woman in the study was asked to keep a diary on lochia discharges and was contacted by a Midwife weekly on mobile phone to report on the amount of lochia and any other experienced complications. Illiterate women were asked to keep memory of the lochia flow for a week. Given phone calls were weekly, this was felt to be fairly reliable. During weekly phone calls women were asked about daily amount of lochia from the last physical attendance or call. At the end of the sixth week, all women were given an appointment to attend a clinic for physical examination and the documentation of findings. The information was documented by the attending provider in the follow-up clinic. At this follow-up appointment pelvic Ultrasound was performed on all women whose IUD strings could not be seen in order to ascertain the presence and position of the device. The women in the Exposed cohort group were asked about their experience with the IUD. Blood investigations and vaginal swabs were taken for women who report abnormal lochia in terms of amount, duration, color and smell in both the groups in order to exclude infection.
Interpretation of key variables
The estimation of amount of lochia was semi-quantitative using a Likert Scale score of 0-4 relative to the amount of lochia discharges experienced on the first day postpartum according to her diary. Thus, the amount of lochia relative to that on the first day was scored as heavier (=Score 4), same (=Score 3) less and moderate (=Score 2), less and scanty (=Score 1), dry (=Score 0). There was no direct measurement of the amount of lochia.
Women who had ongoing lochia discharge at the end of 6th week were considered to have prolonged lochia discharges. Uterine infection was diagnosed if the woman complained or was found on examination to have a foul smelling vaginal discharge plus either increased low abdominal pain/tenderness, fever or positive culture. Method discontinuation was considered to have occurred if: there was voluntary request for removal, fall out of the IUD without replacement, removal due to medical complications or accidental removal without replacement of another IUD by end of 6th week of follow-up. Two models of TCu380A, Optima (Injeflex Co. Brazil) and Pregna (Pregna International, Chakan, India), were in public use in Tanzania. PPIUD providers knew and documented the type of TCu380A Model used as Pregna or Optima but no one was aware of any research interest in these two TCu380A Models. For quality purposes in both hospitals, PPIUD providers were different from Midwives who made weekly phone calls and both these did not conduct the final examination of clients at the end of 6th week.
Data analysis
Data were downloaded into Excel and exported to Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Version 20 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive data were compared among the groups using measures of central tendency and proportions. Chi square was used to compare categorical data; means for two groups were compared by T-test if the data were normally distributed and by Mann-Whitney U test if normal distribution was not assumed. One Way Analysis of Varience (ANOVA) was used to compare the varience in means for the analysis of three groups. In all the statistics, a p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) was in place in order to ensure all aspects of safety of the FIGO PPIUD Initiative in Tanzania.