Although some researches [4-6] have already been conducted to determine the impact of caries in primary teeth on caries in permanent teeth. And there seemed to exist some correlations. However, there is few similar reports in China so far. In our research, the caries status of primary molars and FPMs of 119 children aged 8 to 9 in Guangzhou were analyzed to study the correlation between caries status of primary molars and the prevalence of FPMs caries. We found that the prevalence of primary molars and FPMs caries in children aged 8 to 9 years in Guangzhou were high and serious. The caries prevalence of FPMs, first primary molars, second primary molars and primary molars were 82.4%, 73.9%, 89.1%, and 90.8% respectively. And the prevalence of related dentin caries were 15.1%, 66.4%, 60.5% and 73.9% respectively. These data was much higher than Huang's results on the caries prevalence among 9-year-old children in Guangzhou in 2008(The prevalence of dental caries was 58.33% in primary teeth, and 12.08% in permanent teeth. While dentin caries prevalence of FPMs and second primary molars was close.)[9]. The great differences may due to the diagnostic criteria adopted. In our study, ICDAS was used instead of the traditional WHO diagnostic criteria. Enamel caries were considered non-caries in the traditional WHO diagnostic criteria so that the diagnoses of early caries were ignored. The new ICDAS diagnostic criteria,containing the advantages of traditional WHO diagnostic criteria, was helpful to detect the early dental caries [10]. Early detection of dental cariesis was of great significance for protecting teeth, which belonged to secondary prevention. This is one of the reasons why ICDAS was adopted.
The caries severity of FPMs and primary molars of 119 children were further analyzed. We found that dentin caries accounted for only 4.8% of the total caries. In addition, enamel caries without formation of caries cavity accounted for 82.01%. Therefore, it could be seen that the dental caries in FPMs were mainly composed of enamel caries, most of which were white spot lesions, and no dental caries cavity was formed (ICDAS D1 and D2). This outcome might be due to the fact that they were only 8-9 years old, and the FPMs had just erupted, so the caries severity was limited. White spot lesions belonging to reversible early caries are only demineralization of tooth surfaces without formation of caries cavity, so they can be restored through remineralization therapy. However, the disease can progress without effective interventions. This is one of the advantages of the ICDAS criteria over the traditional WHO criteria, which allows a better assessment of the development of caries and provides the evidence for the treatment. Our study also found that although the prevalence of dental caries in the first primary molars was lower than that of the second primary molars, and the majority of dental caries were dentine caries too. However, the second primary molars had the similar enamel and dentin caries prevalence. This indicated that the first primary molars had a more severe caries state than the second molars. And that might be why the ICDAS system could be superior in detection of incipient caries and have special value in preventing dental caries in young children.
For the prevention of dental caries, early diagnosis and treatment are of great importance. Due to the high prevalence of dental caries, secondary prevention of dental caries is necessary. However, it is more meaningful to achieve primary prevention of dental caries, which can provide effective preventive measures for susceptible populations. There are several techniques to predict dental caries, including laboratory predictions (mainly dental caries activity tests), predisposing factor prediction and so on. However, the laboratory predicts is too complicated, expensive or costly in the clinical operation to realize besides chair. Our study found that the caries prevalence of primary molars (especially second primary molars) and FPMs had positive correlation to certain degree, so as to provide a more practicable way to prevent dental caries.
As a caries predictor for FPMs, the caries status of the first primary molars, the second primary molars and primary molars had statistical significance. The areas under the ROC plots (AUC) is widely recognized as an accuracy index for the authentic assessment of the diagnostic test. AUC value ranges from 0.5 to 1.0, with value of 0.5-0.7 is usually interpreted as indicating “low” test accuracy, 0.7-0.9 is "moderate " accuracy, and >0.9 is "high " accuracy (Henderson,1993)[12]. In our research, the caries status of the first primary molars, second primary molars and primary molars respectively resulted in a value of 0.578, 0.602 and 0.592 under the ROC curve, indicating there was weak prediction value. Although it was lower than that of other scholars [13], it still had certain research value. In our study, the AUC value of the second primary molars was the highest which suggested that caries experience of second primary molars was more meaningful for predicting the caries of FPMs. In addition, our study further considered correlation between the caries severity of primary molars and the prevalence of FPMs caries. However, it turned out there was no link between them. Therefore, regardless of their severities, it might suggest that once the primary molars suffer from caries, FPMs was at risk for caries.
As is known to all, dental caries is a multifactorial disease. Its occurrence and progress are related to the complex interaction of cultural, social, behavioral, nutritional and biological risk factors [15]. Nevertheless, regardless of mild or severe decayed situation in the primary teeth, the risk of FPMs dental caries should not be ignored. To some extent, for the prevention of dental caries, the diagnosis of caries in early primary molars is as important as in FPMs.
The dental caries experience of primary molars, especially those of the secondary primary molars, can be used to predict the caries risk for FPMs. Effective preventive measures, such as pit and fissure sealant, can protect susceptible populations from dental caries. According to a recent teeth protecting guideline, it is highly recommended to consider the use of fissure sealants in permanent molars for children and adolescents [15]. Considering the low fluoride content in drinking tap water in Guangzhou (0.2-0.3 mg / L) [16], preventive care for children is important.
According to our research, caries were still dected in the teeth treated with pit and fissure sealant. The prevalence could be as high as 47.6% if their sealants were not complete. Nevertheless, scholars have found the susceptibility to caries could be reduced even if partial sealant materials had missed [17]. To ensure the effect of pit and fissure sealant, attention must be paid to the selection of indications, saliva management and periodic inspection throughout the process [18].