Materials
Aβ-peptide (1-42) was provided by Sigma-Aldrich (Munich, Germany). Acylated ghrelin was purchased from GL Biochem Ltd (Shanghai, China). RIPA lysis buffer (sc-24948) supplied by Chem Cruz (Huizen, Netherlands). Western blot antibodies for Bax (sc-7480), RIP1K (sc-133102), RIP3K (sc-374639), and GAPDH (sc-47724) were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Heidelberg, Germany). Bcl-2 antibody (ab59348) was provided by Abcam (Cambridge, UK), and Beclin-1 antibody (D40C5) was supplied by Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies, anti-rabbit IgG (A6154), and anti-mouse IgG (A8924) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Munich, Germany). BCA protein assay kit (QG219577) was the product of Thermo Scientific (Rockford, USA). ECL Western blotting substrate kit (ab65623) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK). Other materials and reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Munich, Germany).
Animals
24 adult male albino Wistar rats (Pasteur Institute, Tehran, Iran) weighing 250 ± 20 gr were housed in cages of three in a temperature-controlled holding room (23 ± 1ºC) and on a 12/12hr light/dark cycle (lights on at 8:00 am). Standard laboratory, ad libitum, and water were available. Animals were permitted to become habituated to the environment and were handled for a week before the tests. All experiments following the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory were accepted by the Research and Ethics Committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR.SBMU.MSP.REC.1397.546) and were in accordance with National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of Laboratory animals.
Experimental Design
The adult male rats were randomly sorted into four different groups, six rats in each: control, Aβ 1-42 (10 µg Aβ 1-42 / normal saline (2 mg/ml)), ghrelin (80 μg/kg ghrelin/PBS (1 mg/ml)) and Aβ 1-42 + ghrelin (10 µg Aβ 1-42 / normal saline (2 mg/ml) + 80 μg/kg ghrelin/PBS (1 mg/ml) groups. Fig.1 shows the study design schematically.
Drug administration
Microinjection of Aβ 1-42
The anesthetization was done with an i.p. injection of mixed ketamine (85 and 15 mg/kg, respectively). Adequate Persocaine-E was injected subcutaneously at the site of surgery to prevent bleeding and induces local anesthesia. Aβ 1-42 was dissolved in sterile PBS at a 2 mg/ml concentration and incubated under agitation Teflon-coated stirrer at 800 rpm at room temperature for 36 hours. After that, the Aβ 1-42 turbid solution was sedimented by centrifugation (10 min at 15000 g). Each rat was mounted on a stereotaxic apparatus. After the scalp was incised, the skull was cleaned, and 10 µg (2 mg/ml) aggregated Aβ 1-42 or 5 µl PBS as a vehicle was injected bilaterally into the Cornu Ammonis 3 (CA3) area of the hippocampus by using a 5 μl Hamilton syringe. The site of injections was identified on the skull as follows: AP: − 3.3 mm from Bregma; ML: ± 2.6 mm from the midline; DV: − 3.7 mm from the skull surface based on the Paxinos and Watson’s Atlas. Agents were injected slowly and two minutes after injection, the needle was slowly removed to avoid the backflow of the fluid.
Administration of ghrelin
Acylated ghrelin was freshly dissolved in the normal saline. One day after surgery, 80 μg/kg ghrelin (1 mg/ml) or 20μl normal saline as its vehicle was administrated i.p. for 10 consecutive days.
Behavioral assessment
Morris water maze (MWM) test
The MWM test was done to examine spatial cognitive performance. The experiment began on day 6 after surgery. The apparatus consisted of a circular metal tank placed in a soundproof room with several visual cues; also, it was assigned four quadrants of equal area and filled with water to a depth of 30 cm, which was maintained at 20 ± 1°C. A black platform was placed 1-2 cm below the midpoint of the target quadrant.
Before the training began, habituation was done by allowing rats to swim for 1 min without a platform. Animals received 4 training trials each day for 3 consecutive days (12 total training trials). The location of the platform was constant. However, the sequence of water-entry points was varied each day. The daily interval between trials was 30 s. The animal was allowed to stay on the platform for 20 s. If the rat failed to spot the platform within 60 s, it was guided to the platform and remained there for 20 s. On 3 days of the training phase, the escape latency to reach the platform was recorded for a maximum of 60 s in each trial. 24 hours after the last training day, rats were subjected to a probe trial test in which there was no platform in the tank. The animals were permitted to swim for 60 s to locate it. On the probe day, the number of platform crossing and the swimming pathway was recorded. At the end of the probe test, a visual assessment of rats was performed using a visible platform.
Passive Avoidance Learning (PAL) test
The passive avoidance test was performed 10 days after Aβ 1-42-injection. The apparatus was divided by a guillotine door into two light and dark compartments (20 × 20 × 40 cm). The evaluation of the learning and memory was performed on two consecutive days. Before the training trials, animals were habituated to the apparatus by placing them in the light room. After 5 s, the door was elevated. When the animal enters the dark compartment with all four feet, the door was closed, and the rat stayed there for 20 s. Then the animal was returned to a temporary cage. After 30 min, the rat was again positioned in the light compartment for 5 s. The door was opened to let the animal enter the dark chamber, and after the entrance, the door was shut, but this time animals received a foot shock (1.2 mA, 50 Hz, and 1.5 sec). 20 s after that, the rat was returned to the temporary cage. After 2 min, the same testing process was reiterated. The rats were again placed in the light room to see whether they stayed there for 2 min or not. It was considered successful learning when the animals did not enter the dark compartment during that period; otherwise, they would receive the same electric shock again until they refrain from entering the dark room. Indeed, during the learning session, rats learned not to enter the dark chamber for 120 s after giving electrical foot shock. After 24 hours, a retrieval test was done to assess memory retrieval. Each animal was positioned in the light compartment for 5 s, and then the door was elevated while no foot shock was applied in this trial. The time spent in the light compartment (TLC) and the number of crossing between the two compartments was recorded for 10 min.
Histopathological Study
A day after the conclusion of the behavioral assessment, three rats in each group was perfused transcardially with 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M PBS after anesthetization. Then, all rats were decapitated, and whole brains were extracted and fixed overnight in fresh 4% paraformaldehyde at 4°C. After that, embedding in paraffin, coronal sections (8 μm) were cut by the slicer. For Nissl staining, sections were floated in 0.1% cresyl violet solution at 37°C for 20 min. After washing with distilled water, prepared sections were dehydrated in ethyl alcohol and xylene, fitted with coverslips, and examined with light microscope. Finally, shrunken and hyperchromic neurons with irregular shapes were considered dark cells in the CA1, CA3, and dentate gyrus (DG) regions.
Western blot
On day 11 of the experiment, after deep CO2 inhalation, animals were decapitated. The hippocampi were rapidly dissected on the ice and then transferred to the liquid nitrogen for 24 hours. Thereafter, all samples were stored at -80°C. For protein extraction, 400 μl ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail was added to each sample and homogenized. Then samples were centrifuged for (15 min at 15000 g) at 4°C, and protein-containing supernatant was transferred to new microtubes. The BCA protein assay kit determined protein concentrations in supernatants. Next, samples were mixed with sample buffer and heated at 95 °C for 5 min. Then, in the SDS-PAGE stage, equal protein amounts of each sample were loaded in 15 % acrylamide gel and were run in the running buffer for 90 min with 90 V. Separated proteins in the gel were transferred to the nitrocellulose membrane for 120 min with 100 V. After that, the membranes were blocked in the 5% skimmed milk solution for 2 hours at 4 °C. Then, the membranes were subsequently incubated with different primary antibodies were diluted in the 0.1% TBST (1:1000) overnight at 4 °C. After three washes with 0.1 % TBST, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG or anti-mouse IgG as secondary antibodies (1:2000) for 120 min. After being washed another three times, membranes were smeared with ECL to evaluation their immunoreactivity, and then the images were captured with the Chemi Doc Imaging System (Bio-Rad, USA). Finally, the protein bands intensities were analyzed by Image J software and the density of each band was normalized compared with the GAPDH as internal control.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was done through GraphPad Prism software, version 8.0. The results are expressed as the mean ± SEM. For data analysis, the one-way ANOVA was used. A pairwise comparison was made using Tukey’s post hoc test if a difference was found out to be significant. For MWM data, groups' differences in escape latency were analyzed using two-way ANOVA with repeated measures followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison tests with day and treatment as the sources of variation. The statistical significance was achieved when p<0.05.