Growth Performance and Whole-body Proximate Composition
The results of growth performance and whole-body proximate composition are presented in Table 3. The diets SBM60 had lower WG and SGR compared with diets FM (P < 0.05), but diets LF2-LF10 showed improved WG and SGR vs diets SBM60 (P < 0.05), and returned to the level of diets FM (P > 0.05). The WG and FE were in a dose-dependent relationship with the dietary LF inclusion levels (Fig. 1). The maximum WG and FE were observed for the diet LF6 and diet LF10, respectively. However, there were no differences in FE, HSI, CF, survival and whole-body proximate composition among dietary treatments (P > 0.05).
Intestinal Antioxidant Capacity
As shown in Table 4, FM group had higher intestinal GSH-Px activity and lower MDA content compared with SBM60 group (P < 0.05), but the values of the two parameters were not different between LF2-LF10 groups and FM group (P > 0.05). The MDA content showed a negative quadratic response to increasing dietary LF inclusion levels, a minimum value was observed for diet LF6. However, dietary treatments did not affect intestinal SOD and T-AOC activities (P > 0.05).
Table 3
Effects of lactoferrin (LF) supplementation in high SBM diets on growth performance and whole-body proximate composition of juvenile orange-spotted groupers in a 56-d feeding period. 1
Items
|
Diets 2
|
FM
|
SBM60
|
LF2
|
LF6
|
LF10
|
Growth performance
|
IBW (g/fish) 3
|
33.82±0.10
|
33.76±0.06
|
33.74±0.05
|
33.80±0.07
|
33.98±0.01
|
FBW (g/fish) 3
|
113.24±0.66b
|
95.47±2.59a
|
107.49±4.28b
|
109.85±3.46b
|
106.65±2.96b
|
WG (%) 3
|
234.81±2.54b
|
182.81±7.24a
|
218.56±12.96b
|
224.98±9.89b
|
208.68±5.73ab
|
SGR (%/d) 3
|
2.16±0.01b
|
1.86±0.05a
|
2.07±0.07b
|
2.10±0.05b
|
2.04±0.05b
|
FE 3
|
0.98±0.00
|
0.95±0.00
|
0.96±0.12
|
0.99±0.07
|
1.00±0.12
|
Survival (%) 3
|
100.00±0.00
|
97.78±1.11
|
100.00±0.00
|
100.00±0.00
|
98.89±1.11
|
HSI (%) 4
|
1.31±0.09
|
1.24±0.04
|
1.28±0.07
|
1.24±0.05
|
1.17±0.02
|
CF (g/cm3) 4
|
3.16±0.07
|
3.05±0.11
|
3.19±0.02
|
2.93±0.12
|
2.94±0.03
|
Proximate composition (%)
|
Moisture
|
67.05±0.21
|
67.27±0.22
|
67.56±0.37
|
67.42±0.34
|
68.26±0.39
|
Crude protein
|
18.01±0.49
|
17.95±0.27
|
17.93±0.90
|
19.20±0.33
|
17.75±0.42
|
Crude lipid
|
8.25±0.17
|
7.90±0.29
|
8.18±0.40
|
7.85±0.32
|
7.49±0.11
|
Ash
|
5.00±0.15
|
4.96±0.07
|
4.90±0.06
|
4.87±0.22
|
4.93±0.09
|
1Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by S-N-K test.
2 FM, fish meal diet (control diet); SBM60, high soybean meal diet with 60% fish meal protein replacement and without LF supplementation; LF2, LF6, and LF10 were added 2, 6, and 10 g/kg LF in SBM60 diets, respectively.
3 Values are presented as the means ± SEM (n = 3 tanks)
4 Values are presented as the means ± SEM (n = 27 fish)
Values in the same row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (p < 0.05), while that with the same letter or no letter superscripts indicate no significant differences (p > 0.05).
WG, weight gain (%) = 100 × (FBW - IBW)/IBW.
SGR, specific growth rate (%/d)= 100 × (lnFBW - lnIBW)/days.
FE, feed efficiency = 100 × (FBW - IBW)/FI (as fed basis, g/fish).
Survival (%) = 100 × FN/IN.
HSI, hepatosomatic index (%) = 100 × LW/BW.
CF, condition factor (g/cm3) = 100 × BW/(BL)3
Abbreviations: IBW, initial body weight (g/fish); FBW, final body weight (g/fish); FI, feed intake (g/fish); FN, final number; IN, initial number; LW, liver weight (g/fish); BW, body weight (g/fish); BL, body length (cm/fish).
Table 4
Effect of lactoferrin (LF) supplementation in high SBM diets on intestinal antioxidant indices of juvenile orange-spotted groupers in a 56-day feeding period. 1
Items
|
Diets 2
|
FM
|
SBM60
|
LF2
|
LF6
|
LF10
|
SOD (U/mg protein)
|
71.67±5.50
|
68.92±1.76
|
62.16±5.85
|
64.26±3.23
|
60.70±2.15
|
GSH-Px (U/mg protein)
|
79.58±3.31bc
|
65.29±2.97a
|
82.52±1.76bc
|
72.99±1.35b
|
86.76±4.00c
|
T-AOC (U/mg protein)
|
0.19±0.01
|
0.19±0.01
|
0.21±0.01
|
0.19±0.02
|
0.18±0.01
|
MDA (nmol/mg protein)
|
3.00±0.28a
|
4.56±0.88b
|
1.97±0.21a
|
1.86±0.12a
|
2.55±0.05a
|
YMDA = 0.0783X2 - 0.9351X + 4.2006, R2 = 0.8297, X = LF supplementation levels (g/kg)
|
1 Data were presented as means ± SEM (n = 3 tanks). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by S-N-K test.
2 FM, fish meal diet (control diet); SBM60, high soybean meal diet with 60% fish meal protein replacement and without LF supplementation; LF2, LF6, and LF10 were added 2, 6, and 10 g/kg LF in SBM60 diets, respectively.
Values in the same row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), while that with the same letter or no letter superscripts indicate no significant differences (P > 0.05).
Abbreviations: T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH-Px, glutathion peroxidase.
Plasma Components
Table 5 shows that plasma HDL-C content had an irregular change with increasing dietary LF inclusion levels, and the value in LF6 group was similar (P > 0.05) to that of SBM60 and FM groups but was higher than that of LF2 and LF10 groups (P < 0.05). FM group had higher plasma LDL-C content (P < 0.05) and comparable plasma TC content compared with SBM60 group (P > 0.05), but plasma TC content was not different between LF2-LF10 groups and SBM60 group (P > 0.05), while SBM60 and LF2 groups had higher plasma LDL-C contents (P < 0.05) vs LF6 and LF10 groups. Both plasma LDL-C and TC contents showed a linear decreasing trend with the dietary increase of LF inclusion levels, and reached the minimum values at LF6 and LF10, respectively. However, plasma TG content did not differ across all dietary treatments (P > 0.05).
Intestinal Digestive Enzyme Activity
As shown in Table 6, intestinal lipase and protease activities were comparable and intestinal trypsin activity was lower in SBM60 group than that in FM group (P < 0.05). The intestinal trypsin and lipase activities were higher in LF2-LF10 groups than that in SBM60 group (P < 0.05) and returned to the level of FM group and even higher than that of FM group. The intestinal activities of lipase, trypsin, and protease showed a linear increasing trend with increasing dietary LF inclusion levels. However, the intestinal amylase activity was not affected by dietary treatments (P > 0.05).
Intestinal Permeability
Table 7 shows that intestinal D-Lac and ET contents were higher in SBM60 group than that in FM group (P < 0.05). However, intestinal D-Lac and ET contents were reduced when SBM60 diet with LF supplementation (P < 0.05), and the values in fish receiving SBM60 diets with LF supplementation returned to the level and even lower than that of FM group. Intestinal D-Lac and ET contents did not differ with dietary LF levels from 2 to 10 g/kg (P > 0.05). Both intestinal ET-1 and DAO contents were not affected by dietary treatments (P > 0.05).
Table 5
Effect of lactoferrin (LF) supplementation in high SBM diets on plasma components of juvenile orange-spotted groupers in a 56-day feeding period. 1
Items
|
Diets 2
|
FM
|
SBM60
|
LF2
|
LF6
|
LF10
|
HDL-C (mmol/L)
|
1.06±0.05b
|
1.00±0.03b
|
0.81±0.05a
|
1.03±0.03b
|
0.83±0.09a
|
LDL-C (mmol/L)
|
0.28±0.01c
|
0.19±0.01b
|
0.18±0.01b
|
0.12±0.01a
|
0.12±0.01a
|
TC (mmol/L)
|
3.77±0.21b
|
3.49±0.23ab
|
3.35±0.19ab
|
3.09±0.09ab
|
2.90±0.09a
|
TG (mmol/L)
|
1.61±0.17
|
1.36±0.08
|
1.25±0.06
|
1.57±0.10
|
1.55±0.07
|
YLDL-C = -0.0079X + 0.188, R2 = 0.8573, X = LF supplementation levels (g/kg)
YTC = -0.0592x + 3.4741, R2 = 0.9931, X = LF supplementation levels (g/kg)
|
1 Data were presented as means ± SEM (n = 3 tanks). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by S-N-K test.
2 FM, fish meal diet (control diet); SBM60, high soybean meal diet with 60% fish meal protein replacement and without LF supplementation; LF2, LF6, and LF10 were added 2, 6, and 10 g/kg LF in SBM60 diets, respectively.
Values in the same row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), while that with the same letter or no letter superscripts indicate no significant differences (P > 0.05).
Abbreviations: TG, triglyceride; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Table 6
Effect of lactoferrin (LF) supplementation in high SBM diets on activities of intestinal digestive enzymes of juvenile orange-spotted groupers in a 56-day feeding period. 1
Items
(U/mg protein)
|
Diets 2
|
FM
|
SBM60
|
LF2
|
LF6
|
LF10
|
Lipase
|
0.68±0.00a
|
0.61±0.00a
|
0.84±0.05b
|
0.86±0.02b
|
0.95±0.05bc
|
Amylase
|
0.76±0.06
|
0.73±0.11
|
0.90±0.04
|
0.73±0.07
|
0.82±0.06
|
Trypsin
|
256.07±17.23b
|
175.55±17.55a
|
238.95±17.46b
|
235.03±9.36b
|
283.57±8.83bc
|
Protease
|
20.54±0.87
|
15.91±2.04
|
17.37±2.91
|
23.54±2.56
|
26.54±2.53
|
YLipase = 0.0283X + 0.6876, R2 = 0.7515, X = LF supplementation levels (g/kg)
YTrypsin = 8.8954X + 193.25, R2 = 0.7917, X = LF supplementation levels (g/kg)
YProtease = 1.1231X + 15.786, R2 = 0.9775, X = LF supplementation levels (g/kg)
|
1 Data were presented as means ± SEM (n = 3 tanks). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by S-N-K test.
2FM, fish meal diet (control diet); SBM60, high soybean meal diet with 60% fish meal protein replacement and without LF supplementation; LF2, LF6, and LF10 were added 2, 6, and 10 g/kg LF in SBM60 diets, respectively.
Values in the same row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), while that with the same letter or no letter superscripts indicate no significant differences (P > 0.05).
Table 7
Effect of lactoferrin (LF) supplementation in high SBM diets on the biochemical indices of intestinal mucosal permeability of juvenile orange-spotted groupers in a 56-day feeding period. 1
Items
|
Diets 2
|
FM
|
SBM60
|
LF2
|
LF6
|
LF10
|
DAO (U/L)
|
19.75±1.39
|
20.59±1.05
|
16.09±1.22
|
17.77±2.40
|
17.72±1.47
|
D-Lac (nmol/mL)
|
2.03±0.20a
|
4.05±0.23b
|
1.41±0.18a
|
1.59±0.21a
|
1.41±0.07a
|
ET-1 (ng/L)
|
1.91±0.07
|
2.12±0.09
|
2.27±0.10
|
1.92±0.13
|
2.36±0.20
|
ET (EU/L)
|
1.51±0.03b
|
1.70±0.10c
|
1.23±0.01a
|
1.25±0.01a
|
1.25±0.04a
|
1 Data were presented as means ± SEM (n = 3 tanks). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by S-N-K test.
2 FM, fish meal diet (control diet); SBM60, high soybean meal diet with 60% fish meal protein replacement and without LF supplementation; LF2, LF6, and LF10 were added 2, 6, and 10 g/kg LF in SBM60 diets, respectively.
Values in the same row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), while that with the same letter or no letter superscripts indicate no significant differences (P > 0.05).
Abbreviations: DAO, diamine oxidase; D-lac, d-lactic acid; ET, endotoxin; ET-1, endothelin-1.
Intestinal Histomorphology
Table 8 shows the effects of dietary treatments on the mucosal fold number (nMF), muscle layer thickness (tML), and mucosal fold length (lMF) in the three intestinal segments (PI, MI, and DI). The nMF of the PI, MI, and DI, the lMF of PI and DI, and the tMF of PI remained unaffected by dietary treatments (P > 0.05), but the tML of DI showed a positive quadratic response to increasing dietary LF inclusion levels, with a maximum value observed for diet LF6. Diets LF2 to LF10 displayed higher (P < 0.05) tML of DI vs diet SBM60, and the value returned to the level of diet FM (P > 0.05). The lMF and tML of MI had an irregular change in response to the dietary LF inclusion levels, but the maximum values observed all for diet LF2.
Table 8
Effect of lactoferrin (LF) supplementation in high SBM diets on the intestinal morphology of juvenile orange-spotted groupers in a 56-day feeding period. 1
Items
|
Diets 2
|
FM
|
SBM60
|
LF2
|
LF6
|
LF10
|
PI
|
lMF (μm)
|
577.30±87.68
|
489.10±54.31
|
574.92±35.62
|
513.26±50.67
|
737.53±95.20
|
tML (μm)
|
63.24±6.74
|
64.56±8.11
|
79.05±2.27
|
86.60±9.31
|
86.00±2.51
|
nMF (unit)
|
42.50±4.25
|
45.83±3.09
|
51.67±1.36
|
50.33±8.62
|
48.00±3.55
|
MI
|
lMF (μm)
|
465.12±50.20ab
|
381.90±42.42a
|
580.47±9.06b
|
356.66±9.37a
|
540.48±47.06b
|
tML (μm)
|
53.53±2.44ab
|
44.96±4.06a
|
76.61±7.02b
|
63.13±4.61ab
|
69.62±7.81b
|
nMF (unit)
|
34.33±2.20
|
31.67±1.01
|
43.00±4.36
|
34.83±3.49
|
39.17±0.33
|
DI
|
lMF (μm)
|
417.87±63.72
|
337.13±44.48
|
437.82±22.32
|
397.03±4.38
|
466.67±53.64
|
tML (μm)
|
87.58±7.61b
|
51.53±1.48a
|
74.80±3.34b
|
86.49±1.35b
|
69.78±7.20b
|
nMF (unit)
|
32.00±5.20
|
37.00±4.00
|
40.83±5.33
|
35.00±1.04
|
34.00±3.21
|
DI: YtML = -1.0492X2 + 12.167X + 52.619, R2 = 0.9884, X = LF supplementation levels (g/kg)
|
1 Data were presented as means ± SEM (n = 3 tanks). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by S-N-K test.
2 FM, fish meal diet (control diet); SBM60, high soybean meal diet with 60% fish meal protein replacement and without LF supplementation; LF2, LF6, and LF10 were added 2, 6, and 10 g/kg LF in SBM60 diets, respectively.
Values in the same row with different superscripts indicate significant differences (P < 0.05), while that with the same letter or no letter superscripts indicate no significant differences (P > 0.05).
Abbreviations: PI, proximal intestine; MI, middle intestine; DI, distal intestine; nMF, mucosal fold number; tML, muscle layer thickness; lMF, mucosal fold length.
Abundance and Difference of Intestinal Microbiota
The Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria in DI were the dominant phyla of all the dietary treatments (Fig. 2A). Compared with diets FM, the abundance of Firmicutes was increased and the abundances of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria were decreased by diets SBM60. The abundances of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes generally increased, but the abundance of Proteobacteria decreased with increasing dietary LF levels supplementation in SBM60 diets (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Table 1). However, no significant differences in the abundances of dominant phyla were observed between dietary treatments at the phylum level (P > 0.05).
At the genus level, the DI bacteria of all dietary treatments mainly contained genera Photobacterium, Selenomonas-1, Prevotella-1, Vibrio, and Rikenellaceae-RC9-gut-group (Fig. 2B and Supplementary Table 1). The decreased abundances of genera Photobacterium, Selenomonas-1, and Prevotella-1 and the increased abundances of genera Vibrio and Rikenellaceae-RC9-gut-group were observed in diets SBM60 vs diets FM. The abundances of genera Selenomonas-1, Prevotella-1, and Rikenellaceae-RC9-gut-group showed an open downward parabola response, but the abundances of genera Photobacterium and Vibrio showed an open upward parabola in response to increasing dietary LF inclusion levels. However, there was no significant difference in the abundances of dominant genera between dietary treatments at the genus level (P > 0.05). .
Expression of Intestinal Inflammatory Factor Genes
As shown in Fig. 3, FM group had lower mRNA levels for IL-1β, IL-12, IL-8, and TNF-α in comparison with SBM60 group (P < 0.05), and no differences in the value for the TGF-β1 and IL-10 were observed between them (P > 0.05). Although the intestinal mRNA levels for IL-1β, IL-12, IL-8, TGF-β1, and TNF-α did not differ across diets from LF2 to LF10 (P > 0.05), the values for IL-1β, IL-12, IL-8, and TNF-α were lower, but the value for TGF-β1 was higher in diets LF2 - LF10 than in diet SBM60 (P < 0.05), and returned to the level of FM group (P > 0.05) and even lower than that of FM group. The mRNA level for IL-10 was not different in LF2 and LF10 groups (P > 0.05) but higher than FM, SBM60, and LF6 groups (P < 0.05).