This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of statin treatment in patients undergoing lower-limb arterial angioplasty. Our results indicated that statin use was associated with improved primary patency at 12 and 24 months and decreased mortality at 12 months but not with limb loss in patients undergoing lower-limb arterial angioplasty. Moreover, statin use was associated with improved AFS.
As in this meta-analysis, previous studies examining statin use before lower-limb arterial angioplasty showed that statins can improve primary patency 12 and 24 months after the intervention. The cumulative primary patency was significantly higher at 12 and 24 months after endovascular intervention in the statin group in the study by Aiello et al., wherein over 60% of the treated arterial lesions were femoropopliteal and multilevel arterial stenosis and 66% of the arterial lesions were classified as TASC C or D lesions [10]. Improved primary patency at twelve months associated with the use of statins was observed in patients who underwent femoropopliteal and infrapopliteal arterial angioplasty [13, 17]. Simvastatin therapy limits lumen reduction at 12-month follow-up after angioplasty for femoropopliteal artery disease [15]. However, Dosluoglu et al. and De Grijs et al. found that statin use was not associated with improved primary patency in patients who received endovascular treatment [16, 18]. In a study by De Grijs et al. all patients undergoing primary nitinol stenting of the femoral and popliteal arteries and the statin group had significantly higher rates of diabetes and chronic kidney disease [16]. Dosluoglu et al., in a study with 717 patients (99% men), treated patients with critical ischemia exclusively, and the statin group had more patients with diabetes, which may have influenced the results [18].
Our study also found that statin use before lower-limb arterial angioplasty was associated with decreased mortality at 12 months after the intervention. Few studies have analyzed survival in patients following the use of statins and endovascular revascularization; however, most of these patients demonstrated decreased mortality [10, 17, 18, 20].
Although statins are associated with improved patency and mortality after endovascular procedures, the role of secondary prevention in limb salvage has been reported with conflicting results, possibly due to different patient populations with divergent endpoints.
In a study with 646 patients, Aiello et al. demonstrated that limb salvage rates were significantly higher in patients receiving preoperative therapy than those in the control group (at 12 months after intervention, 87% vs. 71%, p < 0.05), despite the higher number of patients with diabetes in the statin group [10]. This outcome may be attributed to the inclusion of patients who had femoropopliteal (over 35%) and multilevel arterial lesions (over 20%) [10]. Moreover, Todoran et al. stated that statin use prior to the performance of the index procedure was associated with a lower risk of amputation during the follow-up of patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization of the superficial femoral artery (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.2–0.6, p = 0.010) [21]. Small trials have documented favorable vascular remodeling in patients taking statins, showing increases in femoral artery vessel distensibility and compliance [22]. In addition, in a study on about 22000 patients, Vogel et al. indicated that patients who underwent endovascular surgery and used preoperative statins were less likely to have an amputation at 12 months after angioplasty compared with those who did not, for patients with the diagnosis of claudication. However, this association was not observed in patients with rest pain and ulceration/gangrene. Some considerations need to be made about this study, because the patients with claudication were younger and used statins more frequently than the other groups. Several comorbid diseases were unequally distributed across the study population; increased PAD severity was associated with an increased proportion of patients with diabetes mellitus or renal failure [19].
A benefit from using statins in limb salvage was also observed when this medication was initiated after revascularization in patients with PAD. Peters et al. demonstrated that new statin users with critical limb ischemia had a lower risk of major amputation than non-users (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58–0.93). The probability of major amputation was 2.9% lower in the chronic limb-threatening ischemia group [23].
However, Fernandez et al. reviewed predictors of outcomes after endovascular tibial artery interventions in patients with critical limb ischemia and found no association between statin therapy and limb salvage or wound healing [24]. A study by Tomoi et al. demonstrated that statin treatment before successful endovascular treatment for isolated below-the-knee arterial lesions with critical limb ischemia does not influence limb salvage [14]. However, this study included only below-the-knee arteries in patients with critical limb ischemia (76.7% with tissue loss), the majority having arterial lesions classified as TASC D and occlusion of the three leg vessels, which demonstrates the severity of the disease and can explain the absence of beneficial effects of statins in terms of this outcome [14]. Of the 812 patients included in the study, only 169 were using statins, which may have limited the results. Moreover, there were more patients with diabetes in the statin group. Further, Dosluoglu et al. stated that statin use was not associated with improved 5-year limb salvage rates in patients who underwent endovascular treatments [18]. This study focused on different arterial territories in the patients with critical limb ischemia and reported a greater prevalence of patients with diabetes in the statin group [18]. Westin et al. demonstrated that the amputation rate did not significantly differ between the control patients and those using statins, even with improved patency in the infrapopliteal segment; however, a trend favoring statin use was observed. Patients prescribed statin medications had higher rates of diabetes mellitus and multilevel stenosis, and only patients with critical ischemia were treated in this study [17]. Patients with critical limb ischemia had worse rates of limb salvage in the cited studies, possibly owing to the severity of the presentation.
Few studies have reported improvements in the AFS with statin use. The risk of death and major amputation (AFS) was significantly decreased in patients who received treatment with statins [17, 20], particularly in ambulatory patients [14].
The mechanisms by which statins reduce clinical event rates following percutaneous coronary interventions and (possibly) other percutaneous revascularization procedures have not been fully elucidated [7]. Data derived from experimental and clinical trials provide several plausible hypotheses, including plaque stabilization (e.g. reduction of the number of inflammatory cells in atherosclerotic plaques, decreased secretion of matrix metalloproteinases, and inhibition of endogenous cholesterol synthesis in macrophages), increased nitric oxide synthesis, improvement of endothelial function, and reduction of platelet activation and adhesion. In addition, statins have been reported to exert important anti-inflammatory effects in vitro and in vivo as well as anti-thrombotic effects [7, 25, 26, 27]. The apoptosis of neointimal smooth muscle and subsequent reduction in intimal thickness and hyperplasia observed with statins may also contribute to the improved clinical results seen after endovascular intervention [28].
The period for which statin therapy should be initiated before the vascular intervention to achieve its beneficial effects is unknown. The use of statins should be started as soon as possible before an elective procedure. Ideally, statins should be initiated a minimum of 2 weeks prior to vascular surgery. In addition, patients should continue taking statins up to the evening before the open surgical or endovascular procedure [29].
Some limitations of the present analysis should be noted. First, only observational studies were included in this meta-analysis; therefore, statin treatment was not randomly assigned and was associated with other clinical characteristics that may have influenced the outcomes. Second, there was a lack of data for different statin types, dosages, adherence, and pretreatment duration across the included studies. Third, some studies did not indicate how the procedures were carried out nor did they present data about the localization and nature of the arterial lesions.