The present model was attached with the hand pump in a farm having one acre of land area, where vegetable farming was being done. Earlier farmers of that farm were using diesel, petrol or electric operated pumps to lift water from the hand pimp for their irrigation purpose. We conducted a survey regarding their expenditure earlier and compared the expenditure after attaching the present model for irrigation. In this present study, we observed that our present model gives advantages to farmers. We have presented a comparison statement of our model with the external source operated model. Table 1 shows the expenditure details including purchase cost and running cost of different pumps along with our designed model for irrigation of crops in one acre area of land.
Table 1. Comparison of various pumps with the designed model.
Sl. No
|
Parameters
|
Pumps operated by an external source
|
Our model
|
Diesel operated Pump(1 HP)
|
Petrol operated Pump(1 HP)
|
Electric operated Pump(1 HP)
|
I
|
Initial Cost (INR)
|
8000/-
|
8500/-
|
7500/-
|
6500/-
|
II
|
Running cost (INR) per day due to power consumption
|
300/-
|
250/-
|
50/-
|
Nil
|
III
|
Upholding cost (INR) per week
|
100/-
|
100/-
|
100/-
|
Nil
|
From table 1 it is found that the designed model requires only initial purchase cost, which is very less as compared to other arrangements, and our designed model does not require any other costs like daily expenditure, uploading cost per week as other pumps on the basis of power consumption for comparison between petrol, diesel, and electric operated pump with our designed model. It found that there is no requirement for any external source of energy for the operation of our model. It only requires less manual effort for its operation.
Table 2 below shows the comparison between our developed system with the manual-operated hand pump for irrigation of a 1-acre vegetable farm.
Table 2. Comparison between manually operated hand pump with our designed system
Sl. No.
|
Factors
|
Manually operated hand pump
|
Developed system
|
Remark on developed system
|
1
|
Deep of water lift
|
22 feet
|
60 feet to 80 feet
|
Our system lifts water same as deep well pump
|
2
|
Time required to irrigate 1 acre farm
|
10 hour
|
5 hour
|
Less time provides profit to farmers
|
3
|
Chance of accident
|
Yes
|
No
|
Zero accident possible by the developed system
|
4
|
Nature of work
|
More sound and Less powerful operation
|
Smooth work and powerful operation
|
Provides better environment to work
|
5
|
Term of work
|
Limited to 5 hours per day
|
Withstand severe use and can use for 8 hours per day
|
Maximum hour use is possible by our developed system
|
From table 2 it is found that the developed system provides a better environment to do work. All types of farmers can operate our system to lift water from the hand pump without any external sources. The developed system can lift water from deeper as compared to the manually operated hand pump.
Our model requires very less effort as compared to manually operated pumps. The present model is also used for curing construction parts like brick and concrete parts. Generally, during construction work, water for curing purposes is taken from the hand pump, which is drilled in the construction area. The hand pump is operated manually by workers engaged in construction work. So, to help such farmers, we have conducted a survey in 2000 square feet building during construction and presented the comparison of cost and effort on curing by manually operated tube well with our designed model.
Table 3. Comparison of manual operated tube well with our model in constructional area
Sl. No.
|
Factors
|
Systems
|
Remarks
on our model
|
Manually Operated hand pump
|
Hand pump with designed attachment
|
1
|
Effort required
|
More
|
Less
|
Less effort provides more comfort to the workers.
|
2
|
Time required for curing 2000 sq. ft. Construction area
|
4 hours
|
2 hours
|
Cost reduces with the reduction of time.
|
3
|
Sound and Friction
|
More
|
Less
|
Provides a healthy atmosphere.
|
Table 3. shows the comparison between the manually operated hand pump and the hand pump attached to our designed model. The factors for comparison are taken as effort required, number of workers required, sound and friction. Considering all the aspects stated above, the designed model provides advantages over manually operated hand pumps for curing as well as agricultural purposes.
The discharge from the hand pump is calculated by using the relation
Q = \(\frac{\pi }{4}\) x D2 x S x N
Discharge of water from the hand pump for the values of D = 5 inch ( 0.127m), S = 11inch (0.279m) with respect to the possible pumping stroke per minute for the existing hand pump and hand pump attached with our system is given in Table 4.The Table 4. shows the possibility of discharge relating to pumping strokes for existing hand pump.
Table 4. Discharge for pumping strokes of existing hand pump
Sl. No.
|
Type
|
Pumping stroke per minute
|
Discharge from the hand pump (m3/min)
|
1
|
Existing hand pump
|
30
|
0.105
|
2
|
Hand pump with the designed system
|
50
|
0.175
|
From Table 4, it is observed that for an existing hand pump the maximum discharge is 0.105m3/min, whereas for an existing hand pump with our designed system, the maximum discharge is 0.175 m3/min
The specific speed for the hand pump is calculated by using the relation
Ns = N x S
For the existing hand pump, the maximum specific speed is 8.37 and for hand pump with our designed attachment the maximum specific speed is 13.95.
The load on piston of the hand pump is calculated by using the relation
Fp = \(\frac{\pi }{4}\) x D2x S x ω
For the values of D = 5 inch (0.127m), S = 11inch (0.279m) and ω = 1000N/m3. The load on the piston is 3.53 N.
Figure 5 shows the lever arrangement for the existing hand pump and Fig. 6 shows the lever arrangement for hand pump with our designed system.
M.A =\(\frac{{L}_{h}}{{L}_{p}}\)
For the existing hand pump, the Mechanical advantage is 4.39 and for the hand pump with our designed system is 0.466.
Fhx Lh= Fpx Lp
Fh= Fp x ( \(\frac{\text{L}\text{p}}{\text{L}\text{h}}\) )
Fh= Fp x ( \(\frac{1}{\text{M}.\text{A}}\) )
M.A =\(\frac{\text{F}\text{p}}{\text{F}\text{h}}\)
For the existing hand pump effort required at end of the lever is 0.804 N to lift water. The effort required to lift water for the hand pump with our designed system is calculated by using the relation.
Ep = Energy available at the pendulum
For the value of m = 15.5 kg, r = 50cm, the energy available at the pendulum is 76.02 Joule.