With the deeper understanding of undifferentiated early gastric cancer, the indications for the endoscopic treatment of undifferentiated gastric cancer was found to have changed in recent years. The undifferentiated gastric cancer without ulcer with maximum diameter < 2cm had changed from the expanded indication of endoscopic treatment to the absolute indication [6]。It has been reported that the overall survival rate of patients with undifferentiated early gastric cancer after undergoing an ESD was higher than that of surgical patients, although there were no significant differences after propensity score matching[8]; however, there were also reports that some undifferentiated gastric early cancers had distant metastasis at a very early stage [11–14]. Therefore, the choice of ESD for undifferentiated gastric cancer should be made appropriately. In addition, because of the specific characteristics of the biological behavior of undifferentiated early gastric cancer, it has been difficult to assess the accurate boundaries using endoscopy[9]. Therefore, clinicians were still conservative in their choice of endoscopic treatment for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. In many medical centers, surgical treatment was the only option as long as it was pathologically proved to be undifferentiated gastric cancer, regardless of its stage. However, esophageal reflux and residual gastric bile reflux caused by surgical treatment being common led to several secondary problems. Therefore, it was important to explore the risk factors that can promote the development of undifferentiated early gastric cancer and lymph node metastasis.
In order to explore the risk factors of lymph node metastasis, all the patients who underwent surgery, underwent D2 + CME. Previous studies have shown that the surgical dissection of 15 or more lymph nodes per patient can provide an accurate diagnosis lymph node metastasis[10]. Therefore, the patients we included were diagnosed accurately with a lymph node metastasis. It had been reported that the risk of lymph node metastasis of undifferentiated early gastric cancer containing both signet ring cell cancer and poorly differentiated cancer was higher than that of pure signet ring cell cancer or poorly differentiated cancer[11, 12]. In this study, the lymph node metastasis rate of undifferentiated early gastric cancer with mixed components was significantly higher than that of undifferentiated early gastric cancer with pure components, which was consistent with the findings of previous studies. In this study, although the lymph node metastasis rate of undifferentiated early gastric cancer that met the absolute indication of ESD was 0%, there was one case of vascular invasion in the H. pylori related gastric cancer group, while the lymph node metastasis rate and vascular invasion rate of H. pylori negative intramucosal gastric cancer with the maximum diameter ≥ 2, but ≤ 3 which exceeded the absolute indication, were still 0%. Therefore, the infection status of H. pylori may be used to predict the feasibility of ESD treatment for undifferentiated early gastric cancer. For H. pylori negative intramucosal undifferentiated gastric carcinoma, when the lesion was less than or equal to 3 cm, its biological behavior was still inert, and endoscopic treatment was still safe. For H. pylori related undifferentiated intramucosal gastric cancer, even if the lesion was less than 2 cm, the lymph node metastasis should be carefully evaluated before ESD, because H. pylori may disturb the inertia and increase its invasiveness. Regardless of lesion size and depth of invasion, the rate of lymph node metastasis in H. pylori associated early gastric cancer was higher than that in H. pylori negative gastric cancer.
We further analyzed the related factors of lymph node metastasis. The correlation analysis showed that lesion size, depth of lesion invasion, pathological cancer cell composition were related to the risk of lymph node metastasis, and previous studies confirmed the impact of the above factors on the risk of lymph node metastasis[13]. Therefore, in the subgroup analysis, we compared the lesion size, invasion depth and pathological components between the H. pylori related gastric cancer group and H. pylori negative gastric cancer group using the Chi square test and exact probability method. The results showed that there were no significant differences between the two groups for the above factors. Excluding the above effects, we further compared the lymph node metastasis rate and NLR value between the two groups. The Chi square test results showed that the lymph node metastasis rate of the H. pylori related gastric cancer group was significantly higher than that of the H. pylori negative group. When the size of intramucosal cancer was between 2–3cm, the preoperative NLR value of the observation group was higher than that of the control group. The NLR shows the inflammatory response and immune status of the body, which was of great significance in the prognosis of the tumors. Previous studies have also found that the NLR in early gastric cancer group was higher than that in the H. pylori negative control group, and could predict the risk of lymph node metastasis[14, 15]. This suggested that H. pylori may affect the immune status of the body, and increase the risk of a lymph node metastasis. It was found that the cholesterol- α- glucosyltransferase of H. pylori may transform the cholesterol of the cell membrane to glucocholesterol glycoside. The presence of excessive cholesterol promotes the phagocytosis of H. pylori through antigen-presenting cells and enhances the antigen-specific T cell response. Intrinsic cholesterol α- glycosylation can eliminate the phagocytosis of antigen-presenting cells on H. pylori and the subsequent T cell activation[16–18]. In this study, the content of glucocholesterol glycoside in H. pylori related gastric cancer was significantly higher than that in the H. pylori negative control group, and the vascular invasion rate and lymph node metastasis rate of H. pylori related gastric cancer were also higher than those in the control group, suggesting that glucocholesterol glycoside on the one hand inhibited the phagocytosis of H. pylori by cholesterol related antigen-presenting cells, so that the pathogenic factors of H. pylori could continue to play a role and affect the development of gastric cancer. However, the development of the tumor was influenced not only by the biological behavior of tumor itself, but also by the body's antitumor immunity. Studies had shown that the low level of CD8 mRNA was a potential predictive biomarker of poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer undergoing surgery. In addition, some studies have shown that the decreased expression of NKG2D in CD8 + T cells may be one of the key mechanisms for gastric cancer to escape immunity[19, 20]. Therefore, the glucosylation of cholesterol may also enhance the invasiveness of undifferentiated early gastric cancer by inhibiting the antitumor immunity of T cells, which enabled the H. pylori related undifferentiated early gastric cancer to develop faster with a higher risk of a lymph node metastasis. However, when the maximum diameter of the lesion was less than 2 cm, there were no significant differences in the NLR between the H. pylori related gastric cancer group and the H. pylori negative control group; however, the inflammatory response of H. pylori infecting adjacent tissues was significantly higher than the latter, which may have been due to the difference in the inflammatory response which was limited mainly to the gastric mucosa. This did not affect the NLR in the peripheral blood. There were no significant differences in the inflammatory response of adjacent tissues infected with H. pylori and the H. pylori negative control group, suggesting that in addition to immune factors, other factors played a role in enhancing the invasiveness of gastric cancer after sterilization.
In this study, the glucocholesterol glycoside in gastric cancer tissue after sterilization was still significantly higher than that in the control group, which suggested that with the successful sterilization, the originally formed glucocholesterol glycoside may still be deposited partially in cells, resulting in immune inhibition, which may be one of the reasons why the open atrophic gastric mucosa after sterilization was still at a high risk of gastric cancer. However, there were no significant differences in the inflammatory response of the adjacent tissues and the NLR of peripheral blood between the H. pylori negative group and the post sterilization group with the maximum diameter less than 2 cm. This suggested that the invasiveness of undifferentiated early gastric cancer was also affected by other factors other than immunity. It is unclear whether glucocholesterol glycoside also affects the invasiveness of undifferentiated early gastric cancer through other mechanisms. In addition, in this study, the expression of Shh and Gli in H. pylori related gastric cancer with a high expression of glucocholesterol glycoside was significantly higher than that in the H. pylori negative control group (Fig. 1). Studies have shown that Shh plays an important role in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer. [21–24]. Therefore, whether glucocholesterol glycoside also affects the development of gastric cancer through Shh signaling pathway, needs further research.
In conclusion, H. pylori negative undifferentiated intramucosal early gastric cancer was inert, and patients who meet the absolute indications for ESD had a high safety profile after undergoing ESD. However, an H. pylori infection could destroy this inertia and increase the invasiveness of gastric cancer. The glucocholesterol glycoside may be the key to breaking this inertia. Therefore, inhibiting the production or effect of the glucocholesterol glycoside may reduce the invasiveness of undifferentiated early gastric cancer and delay the progression of the tumor.