In most developing countries including Indonesia, universal eye screening of the newborn is not a common practice. Techniques and technologies in retinal examination have improved during the last few decades. This may result in finding ocular abnormalities among newborns easier.
During our study, we found that there was a difference in delivery pattern between our two hospitals. In CM Hospital, the rate for caesarean section was 64.7% compared to the rate in Koja hospital (45.1%). This difference is due to the fact that CM Hospital is the top referral hospital in Jakarta, that predominantly managed high-risk pregnancy which caesarean section was indicated. On the other hand, Koja Hospital is a district hospital, hence simpler, uncomplicated cases where spontaneous delivery can still be achieved.
In our study, we screened a total of 1208 healthy newborns and found that RH (Figure 1) was the most common ocular abnormalities (10.93%), followed by chorioretinitis (0.58%) and macular hemorrhage (0.33%). Other ocular abnormalities such as macular dystrophy, intraocular tumor, optic nerve head abnormality, iris nodule, and persistent pupillary membrane were the least common abnormalities (0.08% each).
We found 7 out of 150 patients with ocular abnormalities, suspected with chorioretinitis. Most likely the exudative retinal lesion found in this study was due to intrauterine infection because the lesion is located in the perivascular area (as seen in Figure 2). Serological test would be required to confirm the diagnosis, which was not the standard diagnostic procedures during the antenatal care.
Table 4: Retinal hemorrhage prevalence in other countries
Country
|
Study
|
Population
|
Prevalence
|
China
|
Li LH, et al3
|
3573 healthy newborns
|
21.5% (769/3573)
|
India
|
Vinekar A, et al4
|
1021 healthy newborns
|
2.4% (25/1021)
|
United Kingdom
|
Callaway NF, et al5
|
202 healthy newborns
|
20.3% (41/202)
|
New Zealand
|
Simkin S, et al6
|
285 healthy newborns
|
11.8% (33/285)
|
Indonesia
|
Present study
|
1208 healthy newborns
|
10.9% (132/1208)
|
Our finding is in accordance with previous studies done in several countries as shown in Table 4. The prevalence ranged from 2.4% to 21.53% with RH as the most common ocular findings.
Using univariate analysis of risk factors associated with retinal hemorrhage, C-section delivery was shown as a protective factor (OR 0.27, p<0.001) compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery, while prolonged labor was associated with increased risk of retinal hemorrhage (OR1.84, p=0.002). C-section delivery was significantly associated towards retinal hemorrhage on multivariate analysis (OR 0.29, p<0.001) while other risk factors were not. Compared to other studies, C-section delivery has been shown to have a protective factor towards the development of retinal hemorrhage, while spontaneous vaginal delivery increases the risk. Zhao Q10 et al showed that a history of caesarean delivery is associated with lower rates of retinal hemorrhage (OR 0.296, p value 0.002), meanwhile a spontaneous vaginal delivery is associated with higher risk of developing retinal hemorrhage (OR 4.909, p value <0.001). A systematic review by Watts P et al11 demonstrate similar result.
The underlying mechanism of retinal hemorrhage in neonates following spontaneous vaginal delivery was proposed by Yanli Z, et al12. During vaginal delivery, the intracranial pressure suddenly rises due to the compression of the fetal head when the fetus descends. This is accompanied by increased pressure in the central retinal vein, dilatation of the scalp- and intracranial veins simultaneously due to venous return obstruction. If this mechanism occurs in newborns where the vascular walls are thinner, they may rupture easily.
In prolonged labor, especially during the second stage of labor, the uterine contractions are longer, the cervix is fully dilated, and the fetal head has descended. It is possible that the umbilical cord is compressed, thus making the fetus prone to fetal uterine ischemia and hypoxia. Hypoxic condition may create an acidic environment, which excites the vagus nerve, accelerates bowel movement, and in the end contaminates the amniotic fluid with meconium, which can cause further fetal hypoxia.12 Hypoxia may cause an autoregulatory cerebral vasodilatation that may lead to increased intracranial pressure, which eventually leads to an increased risk of retinal hemorrhage in fragile vascular walls of newborns.13
In light of instrument-assisted delivery, our study showed different results compared with previous studies. In our population, neither vacuum extraction nor forceps deliveries were statistically associated with RH (OR 0.561, p value 0.56). This result was not in accordance to a previous study from Watts P et al11, which demonstrated that using instruments during delivery increases the incidence of RH (OR 1.75, p = 0.0002). Our result may due to the low rate of instrument-assisted delivery used in our study population (4.1%). Thus, our findings may not show the exact relationship between instrument-assisted deliveries and the incidence of retinal hemorrhage.
We could not follow up 51 of 132 neonates with RH completely until the end of study. Of these infants, 51% (26 of 51 neonates) had severe RH (grade 3) and the remaining 49% had grade 2 RH. It is generally understood that retinal hemorrhages will resolve quickly during the first few weeks8, however prolonged macular hemorrhage can create a long-term impact on visual function14. Among children with retinal hemorrhages and especially those with macular hemorrhage, further longitudinal studies are needed in order to investigate the potential impact of retinal or macular hemorrhage to the visual function during the critical period of the eye development.
Several important ocular abnormalities may be overlooked as universal eye screening is not yet an established practice. We found a small number of ocular abnormalities, such as intraocular tumor (one case) and chorioretinitis (seven cases) which required further immediate workup and appropriate therapy.
Our study did not cover some issues regarding the cost-effectiveness of universal eye screening, such as financial, health personnel, and logistics. It is important to address these issues prior to establishing a universal eye screening as a program at an institutional, or a national level. Oher limitations include the lack of data on the antenatal care of the mothers and the unavailability of the follow-up laboratory assessments.