Search results and growth trends
A total of 12,108 publications from the period from 2000 to 2021 were retrieved. As shown in Figure 1A, the annual publication output grew gradually from 177 in 2000 to 1,236 in 2021. Before 2016, the growth was fewer than 800 publications per year. Subsequently, that number increased rapidly, with a clear increase in 2020. In 2021, the number of publications was five times the number in 2000, indicating developments in this area. Among the publications, articles accounted for 84.77%, indicating that they were the most popular form of literature. The other nine types of publications accounted for the remaining 15.23% of the total and included meeting abstracts, reviews, and proceedings papers (Supplementary table 2). As shown in Figure 1B, geriatrics and gerontology were the main research category in this topic (n=1,739, 14.36%). In addition, public environmental and occupational health ranked second (n=1,356, 11.20%).
Top active countries
From 2000 to 2021, authors from a total of 146 different countries participated in the publication of studies on diseases in the elderly population (Figure 2A and 2B). The top ten most active countries produced more than eighty percent of the publications (Figure 2C); the United States (n=3,632, 30.00%) had the most publications, with more than one-third of all records published by authors in the United States. The United States also had the most citations (times=141,230). The next countries in order of frequency were China (n=1,328, citations=17,485), England (n=1,066, citations=55,322), Japan (n=730, citations=15,429), and Italy (n=724, citations=23,704). As shown in Figure 2A, we drew a network map of global research relationships among the leading countries actively researching diseases in the elderly population. This visualized map of associations included the countries that had at least 10 publications. The 71 included countries were classified into four clusters. The blue cluster included Asian countries (e.g., China, Japan, South Korea, etc.) and North American countries (e.g., USA, Canada, Brazil, etc.). The green cluster mainly consisted of European countries (e.g., France, Italy, Germany, etc.). Since the clusters were classified by active collaborations between countries, Figure 2A provides a clear visualization map of global collaborations. Figure 2B provides an overlay visualization map of countries according to the mean time of publication in years. As we can see in the picture, the United States and European countries had a relatively early average time of publication, indicating they had an early start in this area. Also, developing countries, such as China and South Korea, gradually joined in collaborations.
Institutions and funding agencies
The top 20 universities or institutions that made contributions to research on diseases in the elderly population are shown in Figure 3. The top 5 were as follows: the University of California system (n=427), the University of London (n=389), Harvard University (n=335), the National Institutes of Health USA (n=313) and INSERM (Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale) (n=292). However, the top five most-cited affiliated institutions were the following: the University of London (times=12,657), Harvard University (times=12,052), the University of Pittsburgh (times=10,076), the University of California at San Francisco (times=9,944) and the National Institute on Aging (NIA USA) (times=9,378). As shown in the global network map and the overlay visualization of institutions (Figure 3A and 3B), trends occurred in a pattern that was almost parallel to the trends in the countries. As shown in Supplementary table 3, US funding agencies were still the top 3 most active in the field, with the United States Department of Health and Human Services making the largest contribution (n=1,904, 15.73%). After them, the European Commission ranked 4th. The National Natural Science Foundation of China (n=1,954) ranked 5th. Two UK funding agencies were also in the top ten: UK Research Innovation (n=320) and the Medical Research Council (n=280).
Journals and top-cited publications
The top 10 journals with the most publications related to diseases in elderly populations are listed in Supplementary Table 1. The journal PLOS ONE had the most publications (n=322). The journal BMC GERIATRICS, which ranked 8th, had the highest IF (impact factor) of the top ten journals (IF=27.474). Supplementary figure 1A and 1B shows the overlay visualization map of global research relationships among the most cited journals on diseases in the elderly population according to the average year of publication. Blue circles represent years before 2010, and red circles represent years after 2018. The Lancet had the most citations (citations=28,548). The Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) (citations=9,298) ranked 2nd. The top 10 most cited papers are summarized in Table 1(8, 9, 11, 14-20). Notably, the burden of disease, blood pressure, frailty and macular degeneration were hotspots. The top 10 most cited publications in different parts of the articles, including the background, supporting evidence, differences, and discussion sections, are also summarized in Supplementary Table 4.
Keywords and overlay visualization analysis
Keywords with a minimum number of occurrences greater than 30 in all included publications were analysed using VOSviewer software (Figure 4A and 5B). Of the 29,105 keywords in this area, 545 meaningful topics were identified and further classified into 5 different clusters (Figure 4A). The most common research topics included ‘risk factors’, ‘dementia’, ‘Alzheimer’s disease’, ‘cardiovascular disease’ and ‘hypertension’. The red cluster contained the nodes ‘cardiovascular disease’ and ‘metabolic syndrome’, representing the primary research topics in this cluster. In this cluster, the relationship between metabolic disorders and cardiovascular risk was emphasized. These components include BMI, diabetes, uric acid, CKD, cystatin C, etc. Also, according to the overlay visualization (Figure 4B), the keyword ‘carotid plaque’ was relatively new. The blue cluster contained the large nodes of ‘epidemiology’ and ‘mortality’. The primary research in this cluster was causes of death in the elderly population. Keywords such as ‘cancer’, ‘stroke’, ‘ischemic heart disease’ and ‘heart failure’ belonged in this cluster. The ‘NHANES’ study has been popular in recent years. The green cluster contained two large nodes, ‘Alzheimer’s disease’ and ‘dementia’, indicating that the primary research topic in this cluster was neuropathy. Keywords including ‘cognitive decline’, ‘memory’, ‘hippocampus’ and ‘neuroimaging’ were highlighted in this cluster. Additionally, ‘biological age’ and ‘cognitive ageing’ are relatively new. The light blue cluster included ‘physical activity’ and ‘quality of life’. Keywords such as ‘depression’, ‘activities of daily living’, ‘sleep quality’, ‘accidental falls’ and ‘oral health’ were highlighted, representing the attention given to the topic of how to improve the health and quality of life of the elderly population. Additionally, ‘diet quality’, ‘sleep quality’ and ‘multimorbidity’ have occurred more frequently in recent years. The purple cluster included the tag ‘COVID-19’. This cluster is small and relatively new (Figure 4B). With the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and the susceptibility of elderly individuals to this disease, ‘vaccine’ and ‘immunogenicity’ have rapidly gained substantial attention. Additionally, this study applies overlay visualization analysis to the keywords in publications from the 5 most recent years. The keywords ‘COVID-19’, ‘muscle mass’, ‘depression’ and ‘non-alcoholic fatty liver disease’ have also drawn substantial attention in recent years, indicating that these areas will be the centre of attention in future studies on the elderly population.